Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.7 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Best of Piano Buyer
 Best of Piano Buyer
(ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
Find a Professional
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Advertise on Piano World

(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Who's Online Now
76 registered members (Bryce C, carlos88, ChatNoir, Anticlock, Bett, CharlesXX, 13 invisible), 2,725 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878472
08/11/19 07:28 AM
08/11/19 07:28 AM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,153
Tyrone Slothrop Offline
Tyrone Slothrop  Offline

6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,153
Originally Posted by CyberGene
As if though you’re not used to Pete’s humorous style smile

Clearly humor impaired folks like me benefit from the appropriate emoticon.


across the stone, deathless piano performances

"Discipline is more reliable than motivation." -by a contributor on Reddit r/piano
"Success is 10% inspiration, and 90% perspiration." -by some other wise person
"Pianoteq manages to keep it all together yet simultaneously also go in all directions; like a quantum particle entangled with an unknown and spooky parallel universe simply waiting to be discovered." -by Pete14
(ad) SWEETWATER Lowest Prices
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878507
08/11/19 10:29 AM
08/11/19 10:29 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,167
Raleigh, North Carolina
MacMacMac Offline
9000 Post Club Member
MacMacMac  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,167
Raleigh, North Carolina
I see.
Originally Posted by CyberGene
As if though you’re not used to Pete’s humorous style smile
One word:
[Linked Image]

Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: Frédéric L] #2878576
08/11/19 02:18 PM
08/11/19 02:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,401
G
Gombessa Offline
3000 Post Club Member
Gombessa  Offline
3000 Post Club Member
G

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,401
Originally Posted by Frédéric L
I am a bit puzzled by this discussion. I have an hard time to hit the same note twice with the same velocity... then 127 levels is enough for me... but the designer of the Piano Phoenix by Adele H seems to have requirements by professional at 1300 levels. I have no clue how the extra levels are used (more between levels ? More less than 1 level ? Etc. )


If I had a nickel for every time I heard this argument smile

If a DP only had 8 total velocities, I bet nobody here would be able to hit every note at the exact velocity they intended in their standard repertoire. I bet at 4 velocities it would still be the case. But I think a DP supporting only midi velocities 0-3 for ppp-fff would be extremely limiting and clearly noticable.

Imo, it's NEVER about whether you can hit the precise velocity you want, it's whether there's an audible difference between velocities actually played.

If you can't hear or feel a difference, it probably doesn't matter to have more. If you can tell the difference, then maybe more velocities can be heard as well.


Yamaha P-85, P-105, CP50, Kawai MP11 || Kawai NV-10
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: Gombessa] #2878581
08/11/19 02:40 PM
08/11/19 02:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 2,138
Dublin
johnstaf Online crying
2000 Post Club Member
johnstaf  Online Crying
2000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 2,138
Dublin
Originally Posted by Gombessa


If I had a nickel for every time I heard this argument smile

If a DP only had 8 total velocities, I bet nobody here would be able to hit every note at the exact velocity they intended in their standard repertoire. I bet at 4 velocities it would still be the case. But I think a DP supporting only midi velocities 0-3 for ppp-fff would be extremely limiting and clearly noticable.

Imo, it's NEVER about whether you can hit the precise velocity you want, it's whether there's an audible difference between velocities actually played.

If you can't hear or feel a difference, it probably doesn't matter to have more. If you can tell the difference, then maybe more velocities can be heard as well.


Yes. I don't understand how the inability to reproduce velocities accurately means fewer velocities are necessary.

Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878583
08/11/19 02:46 PM
08/11/19 02:46 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,015
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,015
Sofia, Bulgaria
It’s not about being able to hit the exact velocity on instant. But rather in a sequence of notes, whether a trill, a phrase or a repeated note. While listening to your current note (and in the context of previously played notes that will create pretty accurate muscle memory in your forearms and fingers) you should be able to produce pretty consistent note velocities that follow. With that in mind, if you feel you target a particular note velocity (or range) but the actually produced values audibly jump around that and you miss some in between, then the velocity resolution is low.

With that in mind I think 127 is more than enough.

Last edited by CyberGene; 08/11/19 02:48 PM.

