Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.7 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Best of Piano Buyer
 Best of Piano Buyer
(ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
Find a Professional
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Advertise on Piano World

(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Who's Online Now
104 registered members (Álvaro, anotherscott, ando, beeboss, 36251, aphexdisklavier, akc42, 27 invisible), 7,576 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments #2849603
05/18/19 12:13 PM
05/18/19 12:13 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Hello friends!

I decided to do a little experiment: I played a test track on the Clavinova CLP-635 and recorded a MIDI file. And then I converted it to audio on different devices and programs: there are several CLP-635 voices, several popular VST instruments, and several Pianoteq voices. Total received 15 files.
And most importantly: the test must be blind. That is, it is not known in advance on which device the sound was received. And this, I think, excludes any prejudiced attitude as much as possible. Therefore, the names of voices I will post later: in 1-2 days.

Test audio files here >>

I would be very grateful if you can listen to these files and answer a few questions (you can write the first two digits of the file name - this is the number):
1. Do you hear a distinct difference between these voices?
2. Which voice do you like best?
3. Which voice do you think is the worst?


Many thanks in advance and pleasant listening!

PS: It would be great if you can make a test recording on your instrument. And upload this file here. We all have different digital pianos and it would be possible to create something like a comparative table with the sound of different instruments.
Test MIDI: Chopin op.28 No_4 (18.05.19) >>


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
(ad) SWEETWATER Lowest Prices
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849617
05/18/19 12:40 PM
05/18/19 12:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 260
R
RobR Offline
Full Member
RobR  Offline
Full Member
R

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 260
3 is the best, better yet: The only one which is convincing to my ears.

6 and 14 are abysmal, it was a tough choice choosing which one is worst.

I hear a lot of Pianoteq models in these demos, am i right? EDIT: Nevermind, it's in the title, so i was right:)


Last edited by RobR; 05/18/19 12:42 PM.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849652
05/18/19 01:56 PM
05/18/19 01:56 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 165
Norway
O
oivavoi Offline
Full Member
oivavoi  Offline
Full Member
O

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 165
Norway
Can't download the files to my ipad! Will try later on the computer.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: RobR] #2849656
05/18/19 02:06 PM
05/18/19 02:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by RobR
3 is the best, better yet: The only one which is convincing to my ears.

6 and 14 are abysmal, it was a tough choice choosing which one is worst.

I hear a lot of Pianoteq models in these demos, am i right? EDIT: Nevermind, it's in the title, so i was right:)


RobR, thank you very much!
Yes, of course, there is Pianoteq there (I will say more: there are 6 different timbres from Pianoteq, including the new Bechstein).

Originally Posted by oivavoi
Can't download the files to my ipad! Will try later on the computer.

I made an alternative source, perhaps this will help you:
Test audio files (DropBox) >>


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849669
05/18/19 02:45 PM
05/18/19 02:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 507
Just outside London UK
akc42 Online content
500 Post Club Member
akc42  Online Content
500 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 507
Just outside London UK
I downloaded an played all the files

I liked No 4 the best, but I like a mellow voice rather than a bright one

Agree that 6 and 14 are the worst, BUT I also found 13 and 15 slightly funny - some sort of background ringing which I didn't like.

I did make a load of wav files on my CA67 with a load of different piano voices selected, but I also tried selecting an organ and playing the midi file and I still got a piano voice and a quick listen to the various wav files I made are all the same, so I am not sure what piano settings the CA67 uses. I can load it somewhere if useful, but I am not sure what sounds its using

Last edited by akc42; 05/18/19 02:45 PM. Reason: Add preference
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849673
05/18/19 02:53 PM
05/18/19 02:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 20
P
PianoMasterIreland Offline
Full Member
PianoMasterIreland  Offline
Full Member
P

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 20
Thanks for this; always a bit of fun especially when it's a blind test. I'll write my thoughts on each one as I go.

01. Sounds like clipping coming through on some chords although that could be the sound effect of the MIDI limitation. It's a clean sound. The decay on the notes is respectable but this piano isn't to my liking overall.
02. Sounds distant with a lot of hissing in the background. This surely is a VST. The piano is nice with a rounded sound. A lot more exciting than number one but I can't get past the hissing.
03. A more modest tone from this one but quite beautiful. As with number two, too much hiss for me. I like the attack on this piano on the accented notes but it's a mellow sound overall. I'm more of a bright guy.
04. I'm aware this is MIDI file which is going to be clinical in technique crossover but I really didn't like this piano's obsession with the pedal sound. Reminds me of an old upright I'd hear in a showroom. I get that people might go for this but I can comfortably say; hate it.
05. Off to a lovely start. Clean delivery. It's another mellow sound. High notes are a little weak. Wow, the overtones on the final chords are dense; don't think I'm fond of that..
06. So, going to have to forget hissing lest all my comments here be negative!😂It's bright. The samples in this are quite good. It's an improvement for me but not number 1 yet.
07. Immediately know I wouldn't go for this. That twang aside, it's got a heavy lumbering sound although I do admire the sampling on certain individual notes.
08. Quite nice. Is it Yamaha? I've become a Yamaha fan boy (P255 and Garritan CFX). I'll possibly mark this down as favourite so far, lovely balance and attack. Final chords - gorgeous.
09. An in-your-face left hand on this track. The climactic part on this was disappointing. I have to hand it a really good sustain.
10. An older piano sound again here which just isn't up my street. It reminds me of another percussion, keyboard instrument like celeste in parts. Good dynamics to be fair. Sampling is very respectable.
11. I don't have strong feelings on this one on way or another. It's okay. It has an ethereal sound. The pedal sampling is annoying.
12. I may be beginning to need a palette cleanser but this reminds me of previous pianos here. A respectable sound. Bass is lacking more so in this one.
13. This is like glass. Really smooth and ringing. I'm drawn to it so far. It let me down in the climax. Right hand drowned out. Too delicate.
14. Sounds tired and dusty. Bored by it. Shaky sampling on the higher notes very obvious. This sounds inconsistent with itself.
15. I like this one a lot. Really nice tone. It's slightly imbalanced. It's not as nice as number eight.

