Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.5 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
Find a Professional
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Advertise on Piano World

What's Hot!!
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
(125ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad)
Piano Buyer Guide
Piano Buyer Fall 2017
Who's Online Now
142 registered members (8opus, ajames, AdrianR, Alex_, Almaviva, 30 invisible), 1,373 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#609723 - 02/02/09 05:51 PM wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,930
88Key_PianoPlayer Offline
1000 Post Club Member
88Key_PianoPlayer  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,930
El Cajon, CA
I have been unable to find equations / calculators online for rescaling pianos using alternate string materials. I'd like to experiment with a couple notes on my 1950 Baldwin Hamilton, and see what difference using tungsten winding (19.25g*cm^3 density per Wikipedia) would be compared with copper (8.96g*cm^3 density).
(Tungsten is ~2.15x denser than copper. IMO this would allow for much thinner windings, improving the inharmonicity - as I understand, inharmonicity is directly related to the ratio of string length to its diameter.)
Maybe there's a reason why it's not used though. Why? Cost? It doesn't work? I'd like to find out for myself, but only on a couple notes for starters cause I don't want to waste several hundred $ on the entire bass section just to find out it doesn't work.
Then there's the possible difficulty of getting said strings made. I know some string bass makers make them, but would they be able to make them to my specifications, if I specified the core wire material and diameter, total length, the fact that there's a hitch pin loop (which I could make myself later if necessary), winding material, diameter and length, etc.? Or would I have to make them myself, and possibly scrap the idea? (Then there's the difficulty / impracticality of using tungsten windings on the upper end of the bass - I understand it's difficult to make strings with extremely thin windings.)
Also if I used a string material with radically different density from the original, would that mean I might need to change where the piano switches from unichords to bichords, and from bichords to trichords? (Obviously I'm not moving the bass/tenor break, and I don't want to rescale the bridges on this piano.) And, if I was to end up rescaling the entire bass, up to the tenor, I personally would prefer to keep the plain steel trichords starting at C#3. IMO they sound better than the wound bichords on newer Hamiltons, even though they may not be as easy to tune. (While I may like running plain trichords a bit lower than some designers like, I have heard cases where the designer took it TOO far, like the older 4'11" Yamaha grands, for example.)


Associate Member - Piano Technicians Guild
1950 (#144211) Baldwin Hamilton
1956 (#167714) Baldwin Hamilton
You can right-click my avatar for an option to view a larger version.
(ad 800)
PTG Journal
PTG Journal
#609724 - 02/02/09 07:05 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,205
Dale Fox Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Dale Fox  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,205
Nor California Sacramento area
Pure tungsten has very low ductility. IOWs, It won't wind worth a darn.

I think you have some misunderstandings concerning inharmonicity. Inharmonicity relates to the flexibility of the wire. In the case of wound wire, the main component is the core diameter. The wrap has some stiffening effect which is far outweighed by the increase in flexibility of the entire unit. IE the core becomes MUCH more flexible because of the increased tension attainable because of the increase in mass from the wrap. \\

The additional stiffness of a non-ductile material would serve to counter the decrease in inharmonicity of the core. You might find that you have a small overall sized bass string, that is less flexible because of the lack of ductility of the wrap.


Dale Fox
Registered Piano Technician
Remanufacturing/Rebuilding
#609725 - 02/02/09 10:31 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,930
88Key_PianoPlayer Offline
1000 Post Club Member
88Key_PianoPlayer  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,930
El Cajon, CA
Tungsten won't wind worth a darn? Then why is it used on some cellos, string basses and electric bass guitars? And what would prevent it from being wound around a steel core and used in a piano? Or would the string designer need to come up with a different core material?

And maybe I do have some misunderstandings about inharmonicity. I was basically trying to figure out how to improve a given string by winding it with a denser material, while keeping flexibility up, speaking length and tension equal, and diameter down.


Associate Member - Piano Technicians Guild
1950 (#144211) Baldwin Hamilton
1956 (#167714) Baldwin Hamilton
You can right-click my avatar for an option to view a larger version.
#609726 - 02/02/09 11:22 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,205
Dale Fox Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Dale Fox  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,205
Nor California Sacramento area
I assumed you meant pure tungsten. My mistake. Tungsten alloys would have to be used.

