2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
48 members (AlkansBookcase, Carey, CharlesXX, bcalvanese, colinvda, Adam Reynolds, cascadia, ChickenBrother, CrashTest, 6 invisible), 2,153 guests, and 304 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 20 of 38 1 2 18 19 20 21 22 37 38
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
OK, I did not look at the answers yet, if that is what Kees long post is. Here are the M3s that seemed slower than the one below:

F#3
G3
A3
B3
D3
F4

It was so wierd listening for just an interval being out of sequence instead of the more necessary and practical and difficult job of deciding which note(s) should be adjusted and in what direction. I really have only about 80% confidence in my results.


Jeff Deutschle
Part-Time Tuner
Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
Originally Posted by UnrightTooner
.....

Here are the M3s that seemed slower than the one below:

F#3
G3
A3
B3
D3
F4

.....


Originally Posted by DoelKees
.....

Measured M3 beatrates

F3A 6.7
F#A# 7.0
GB 7.1
G#C 8.6 (large jump concides with mini-break)
AC# 8.8
A#D 8.9
BD# 9.9
C4E 9.2 (here we've crossed the mini-break)
C#F 9.5
DF# 10.0
D#G 10.9
EG# 12.0
F4A 11.0 (here A was measured on partial 1)

.....

Kees


Huh! I guess I suck at this!


Jeff Deutschle
Part-Time Tuner
Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,082

Silver Supporter until December 19, 2014
2000 Post Club Member
Offline

Silver Supporter until December 19, 2014
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,082
Originally Posted by DoelKees

I might if there were more responses. I guess it's easier to claim to be able to accurately hear beat speeds than to actually demonstrate this.

Kees


Was enjoying this exchange until the unnecessary non causa pro causa. Doesn't exactly motivate one to participation.


Bob W.
Piano Technician (Retired since 2006)
Conway, Arkansas
www.pianotechno.blogspot.com
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
Fwiw, if you use the beatrates of F3-A3 and F4-A4 and construct a logarithmic curve (as you would expect beatrates to behave) this is the result compared to how tunelab tuned:

Measured M3 beatrates

F3A 6.7 -- 6.7
F#A# 7.0 -- 7.0
GB 7.1 -- 7.3
G#C 8.6 -- 7.6 (large jump concides with mini-break)
AC# 8.8 -- 7.9
A#D 8.9 -- 8.2
BD# 9.9 -- 8.5
C4E 9.2 -- 8.9 (here we've crossed the mini-break)
C#F 9.5 -- 9.3
DF# 10.0 -- 9.7
D#G 10.9 -- 10.1
EG# 12.0 -- 10.6
F4A 11.0 -- 11.0 (here A was measured on partial 1)

As I have mentioned before, the beatrate of M3s less than double each octave. In this case the multiplier is 1.64.

[Edit:] Hmm, but if you ignore F4-A4 you get a multiplier of 1.89 and the following beatrate curve:

Measured M3 beatrates

F3A 6.7 -- 6.7
F#A# 7.0 -- 7.1
GB 7.1 -- 7.4
G#C 8.6 -- 7.9 (large jump concides with mini-break)
AC# 8.8 -- 8.3
A#D 8.9 -- 8.7
BD# 9.9 -- 9.2
C4E 9.2 -- 9.7 (here we've crossed the mini-break)
C#F 9.5 -- 10.2
DF# 10.0 -- 10.8
D#G 10.9 -- 11.4
EG# 12.0 -- 12.0
F4A 11.0 -- 12.6 (here A was measured on partial 1)

[2nd Edit:] Was I actually comparing, in my mind, what the progression should have been rather than the absolute difference in beatrates ...? ...? ...?



Last edited by UnrightTooner; 10/29/13 10:14 AM.

Jeff Deutschle
Part-Time Tuner
Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 551
P
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 551
Originally Posted by DoelKees
Originally Posted by Chris Storch
Kees,

Was there a prize for the technician who guessed right?