Favourite: 08

Least favourite: 04

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: akc42] #2849678
05/18/19 03:17 PM
05/18/19 03:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by akc42
I downloaded an played all the files

I liked No 4 the best, but I like a mellow voice rather than a bright one

Agree that 6 and 14 are the worst, BUT I also found 13 and 15 slightly funny - some sort of background ringing which I didn't like.

I did make a load of wav files on my CA67 with a load of different piano voices selected, but I also tried selecting an organ and playing the midi file and I still got a piano voice and a quick listen to the various wav files I made are all the same, so I am not sure what piano settings the CA67 uses. I can load it somewhere if useful, but I am not sure what sounds its using


akc42, thank you for your feedback!
By the way, you have raised an interesting topic: it turns out that changing the voice for a MIDI file to Kawai CA67 is not such an easy task. I have an option on the CLP-635 in the settings that changes the voice for a MIDI file (this is very convenient), I thought it was on any instrument.
I found a discussion of this issue here on the forum, perhaps it will be useful to you:
Kawai CA67 MIDI Playback From USB


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: PianoMasterIreland] #2849679
05/18/19 03:26 PM
05/18/19 03:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
PianoMasterIreland, incredibly comprehensive answer! You have a great ear and you noticed many small details.
And it is especially interesting to read this, knowing the names of instruments smile
I think tomorrow I will show a table with names.


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849680
05/18/19 03:27 PM
05/18/19 03:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
I also tried opening the files from my iPhone but it seems they are not playable on iPhone by default. Even DropBox won’t show a player. Ogg is kind of exotic nowadays. Should’ve used AAC which is the same high quality and supported on all platforms. I’ll take a listen when I’m on my laptop.

Last edited by CyberGene; 05/18/19 03:28 PM.

My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: CyberGene] #2849685
05/18/19 03:53 PM
05/18/19 03:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by CyberGene
I also tried opening the files from my iPhone but it seems they are not playable on iPhone by default. Even DropBox won’t show a player. Ogg is kind of exotic nowadays. Should’ve used AAC which is the same high quality and supported on all platforms. I’ll take a listen when I’m on my laptop.


CyberGene, I got used to the OGG format and converted all my music into it. I did not know that there are problems with it on iOS.
But for convenience, I made MP3 files, I hope it will be compatible:
Test audio files (MP3) >>


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849698
05/18/19 04:51 PM
05/18/19 04:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 167
USA
J
JJHLH Online content
Full Member
JJHLH  Online Content
Full Member
J

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 167
USA
Originally Posted by StasNick
Originally Posted by CyberGene
I also tried opening the files from my iPhone but it seems they are not playable on iPhone by default. Even DropBox won’t show a player. Ogg is kind of exotic nowadays. Should’ve used AAC which is the same high quality and supported on all platforms. I’ll take a listen when I’m on my laptop.


CyberGene, I got used to the OGG format and converted all my music into it. I did not know that there are problems with it on iOS.
But for convenience, I made MP3 files, I hope it will be compatible:
Test audio files (MP3) >>


I couldn’t get this to work on my iPad either.


Yamaha N1X, P-515. Garritan CFX. Genelec 8331 monitors.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849704
05/18/19 05:04 PM
05/18/19 05:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
For me it works.


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849722
05/18/19 06:20 PM
05/18/19 06:20 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 165
Norway
O
oivavoi Offline
Full Member
oivavoi  Offline
Full Member
O

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 165
Norway
Got the mp3's to work.

Listened through and scribbled down my first impressions upon listening to them. This is very spontaneous and probably not very precise. FWIW:

1: something is wrong. clipping? Muffled
2: metallic sheen. noticeable hiss
3: noticeable hiss here as well
4: what's that really strange noise which shouldn't be there?
5: nice all in all. well-rounded. no hiss. but do I detect some digital artifacts? I think so. Or maybe not. Not sure. Can't make up my mind about it.
6: this one sounds really different! Difficult to describe, but weird. Like it's old or something.
7: I like it. Musical and clear sound. But with this one there's a fairly pronounced low-level noise. Damper noise I assume?
8: wow! My clear favorite so far. Nothing to comment on really. The damper noise isn't annoying but blends well with the overall sound. Lovely and rich and clear.
9: once again pronounced low-level noises. Damper noise. This time the damper noise has a more metallic feel to me.
10: sound feels nasal on this one. kind of 'twangy'. Once again I find the damper noise noticeable
11: what's with the weird low-level scratchy noises?
12: different tonally from the last one, but scratchy noises here as well. AND metallic damper noise
13: no hiss or low-level noise. But it has a kind of artificial "amplified" feel to it. A bit weird tonally
14: different from the last one, but also feels artificial to me
15: very polite, this one. Probably not my overall favourite but I definitely like it.

Eight is my clear winner!

Last edited by oivavoi; 05/18/19 06:26 PM.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849737
05/18/19 07:28 PM
05/18/19 07:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 167
USA
J
JJHLH Online content
Full Member
JJHLH  Online Content
Full Member
J

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 167
USA
I can give my rough impression after listening to them all.

Ones I preferred: 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11

Neutral towards: 1, 7, 12

Didn’t like as much: 2, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15

Thank you for the taking the time and effort to do this experiment.


Yamaha N1X, P-515. Garritan CFX. Genelec 8331 monitors.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849816
05/19/19 04:55 AM
05/19/19 04:55 AM
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 966
Finland
C
clothearednincompo Offline
500 Post Club Member
clothearednincompo  Offline
500 Post Club Member
C

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 966
Finland
Quick impressions without reading anyone's comments:

1) There's a certain piano brand somewhere in the file's metadata. Sounds ok, could be Pianoteq(?)
2) Has more reverb than #1 so that's at least different. Maybe a Japanese grand VST(?)
3) Pretty much like #2
4) What's wrong with this one? The una corda pedal stuck down? Maybe it's the NI Noire piano with the "felt effect".
5) Okay, could be a Clavinova.
6) A historical "pianoforte"/"fortepiano" from Pianoteq. Interesting but probably boring over time.
7) A wild guess: another "slightly older" piano from Pianoteq. Or Clavinova's "Bösendorfer".
8) Could be anything. Except a Casio. An okay "basic grand".
9) A bit muffled? Again an okay "basic grand". Maybe Pianoteq.
10) Brighter than #9. Could be anything except a Casio.
11) Pianoteq Steinway(?)
12) Pianoteq Bechstein(?)
13) Could be anything except a Casio. At least the key action noises are now gone.
14) Again a historical "pianoforte"/"fortepiano" from Pianoteq.
15) Could be anything except a Casio. Maybe a digital piano.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849819
05/19/19 05:07 AM
05/19/19 05:07 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 571
Celestis
Granyala Offline
500 Post Club Member
Granyala  Offline
500 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 571
Celestis
Originally Posted by StasNick
1. Do you hear a distinct difference between these voices?
2. Which voice do you like best?
3. Which voice do you think is the worst?