I'm not sure it matters what you wind a string with. (Within limits, of course). Inharmonicity of a string is based on the flexibility of the (Core) wire. THe important thing when trying to keep everything the same, (Length, tension and flexibility) is to keep the mass of the wound wire the same. You could (again within limits) wind with most any ductile material. Keeping in mind that not all materials have the same density.

Aluminum has a density of about 27% that of piano wire, Copper about 89%, soft iron as found on many older piano is about 79% as dense. Tungsten has a density almost 3 times that of copper. Based on these densities, one can understand why some American makers used Aluminum windings on small consoles and spinets in the low tenor of their scales. Copper would have been entirely too small a diameter to wind successfully for the small amount of weight needed for these scales. Tungsten would be too dense for most of the higher bass notes on most scales. Unfortunately, the AL wound strings sounded BAD by the time I heard any of them. Perhaps they sounded better when new.

I'm sure other metals have been used. Most likely we keep with copper because it lasts a long time, sounds good when done well and is fairly inexpensive.

Of course the best way to reduce the diameter of the bass string is to make the piano longer.

Good luck with your quest. I'd be interested in hearing if you have any breakthroughs.


Dale Fox
Registered Piano Technician
Remanufacturing/Rebuilding
(ad)
Piano & Music Accessories
piano accessories music gifts tuning and moving equipment
#609727 - 02/03/09 12:59 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,822
Roy123 Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Roy123  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,822
Massachusetts
Copper is denser than steel or iron. Tungsten is a bit more than twice as dense as copper.

#609728 - 02/03/09 01:46 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,930
88Key_PianoPlayer Offline
1000 Post Club Member
88Key_PianoPlayer  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,930
El Cajon, CA
Ok... so is there a way to make calculations for strings taking into account different density materials? I so far haven't found anything online - the few calculators I've tried all assume you're wrapping copper over steel, and if I remember correctly don't account for double wrap.


Associate Member - Piano Technicians Guild
1950 (#144211) Baldwin Hamilton
1956 (#167714) Baldwin Hamilton
You can right-click my avatar for an option to view a larger version.
#609729 - 02/03/09 02:14 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,095
Gene Nelson Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Gene Nelson  Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,095
Old Hangtown California
Just a guess but using the formula that you found for copper over steel, copper density being 8900 Kg/m3 - would it not be unreasonable to replace the density number with that for the material that you propose to use - like iron would be 7900 or aluminum 2700?? tungsten ??? and arrive at a reasonable tension/ inharmonisity value?


RPT
PTG Member
#609730 - 02/03/09 07:40 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,550
BDB Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
BDB  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,550
Oakland
It is a waste of time to speculate about the density of materials that may not be at all suitable for wrapping strings.


Semipro Tech
#609731 - 02/04/09 01:14 AM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,205
Dale Fox Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Dale Fox  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,205
Nor California Sacramento area
Some people have more curiosity than others. Besides, it's our time to waste.


Dale Fox
Registered Piano Technician
Remanufacturing/Rebuilding
#609732 - 02/04/09 01:53 AM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,550
BDB Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
BDB  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 25,550
Oakland
But it would be more fruitful to look into the properties that make a material suitable for winding bass strings other than density. Why does copper work so well? Why does aluminum work so poorly? Why is soft steel somewhere in between? How would you test for longevity, which has turned out to be so important?


Semipro Tech
#609733 - 02/04/09 10:58 AM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,205
Dale Fox Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Dale Fox  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,205
Nor California Sacramento area
I agree. Copper is used because it works so well, lasts so long and can be used for all but the lightest requirements.
In looking for alternatives, I believe that most people will learn something about how the piano functions. In other words, they will become knowledgeable about what they are doing and the theories behind proper function and design. This is usually a good thing as most people choose to remain woefully ignorant about what they are doing for a living.
So I never discourage a theoretical discussion if it isn't based on total lunacy.


