Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
You would do the board a great favor if you could simply try and report back.
Ah and by the way just add an acoustic piano to the test so we can have the next acoustic vs. digital thread based on proper evidence.
I'm considering driving to my nearest Kawai dealer to perform such a test, but I'm not sure the dealer will allow for me to water-down his pianos. If he does allow for the aforementioned test, I will douse a CA-97 and a Shigeru in water, wait for a few minutes, and then play-test the instruments.
On page 5 you can get a coat made of squirrels for $100!
Kawai CA95 / Steinberg UR22 / Sony MDR-7506 / Pianoteq Stage + Grotrian, Bluethner / Galaxy Vintage D / CFX Lite In the loft: Roland FP3 / Tannoy Reveal Active / K&M 18810
So the key surfaces on the CA95 "absorb moisture":
But the new CA97 surfaces "resist moisture".
Which is it, Kawai??
The first video is correct - the key surfaces absorb moisture.
Thank you for posting the video, by the way.
Cheers, James x
I wonder, if we are going to be pedantic, is it really correct ? I would have thought it may be adsorption is what is actually happening how the keys deal with moisture. Resistant would to me indicate it acts as a repellent, a material with hydrophobic properties, then any water molecules would just stay on the top of the keys, so doubt it's that. On the other hand I shudder to think what absorption would do on a chemical level to the key tops, doesn't sound right to me and not a good design long term to prevent deterioration. There again, it may be okay given a lifetime they are designed to last for.
In any case, pedantic points aside, In both cases I would have taken it to mean that the keys are designed to help with sweaty hands and preventing slip, something like that. It's not something I would get hung up on, besides, it would probably be a common issue for a lot of buyers to never have heard of adsorption, even if that is what is primarily at work.
Selftaught since June 2014. Books: Barratt classic piano course bk 1,2,3. Humphries Piano handbook, various... Kawai CA78, Casio AP450 & software pianos. 12x ABF recitals. My struggles: https://soundcloud.com/alexander-borro
In any case, pedantic points aside, In both cases I would have taken it to mean that the keys are designed to help with sweaty hands and preventing slip, something like that. It's not something I would get hung up on, besides, it would probably be a common issue for a lot of buyers to never have heard of adsorption, even if that is what is primarily at work.
I don't think it's really pedantic. If it doesn't do what it says (as it can't if it claims to both "resist" and "absorb"), it's false advertising. This does matter: you can't just make stuff up about your product to get people to buy it.
According to a patent that was dug up in a previous thread, the plastic of the white key surface contains powdered silica gel. Hence, if it's doing anything, as you correctly surmise, it's adsorbing (not absorbing) moisture. However since...
1) water can only be adsorbed by grains at the surface, so the volume adsorbed must be really tiny, limited to the thickness of a powder grain and the % of surface area consisting of these grains 2) silica gel needs to be heated to oven-temperatures to desiccate it after hydration
... I would bet that the silica at the surface becomes hydrated immediately after production from moisture in the air, and it's unlikely that any water is adsorbed during the keys' playing life.
Originally Posted by toddy
...otherwise, the keys may simply be easier to grip, which would makes sense, I suppose.
Possible, but actually my smooth-plastic Roland keys have a better grip (just like you can grip glass which is perfectly smooth). More likely it makes the surface rougher and therefore more ivory-like. Personally I'm not sure I've ever played a piano with real ivory; nor do I have any desire to. Sawn up bits of tooth. Gross.
Kawai CA95 / Steinberg UR22 / Sony MDR-7506 / Pianoteq Stage + Grotrian, Bluethner / Galaxy Vintage D / CFX Lite In the loft: Roland FP3 / Tannoy Reveal Active / K&M 18810
"...Is there such a thing as moisture-absorbing plastic?..."
There are contact lenses. So the answer is, "Yes." How useful it will be to know that is another matter.
I find that the surface on the keys of my Kawai is nicer to touch than that of ordinary acrylic keytops. Not too slick, not too rough. Besides the surface itself, there is a subtle patterning. I suppose if your fingers are really wet, it might help them grip the keys the way the pattern on your tires helps them grip the road.
But, I have spent time just looking intently at the acrylic-topped keys on my MP8ii, noticing how carefully Kawai has treated all the surfaces, edges, etc. Very nice job.
I wouldn't want piano keys to absorb moisture. Would you?
Knowing that a keyboard was impregnated with the bodily fluids of its owner would probably lower its resale value. Could be helpful for those looking for a cheap used instrument.
Contact lenses are porous. They're meant to be that way. But are piano keys porous? Nope. Just solid plastic.
Regardless ... I wouldn't want piano keys to absorb moisture. Would you?
Isn't this exactly the point: the DP makers positively crow about using some high technology plastic, perhaps similar to contact lenses, which absorbs 'bodily fluids' as it was termed above:
Synthetic ivory differs from the plastic keys because it has more texture and will absorb some sweat. In general, it wouldn’t be wrong to say that this will be a better option for people who have sweaty hands.
Digital Music Instruments
...feel of ivory acoustic piano keys providing a familiar stability and comfort to the pianist. The keys are designed to absorb moisture....
Roland
Ivory Touch key surfaces are engineered with a painstaking attention to detail, so not only does the fine microtexture feel just like the real thing, your key surfaces also colour naturally and absorb moisture from your finger tips, giving you sublime control over every note you play.
Well, the keys on my seven-year-old Yamaha are still white. Their surfaces did not "colour naturally and absorb moisture from your finger tips". They're still as white as snow. And I'm glad of it.
Do other keyboards absorb? I doubt it. But regardless ... would manufacturers please spend more time improving their pianos? And spend less time BS trumpeting their (not) absorbent keytops?
Well, the keys on my seven-year-old Yamaha are still white. Their surfaces did not "colour naturally and absorb moisture from your finger tips". They're still as white as snow. And I'm glad of it.
Ah, but did you get a piano with ivory textured keys?
Yes - like on mine. Actually, I find they have enough texture for the fingers not to slip, and if anything, they will probably last longer than the ivory type before their surface erodes.
I refuse to buy pianos with "synthetic ivory keytops" since most used keys on my Kawai ES7 became shiny after just a few months of playing. Now my regular "plastic" Yamaha keys look like new regardless of how much I play.