1) Yes. There are timbre / EQ and stereo image changes.
2) No favorite really. They all sounded convincing to my ears.
3) Nr. 5 sounded very flat / lifeless

I also noticed damper noise on Nr. 12 and odd metallic scratching noises in Nr. 4.

Other than that, I found myself enjoying the playing an not thinking much about stuff that stands out / disrupts the experience.


The backbone of modern industrial society is, and for the foreseeable future will be, the use of electrical Power.
VPC 1 -> Pianoteq 6 Std | Garritan CFX / Pearl Alto Flute 201
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849821
05/19/19 05:15 AM
05/19/19 05:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 300
S
stamkorg Offline
Full Member
stamkorg  Offline
Full Member
S

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 300
Interesting test but not easy.

1st Q: YES

2nd Q: The best for me is the 5 , but unnatural bass resonnance in the end.

3rd Q: The worst for me is the 6

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849827
05/19/19 05:47 AM
05/19/19 05:47 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
I also didn’t read other opinions in order not to be influenced. I listened them in order and wrote short notes after each:

1. OK, slightly nasal
2. OK, metallic sustain, nasal
3. Better
4. Too soft and dull, maybe bad velocity mapping, some weird hammer knocks, not enough dynamic range
5. Ok, metallic sustain at places
6. Ugh, nasty! Immediately starts ugly, contender for worst so far
7. Another contender for worst, but slightly better than 6
8. Best so far but still slightly metallic sustain
9. OK at low velocities but at higher velocities exhibits some synthetic CP70 sustain
10. OK-ish, but still some nasal and metallic character
11. Among the better ones, but some bell-like attack at places that spoils it
12. Best so far!
13. Among the best ones, maybe slightly smeared sustain but otherwise very good
14. Ugh! Another ugly and nasal contender for the title of “worst”
15. Ohh, this is great! Maybe it’s the best

The best is 15. Also good are 12, 13, 8, to some degree 11
Worst: 6, 7, 14


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849833
05/19/19 06:12 AM
05/19/19 06:12 AM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
N
nax Offline
Full Member
nax  Offline
Full Member
N

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
Great comparison. I made the mistake to first read a few comments, so it might not be 100% blind:

round sound: 3, 8, 11

ok: 7, 9, 12, 15

too thin: 1, 14

too bright: 10

too mellow (muffled bass around 1:16-1:18): 4, 5

a bit artificial/tinny (too much virtual resonance? or maybe just reverb): 2, 6, 13

Overall, I would probably vote for 8.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2849958
05/19/19 11:44 AM
05/19/19 11:44 AM
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 45
L
lorez Offline
Full Member
lorez  Offline
Full Member
L

Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 45
3 and 10 are the ones I like the most.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850010
05/19/19 01:53 PM
05/19/19 01:53 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 541
Greater Chicago Metro Area
E
EPW Online content
500 Post Club Member
EPW  Online Content
500 Post Club Member
E

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 541
Greater Chicago Metro Area
I don't know if I have a clear cut winner but I like 8, 12, 13 and 15.
I still will take Pianoteq for its playability, there is just something about the interaction while playing it that I love. YMMV


All these years playing and I still consider myself a novice.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850026
05/19/19 02:44 PM
05/19/19 02:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
MacMacMac Offline
9000 Post Club Member
MacMacMac  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
1 - Pretty good.
2 - Veiled. The piano isn't here, it's elsewhere. Is this Pianoteq?
3 - Same comment as #2.
4 - Veiled.
5 - Much better than the previous three.
6 - Thin, like a cheap digital.
7 - Not too bad, but not as good as 5.
8 - Sounds good, but it lacks stereo spread.
9 - Muffled, and some noises.
10 - Refreshing after hearing those veiled, muffled pianos. But the sound placement moves around oddly.
11 - As oivavoi said, what's with the weird noises?
12 - How do you spell "eh"?
13 - I'm begin to tire of this exercise.
14 - As oivavoi said, this has a very artificial sound.
15 - As I write this I realize that I didn't listen to #15.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850390
05/20/19 12:05 PM
05/20/19 12:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Many thanks to everyone who took part in this experiment. This gives a lot of information to think about.

It is time to reveal the names of the instruments.
(Warning: if you want to pass the blind test, then do not look under this spoiler!):


  • 01 - VST - C. Bechstein Digital Grand ---01
  • 02 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (with compression and reverb, v1) ---02
  • 03 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (with compression and reverb, v1) ---03
  • 04 - VST - Noire Felt ---04
  • 05 - VST - The Grandeur ---05
  • 06 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Upright Yamaha SU7 (with compression and reverb, v1) ---06
  • 07 - Pianoteq - Steinway D (Classical) ---07
  • 08 - Pianoteq - Steingraeber (E-272) ---08
  • 09 - Pianoteq - Grotrian (Concert Royal) ---09
  • 10 - Pianoteq - Ant Petrof (Prelude) ---10
  • 11 - Pianoteq - Bechstein DG (Prelude) ---11
  • 12 - Pianoteq - Steinway B (Prelude) ---12
  • 13 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (original, without processing) ---13
  • 14 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Upright Yamaha SU7 (original, without processing) ---14
  • 15 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (original, without processing) ---15
  • 16 - VST - The Hammersmith ---16
  • 17 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (with de-noising, compression and reverb, v2) ---17
  • 18 - VST - Noire Pure ---18
  • 19 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (with de-noising, compression and reverb, v2) ---19