Dale Fox
Registered Piano Technician
Remanufacturing/Rebuilding
#609734 - 02/04/09 10:52 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 53
vin mrykalo Offline
Full Member
vin mrykalo  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 53
Kansas
The basis for calculating wound string tensions is the Taylor formula which is: Tension= freq.squared times length squared times diameter squared times pi (3.14) times specific weight of the materials all divided by the constant 9.81. The difficulty lies with calculating specific weight, as you will have two different materials, (the core and the wrapping) and small spaces of air, not part of the string, but which you must take into account nevertheless. This works out to 78.5 % wrapping material to 21.5% air. For example the actual specific weight for copper is 8.9, but figuring the air space, the specific weight is reduced to 6.9865 for purposes of the formula. And then of course, there is the steel core which is 7.85. For bass strings, there are guidelines for ratios between core material and winding, depending upon where you are in the scale. I would imagine they would hold true regardless of the winding material, at least used as a guideline. It is 2:1 for the very low strings, 2 of winding to 1 of core, to 4:1 in the highest wound strings. Anyway, maybe you can use this as a jumping off point (but not as in jumping off a building <g>).


Vince Mrykalo RPT MPT
UK Piano Technician
#609735 - 02/05/09 04:43 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,523
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member
Del  Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,523
Olympia, Washington
Quote
Originally posted by vincent mrykalo:
For bass strings, there are guidelines for ratios between core material and winding, depending upon where you are in the scale. I would imagine they would hold true regardless of the winding material, at least used as a guideline. It is 2:1 for the very low strings, 2 of winding to 1 of core, to 4:1 in the highest wound strings. Anyway, maybe you can use this as a jumping off point (but not as in jumping off a building <g>).
I’ve heard something like this before and I keep wondering where it came from. It does not seem to have been followed by piano makers in the real world. For some—though by no means all—single-wrapped low bass strings that 2:1 ratio might be close but for the higher wrapped strings a 4:1 ratio is not even close. For example, in the scale for a new piano that I just happened to have open there is a bi-chord wrapped string up close to the break with a core of 1.0 mm (approx. 0.039”) and a copper wrap of 0.47 mm (approx. 0.019”).

Depending on the length of that string (relative to the length of the lowest strings using plain steel) the diameter of that wrap wire could be more or less on a smaller or larger core and with no consistent ratio between them being discernable.

ddf


Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon
#609736 - 02/05/09 04:49 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,523
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member
Del  Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,523
Olympia, Washington
Quote
Originally posted by Dale Fox:

I assumed you meant pure tungsten. My mistake. Tungsten alloys would have to be used.
I am aware of only very limited experiments being conducted with tungsten wire. The main problem (if memory serves) was that the the wrap wire broke down quickly under repeated hammer blows. And we do expect our wrapped strings (as with every other component of the piano) to last pretty much forever.

I do not know for sure if the wrap wire was pure tungsten or some tungsten-based alloy. I think it was pure tungsten, but here memory does not serve....

ddf


Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon
#609737 - 02/05/09 06:47 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 53
vin mrykalo Offline
Full Member
vin mrykalo  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 53
Kansas
Oops, my mistake. The ratio should be 1:4. Read my notes wrong. Sorry.

Quote
Originally posted by Del:
I’ve heard something like this before and I keep wondering where it came from. It does not seem to have been followed by piano makers in the real world. For some—though by no means all—single-wrapped low bass strings that 2:1 ratio might be close but for the higher wrapped strings a 4:1 ratio is not even close. For example, in the scale for a new piano that I just happened to have open there is a bi-chord wrapped string up close to the break with a core of 1.0 mm (approx. 0.039”) and a copper wrap of 0.47 mm (approx. 0.019”).

Depending on the length of that string (relative to the length of the lowest strings using plain steel) the diameter of that wrap wire could be more or less on a smaller or larger core and with no consistent ratio between them being discernable.

ddf [/QB]


Vince Mrykalo RPT MPT
UK Piano Technician
#609738 - 02/05/09 07:13 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,523
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member
Del  Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,523
Olympia, Washington
Quote
Originally posted by vincent mrykalo:
Oops, my mistake. The ratio should be 1:4. Read my notes wrong. Sorry.

Quote
Originally posted by Del:
I’ve heard something like this before and I keep wondering where it came from. It does not seem to have been followed by piano makers in the real world. For some—though by no means all—single-wrapped low bass strings that 2:1 ratio might be close but for the higher wrapped strings a 4:1 ratio is not even close. For example, in the scale for a new piano that I just happened to have open there is a bi-chord wrapped string up close to the break with a core of 1.0 mm (approx. 0.039”) and a copper wrap of 0.47 mm (approx. 0.019”).