My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878892
08/12/19 01:12 PM
08/12/19 01:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
J
Jethro Online content
500 Post Club Member
Jethro  Online Content
500 Post Club Member
J

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by CyberGene
It’s not about being able to hit the exact velocity on instant. But rather in a sequence of notes, whether a trill, a phrase or a repeated note. While listening to your current note (and in the context of previously played notes that will create pretty accurate muscle memory in your forearms and fingers) you should be able to produce pretty consistent note velocities that follow. With that in mind, if you feel you target a particular note velocity (or range) but the actually produced values audibly jump around that and you miss some in between, then the velocity resolution is low.

With that in mind I think 127 is more than enough.

Yes, basically it is about the creative process. As an artist, you don't want to have any limitations to what you can or can't do. Listening to another pianist play on a digital piano might sound fine to you, but if you ask him or her if the outcome was what he or she expected they might say no. They might say they had other intentions throughout the piece he or she was playing but was somewhat limited by the technology.

That said, it's difficult to argue that more velocity layers are needed over the 127 currently available when most sampled libraries represent only a fraction of what is already available.

So I would never debate the velocity layer issue from a listener's perspective, but it is from the pianist's perspective and the limitations it may enforce on sensitive, experienced pianists. I think it is up to the individual to decide whether MIDI or digital technology will work for them. For anyone else to decide for them is hubristic.

Last edited by Jethro; 08/12/19 01:17 PM.

Shigeru Kawai SK2 (2019), Kawai RX-2 (2007), Young Chang (1982), Kawai VPC-1 (2019), Yamaha P80 (2001), Korg C-50 (1995) , Roland Juno 1 (1988), Korg Poly 61 (1986), Lowrey Symphonic Holiday (1975)
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: Jethro] #2878906
08/12/19 02:11 PM
08/12/19 02:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,015
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,015
Sofia, Bulgaria
Originally Posted by Jethro
Originally Posted by CyberGene
It’s not about being able to hit the exact velocity on instant. But rather in a sequence of notes, whether a trill, a phrase or a repeated note. While listening to your current note (and in the context of previously played notes that will create pretty accurate muscle memory in your forearms and fingers) you should be able to produce pretty consistent note velocities that follow. With that in mind, if you feel you target a particular note velocity (or range) but the actually produced values audibly jump around that and you miss some in between, then the velocity resolution is low.

With that in mind I think 127 is more than enough.

Yes, basically it is about the creative process. As an artist, you don't want to have any limitations to what you can or can't do. Listening to another pianist play on a digital piano might sound fine to you, but if you ask him or her if the outcome was what he or she expected they might say no. They might say they had other intentions throughout the piece he or she was playing but was somewhat limited by the technology.

That said, it's difficult to argue that more velocity layers are needed over the 127 currently available when most sampled libraries represent only a fraction of what is already available.

So I would never debate the velocity layer issue from a listener's perspective, but it is from the pianist's perspective and the limitations it may enforce on sensitive, experienced pianists. I think it is up to the individual to decide whether MIDI or digital technology will work for them. For anyone else to decide for them is hubristic.

All digital pianos and VST-s for at least the last 20-30 years support 127 velocity layers. I’m not sure what you’re implying, e.g. that only Pianoteq supports 127 velocities? In case you mean that, you’re wrong. All pianos can respond with smooth dynamic gradation in 127 volume steps. And many sample-based digital pianos and VST-s also produce 127 different timbres which is apparent in the excellent spectral analysis our forum member dewster used to perform on digital pianos in the past. No difference here between Pianoteq and digital pianos.

Last edited by CyberGene; 08/12/19 02:12 PM.

My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878907
08/12/19 02:23 PM
08/12/19 02:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
J
Jethro Online content
500 Post Club Member
Jethro  Online Content
500 Post Club Member
J

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Originally Posted by Jethro
Originally Posted by CyberGene
It’s not about being able to hit the exact velocity on instant. But rather in a sequence of notes, whether a trill, a phrase or a repeated note. While listening to your current note (and in the context of previously played notes that will create pretty accurate muscle memory in your forearms and fingers) you should be able to produce pretty consistent note velocities that follow. With that in mind, if you feel you target a particular note velocity (or range) but the actually produced values audibly jump around that and you miss some in between, then the velocity resolution is low.

