Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.7 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Best of Piano Buyer
 Best of Piano Buyer
(ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
What's Hot!!
PIANO TEACHERS Please read this!
-------------------
European Tour for Piano Lovers
JOIN US FOR THE TOUR!
--------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
Find a Professional
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Advertise on Piano World

Who's Online Now
75 registered members (Alex_G, ando, amad23, Beowulf, Beemer, 26 invisible), 1,002 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 18 of 21 1 2 16 17 18 19 20 21
Re: Rubenstein Competition [Re: hreichgott] #2283907
05/31/14 09:06 PM
05/31/14 09:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
F
fnork Offline
2000 Post Club Member
fnork  Offline
2000 Post Club Member
F

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
Originally Posted by hreichgott
Martin, I agree. Programs might even become *gasp* more... entertaining...

so true! frederic chiu sort of went that way at the cliburn - didnt advance, unfortunately!
Speaking of humour, not everyone seems able to convey that at all - several people programmed Haydn but not much of it had any humour...The winner's Haydn (1st round I think) seemed fairly dull to me.

Piano & Music Gifts & Accessories (570)
Piano accessories and music gift items
Re: Rubenstein Competition [Re: bennevis] #2283927
05/31/14 10:34 PM
05/31/14 10:34 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22,298
New York
Mark_C Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Mark_C  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22,298
New York
Originally Posted by bennevis
....if I see a recital program where miniatures....
The only exception to this, IMO, is in all-Chopin recitals....where, because Chopin's best music isn't large-scale, programming of groups of unrelated miniatures is usual.

....although such recitals usually (I think usually) do have at least one of the sonatas, plus, additionally (redundancy for emphasis) grin usually at least a couple of the other pieces aren't that "small scale" either.


Regarding the suspicion that has been expressed about a couple of the members: While I do find it hard (still) to take some of the information at face value (including that if I were forced to bet one way or the other about the piano selection for the finals, I'd bet that what has been stated here isn't a full representation and is at least somewhat misleading), I don't see anything that suggests deviousness or otherwise untoward forum behavior.

Be that as it may, I appreciate the contributions from the new people, as well as the general discussion of Faziolis and Steinways.

I think WR's analogy of Steinway-Fazioli to Erard-Pleyel is very interesting, and from my admittedly limited experience with Faziolis, it has at least some validity. My only experience was in the first Chicago amateur competition (2010), two different Faziolis. We discussed it quite a bit in the thread on that event, starting with this post and continuing in many other posts, including these of mine: this one and this one and this one ....and this from SlatterFan, and this from Cinnamonbear who was in the audience.

Re: Rubenstein Competition [Re: fnork] #2284008
06/01/14 02:35 AM
06/01/14 02:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 12
P
pianistric Offline
Junior Member
pianistric  Offline
Junior Member
P

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 12
Agreed, the repertoire choice was regrettable for several young contenders, even sometimes when programming "miniatures" or shorter major works. One first-rounder played Beet 32 Variations in c-minor followed by Rach Moments Musicaux. Better to have sandwiched something, a lighter, poetic Liszt, or, indeed, Chopin mazurkas (while we're at it!)or Ravel, from "Miroirs" -or Debussy, etc, then ending with two or three of the Rach for a big-guns finish. As it was, we had two severe minor-keyish lumps, inadequate to show his possible range. One interesting player shot himself in the foot programming Grieg Sonata,(welcome rarity but difficult to convince an audience),followed by TEN(10!!!)pieces from Romeo&Juliet of Prokofiev. I love this work but wouldn't dream of forcing it on a competition audience; three would have made an excellent group....

Others had little idea of the "flow" of a program, dishing out hard lumps of contemporary, (compulsory piece)followed by Carl Vine, or Corigliano with Prok 7th! However well played, these can be indigestible together.

Szymanowski Variations op 3 had a lovely poetic interpretation, then Haydn then Liszt, (Leggierezza & Petrarca104),ending with S-S/Liszt Danse Macabre. This was ideal in every way to illustrate your point; contrasting flavors, showing many aspects of the player's capacities.

I do agree about the "dosage" of pieces and some composers provide gifts, Debussy, Fauré, Chabrier, Tchaikovsky, Skriabin, Smetana... as well as the Medtner you mentioned, plus certain Brahms, Schumann.... I remember programs where the construction was an art and a pleasure in itself; Cherkassky was a particular master of this art.

Thank you for the Babayan interview link, most fascinating.