Depending on the length of that string (relative to the length of the lowest strings using plain steel) the diameter of that wrap wire could be more or less on a smaller or larger core and with no consistent ratio between them being discernable.

ddf
[/QB]
Even so...it just doesn't seem to hold true in real life.

I've tried, over the years, to come up with a simplistic, yet reliable, "rule of thumb" like this but they always break down when I start trying to use them to design real strings in real pianos.

ddf


Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon
#609739 - 02/05/09 09:18 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 53
vin mrykalo Offline
Full Member
vin mrykalo  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 53
Kansas
Quote
Originally posted by Del:
I’ve heard something like this before and I keep wondering where it came from. It does not seem to have been followed by piano makers in the real world. For some—though by no means all—single-wrapped low bass strings that 2:1 ratio might be close but for the higher wrapped strings a 4:1 ratio is not even close. For example, in the scale for a new piano that I just happened to have open there is a bi-chord wrapped string up close to the break with a core of 1.0 mm (approx. 0.039”) and a copper wrap of 0.47 mm (approx. 0.019”).

Depending on the length of that string (relative to the length of the lowest strings using plain steel) the diameter of that wrap wire could be more or less on a smaller or larger core and with no consistent ratio between them being discernable.

ddf [/qb]
[/QB][/QUOTE]Even so...it just doesn't seem to hold true in real life.

I've tried, over the years, to come up with a simplistic, yet reliable, "rule of thumb" like this but they always break down when I start trying to use them to design real strings in real pianos.

ddf [/QB][/QUOTE]

Not trying to be too pedantic about this, ha I just want to respond that the 1:4 ratio is taken from "On the Calculation of the Tension of Wound Strings". The author says: "for the note F33 the copper-steel ratio should average 1 to 4, e.g. .2mm copper to .8mm steel." Quoting further, "The two average values of the diameter ratios for A0 and F33 are the two extremes...we can set up an average value for each intermediate note." Since the 1:4 ratio refers to a fairly high note for a wound string, this rule of thumb may be a little closer to reality.


Vince Mrykalo RPT MPT
UK Piano Technician
#609740 - 02/06/09 03:07 PM Re: wound string scale calculations using alternate materials?  
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,523
Del Offline
5000 Post Club Member
Del  Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,523
Olympia, Washington
Quote
Originally posted by vincent mrykalo:
Not trying to be too pedantic about this, ha I just want to respond that the 1:4 ratio is taken from "On the Calculation of the Tension of Wound Strings". The author says: "for the note F33 the copper-steel ratio should average 1 to 4, e.g. .2mm copper to .8mm steel." Quoting further, "The two average values of the diameter ratios for A0 and F33 are the two extremes...we can set up an average value for each intermediate note." Since the 1:4 ratio refers to a fairly high note for a wound string, this rule of thumb may be a little closer to reality.
And that's not the only mistake in the book.

ddf


Delwin D Fandrich
Piano Research, Design & Manufacturing Consultant
ddfandrich@gmail.com
(To contact me privately please use this e-mail address.)

Stupidity is a rare condition, ignorance is a common choice. --Anon

Moderated by  Piano World 

Piano Acc. & Gift Items in
Piano World's Online Store
In PianoSupplies.com ,(a division of Piano World)
our online store for piano and music gifts and accessories, Digital Piano Dolly, party goods, tuning equipment, piano moving equipment, benches, lamps Caster Cups and more.


Free Shipping* on Jansen Artist Piano Benches, Cocoweb Piano Lamps, Hidrau Hydraulic Piano Benches
(*free shipping within contiguous U.S. only)
(ad)
Pearl River & Ritmuller
Ritmuller Pianos
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq 6 Out now
ad
Pierce Piano Atlas


New Topics - Multiple Forums
Why I love and hate the internet.
by JayWalkingBlues. 12/11/17 04:32 PM
Thought I was retired!
by synthnut. 12/11/17 04:07 PM
Which is the best software synth for AP's & EP's ?
by sonicblasphemy. 12/11/17 02:09 PM
Mason & Hamlin upright - Free
by dynamobt. 12/11/17 01:30 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums44
Topics183,216
Posts2,678,408
Members89,264
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Check It Out!
There's a lot more to Piano World than just the forums.
Click Here to
Explore The Rest of Piano World!!
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2017 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0