With that in mind I think 127 is more than enough.

Yes, basically it is about the creative process. As an artist, you don't want to have any limitations to what you can or can't do. Listening to another pianist play on a digital piano might sound fine to you, but if you ask him or her if the outcome was what he or she expected they might say no. They might say they had other intentions throughout the piece he or she was playing but was somewhat limited by the technology.

That said, it's difficult to argue that more velocity layers are needed over the 127 currently available when most sampled libraries represent only a fraction of what is already available.

So I would never debate the velocity layer issue from a listener's perspective, but it is from the pianist's perspective and the limitations it may enforce on sensitive, experienced pianists. I think it is up to the individual to decide whether MIDI or digital technology will work for them. For anyone else to decide for them is hubristic.

All digital pianos and VST-s for at least the last 20-30 years support 127 velocity layers. I’m not sure what you’re implying, e.g. that only Pianoteq supports 127 velocities? In case you mean that, you’re wrong. All pianos can respond with smooth dynamic gradation in 127 volume steps. And many sample-based digital pianos and VST-s also produce 127 different timbres which is apparent in the excellent spectral analysis our forum member dewster used to perform on digital pianos in the past. No difference here between Pianoteq and digital pianos.


Not implying anything grin. Yes any MIDI capable digital piano is capable of 127 velocity layers, whether there is this smooth dynamic gradation in 127 different timbres exists in most sampled pianos today- I'd say that is open to debate. I certainly don't feel that smooth gradation- others may though. So to each his own. I happen to agree with the argument for and against modeled and sampled sounds by the way. They both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

My suggestion is always to aim towards an acoustic piano at some point in your playing and all is solved.

Last edited by Jethro; 08/12/19 02:28 PM.

Shigeru Kawai SK2 (2019), Kawai RX-2 (2007), Young Chang (1982), Kawai VPC-1 (2019), Yamaha P80 (2001), Korg C-50 (1995) , Roland Juno 1 (1988), Korg Poly 61 (1986), Lowrey Symphonic Holiday (1975)
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878908
08/12/19 02:42 PM
08/12/19 02:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 342
magicpiano Offline
Full Member
magicpiano  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 342
I think that if a pianist has the feel that he/she isn't able to give the dynamics he wants in its playing on a digital piano, compared to an acoustic, the culprit is not the standard MIDI limit of 127 values for the velocity, but the imperfect mechanics/electronics of the keyboard action and/or the quality of the sound engine.

If you really need more than 127 velocity values, you should explain why. Let's suppose we have a VST with 127 velocity layers fully sampled one-by-one. Do you think a human ear could feel a difference (in timbre and volume) between velocity X and velocity X+1 (where X is between 1 and 127)? Would a person feel the need of a velocity X+0.5 ?

Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: magicpiano] #2878912
08/12/19 03:09 PM
08/12/19 03:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
J
Jethro Online content
500 Post Club Member
Jethro  Online Content
500 Post Club Member
J

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by magicpiano
I think that if a pianist has the feel that he/she isn't able to give the dynamics he wants in its playing on a digital piano, compared to an acoustic, the culprit is not the standard MIDI limit of 127 values for the velocity, but the imperfect mechanics/electronics of the keyboard action and/or the quality of the sound engine.

If you really need more than 127 velocity values, you should explain why. Let's suppose we have a VST with 127 velocity layers fully sampled one-by-one. Do you think a human ear could feel a difference (in timbre and volume) between velocity X and velocity X+1 (where X is between 1 and 127)? Would a person feel the need of a velocity X+0.5 ?

