2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
64 members (Bellyman, brennbaer, busa, Barly, 1957, btcomm, Animisha, 14 invisible), 2,018 guests, and 347 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 116 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 115 116
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 37
A
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
A
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 37
They would be crazy to announce them if they're not going to be available soon? Cause all the people like me who were holding off on a CLP-6xx in anticipation of a 7xx, are just going to carry on waiting, thus killing sales stone dead?


Yamaha N3
(ex Clavinova CLP-175)
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 773
9190 Offline OP
500 Post Club Member
OP Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 773
Originally Posted by impossiblejj
And their hammers, which are bended wires, or at least were few years ago. How does it look today, noone knows.

But if Yamaha wouldn't be ashamed of the look of their action, they would be more than happy to show it.

I had an instrument from Yamaha with GH3 action (with those "bended wires"), and Kawai with RHII action. I didn't have any problems with Yamaha keyboard, I liked the feel and the lack of any problems. And I have a lot of complaints about RHII keyboard from Kawai. So after that, I ask: what does it matter to me who shows the structure of their keyboard action, and who does not, if in the end I am definitely more satisfied with the keyboard whose manufacturer does not show it or shows "bended wires"? I don't care what keyboard action looks like as long as I'm happy with the feel and reliability of the keyboard.

And about the screen, I would definitely prefer an "old-fashioned" screen and control panel with separate buttons (like on lower-end models from Kawai or Yamaha) than one large touch screen and the way it is implemented in the flagship models of Kawai now.

Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 51
K
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
K
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 51
Availability in the UK on dealers websites is October, so a few months before we can get some objective hands on views.
I am sure Tony from Bonners will post one of his excellent demonstrations, but note they are demonstrations, not critical reviews. He always advises people to visit Bonners to try before you buy, which most users of this forum also sensibly recommend.
Yamaha certainly market their products well. Kawai have some excellent digital pianos, but although my local dealer in Newcastle on Tyne sells Kawai acoustic upright and grand pianos, but they will not stock Kawai digital because they cannot sell them (their words not mine).
They also stock Roland, and I love the LX 708 cabinet, but their new modelled sound is so artificial to my ears. Sorry Roland fans.
So I will visit Bonners in October, a 600 mile round trip, to test drive the Yamaha alongside the Kawai and the new Dexibell H10 and give you the benefit of my very inexperienced views!!!

Joined: May 2020
Posts: 8
A
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
A
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 8
According to Yamaha French website, clp700 will be available in September in France, except from clp785 which should be available in October.

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
P
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
I wonder how the 785 will compare to the NU1X.

Overall, it seems like people ‘round here preferred the NU1X over the 685; even in terms of sound; which baffled me since the NU1X only uses four modest speakers. And yes, when it comes to ‘upright cabinet’ type pianos the more -speakers- the better; it’s simply a matter of dispersion and not raw volume (they can all get pretty loud).

My take is that Yamaha did not touch the speaker system for the 785. The more I read about the ‘transducers’, the more I feel like these are being used for vibrations rather than sound; akin to the TRS; only this time Yamaha seems to go for the whole cabinet (vibration) instead of just the keys (I could be wrong).

Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,106
J
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
J
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,106
Originally Posted by Kawai James
Originally Posted by CyberGene
On the acoustic piano forum someone in 2015 claimed that in the International Chopin Piano Competition in Warsaw there was a dedicated Yamaha technician to prepare the CFX, where the rest of the pianos (the Steinway, the Kawai and the Fazioli) were served by a single local technician.

I don't believe this is correct.

It's my understanding that Kawai sends technicians to prepare SK-EX instruments used at international piano competitions.

What Kawai James is trying to say is, Kawai, pays James, to go to international competitions to slip a few benjamins in the competitor's pockets to select the Kawai. But of recent years, yamaha has been dishing out heavier benjamins. So, Kawai has been planting these Informational attack dogs on Online Piano forums to roll fud' on yamaha discussions.

Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,080
N
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
N
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,080
Originally Posted by Pete14
I wonder how the 785 will compare to the NU1X.

Overall, it seems like people ‘round here preferred the NU1X over the 685; even in terms of sound; which baffled me since the NU1X only uses four modest speakers. And yes, when it comes to ‘upright cabinet’ type pianos the more -speakers- the better; it’s simply a matter of dispersion and not raw volume (they can all get pretty loud).