Re: Rubenstein Competition [Re: patfried] #2284022
06/01/14 03:45 AM
06/01/14 03:45 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 18
J
johnbroadwood Offline
Junior Member
johnbroadwood  Offline
Junior Member
J

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 18
Originally Posted by patfried
Originally Posted by johnbroadwood
Originally Posted by Hakki
I am with Marty on this.
These last posts from new comers seem to be part of brand promoting efforts.
Probably from a single user under different names.


Wow.

The fact is: that Fazioli was kept somewhere else -not in the store- before it went to the competition and lots of people played it there. I am one of them. And i know the Steinway from other occasions.

I became a member to contribute to a discussion about something i happened to have an experience with, without any intention to get into a Steinway vs. Fazioli fight or any fight about any piano in the first place. I have no connection to any store, company or brand but my nickname. I wasn't even discussing about where the Fazioli came from when my comments about both pianos and finalists apparently made another user so angry that he felt the need of "defending" Fazioli.


Nobody has been angry at you. I even already apologized once in case my reply sounded angry at you and explaining that it wasn't. Why do you keep fixed on that? Maybe you missed my reply?


No, sorry, i confused your nicknames and thought it was the same person again, and in that case i obviously don't mean you.

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Minnesota Marty] #2284026
06/01/14 04:34 AM
06/01/14 04:34 AM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,788
H
Hakki Offline
3000 Post Club Member
Hakki  Offline
3000 Post Club Member
H

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,788


This is from the 2011 Busoni competition where he won 2nd prize.
(BTW, nicely tuned and voiced piano sound here)

I revisited his stage I and stage II performances of the Rubinstein competition. It is apparent that his priority is clarity, perfection, and distinct phrasing, as if he is recording a CD in the studio. This leads to a cautious and fragmented playing at times. But the jurors saw him as a safe bet.

On a side note it is interesting in the above video how the conductor is trying hard to keep up with the soloist. Whereas in the Rubinstein, the conductor at the romantic concertos just wanted the soloists to obey him and follow the orchestra. He was not interested in what the soloists were doing.

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Hakki] #2284031
06/01/14 05:12 AM
06/01/14 05:12 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 21
P
patfried Offline
Full Member
patfried  Offline
Full Member
P

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 21
aaahh, the Busoni... one of my least favourite competitions. I also had some insights into it some times, and have known jurors there. Among all the big competitions, I don't know why but this one often ends up being one of the dirtiests. I did miss that edition, though, so I can't share anything about that one.

BUT..I was there last year, and there were good stories! laugh You should check last year's final concerto round if you can. It was probably the worst final I have ever heard in professional music competitions (not just piano). A certain Rodolfo Leone, local hero with half the hability or charisma of Colafelice, cheating his way through Rach 3 and getting rewarded with 2nd Prize without 1st for it; The 3rd Prize was shared by a talented Japanese called Sakiya who at least tried an honest fight against Rach 3 as well (but unfortunately lost miserably, poor fella), and Shiskin massacring Tchaikovsky note by note (he was here in the first round of the Rubinstein). It was embarrassing to watch that final. By the way, Maria Mazo was also there (and won a minor prize i think) but surprisingly wasn't allowed into the last concerto round (only 3 people play). I know that there was a big fight among the jurors then, with some people giving her top marks and some other actually giving her zeroes (source: jurors themselves). Rather strange. Had she been allowed to play her concerto there and had she played half as good as she did here she should easily have been a Busoni 1st Prize Winner by now. That girl isn't the luckiest, really.

P.S. Another anecdote: I remember hearing Shiskin's Mozart concerto in the pre-final round. He banged it like a machine gun. It was really awful, I certainly assumed he was the worst of the 6 candidates and had lost his chances to be in the last final. Well, not only he did pass, he was awarded the Special Prize for the Best Mozart Concerto laugh That's competitions for you, my friends.

Last edited by patfried; 06/01/14 07:50 AM.
Re: Rubenstein Competition [Re: pianistric] #2284092
06/01/14 09:54 AM
06/01/14 09:54 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,330
B
bennevis Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
bennevis  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
B

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,330
Originally Posted by pianistric
Agreed, the repertoire choice was regrettable for several young contenders, even sometimes when programming "miniatures" or shorter major works. One first-rounder played Beet 32 Variations in c-minor followed by Rach Moments Musicaux. Better to have sandwiched something, a lighter, poetic Liszt, or, indeed, Chopin mazurkas (while we're at it!)or Ravel, from "Miroirs" -or Debussy, etc, then ending with two or three of the Rach for a big-guns finish. As it was, we had two severe minor-keyish lumps, inadequate to show his possible range. One interesting player shot himself in the foot programming Grieg Sonata,(welcome rarity but difficult to convince an audience),followed by TEN(10!!!)pieces from Romeo&Juliet of Prokofiev. I love this work but wouldn't dream of forcing it on a competition audience; three would have made an excellent group....