In addition, I added 4 more files (with new instruments): these are numbers from 16 to 19:
Test audio files (OGG) >>
Test audio files (MP3) >>


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850443
05/20/19 02:01 PM
05/20/19 02:01 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 541
Greater Chicago Metro Area
E
EPW Online content
500 Post Club Member
EPW  Online Content
500 Post Club Member
E

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 541
Greater Chicago Metro Area
Thanks for taking the time for uploading the audio for us to debate about which piano sound we like/dislike smile


All these years playing and I still consider myself a novice.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850446
05/20/19 02:21 PM
05/20/19 02:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
MacMacMac Offline
9000 Post Club Member
MacMacMac  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
So ... my favorites were the Grandeur (which is my everyday favorite) and the Bechstein VST (which is entirely new to me).
My least favorites were the CLP635 and four of the six Pianoteqs.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850453
05/20/19 02:31 PM
05/20/19 02:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unsurprisingly my favorite is the unmodified CFX from the CLP smile Also unsurprisingly the Pianoteq Steinway D is among the worst to me. Unsurprisingly I liked the Pianoteq Bechstein DG which I have also praised in another thread. Surprisingly there are a few other Pianoteq presets that I liked: the Steinway B and the Steingraeber. It’s a shame there are no sampled CFX pianos though. Especially Garritan CFX.


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850461
05/20/19 02:52 PM
05/20/19 02:52 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 541
Greater Chicago Metro Area
E
EPW Online content
500 Post Club Member
EPW  Online Content
500 Post Club Member
E

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 541
Greater Chicago Metro Area
I liked the Pianoteq Steinway B which I have. I liked the Steingraeber and is on my list to purchase from Pianoteq. I also like the unmodified CFX from the CLP too.
I brought the Steinway Model D from Pianoteq but I like the Model B more and play that one more.

Unlike MacMacMac I like Pianoteq smile


All these years playing and I still consider myself a novice.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850472
05/20/19 03:24 PM
05/20/19 03:24 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 165
Norway
O
oivavoi Offline
Full Member
oivavoi  Offline
Full Member
O

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 165
Norway
Interesting!

It’s been a couple of years since I used pianoteq or VST’s regularly, but it kind of confirms my preference for Pianoteq. Haven’t played the Steingraeber myself, but it makes sense that it was my favorite given that Steingraeber by far and away is my favorite acoustic piano manufacturer.

The big shocker for me is nr 1. I would really have expected to like the Bechstein digital. But I would say the clipping (or whatever) is unmistakeable. Is something malfunctioning with this VST on the computer used?

Last edited by oivavoi; 05/20/19 03:24 PM.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850481
05/20/19 04:03 PM
05/20/19 04:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
K
kj85 Offline
Full Member
kj85  Offline
Full Member
K

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
Originally Posted by StasNick
It is time to reveal the names of the instruments.


My Grandeur VST does not sound like the rendered sample at all, which has a nice, full sound. Have you changed any of the default settings or did you run the output through some filter?

Other than that, don't really have a preference. They all sound like pianos.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: kj85] #2850572
05/21/19 01:20 AM
05/21/19 01:20 AM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
N
nax Offline
Full Member
nax  Offline
Full Member
N

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
It would be really great if anyone could add the Garritan CFX and Ivory II American D with the given midi file to the list (and shuffle numbers again).
I don't own them, but I am thinking of buying them to test whether I like them better than the sound of my N1X.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850629
05/21/19 07:34 AM
05/21/19 07:34 AM
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 127
Portugal
M
MarioPf Offline
Full Member
MarioPf  Offline
Full Member
M

Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 127
Portugal
Originally Posted by StasNick

1. Do you hear a distinct difference between these voices?
2. Which voice do you like best?
3. Which voice do you think is the worst?



1. Yes.
2. 11
3. 17

6 and 14 may sound odd but I think they are sounds from old pianos and not so bad.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850646
05/21/19 08:18 AM
05/21/19 08:18 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 571
Celestis
Granyala Offline
500 Post Club Member
Granyala  Offline
500 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 571
Celestis
I did a few renders with a VST that shall not be named for now.
If you recognize it, keep it to yourself fow now, don't ruin the fun for people that may not know it.

All profiles were predefined by the manufacturer, nothing custom.
Will post the name of the presets and VST later.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YE-CEo8CtLmMx0BybKNAcb5diKmI68FB

What do you think?

Last edited by Granyala; 05/21/19 08:23 AM.

The backbone of modern industrial society is, and for the foreseeable future will be, the use of electrical Power.
VPC 1 -> Pianoteq 6 Std | Garritan CFX / Pearl Alto Flute 201
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: Granyala] #2850689
05/21/19 10:22 AM
05/21/19 10:22 AM
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 127
Portugal
M
MarioPf Offline
Full Member
MarioPf  Offline
Full Member
M

Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 127
Portugal
Originally Posted by Granyala
I did a few renders with a VST that shall not be named for now.
If you recognize it, keep it to yourself fow now, don't ruin the fun for people that may not know it.

All profiles were predefined by the manufacturer, nothing custom.
Will post the name of the presets and VST later.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YE-CEo8CtLmMx0BybKNAcb5diKmI68FB

What do you think?


1. Very pleasant sound.

2. Metallic sound, not always pleasant.

3. Nice but it seems like a piano in another rooms sometimes.

4. Sound inside the head; treble line very thin.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: oivavoi] #2850697
05/21/19 10:38 AM
05/21/19 10:38 AM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by oivavoi
Interesting!

It’s been a couple of years since I used pianoteq or VST’s regularly, but it kind of confirms my preference for Pianoteq. Haven’t played the Steingraeber myself, but it makes sense that it was my favorite given that Steingraeber by far and away is my favorite acoustic piano manufacturer.

The big shocker for me is nr 1. I would really have expected to like the Bechstein digital. But I would say the clipping (or whatever) is unmistakeable. Is something malfunctioning with this VST on the computer used?


oivavoi, I agree: the Steingraeber sounds pretty good. Perhaps I accidentally picked up the tuning (E-272), which sounds open and free, it has a good bass, and in the recording there is “air”, besides, the pedal noise is low.
By the way, I think that this pedal noise should be immediately reduced in all VST and Pianoteq - this is what I learned from this experiment.

