 |
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
38 members (Boboulus, crazyRyoga, Beowulf, David B, bohemiatotal, clothearednincompo, Almar, brennbaer, Adem, 8 invisible),
444
guests, and
568
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,675
8000 Post Club Member
|
8000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,675 |
I don't know nayone who regretted buying the 515. It seemed poor on trills when I first bought it, but now, nearly a year later, its so much better. There may be better actions out there, but we're talikng the racer`s edge here, and much more dosh.
"I am not a man. I am a free number" " ![[Linked Image]](http://www.pianoworld.com/Uploads/files/Joplinbadgetiny.jpg) "
|
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 108
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 108 |
If you are classical pianist at intermediate level, you get an acoustic piano, not a slab. The choice of acoustic vs digital has nothing to with your playing level.
|
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 225
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 225 |
Acoustic is acoustic, digital cannot match it. The second best choice if you cannot have an acoustic piano for some reason, whether it is a grand piano or an upright, is to find a digital piano which translates your playing into sound most accurately.
Roland HP-507RW | Yamaha U1 | Roland FP-90
|
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,198
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,198 |
To me Roland FP-90 wins because it has piano sound modelling, while its competitors Kawai ES8 / ES920 and Yamaha P515 do not. This is incorrect. P-515 features Virtual Resonance Modeling. Kawai employs similar sound processing. No, JoeT, it is correct. This forum used to be full of digital piano expertise. Now it's just newbies registering to lecture others.
Richwood RD-17C-CE | LaMancha Rubi CM-N | Yamaha P-515
|
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,198
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,198 |
If you are classical pianist at intermediate level, you get an acoustic piano, not a slab. The choice of acoustic vs digital has nothing to with your playing level. As a classical pianist, once you reached a certain level, you go for an acoustic grand piano. Nothing else. And once you're past the beginner stage, you get at least an acoustic upright.
Richwood RD-17C-CE | LaMancha Rubi CM-N | Yamaha P-515
|
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 108
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 108 |
If you are classical pianist at intermediate level, you get an acoustic piano, not a slab. The choice of acoustic vs digital has nothing to with your playing level. As a classical pianist, once you reached a certain level, you go for an acoustic grand piano. Nothing else. And once you're past the beginner stage, you get at least an acoustic upright. Digital pianos have a completely different application than acoustic pianos and that should define whether you buy one or the other, not playing level. Both types of pianos come in many different versions from small and portable to full size grand pianos.
|
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2 |
I don't know nayone who regretted buying the 515. It seemed poor on trills when I first bought it, but now, nearly a year later, its so much better. There may be better actions out there, but we're talikng the racer`s edge here, and much more dosh. I bought it and returned it. The key action was much too heavy for me. So not everyone is happy with the P515
|
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,675
8000 Post Club Member
|
8000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,675 |
If you are classical pianist at intermediate level, you get an acoustic piano, not a slab. The choice of acoustic vs digital has nothing to with your playing level. As a classical pianist, once you reached a certain level, you go for an acoustic grand piano. Nothing else. And once you're past the beginner stage, you get at least an acoustic upright. Hey Joe! You must habitually vaccilate between the North and South poles of our revered planet . . .
"I am not a man. I am a free number" " ![[Linked Image]](http://www.pianoworld.com/Uploads/files/Joplinbadgetiny.jpg) "
|
|
|
 Re: Roland FP60 vs Yamaha P515?
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 225
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 225 |
To me Roland FP-90 wins because it has piano sound modelling, while its competitors Kawai ES8 / ES920 and Yamaha P515 do not. This is incorrect. P-515 features Virtual Resonance Modeling. Kawai employs similar sound processing. No, JoeT, it is correct. This forum used to be full of digital piano expertise. Now it's just newbies registering to lecture others. My registration date appears to be 2 years earlier than yours, does it make me more senior on this forum? OMG, newbies lecturing advanced adult hobbyists who learnt piano as kids on an acoustic piano and played since then, to buy a grand and move it around with you as they move for work 
Roland HP-507RW | Yamaha U1 | Roland FP-90
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics204,350
Posts3,048,280
Members100,102
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|