I do agree about the "dosage" of pieces and some composers provide gifts, Debussy, Fauré, Chabrier, Tchaikovsky, Skriabin, Smetana... as well as the Medtner you mentioned, plus certain Brahms, Schumann.... I remember programs where the construction was an art and a pleasure in itself; Cherkassky was a particular master of this art.


I had been to quite a few Cherkassky concerts - he always programmed a big work or two (e.g. Pictures, Bartók's Sonata, Chopin's 4 Ballades etc). His renowned encores pieces were just that - encores, not part of the main program. I've never known him to program miniatures as the main dish.

It all goes to show that one man's meat is another man's poison - Corigliano's Etude Fantasy followed by Vine followed by a Prok War Sonata is a great program for me: they're all in completely different styles. Similarly, Beethoven's C minor Variations followed by the complete Rach Op.16 is a nice 45-minute program, IMO.

But I agree about the Grieg Sonata - it's really not heavyweight enough to make people's ears prick up. Nor Sibelius's Sonata either. But Nielsen's Chaconne would be fine, if only someone would play it.


"I don't play accurately - anyone can play accurately - but I play with wonderful expression. As far as the piano is concerned, sentiment is my forte. I keep science for Life."
Re: Rubenstein Competition [Re: bennevis] #2284121
06/01/14 11:34 AM
06/01/14 11:34 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 12
P
pianistric Offline
Junior Member
pianistric  Offline
Junior Member
P

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 12
Fair enough, the audience's poison might also be my meat, (Corigliano/Vine/Prok, etc,)but i was working more on what Babayan spoke about. In this case, much of the audience switched off, not appreciating the style contrasts enough. The Beet/Rach program if played fantastically, (it wasn't), might make the right effect, but if half the jurors are indifferent to Rach, then disapprove of his Beet style, his "only two shots" are wasted. In competition terms, more variety would surely have helped him.

Cherkassky certainly programmed the Solid Lumps, but also many miniatures. Skriabin prelude groups, Saint-Saens études, Tchaik Dumka and Theme&Variations, Mendelssohn Prels&Fugs, SongsWithout Words, Paderewski Theme & Hairyvations, Chabrier Bourrée Fantasque, Weber Polacca Brilliant.... plus oddities such as Berkeley Preludes, Bennett Etudes, Shockhausen IX, Messiaen Ile de Feu.... many more in this vein, all on the program! You may have just caught him in Big Lump Mode each time, cos that could happen too, 4Ballades 4Scherzi Pick Chewers at an Exhib, Brahms Hairyvations, (Pandel or Hag), f-minor sonata.

A "Russian Season" program once:

Tchaik Gmaj sonata
Prok 7
Muss pictures
Balak Tarantella
Islamey
5 encores:
Skr Etude c#min
Shost Polka
Cherkassky Prelude Pathetique
Liadov (?)
RimskyRach FlightBumblebee

That's certainly in Big Lump Mode; til the encores.

I've managed to get to four performances of Nielsen Chaconne:
John Ogdon
Martin Roscoe
A student
A student.........!

Great piece.



Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: patfried] #2284143
06/01/14 12:35 PM
06/01/14 12:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22,298
New York
Mark_C Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Mark_C  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22,298
New York
Originally Posted by patfried
.....I remember hearing Shiskin's Mozart concerto in the pre-final round [of last year's Busoni Competition]. He banged it like a machine gun. It was really awful, I certainly assumed he was the worst of the 6 candidates and had lost his chances to be in the last final. Well, not only he did pass, he was awarded the Special Prize for the Best Mozart Concerto laugh That's competitions for you, my friends.