As for the C. Bechstein digital (VST):
I chose one of the standard settings (Classic near) and it looks like it sounds awful. I made a new version (with more fine tuning of the sound, including setting the curve for the keyboard) and I really like this result. The sound of this VST is pleasant, the responsiveness is very good, although I think that it is thin and overly open (there is little bass and low frequencies in it). This file is here (number 00):
Test audio files (OGG) >>
Test audio files (MP3) >>


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: kj85] #2850702
05/21/19 10:56 AM
05/21/19 10:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by kj85
Originally Posted by StasNick
It is time to reveal the names of the instruments.


My Grandeur VST does not sound like the rendered sample at all, which has a nice, full sound. Have you changed any of the default settings or did you run the output through some filter?

Other than that, don't really have a preference. They all sound like pianos.


kj85, no, I did not add filters. But I changed the settings. The main ones are:
1. Tone: turn to the right until the sound is clear and bright for your hearing, and then slow down a little. And, as it seems to me, it will sound much better than the default.
2. Anatomy: Adjust the curve for better responsiveness and accuracy for your keyboard. My best fit is Hard. Enable Overtones for a richer sound. Reduce pedal noise.
3. Space: I like the Piano reso 1 setting, and I reduce the size and amount a bit.
I attach screenshots for clarity.

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Last edited by StasNick; 05/21/19 10:57 AM.

I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850713
05/21/19 11:19 AM
05/21/19 11:19 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 165
Norway
O
oivavoi Offline
Full Member
oivavoi  Offline
Full Member
O

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 165
Norway
Originally Posted by StasNick
Originally Posted by oivavoi
Interesting!

It’s been a couple of years since I used pianoteq or VST’s regularly, but it kind of confirms my preference for Pianoteq. Haven’t played the Steingraeber myself, but it makes sense that it was my favorite given that Steingraeber by far and away is my favorite acoustic piano manufacturer.

The big shocker for me is nr 1. I would really have expected to like the Bechstein digital. But I would say the clipping (or whatever) is unmistakeable. Is something malfunctioning with this VST on the computer used?


oivavoi, I agree: the Steingraeber sounds pretty good. Perhaps I accidentally picked up the tuning (E-272), which sounds open and free, it has a good bass, and in the recording there is “air”, besides, the pedal noise is low.
By the way, I think that this pedal noise should be immediately reduced in all VST and Pianoteq - this is what I learned from this experiment.

As for the C. Bechstein digital (VST):
I chose one of the standard settings (Classic near) and it looks like it sounds awful. I made a new version (with more fine tuning of the sound, including setting the curve for the keyboard) and I really like this result. The sound of this VST is pleasant, the responsiveness is very good, although I think that it is thin and overly open (there is little bass and low frequencies in it). This file is here (number 00):
Test audio files (OGG) >>
Test audio files (MP3) >>


Great work!

Yes, the new Bechstein version sounds much better. Still - IMHO - not even close to the Pianoteq Steingraeber. (Steingraeber pianos are not very well known, compared to Steinway and Bösendorfer etc, but they really are ahead of the pack... again IMHO)

And I very much agree re: pedal noise. Pedal noise, and other mechanical noises, are inherent weaknesses of the mechanics of an acoustic instrument. It's not a good thing! It's there because we can't get rid of it! Why on earth would one like to import that into a digital instrument? That would be like voluntarily putting "clicks" and "pops" on MP3's, because they were there on vinyl and tape recordings.

I also think it's possible that the brain (or my brain at least) reacts differently to such noises when they are present digitally, and not in the instrument itself. When playing an acoustic instrument, it may be that we kind of stop noticing such noise, because it's so connected to the instrument itself. But when playing a DP, there is no way of making that connection between the noise and the actual instrument we have in front of us.

Acoustic pianos can be wonderful creatures, and the playing experience can't be fully recreated by digital technology IMO. But there are some things digitals do better than acoustics, and one of those things is the possibility of playing without generating mechanical noise. So on my Kawai CS10 I always turn the pedal noise all the way down.

Last edited by oivavoi; 05/21/19 11:19 AM.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850719
05/21/19 11:52 AM
05/21/19 11:52 AM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
K
kj85 Offline
Full Member
kj85  Offline
Full Member
K

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
Originally Posted by StasNick
I attach screenshots for clarity.


Thanks. Can you post the anatomy settings screenshot? The tone settings appear twice in you post by mistake.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: kj85] #2850772
05/21/19 02:27 PM
05/21/19 02:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by kj85
Originally Posted by StasNick
I attach screenshots for clarity.


Thanks. Can you post the anatomy settings screenshot? The tone settings appear twice in you post by mistake.

Yes, of course. Here is a new screenshot:

[Linked Image]


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850781
05/21/19 03:03 PM
05/21/19 03:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
K
kj85 Offline
Full Member
kj85  Offline
Full Member
K

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
Originally Posted by StasNick
Yes, of course. Here is a new screenshot


Thanks. Still sounds very different from your sample. Unless, I am making some obvious mistake, I don't see how two renders of the same midi file using the same settings in the same VST instrument can be so different.

It's after midnight here. In the morning, I'll upload screenshots of my settings as well as a render of your midi file using said settings.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850783
05/21/19 03:14 PM
05/21/19 03:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,450
Lampedusa
N
newer player Offline
1000 Post Club Member
newer player  Offline
1000 Post Club Member
N

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,450
Lampedusa
Thanks for taking the time to organize this StasNick.

My preferences were generally for music that had:

- fewer mechanical sounds,
- less audio distortion,
- fewer "synthetic" sounding chords (which sometimes took time to rear their ugly heads and were not only PianoTeq).

