2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
73 members (akse0435, amc252, 20/20 Vision, benkeys, apianostudent, Bellyman, AlkansBookcase, accordeur, 15 invisible), 1,996 guests, and 311 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 233
T
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
T
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 233
I don't disagree with you, in theory. What I'm saying is that there's more that goes into the "feel" of an action than just pivot length, the hammer movement, up and down weights, etc; the things we often talk about here that we can measure more easily. As Gene was saying, there are various frictions involved at different points of the system, for example. I think beyond just an initial up or down weight, there is a certain momentum the key will have based on how quickly you touch the key, etc. It's complicated, and an extremely good synthetic key folded design could address all of those aspects. More likely, they've addressed a couple that can easily be measured, such as pivot length and down weight, maybe even friction/resistance during key travel. But is that friction constant or does it change over the course of the keystrike and key return? There's only so much they can design for without the extra complexity adding more cost, more weight, decreased reliability, etc. Essentially companies are making a series of compromises to save space, weight, and cost. If the near-perfect folded design costs more to produce than Kawai's design, but saves weight and space, would they be able to profitably sell it in products at scale?

It just seems to me that the closer your design is mechanically to what you're trying to simulate, the easier it will be for that design to mimic all of the various little weights, inertial feel, frictions, etc. I think also a mechanical design that is more similar to the real thing will tend to stay more stable in maintaining all of those small differences over the long run than something that uses special grease or felt to mimic friction, etc.

I believe there is also a benefit in feel, but probably not in reliability, to using long wooden keysticks in terms of vibration transmission, weight, and maybe even other aspects.

Could an ideal folded action perfectly mimic all of those aspects? Sure, but if I were designing one the path I'd likely choose to take would be similar to Kawai's, if I was willing to take the size, weight, and cost penalties associated with it.

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 508
P
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 508
It will take time for the Roland LX706 to be compared with an MP11, because not many people have it. I never tried the LX706, but according to what I read its folded action has nothing to envy to the other ones, which is good news to me.

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,345
K
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
K
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,345
Originally Posted by pold
It will take time for the Roland LX706 to be compared with an MP11, because not many people have it. I never tried the LX706, but according to what I read its folded action has nothing to envy to the other ones, which is good news to me.

I tried the LX706 a couple of times when testing digital pianos and ended up with the MP11SE. I must have played the LX706 for over an hour all up while trying to decide.

I was happy with the action, but disappointed by the sound of the LX706 and liked the MP11SE better. But in the end after purchase I was not satisfied with the sound of that either. I just use the MP11SE as a controller now and use two different VSTs.

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 508
P
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 508
Originally Posted by KevinM
Originally Posted by pold
It will take time for the Roland LX706 to be compared with an MP11, because not many people have it. I never tried the LX706, but according to what I read its folded action has nothing to envy to the other ones, which is good news to me.

I tried the LX706 a couple of times when testing digital pianos and ended up with the MP11SE. I must have played the LX706 for over an hour all up while trying to decide.

I was happy with the action, but disappointed by the sound of the LX706 and liked the MP11SE better. But in the end after purchase I was not satisfied with the sound of that either. I just use the MP11SE as a controller now and use two different VSTs.

ah yes, regarding internal sound quality I gave up years ago, I don't like any of them, including the Novus 10. I can accept the internal sound of organ, electric piano or harpsichord, but for grand piano there is no point, you need a vst and a nice computer.

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 193
A
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
A
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 193
Yeah… (:

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
New DP for a 10 year old
by peelaaa - 04/16/24 02:47 PM
Estonia 1990
by Iberia - 04/16/24 11:01 AM
Very Cheap Piano?
by Tweedpipe - 04/16/24 10:13 AM
Practical Meaning of SMP
by rneedle - 04/16/24 09:57 AM
Country style lessons
by Stephen_James - 04/16/24 06:04 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,391
Posts3,349,273
Members111,634
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.