Sometimes people tell a new member (or an old one) that he/she ought to say more about who he/she is. I've rarely (maybe never) felt anything like it myself before in all my 200 years here grin but I've got to say, if you're saying things like that, IMO indeed you'd better say more about who you are. Your posts have had hints -- we know that you have some familiarity with the piano scene, that you've been to competitions (in one capacity or another), and that you've been in a position to speak with jurors. But if you're saying stuff like the above in addition to trashing other aspects of competitions (or close to trashing, if you think that's too strong a word), IMO you really ought to say more -- at the very least, more about what you are, but actually I think that when you're doing criticisms of the sort that you're doing, it's frankly a bit cowardly to hide behind any anonymity at all, and I think you ought to say exactly who you are -- or else tone down this kind of trashing.

About the specifics of that situation: First of all, it seems to me highly likely that what you said is at least an exaggeration. Moreover, it doesn't say anything about other aspects of the performance. All we get, really, is that you felt it was too loud, too percussive, and insensitive -- and sure, that's a lot, but, besides seeming like at least an exaggeration, it doesn't tell us anything about other aspects, including things that juries might legitimately give great weight. Speaking just theoretically, since I don't know anything of that performance, I'm going to take a guess that I'd put a few nickels on: His rhythms and rhythmic sense were terrific -- not just spot on, but sparkling and interesting. And if not that, then something else, like his overall conception of the piece, including relations among the movements and among sections of movements.

Huge digression coming.....and therefore in small print....

I was at part of the first amateur Cliburn competition just as an audience member, and then was glad to learn that recordings of the entire competition were available. I'd never known of any such thing before. I saw the CD's as an opportunity to do a little "study" of what priorities the jury emphasized in its decisions.

I mentioned before that I think juries generally hear more than most other listeners, including other sophisticated listeners. Even granting that sometimes juries might make mistakes, including bad ones, and that perhaps sometimes the decisions can be corrupt (and indeed in that competition there was some strong feeling in that direction), I thought that a reasonable best bet was to assume that there was good rationale behind the very great majority of the decisions -- and I thought I could learn from listening to the performances, knowing which ones were advanced or not advanced. I also just found it interesting to study them in such a way. Granted, the 'study' had enormous limitations, the main one being that it was limited by what I (not exactly the most expert listener) could discern. It wouldn't hold any scientific water. Plus, the considerations in an amateur competition are hardly the same as in a professional one. Still, I felt that what I found was significant at least in that setting, and more importantly, it gave me an awareness and insight into aspects of music-making beyond anything I'd had before and (I felt) gave me a huge leap in being able to appreciate different levels of playing.


What I felt I found was that besides the most basic criterion of "Can the person really play the piece," which is not highly applicable in professional competitions, the main criterion by far seemed to be rhythm -- not just accuracy/precision but perhaps even more so, having and showing a creative and personal understanding of what the rhythms on the page are conveying. I realize that this is a very pregnant sentence grin but I'll just leave it at that for now, except to add that it involves things like exact lengths of written note values, different kinds of articulations of different-length notes, tiny ebbs and flows of speed where appropriate, and of course choices of tempos. And since then, I've found that this correlates very highly (at least for me) with my impression of musicians' playing in general. The way I've sometimes put it -- an exaggeration, of course smile -- is that what notes you play aren't as important as when you play them.

Admittedly, one of the other things I 'found' was that a very important criterion was "absence of ugly," and from what you said, that pianist perhaps -- perhaps -- should have been failed on that ground. But in any event, in your account I don't see any wonderment about "what may it have been that they saw," which is how I'd try to approach such a situation, rather than just thinking "the jury made an awful and ridiculous decision."

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Minnesota Marty] #2284149
06/01/14 12:50 PM
06/01/14 12:50 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,788
H
Hakki Offline
3000 Post Club Member
Hakki  Offline
3000 Post Club Member
H

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,788

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Hakki] #2284152
06/01/14 12:55 PM
06/01/14 12:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22,298
New York
Mark_C Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Mark_C  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22,298
New York
Originally Posted by Hakki

Thanks!!

Starting to listen.....and what I can easily determine immediately is that the prior characterization was not merely an exaggeration, but completely and utterly wrong, misleading, and.....it is taking great restraint not to say b___s___.

BTW, FWIW: I didn't know before which Mozart concerto he played. This happens to be one that I know very well. It was the first Mozart concerto that I learned. What we're hearing here is absolutely lovely Mozart playing -- no resemblance whatsoever to what was posted before, and I feel no need to append an "IMO" on that. The description was way, way off.


Pat: If the rest of what you've said about this-that-and-the-other is as accurate as what you said about this Mozart.....well......