I guess we would never know for sure unless they got beyond that 127 level limit. No one's perfect when they play no matter what the level- and maybe 127 levels is all that can audibly be discriminated by even the most experienced pianists, but think about how many possible velocities a piano key can actually be struck. It must be close to infinity. I can't tell you how the brain is able to go from a thought to a tactile action when playing music, but I can guarantee it allows for far more than just 127 different velocities to strike a key. That key strike may be attenuated by your emotional state, the touch and feedback of the keyboard, the technical demands of the piece you are attempting and your own physiological/biomechanical constraints. All artists would prefer the maximum amount of sensitivity that an instrument would allow for. This 127 level limitation was a established at a time when I was using 5.25 floppy discs and Atari computers. Maybe this limitation was posed by the limitations of the technology at that time, but why should we assume this is the limitation of the human brain to discriminate? The point being, most artists/high level pianists would prefer the least amount of limitations to express their art to maximize the amount of creativity our brains are truly capable of.

Last edited by Jethro; 08/12/19 03:13 PM.

Shigeru Kawai SK2 (2019), Kawai RX-2 (2007), Young Chang (1982), Kawai VPC-1 (2019), Yamaha P80 (2001), Korg C-50 (1995) , Roland Juno 1 (1988), Korg Poly 61 (1986), Lowrey Symphonic Holiday (1975)
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878922
08/12/19 03:53 PM
08/12/19 03:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,153
Tyrone Slothrop Offline
Tyrone Slothrop  Offline

6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,153
I’ve seen similar arguments about 4K and 8K televisions not being needed because they are beyond the point of our brains to resolve the pixels. This may be absolutely true, however 4K televisions are nonetheless already here and 8K televisions are coming soon whether we need it or not. In the same way, the next version of the MIDI standard is coming and some number of years from now, it won’t matter if we can resolve 127 audio levels or 256 times as many because the MIDI then will simply have a higher limit.


across the stone, deathless piano performances

"Discipline is more reliable than motivation." -by a contributor on Reddit r/piano
"Success is 10% inspiration, and 90% perspiration." -by some other wise person
"Pianoteq manages to keep it all together yet simultaneously also go in all directions; like a quantum particle entangled with an unknown and spooky parallel universe simply waiting to be discovered." -by Pete14
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878924
08/12/19 04:14 PM
08/12/19 04:14 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,015
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,015
Sofia, Bulgaria
And are we sure our digital pianos are not internally using much higher resolution velocity values? Maybe when exported through MIDI it’s only 127 but down-converted from a higher precision. In my DIY controller I have approximately 20000 steps between lowest velocity and highest velocity. And I recalculate that to produce a value between 1-127. I could easily imagine that my N1X might be even better than that taking in mind how advanced it is. Why would they bother to internally handicap it? Replaying the samples in the 16-bit dynamic range (even if not using the entire range) is exactly the same as replaying only 127 volume levels, there’s no difference.


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878927
08/12/19 04:33 PM
08/12/19 04:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,167
Raleigh, North Carolina
MacMacMac Offline
9000 Post Club Member
MacMacMac  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,167
Raleigh, North Carolina
Let's stop calling them "127 velocity layers" when they're not layers. They're just 127 digital stops on the volume control.

Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: Jethro] #2878933
08/12/19 04:45 PM
08/12/19 04:45 PM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 342
magicpiano Offline
Full Member
magicpiano  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 342
Originally Posted by Jethro
I guess we would never know for sure unless they got beyond that 127 level limit. No one's perfect when they play no matter what the level- and maybe 127 levels is all that can audibly be discriminated by even the most experienced pianists, but think about how many possible velocities a piano key can actually be struck. It must be close to infinity. I can't tell you how the brain is able to go from a thought to a tactile action when playing music, but I can guarantee it allows for far more than just 127 different velocities to strike a key. That key strike may be attenuated by your emotional state, the touch and feedback of the keyboard, the technical demands of the piece you are attempting and your own physiological/biomechanical constraints. All artists would prefer the maximum amount of sensitivity that an instrument would allow for. This 127 level limitation was a established at a time when I was using 5.25 floppy discs and Atari computers. Maybe this limitation was posed by the limitations of the technology at that time, but why should we assume this is the limitation of the human brain to discriminate? The point being, most artists/high level pianists would prefer the least amount of limitations to express their art to maximize the amount of creativity our brains are truly capable of.

