Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
That ending, in effect, starts a turnaround, aborts it, and starts it over again. The Eb7 served the function of getting you back to the tonic to start the turnaround again.
That, however, doesn't explain it's function in the first ending.
I'm not trying to be unclear but trying to start a conversation. Nahum(sp) defined it's function correctly in the first ending. In the second ending the first two times it appears it has a different but all together common function.
In the 2nd ending the turn around is not started and then aborted either, also the Eb7 doesn't get you back to the tonic in the first ending, it is just a borrowed dominant resolving to cm7(per Nahum), it does however, 'get you back to the tonic' when it resolves directly to the temporary tonal center of F(Bb/F) in the second ending. That two bar progression appears three times in a row in the second ending; the third time heading into the turn-around.
My question is; what do you think the chord progression is in the 2nd ending?
The discussion of one is intertwined with the other.
I'll try to give my thoughts:
1. I hear the second ending as: Turn around begins: I III7 iv -- pretty standard, except the III is dominant. Instead of the expected ii chord, however, the turnaround "aborts," using the IV7 to get you back to the tonic The exact same sequence repeats twice. The last time, however, after the odd IV7 chord, you go to the ii V to finish the turnaround.
This isn't a theoretical explanation; this is how I hear it. I hear a turnaround that is interrupted and then started over again.
2. I don't understand your comment or Nahum's that the Eb7 is a borrowed dominant that gets you to the C minor (the ii) chord. I'm not criticizing this; I just don't know what you mean. I don't know what a "borrowed" dominant is.
To me it does not resemble a chord progression I've ever seen.
You seem troubled by Eb7 analyzing as IV7, rather than a V7 of something else, like bVII. But that's one of the characteristics of the blues. IV7 is dominant in form (likewise I7), but doesn't have the normal dominant resolution. So it analyzes simply as IV7.
2. I don't understand your comment or Nahum's that the Eb7 is a borrowed dominant that gets you to the C minor (the ii) chord. I'm not criticizing this; I just don't know what you mean. I don't know what a "borrowed" dominant is.
Good question. Nahum answered it before. The Eb7 resolved down a perfect 5th. to Abmaj7, the iii7 of Abmaj7 is a standard substitution. The Eb7 in this case allows a nice dominant splash of color(with a standard dominant function)between the vi7 and ii7.
Take the backdoor dominant approach from Misty and re-analyze.
I don't know what you're asking. The Eb7 in Groove Merchant is not a backdoor dominant approach to anything, and can't be analyzed as such. It's a blues IV7. The "backdoor dominant" is bVII7.
The Eb7 resolved down a perfect 5th. to Abmaj7, the iii7 of Abmaj7 is a standard substitution. The Eb7 in this case allows a nice dominant splash of color(with a standard dominant function)between the vi7 and ii7.
Just to state the obvious, I disagree. Eb7 is not functioning as V7/bVII here. It's a blues IV7. IMO.
You seem troubled by Eb7 analyzing as IV7, rather than a V7 of something else, like bVII. But that's one of the characteristics of the blues. IV7 is dominant in form (likewise I7), but doesn't have the normal dominant resolution. So it analyzes simply as IV7.
Mike,
I have no problem with the IV7 in blues but I just would ask that you consider that referencing standard I7-IV7 sections of songs and thinking that they are the same as the turn-arounds and vamps as discussed in Groove Merchant is comparing apples to oranges.
One time - treat the Eb7 as a back door dominant and analyze.
I have no problem with the IV7 in blues but I just would ask that you consider that referencing standard I7-IV7 sections of songs and thinking that they are the same as the turn-arounds and vamps as discussed in Groove Merchant is comparing apples to oranges.
Sorry, either I just don't understand what you're saying or, more likely, we disagree, which is of course fine.
Originally Posted by emenelton
One time - treat the Eb7 as a back door dominant and analyze.
Emenelton: Got it. I sat down at the keyboard (in my office!) and played a dominant chord that resolved down to a minor chord a minor third lower (E.g., D7 to B-7), which is what Nahum was suggesting. It actually sounds reasonably good. Not quite a smooth as a typical V-I, but it seems to work.
Perhaps it works well in this particular turnaround because it has the III chord (after the tonic) as a dominant, which is a nice, bluesy, sound. Yet, the III7 leads naturally to a minor ii chord (G-7 in this case). It's nice to inject another dominant chord in the sequence, thus the Eb7.