P.S. Anyone know who wrote the cadenza that he plays in the 1st mvt?

Last edited by Mark_C; 06/01/14 01:03 PM.
Re: Rubenstein Competition [Re: Minnesota Marty] #2284153
06/01/14 01:03 PM
06/01/14 01:03 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 18
J
johnbroadwood Offline
Junior Member
johnbroadwood  Offline
Junior Member
J

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 18
There are certain problems with using short pieces and making a more varied program (which aren't necessarily the same thing).

The main problem is that a lot of (maybe the majority of) short pieces are actually parts of bigger cycles but they're only known as separate pieces. Meaning, you might lose some of the "esprit" of a piece when you take it out of its context. One of the best examples i know for that is Rachmaninoff Op. 23 ten preludes, which has a structure as a whole that can't be overlooked and the whole thing is very very rarely played (i guess mostly because no. 9, though).

There are different types of musicians; some have magnificent ability and intellect to maintain a dramaturgy throughout a work of a big scale, some are miniature artists and fascinate their audience within a small piece. Therefore i don't think there's a right way to create a program. Because there isn't one effect that a program should make. You may want to keep your audience awake and entertained, or to challenge them and force them to think (which is very rarely the case in competitions), or make them get up at the end of the concert and cheer, or you may want to leave them in tears. Not every concert has to be very "attractive" and audience-friendly, i think that's a bit too hollywood-esque thinking.

And needless to say, one person is allowed to do different types of programs on different occasions.

But when it comes to competitions, of course you can't "challenge" your audience too much. That would be risky, not wrong though.

And although having a varied program in a competition has certain advantages, it also means giving more options to the jury to dislike things.

I have no answer to the question "what should an ideal program be like". You can do anything if your reason behind doing something is clear and convincing. Anything.

Last edited by johnbroadwood; 06/01/14 01:11 PM.
Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Mark_C] #2284164
06/01/14 01:38 PM
06/01/14 01:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
F
fnork Offline
2000 Post Club Member
fnork  Offline
2000 Post Club Member
F

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
Originally Posted by Mark_C
P.S. Anyone know who wrote the cadenza that he plays in the 1st mvt?

Remember in whose name the competition is? You might have a clue there laugh

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Mark_C] #2284165
06/01/14 01:44 PM
06/01/14 01:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
F
fnork Offline
2000 Post Club Member
fnork  Offline
2000 Post Club Member
F

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
Originally Posted by Mark_C
Thanks!!

Starting to listen.....and what I can easily determine immediately is that the prior characterization was not merely an exaggeration, but completely and utterly wrong, misleading, and.....it is taking great restraint not to say b___s___.

BTW, FWIW: I didn't know before which Mozart concerto he played. This happens to be one that I know very well. It was the first Mozart concerto that I learned. What we're hearing here is absolutely lovely Mozart playing -- no resemblance whatsoever to what was posted before, and I feel no need to append an "IMO" on that. The description was way, way off.

Well, it was off, but yours is leaning rather too much in the other direction. Describing it as 'lovely Mozart playing' also sounds like a gross exaggeration for a mostly dull and characterless (but accurate) rendition.

btw, here is how lively the piece can sound performed by someone who got to substitute another pianist on not much more than a weeks notice wink http://vimeo.com/96182376

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: fnork] #2284177
06/01/14 02:02 PM
06/01/14 02:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22,298
New York
Mark_C Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Mark_C  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22,298
New York
Originally Posted by fnork
Well, it was off....

Glad you agree on that. grin
And that was the main point. If you feel I'm wrong that it wasn't just off but way, way off, OK smile although I hold to my view, and I suspect you agree that "banging it like a machine gun" has no resemblance to the actual performance. I do think it's lovely Mozart playing, and indeed beyond lovely. It's possible for a performance to be "lovely" but without the beauty, sophistication (including in the rhythmic treatments, as I had guessed), and (IMO!) Mozartean 'perfection' that I find in this performance. I'm surprised you find it dull and characterless, but OK. That's subjective. I'm not sure "banging it like a machine gun" can be defended on subjectivity.

P.S. Thanks for the 'hint' on whose cadenza that is. ha

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Mark_C] #2284186
06/01/14 02:12 PM
06/01/14 02:12 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,788
H
Hakki Offline
3000 Post Club Member
Hakki  Offline
3000 Post Club Member
H

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,788
Originally Posted by Mark_C
...the prior characterization was not merely an exaggeration, but completely and utterly wrong, misleading, and.....it is taking great restraint not to say b___s___.