Of course an acoustic piano is capable of infinite timbrical and volume variations. That our fingers are able to generate much more velocities than 127, it's true. We are analogic beings, not digital. But this doesn't mean that the human brain is capable to "distinctly" perceive more than 127 timbrical variations in the typical dynamic range of a piano. Honestly, I don't think I'm able to clearly distinguish the timbre of all the 20 layers of my piano VST. For example, supposing they are all volume-normalized, if you listen to the 4th and then the 8th velocity layer, then you can hear a difference. But between the 7th and the 8th it's very very difficult. And they are just 20! So, why we would need more than 127?

Anyway, I don't want to limit our brain abilities, but without scientific proof of the contrary, personally I think 127 timbrical variations is enough for a piano. Maybe it's not for a violin.

Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878938
08/12/19 05:09 PM
08/12/19 05:09 PM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 342
magicpiano Offline
Full Member
magicpiano  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 342
Originally Posted by CyberGene
And are we sure our digital pianos are not internally using much higher resolution velocity values? Maybe when exported through MIDI it’s only 127 but down-converted from a higher precision.[...]
Yes, it's possible. Most of the current DPs interpolate between layers, so the limit is just in the bit-depth they use to store audio values, and it would be stupid to limit a value like 32768 in a range 1-127 if you don't have to record a MIDI file.

Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: magicpiano] #2878946
08/12/19 05:53 PM
08/12/19 05:53 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
J
Jethro Online content
500 Post Club Member
Jethro  Online Content
500 Post Club Member
J

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by magicpiano
Originally Posted by Jethro
I guess we would never know for sure unless they got beyond that 127 level limit. No one's perfect when they play no matter what the level- and maybe 127 levels is all that can audibly be discriminated by even the most experienced pianists, but think about how many possible velocities a piano key can actually be struck. It must be close to infinity. I can't tell you how the brain is able to go from a thought to a tactile action when playing music, but I can guarantee it allows for far more than just 127 different velocities to strike a key. That key strike may be attenuated by your emotional state, the touch and feedback of the keyboard, the technical demands of the piece you are attempting and your own physiological/biomechanical constraints. All artists would prefer the maximum amount of sensitivity that an instrument would allow for. This 127 level limitation was a established at a time when I was using 5.25 floppy discs and Atari computers. Maybe this limitation was posed by the limitations of the technology at that time, but why should we assume this is the limitation of the human brain to discriminate? The point being, most artists/high level pianists would prefer the least amount of limitations to express their art to maximize the amount of creativity our brains are truly capable of.

Of course an acoustic piano is capable of infinite timbrical and volume variations. That our fingers are able to generate much more velocities than 127, it's true. We are analogic beings, not digital. But this doesn't mean that the human brain is capable to "distinctly" perceive more than 127 timbrical variations in the typical dynamic range of a piano. Honestly, I don't think I'm able to clearly distinguish the timbre of all the 20 layers of my piano VST. For example, supposing they are all volume-normalized, if you listen to the 4th and then the 8th velocity layer, then you can hear a difference. But between the 7th and the 8th it's very very difficult. And they are just 20! So, why we would need more than 127?

Anyway, I don't want to limit our brain abilities, but without scientific proof of the contrary, personally I think 127 timbrical variations is enough for a piano. Maybe it's not for a violin.


Yes I don't know if this had ever been scientifically researched but from my understanding the 127 was just an arbitrary number that was established given the constraints of the technology available back in the late 70's/80's when MIDI was created. You bring up another point as well with the violin. This MIDI velocity limitation was not applied specifically towards MIDI keyboards, it applied to ALL MIDI instruments including drum pads and even electronic violins and more importantly beyond that these velocity layer implementation vary from one digital instrument to the next even within the same category of instruments. I remember because I played around with those. So clearly the MIDI engineers did not have any specific instrument in mind when they created the 127 velocity standard so it supports the notion that for the digital piano there more be more (or possibly less) velocity layers that could be discriminated by advanced pianists. I'm sure we can all agree that the mechanics involved in drum playing is different from playing the piano so why restrict both to only 127 velocity layers? Imagine if Da Vinci or Van Gogh were limited to only 127 levels of brush strokes. It must of had something to do with the practicalities of the implementation of MIDI at the time and the constraints of the technology available at that time as well.