On this listening test, I thought dry vs. wet was much less important than clean, natural sounding notes. That might be bias as I use the very noisy and very wet Garritan CFX every day.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850823
05/21/19 04:46 PM
05/21/19 04:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 45
L
lorez Offline
Full Member
lorez  Offline
Full Member
L

Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 45
So it turns out I like the Yamaha CFX from a 635, not surprising since I own a P-515 and after I bought the triple pedal unit I was forced to switch to the internal sounds to utilize half pedaling (none of the VSTs I own for iPad support it). At first I didn’t like it at all, then I began to appreciate it. Now I actually prefer it to my VSTs. The Petrof is a surprise to me. I’m not familiar with the instrument but at least it’s Pianoteq so it should be amazingly playable.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850851
05/21/19 06:17 PM
05/21/19 06:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
MacMacMac Offline
9000 Post Club Member
MacMacMac  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
Can anyone add a better piano to this test? Such as the CLP685?

I ask that because I'm finding the CLP635 tested here as being only marginally better than my 2005-vintage CLP240.
As I described it earlier: Thin, like a cheap digital. Not at all impressive.

I'd like to hear what the high-end Clav sounds like.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2850879
05/21/19 08:24 PM
05/21/19 08:24 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,015
canada
J
johnlewisgrant Offline
1000 Post Club Member
johnlewisgrant  Offline
1000 Post Club Member
J

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,015
canada
Modified the midi file.... just a wee bit... Employing a secret sample:

https://www.dropbox.com/l/scl/AACoyDA1mWYvcpmLh7XQ9ul0vT04GBEa6U0


That's a crazy-long url.

I just ran the file and got heavy clipping in the loud section.... I can fix that... my bad.

Also, the pedaling is WAY off in some places, which obviously can be fixed, as well.

Last edited by johnlewisgrant; 05/21/19 08:31 PM.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2851066
05/22/19 10:35 AM
05/22/19 10:35 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 571
Celestis
Granyala Offline
500 Post Club Member
Granyala  Offline
500 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 571
Celestis
As promised, the name and settings of my renders:


Garritan CFX full

01 - standard player
02 - standard classic
03 - standard contemporary
04 - classic soft and cozy


The backbone of modern industrial society is, and for the foreseeable future will be, the use of electrical Power.
VPC 1 -> Pianoteq 6 Std | Garritan CFX / Pearl Alto Flute 201
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: kj85] #2851089
05/22/19 11:25 AM
05/22/19 11:25 AM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
K
kj85 Offline
Full Member
kj85  Offline
Full Member
K

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
Originally Posted by kj85
Originally Posted by StasNick
Yes, of course. Here is a new screenshot


Thanks. Still sounds very different from your sample. Unless, I am making some obvious mistake, I don't see how two renders of the same midi file using the same settings in the same VST instrument can be so different.

It's after midnight here. In the morning, I'll upload screenshots of my settings as well as a render of your midi file using said settings.


My screenshots:

Tone:
[Linked Image]

Anatomy:
[Linked Image]


And the rendered audio:
"The Grandeur" rendering

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2851175
05/22/19 02:24 PM
05/22/19 02:24 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
N
nax Offline
Full Member
nax  Offline
Full Member
N

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
Thank you for adding the Garritan CFX. I suspected the Garritan because of the level of reverb.

If someone could add the Ivory II American D, then I would do a re-shuffle of all, so that one can do a blind test again (even though it is not really blind if you have a good memory of the sound).

Last edited by nax; 05/22/19 02:24 PM.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: MacMacMac] #2851191
05/22/19 03:02 PM
05/22/19 03:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by MacMacMac
Can anyone add a better piano to this test? Such as the CLP685?


Yes, it would be great to hear other digital pianos (including Casio, Roland and Kawai).
But I'm not sure that the CLP 685 sound engine is fundamentally different from other instruments in this series (although I could be wrong).


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: Granyala] #2851195
05/22/19 03:10 PM
05/22/19 03:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by Granyala
As promised, the name and settings of my renders:


Granyala, thank you for your test!
I suspected it was a VST. But I did not like any of the samples. And I remembered that I once tested the Garritan CFX and concluded that this is not the best VST with the Yamaha CFX timbre (in my opinion), so it was removed a long time ago and did not even use it in this test.
But number 1 and number 2 would probably be good if the reverb was much smaller.


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: lorez] #2851199
05/22/19 03:24 PM
05/22/19 03:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
StasNick Offline OP
Full Member
StasNick  Offline OP
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Russia
Originally Posted by lorez
So it turns out I like the Yamaha CFX from a 635, not surprising since I own a P-515 and after I bought the triple pedal unit I was forced to switch to the internal sounds to utilize half pedaling (none of the VSTs I own for iPad support it). At first I didn’t like it at all, then I began to appreciate it. Now I actually prefer it to my VSTs. The Petrof is a surprise to me. I’m not familiar with the instrument but at least it’s Pianoteq so it should be amazingly playable.


The built-in Clavinova engine has many advantages (I compared it with many third-party VSTs): support for the half-pedals, beautiful timbre, great dynamics and excellent response to keystrokes. In addition, there is even support for Key-off velocity's MIDI commands (Pianoteq also has this, but if you use the standalone version), this trifle adds realism to the game, simulating different string sounds at different key-off speeds. Well, the main advantage: to start the game you need 8-10 seconds from switching on smile
But there are also disadvantages that I found: samples are not recorded in the highest quality (no 24 bits and no at least 48 kHz), during post-processing you can hear that the recordings are not perfect and there is noise (very quiet, but it is), except In addition, the built-in reverb is just awful (I always turn it off). But this does not affect the game live (for which the tool was created), but rather a claim to Yamaha for the future.


I started learning to play the piano in November 2017.
Yamaha Clavinova CLP-635 | SoundCloud >>
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: nax] #2851572
05/23/19 06:59 PM
05/23/19 06:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 92
C
Craig Richards Offline
Full Member
Craig Richards  Offline
Full Member
C

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by nax
Thank you for adding the Garritan CFX. I suspected the Garritan because of the level of reverb.

If someone could add the Ivory II American D, then I would do a re-shuffle of all, so that one can do a blind test again (even though it is not really blind if you have a good memory of the sound).


I have Ivory 2.5 American D. Will render an audio file now. Can I upload the file directly to the thread?