Emenelton: Got it. I sat down at the keyboard (in my office!) and played a dominant chord that resolved down to a minor chord a minor third lower (E.g., D7 to B-7), which is what Nahum was suggesting. It actually sounds reasonably good. Not quite a smooth as a typical V-I, but it seems to work.
Perhaps it works well in this particular turnaround because it has the III chord (after the tonic) as a dominant, which is a nice, bluesy, sound. Yet, the III7 leads naturally to a minor ii chord (G-7 in this case). It's nice to inject another dominant chord in the sequence, thus the Eb7.
Your example of D7 to bmi7 is in the key of A.
That Eb7 in the first ending gives a nice dominant color splash that's outside the key center but resolves in a mainstream manner to the ii7/cm7, so it adds color but fits right in. The gm7 goes down a fifth naturally to the cm7 but the Eb7, in between them, resolves to the same cm7 in a stronger fashion.
Starting on the 13th bar into the 2nd ending the tonal center shifts to the V major.
This progression's tonal center is F:
I sus4 (this is a major sus4 chord with an added 6th.) - VI7 - ii7 - lowered VII dominant.
It does it three times in a row.
Or simply I-VI-ii-V7 (with the flat-VII dominant substituting as a back door dominant for the V7, I refer to this chord as a modal exchange) You can vamp on it all day until you finally decide to take door #1 out from your last Eb7 and hit the ii7-V7-I (cm7-F7-Bb7) in the tonic key to wrap up the song.
Eb7 functions in 3 different ways in Groove Merchant:
as a typical IV7 blues chord (Mike A) as a borrowed dominate when it leads to the cm7 (Nahum) as a modal exchange(back door dominant thanks MA) when it resolves up a whole step to F-sus4-add6 (per me)
excuse me I have to go back to the dentist now and have more teeth pulled! LOL
emenelton: Thanks, and I fully understand the three views. You're last comment reminded my of my piano teacher, who is mostly self-taught. When I mention one of these esoteric theory discussion she always asks: "And does it help you play better?"
Nahum: I think your chords are from the Thad Jones arrangement? While that's the most famous version of the piece, I'm not sure it reflects the "correct" chords.
In the 2nd ending, the Eb7 serves as a plain old IV7 in a Bb blues. It is indeed an interrupted resolution trying to get back home to Bb, which in this context sounds good (as do all 'endless' turnarounds). It is sprinkled in for a bluesy taste. No other function.
Last edited by erichlof; 12/09/1601:26 PM. Reason: Mistake about Db7 (my bad)
emenelton: Thanks, and I fully understand the three views. You're last comment reminded my of my piano teacher, who is mostly self-taught. When I mention one of these esoteric theory discussion she always asks: "And does it help you play better?"
Nahum: I think your chords are from the Thad Jones arrangement? While that's the most famous version of the piece, I'm not sure it reflects the "correct" chords.
That chart is essentially the same chords. The #f is the same as the D7. For me it does help me play better. When I can understand that second ending as a I-VI7-ii7-VII7 Thats' a basic vamp that should be really familiar, so I'll practice it until I hear that familiarity.
Even Nahum's latest example does reinforce that the tonal center has moved to the fifth degree for the first six bars of the second ending.
In the 2nd ending, the Eb7 serves as a plain old IV7 in a Bb blues. It is indeed an interrupted resolution trying to get back home to Bb, which in this context sounds good (as do all 'endless' turnarounds). It is sprinkled in for a bluesy taste. No other function.
That was really nice. Thanks for posting it. Are you saying the chord before the cm7, 4 measures from the end of the 2nd ending, is a Db7 and not an Eb7?
Hi emenelton, at first I thought I heard a Db7 in the original track, slipping down to a C7. That would be a classic tritone substitution dominant for G7. Upon closer inspection of the original recording however, they are indeed playing an Eb7, which in this case because of the extended blues form (16 bar blues rather than 12 bar blues), functions as a plain old IV7 wherever it pops up. It makes the listener want to hear the resolution to Bb, but denies that, instead moving to either C7, or in the case of the 2nd ending, Bb/F - which is not really a definite resolution.
Typically the same technique is used in classical period instrumental concertos. Right before the big solo cadenza, you will hear a Eb - Bb/F in the case of a concerto in Bb Major. It's 'sort of' satisfying, but leads you on a continuing path through the soloist's cadenza, until the final definite resolution of Bb at the end of the form.
![[Linked Image]](http://s929.photobucket.com/user/jazzman1945/media/img28_zpsw9goubxz.jpg.html)