I think you overestimate how many people play with in build speakers. I think those that prefer NU1X over CLP 685 are liking keyboard more or they just play on headphones and don't mind weaker speaker system. Honestly even N3X I've tested had a bit too weak sound compared to real grand piano or even CLP685 or CA98. And I don't mean sound loudness alone, rather it didn't have proper vibrations.


Roland LX708
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 1,084
D
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
D
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 1,084
There's Beethoven, and there's Chopin! I'm listening to the Chopin right now and it sounds like it's a 19th century piano sample? This is exciting! smile

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
P
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
Did they or did they not improve the action? I don’t want any ‘ifs, ands, or buts’; I just want a straight answer! Yes or No!

Did they sample Chopin’s piano?...once again, ‘Yes or No’.

Did they update speaker system?.....do I need to say it again?......Yes or freaking No!

I’m losing my patience here.

So far the only thing we know for certain is that the NU1X still kicks the 785’s ass! laugh

Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,080
N
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
N
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,080
Originally Posted by Pete14
Did they update speaker system?.....do I need to say it again?......Yes or freaking No!
You can see in t he specs then did not.


Roland LX708
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,439
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,439
Oh Pete! Show some patience. Because you're not going to buy one, right? Me neither. smile

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
P
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
But what’s all this talk about transducers? Surely, it doesn’t have a sound board, so is this simply for good vibrations?

Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,106
J
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
J
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,106
Originally Posted by Pete14
But what’s all this talk about transducers? Surely, it doesn’t have a sound board, so is this simply for good vibrations?

It's the same thing as the Rumble pak for N64 controllers. or the ubiquitous vibration feature in all modern consoles. It just doesn't vibrate the keys, it kind of just wiggles your belly fat.

Last edited by jeffcat; 07/02/20 11:56 AM.
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
P
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
Can it wiggle other things, I ask?

Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 51
K
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
K
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 51
Calm down Pete. I am getting concerned about your blood pressure. Remember, patience is a virtue!!!!!

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
P
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
blush

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,367
E
EPW Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,367
Originally Posted by Pete14
Can it wiggle other things, I ask?

It depends on how you sit on the bench!


All these years playing and I still consider myself a novice.
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
P
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,751
blush

Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 67
R
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
R
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 67
Well - hate to rain on the the troll parade, my suggestion would be to create a diferent "Let's be negative on a piano nobody has seen and I don't want to buy thread" for those posts.

I'm actually really curious about thenew series. Especially the CLP-745 and possibly the CLP-775. It'll be also interesting to see when and what pricepoint they'll come available over here in The Netherlands. As far as I've seen there's no CLP-645 PE's in stock anywhere anymore here. Spotted a white one in Amsterdam though (for EUR 1995). The new ones don't seem to be a major upgrade, but nice enough not to rush to a store and get a 645.

Maybe I'm biased. Just to share a different perspective, currently playing mostly on a CLP-300 which is well over 30 years old (yes, ready for an upgrade in action, samples and sound ;-) ) which has developed only some minor issues. Also play on an upright Petrof, which is way nicer. I don't think anything in the CLP-700 series would be good enough to beat a proper accoustic upright in sound, feel and overall "playing experience".

Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 8
F
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
F
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 8
Does anyone have info (or even a guess) on the difference between GrandTouch and GrandTouch-S?

I’ll make a guess myself: GrandTouch uses wood, while the -S version uses plastic?

On that note, does the wood really make a difference? Folks who have tried wood and plastic, what difference did it make for you?

Last edited by fakeChopin; 07/02/20 03:47 PM.
Page 5 of 116 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 115 116

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Very Cheap Piano?
by Tweedpipe - 04/16/24 10:13 AM
Country style lessons
by Stephen_James - 04/16/24 06:04 AM
How Much to Sell For?
by TexasMom1 - 04/15/24 10:23 PM
Song lyrics have become simpler and more repetitive
by FrankCox - 04/15/24 07:42 PM
New bass strings sound tubby
by Emery Wang - 04/15/24 06:54 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,386
Posts3,349,204
Members111,631
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.