Shigeru Kawai SK2 (2019), Kawai RX-2 (2007), Young Chang (1982), Kawai VPC-1 (2019), Yamaha P80 (2001), Korg C-50 (1995) , Roland Juno 1 (1988), Korg Poly 61 (1986), Lowrey Symphonic Holiday (1975)
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: CyberGene] #2878948
08/12/19 06:05 PM
08/12/19 06:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 614
Z
Zaphod Offline
500 Post Club Member
Zaphod  Offline
500 Post Club Member
Z

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 614
I'm pretty firmly in the camp that these ultra high resolutions are a case of Emperor's new clothes really.

I would wager that one could even perfectly well use a digital with less than 127 velocities.

Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: Zaphod] #2878950
08/12/19 06:08 PM
08/12/19 06:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,153
Tyrone Slothrop Offline
Tyrone Slothrop  Offline

6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,153
Originally Posted by Zaphod
I'm pretty firmly in the camp that these ultra high resolutions are a case of Emperor's new clothes really.

Yeah, but what of it? Do you think that aside from the retro-crowd, anyone would willingly buy a 720p TV, for example, when 4K TVs are about the same price?


across the stone, deathless piano performances

"Discipline is more reliable than motivation." -by a contributor on Reddit r/piano
"Success is 10% inspiration, and 90% perspiration." -by some other wise person
"Pianoteq manages to keep it all together yet simultaneously also go in all directions; like a quantum particle entangled with an unknown and spooky parallel universe simply waiting to be discovered." -by Pete14
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: Tyrone Slothrop] #2878952
08/12/19 06:10 PM
08/12/19 06:10 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
J
Jethro Online content
500 Post Club Member
Jethro  Online Content
500 Post Club Member
J

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Originally Posted by Zaphod
I'm pretty firmly in the camp that these ultra high resolutions are a case of Emperor's new clothes really.

I would wager that one could even perfectly well use a digital with less than 127 velocities.

Yeah, but what of it? Do you think that aside from the retro-crowd, anyone would willingly buy a 720p TV, for example, when 4K TVs are about the same price?

and I'm pretty sure Kissin can make music on an 8 key toy piano but he won't be smiling.


Shigeru Kawai SK2 (2019), Kawai RX-2 (2007), Young Chang (1982), Kawai VPC-1 (2019), Yamaha P80 (2001), Korg C-50 (1995) , Roland Juno 1 (1988), Korg Poly 61 (1986), Lowrey Symphonic Holiday (1975)
Re: What if Chopin had MIDI? [Re: Tyrone Slothrop] #2878953
08/12/19 06:10 PM
08/12/19 06:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 614
Z
Zaphod Offline
500 Post Club Member
Zaphod  Offline
500 Post Club Member
Z

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 614
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Originally Posted by Zaphod
I'm pretty firmly in the camp that these ultra high resolutions are a case of Emperor's new clothes really.

I would wager that one could even perfectly well use a digital with less than 127 velocities.

Yeah, but what of it? Do you think that aside from the retro-crowd, anyone would willingly buy a 720p TV, for example, when 4K TVs are about the same price?


Yeah that's a fair point. If it's around the same price then might as well buy it. I'd agree with that.

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Piano World 

Shop our Store for Music Lovers!
PianoSupplies.com is Piano World's Online Store
Please visit our store today.
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq Bechstein
(ad)
Faust Harrison Pianos
Faust Harrison 100+ Steinway pianos
New Topics - Multiple Forums
How Many Digitals Get This Correct
by Jonky Ponky. 09/16/19 12:17 AM
Pianodisc midi retrofit
by Sweelinck. 09/15/19 11:30 PM
Brass lick
by fatar760. 09/15/19 05:59 PM
Was Rachmaninov really a "triple threat"?
by pianoloverus. 09/15/19 05:31 PM
In ear headphones
by KevinM. 09/15/19 04:16 PM
What's Hot!!
Our August Newsletter is Out!
------------------
Mason & Hamlin Piano Factory Tour!

-------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
Forum Statistics
Forums41
Topics194,058
Posts2,869,817
Members94,422
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
Please Support Our Advertisers


Faust Harrison 100+ Steinways

Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver

 Best of Piano Buyer

PianoTeq Bechstein
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2019 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1