Pianist, Composer & Arranger
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2851578
05/23/19 07:40 PM
05/23/19 07:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 92
C
Craig Richards Offline
Full Member
Craig Richards  Offline
Full Member
C

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 92
Here's Ivory 2.5 ACD (a downloadable 24bit 44.1 WAV file):

https://soundcloud.com/pianoproducer-online/ivory-25-acd-chopin-op28-no-4/s-PVuAI

I used Ivory's built in EQ & Reverb.

PS: How can I add screenshot images of my settings to my post?


Pianist, Composer & Arranger
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: Craig Richards] #2851586
05/23/19 08:15 PM
05/23/19 08:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
K
kj85 Offline
Full Member
kj85  Offline
Full Member
K

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 141
India
Originally Posted by Craig Richards
PS: How can I add screenshot images of my settings to my post?


Upload it somewhere (imgur etc) and use the image url within "img" tags.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: kj85] #2851644
05/24/19 03:27 AM
05/24/19 03:27 AM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 92
C
Craig Richards Offline
Full Member
Craig Richards  Offline
Full Member
C

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by kj85
Originally Posted by Craig Richards
PS: How can I add screenshot images of my settings to my post?


Upload it somewhere (imgur etc) and use the image url within "img" tags.


Here's my Ivory 2.5 American Concert D settings:

https://imgur.com/dovZUmY

https://imgur.com/ZHMSSsv

Last edited by Craig Richards; 05/24/19 03:29 AM.

Pianist, Composer & Arranger
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2851655
05/24/19 04:42 AM
05/24/19 04:42 AM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
N
nax Offline
Full Member
nax  Offline
Full Member
N

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 31
Thanks a lot for adding the Ivory. I like the sound, but at 1:18 it seems that the sustain of the bass note is not the same as on others, maybe an issue with the midi pedal data.

I did an automatic re-shuffling of all files (hopefully without errors):

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/80r5kunfe21ddzx/AADEV84ZdOLLNb8uqZ8pkGx-a?dl=0

Click below for the new list of VSTs.


01 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Upright Yamaha SU7 (with compression and reverb, v1)
02 - Pianoteq - Steingraeber (E-272)
03 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (with compression and reverb, v1)
04 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Upright Yamaha SU7 (original, without processing)
05 - VST - C. Bechstein Digital Grand ---01
06 - Pianoteq - Ant Petrof (Prelude)
07 - Garritan CFX full - standard contemporary
08 - Garritan CFX full - standard player
09 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (original, without processing)
10 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (original, without processing)
11 - Ivory 2.5 - American Concert D
12 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (with de-noising, compression and reverb, v2)
13 - Garritan CFX full - classic soft and cozy
14 - Pianoteq - Grotrian (Concert Royal)
15 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (with compression and reverb, v1)
16 - Garritan CFX full - standard classic
17 - Pianoteq - Bechstein DG (Prelude)
18 - VST - Noire Pure
19 - VST - The Hammersmith
20 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (with de-noising, compression and reverb, v2)
21 - Pianoteq - Steinway B (Prelude)
22 - VST - The Grandeur
23 - Pianoteq - Steinway D (Classical)
24 - VST - Noire Felt

Last edited by nax; 05/24/19 04:42 AM.
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: MacMacMac] #2857745
06/12/19 10:39 AM
06/12/19 10:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 29
P
pianophil Offline
Full Member
pianophil  Offline
Full Member
P

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 29
7 - Pianoteq - Steinway D (Classical)
Originally Posted by MacMacMac

7 - Not too bad, but not as good as 5.


8 - Pianoteq - Steingraeber (E-272)
Originally Posted by MacMacMac

8 - Sounds good, but it lacks stereo spread.


10 - Pianoteq - Ant Petrof (Prelude)
Originally Posted by MacMacMac

10 - Refreshing after hearing those veiled, muffled pianos. But the sound placement moves around oddly.


Thank you for the kind words MacMacMac, their value is increased by there rarity wink. I was really pretty happy to see that finally you like the sound of some instruments in Pianoteq (of course not all of them!).

Philippe (Modartt)

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: pianophil] #2857754
06/12/19 11:01 AM
06/12/19 11:01 AM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,269
Tyrone Slothrop Online content
Tyrone Slothrop  Online Content

6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,269
Originally Posted by pianophil
Thank you for the kind words MacMacMac, their value is increased by there rarity wink. I was really pretty happy to see that finally you like the sound of some instruments in Pianoteq (of course not all of them!).

Philippe (Modartt)

Yes, shocking, all things considered smile

Philippe, can you settle a controversy for us that mcontraveos raised on another thread? Were actual physical Steinway D/B pianos used in the actual modeling work during the development of the Steinway D & B VIs in Pianoteq? Or was the work entirely done using recordings of those pianos?


across the stone, deathless piano performances

"Discipline is more reliable than motivation." -by a contributor on Reddit r/piano
"Success is 10% inspiration, and 90% perspiration." -by some other wise person
"Pianoteq manages to keep it all together yet simultaneously also go in all directions; like a quantum particle entangled with an unknown and spooky parallel universe simply waiting to be discovered." -by Pete14
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: Tyrone Slothrop] #2857761
06/12/19 11:12 AM
06/12/19 11:12 AM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,269
Tyrone Slothrop Online content
Tyrone Slothrop  Online Content

6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 6,269
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Originally Posted by pianophil
Thank you for the kind words MacMacMac, their value is increased by there rarity wink. I was really pretty happy to see that finally you like the sound of some instruments in Pianoteq (of course not all of them!).

Philippe (Modartt)

Yes, shocking, all things considered smile

It's my belief that in double-blind tests over time, not only will modeled VIs pass "Turing tests" with sampled VIs, but VIs in general will pass Turing tests against acoustical pianos. The differences become slighter and slighter with time until it will be hard for non-experts to distinguish them aurally.


across the stone, deathless piano performances

"Discipline is more reliable than motivation." -by a contributor on Reddit r/piano
"Success is 10% inspiration, and 90% perspiration." -by some other wise person
"Pianoteq manages to keep it all together yet simultaneously also go in all directions; like a quantum particle entangled with an unknown and spooky parallel universe simply waiting to be discovered." -by Pete14
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2857771
06/12/19 11:34 AM
06/12/19 11:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
Sample based pianos have long passed the Turing-test against real pianos when only listening to recordings. Pianoteq not so much, or at least I believe so and would bet that I can recognize a Pianoteq recording vs a real grand piano.