+1 thumb

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Mark_C] #2284191
06/01/14 02:23 PM
06/01/14 02:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
F
fnork Offline
2000 Post Club Member
fnork  Offline
2000 Post Club Member
F

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
Originally Posted by Mark_C
Glad you agree on that. grin
And that was the main point. If you feel I'm wrong that it wasn't just off but way, way off, OK smile although I hold to my view, and I suspect you agree that "banging it like a machine gun" has no resemblance to the actual performance. I do think it's lovely Mozart playing, and indeed beyond lovely. It's possible for a performance to be "lovely" but without the beauty, sophistication (including in the rhythmic treatments, as I had guessed), and (IMO!) Mozartean 'perfection' that I find in this performance. I'm surprised you find it dull and characterless, but OK. That's subjective. I'm not sure "banging it like a machine gun" can be defended on subjectivity.

P.S. Thanks for the 'hint' on whose cadenza that is. ha

Haha, 'banging like a machine-gun' was a rather funny description indeed. As for the performance, it was perfectly alright and even had some nice touches, but it came across as somewhat rigid and unflexible to me, and without any major contrasts anywhere. The F# minor section in the last movement is one of many spots where you'd expect a character change, but he sort of just went on in the same manner as previously.

Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: fnork] #2284199
06/01/14 02:39 PM
06/01/14 02:39 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 18
J
johnbroadwood Offline
Junior Member
johnbroadwood  Offline
Junior Member
J

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 18
Originally Posted by fnork
... it was perfectly alright and even had some nice touches, but it came across as somewhat rigid and unflexible to me, and without any major contrasts anywhere. The F# minor section in the last movement is one of many spots where you'd expect a character change, but he sort of just went on in the same manner as previously.


That's exactly what was wrong with him in Rubinstein. Probably it was more obvious because he played the Waldstein.


Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: Minnesota Marty] #2284217
06/01/14 03:04 PM
06/01/14 03:04 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,788
H
Hakki Offline
3000 Post Club Member
Hakki  Offline
3000 Post Club Member
H

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,788
Shishkin - Waldstein

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=GF1h2L56ba0#t=3147

One of his major drawback is that he relies too much on the una corda pedal. Instead he should have created the shadings using his touch in some places. He is not pressing the keys all the way down sometimes. And overall too metronomic playing. Though his playing is very accurate.

Last edited by Hakki; 06/01/14 03:27 PM.
Re: Rubinstein Competition [Re: johnbroadwood] #2284244
06/01/14 03:37 PM
06/01/14 03:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
F
fnork Offline
2000 Post Club Member
fnork  Offline
2000 Post Club Member
F

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,102
Helsinki, Finland
Originally Posted by johnbroadwood
Originally Posted by fnork
... it was perfectly alright and even had some nice touches, but it came across as somewhat rigid and unflexible to me, and without any major contrasts anywhere. The F# minor section in the last movement is one of many spots where you'd expect a character change, but he sort of just went on in the same manner as previously.


That's exactly what was wrong with him in Rubinstein. Probably it was more obvious because he played the Waldstein.

Certainly - tried listening through a bit of that performance, and while he did get into it after a while, it came across as mediocre in so many ways. some pp's came out louder than p's, crescendi to subito piano were ignored, sforzati ignored, the overall dynamic scale was surprisingly small. THIS was the best they could find at the last Busoni competition?

Page 18 of 21 1 2 16 17 18 19 20 21

Moderated by  Brendan, Kreisler 

(ad)
Faust Harrison Pianos
Faust Harrison 100+ Steinways
(ad)
Sweetwater - Keyboards
Sweetwater Keyboard Deals
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq Bechstein
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Lisner Piano
by GoldenTiger. 02/17/19 06:27 AM
Key lubricant for a digital piano
by Harlequinmusic. 02/16/19 10:14 PM
Query - Serenade (Rachmaninoff)
by Moo :). 02/16/19 09:28 PM
CLIMATE CHANGE
by MICHAEL122. 02/16/19 09:15 PM
live performance-Tanya Gabrielian, Live @ KPG
by supersport. 02/16/19 08:01 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums40
Topics190,318
Posts2,796,026
Members92,485
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Please Support Our Advertisers
Faust Harrison 100+ Steinways

Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver

Sweetwater

 Best of Piano Buyer

PianoTeq Bechstein
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2019 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.2