This particular test here contains a limited number of pianos, mostly Pianoteq and mostly edited versions of sounds from a Yamaha CLP which isn't the best piano sound frankly speaking, despite me owning a Yamaha digital piano smile It's slightly sad some established sample-based VST-s are missing, such as Garritan CFX, Vintage D, VSL libraries, Ivory, etc. Noire is IMO one of the bad examples.


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2857800
06/12/19 01:23 PM
06/12/19 01:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
MacMacMac Offline
9000 Post Club Member
MacMacMac  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
Referring to something as not too bad, or better than something much worse is a bit short of high praise, yes? smile
Originally Posted by pianophil
Thank you for the kind words , their value is increased by there rarity wink. I was really pretty happy to see that finally you like the sound of some instruments in Pianoteq (of course not all of them!).
And those were my highest rated of the PT's.

I found the others to be ...
- muffled, and some noises.
- refreshing after hearing those veiled, muffled pianos. But the sound placement moves around oddly.
- what's with the weird noises?
- how do you spell "eh"?
- this has a very artificial sound.

And I gave highest marks to my every-day piano, the Grandeur.
And lowest to the native Clav sounds from the 635. No surprise there either.

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2857804
06/12/19 01:30 PM
06/12/19 01:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,777
Northern England.
peterws Offline
7000 Post Club Member
peterws  Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,777
Northern England.
Originally Posted by StasNick
Many thanks to everyone who took part in this experiment. This gives a lot of information to think about.

It is time to reveal the names of the instruments.
(Warning: if you want to pass the blind test, then do not look under this spoiler!):


  • 01 - VST - C. Bechstein Digital Grand ---01
  • 02 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (with compression and reverb, v1) ---02
  • 03 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (with compression and reverb, v1) ---03
  • 04 - VST - Noire Felt ---04
  • 05 - VST - The Grandeur ---05
  • 06 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Upright Yamaha SU7 (with compression and reverb, v1) ---06
  • 07 - Pianoteq - Steinway D (Classical) ---07
  • 08 - Pianoteq - Steingraeber (E-272) ---08
  • 09 - Pianoteq - Grotrian (Concert Royal) ---09
  • 10 - Pianoteq - Ant Petrof (Prelude) ---10
  • 11 - Pianoteq - Bechstein DG (Prelude) ---11
  • 12 - Pianoteq - Steinway B (Prelude) ---12
  • 13 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (original, without processing) ---13
  • 14 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Upright Yamaha SU7 (original, without processing) ---14
  • 15 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (original, without processing) ---15
  • 16 - VST - The Hammersmith ---16
  • 17 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Bosendorfer (with de-noising, compression and reverb, v2) ---17
  • 18 - VST - Noire Pure ---18
  • 19 - DP Yamaha CLP-635 - Yamaha CFX (with de-noising, compression and reverb, v2) ---19



In addition, I added 4 more files (with new instruments): these are numbers from 16 to 19:
Test audio files (OGG) >>
Test audio files (MP3) >>



Very good! My fave was 17, the yamaha Bosie. I didn't score 1,4,5,15. The rest were fine in their own way. Tweaking makes a huge difference.


"I am not a man. I am a free number"

"[Linked Image]"
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: CyberGene] #2857967
06/13/19 12:05 AM
06/13/19 12:05 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 571
Celestis
Granyala Offline
500 Post Club Member
Granyala  Offline
500 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 571
Celestis
Originally Posted by CyberGene
It's slightly sad some established sample-based VST-s are missing, such as Garritan CFX, Vintage D, VSL libraries, Ivory, etc. Noire is IMO one of the bad examples.

Some other VSTi were posted later in the tread.


The backbone of modern industrial society is, and for the foreseeable future will be, the use of electrical Power.
VPC 1 -> Pianoteq 6 Std | Garritan CFX / Pearl Alto Flute 201
Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: CyberGene] #2858067
06/13/19 08:35 AM
06/13/19 08:35 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
MacMacMac Offline
9000 Post Club Member
MacMacMac  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,228
Raleigh, North Carolina
I, too, think the set is missing a lot of great ones, while over-representing some of the worst.
Originally Posted by CyberGene
It's slightly sad some established sample-based VST-s are missing, such as Garritan CFX, Vintage D, VSL libraries, Ivory, etc.
Noire is IMO one of the bad examples.
The Garritan CFX is there, though. Did you miss it?
Vintage D is not, but should be.

In all, I see ...
8 CLP635 varieties
6 Pianoteq varieties
4 Garritan CFX varieties
2 Noire varieties
1 C. Bechstein Digital Grand
1 Grandeur
1 Hammersmith
1 American Concert D


A bottom-of-the line Clav doesn't even belong on the list ... except to prove that you can do much better, eh?

Re: Blind sound test: DP vs Pianoteq vs VST instruments [Re: StasNick] #2858106
06/13/19 10:06 AM
06/13/19 10:06 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
CyberGene Offline
4000 Post Club Member
CyberGene  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,090
Sofia, Bulgaria
When I made the test it was containing only a very limited set of pianos. I think new ones were gradually added to the test, including those mentioned but I think there was not point in doing it again since the actual order of the first 15 was the same and I already knew what is what.


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Piano World 

Shop our Store for Music Lovers!
PianoSupplies.com is Piano World's Online Store
Please visit our store today.
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq Bechstein
(ad)
Faust Harrison Pianos
Faust Harrison 100+ Steinway pianos
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Boston grand
by Steven Bolstridge. 09/20/19 08:05 PM
Mozart’s D Minor Concerto
by MizuiroNinja. 09/20/19 06:52 PM
Fame Grand 200 digital
by monsieurmickey. 09/20/19 04:21 PM
What's Hot!!
Our August Newsletter is Out!
------------------
Mason & Hamlin Piano Factory Tour!

-------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
Forum Statistics
Forums41
Topics194,126
Posts2,871,471
Members94,463
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
Please Support Our Advertisers


Faust Harrison 100+ Steinways

Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver

 Best of Piano Buyer

PianoTeq Bechstein
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2019 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1