I be curious to know if there was are wire size changes that coincide with the step changes in IH you measured.

The premise was that technicians don't have to guess but can hear those beatrates very accurately, which does not seem to be the case from the limited data posted. No wire size change that I can measure.

Kees


I was pretty damn close!

Quote
The first three thirds sound the same speed to me, G3-B3 sounds perhaps a fraction slower than the preceeding two. (6.7, 7.0,7.1 are the speeds, G3-B3 is a fraction slower than I would expect but not slower than the preceeding one.)
The next progress fine.
C-E and C#-F are slower than the preceeding thirds.(Correct. This is where the break happens)) D-F# resumes the progression. Difficult to hear above that, but E4-G#4 sounds fast compared to F4A4(Correct)

F3-D4 is too slow, F#3-D#4 too fast. (wrong)The next progress until A#3-F#4 which is slower, and the C4-A4 is too slow as well.
Typos, meant A#3G4, which isn't faster (but isn't slower) than the previous. Correct on C4A4.


The fact that a break was at C is unusual - is that a plate strut on a grand? What kind of piano is this?

I move my head around and play at different volumes to pick out the partials that I want to listen to. This was difficult to do here.

Last edited by Phil D; 10/29/13 12:00 PM.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
O
9000 Post Club Member
Offline
9000 Post Club Member
O
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
Kees I am sorry I did not take the time but a few intervals really did not sound right as D# G4 - FA EG#. (M3) of course all the too slow, or slowing, and in the 6 ths is tis clear that the progression is not there.

The jumps are mostly due to the display I suppose, are all notes sampled ?


I recorded more intervals today while tuning finally that vertical I have on sale. I will post that in a moment it is a sort of CHAS tuning.

Is it what you expect, Phil (I thought that hearing me tuning PR the piano could be of some interest, actually for a PR it was not that bad.


I do not need to listen to this or that partial, only for octaves be aware of what is coupling, I have read that there are two ways to listen. I listen for activity not chasing for a particular beat. I listen to what is strong and evident. (for octaves it comes from 2:1)

Regards







Last edited by Olek; 10/29/13 04:25 PM.

Professional of the profession.
Foo Foo specialist
I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,515
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,515
Originally Posted by Phil D

I was pretty damn close!

You are right, I stand corrected.
Originally Posted by Phil D

The fact that a break was at C is unusual - is that a plate strut on a grand? What kind of piano is this?

It a 1903 Heintzmann upright. There is no reason that mini-break should be there. String diameter remains the same. Perhaps the makers anticipated tunelab placing C too high which results in a better CE M3 and thus something like a mild well temperament. (Joke.)
Originally Posted by Phil D

I move my head around and play at different volumes to pick out the partials that I want to listen to. This was difficult to do here.

You are right, the only way to really test yourself is to do this experiment at home and listen live. I will be happy to measure beatrates for anyone wishing to do the experiment. Not sure if there is freeware that allows you do do spectral analysis yourself.

Kees

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
O
9000 Post Club Member
Offline
9000 Post Club Member
O
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
Originally Posted by DoelKees
Originally Posted by Phil D

I was pretty damn close!

You are right, I stand corrected.
Originally Posted by Phil D

The fact that a break was at C is unusual - is that a plate strut on a grand? What kind of piano is this?

It a 1903 Heintzmann upright. There is no reason that mini-break should be there. String diameter remains the same. Perhaps the makers anticipated tunelab placing C too high which results in a better CE M3 and thus something like a mild well temperament. (Joke.)
Originally Posted by Phil D

I move my head around and play at different volumes to pick out the partials that I want to listen to. This was difficult to do here.

You are right, the only way to really test yourself is to do this experiment at home and listen live. I will be happy to measure beatrates for anyone wishing to do the experiment. Not sure if there is freeware that allows you do do spectral analysis yourself.

Kees


There are freewares, I am looking for one that I had and the name escapes me(providing the same type of real time "flag "graph (flag ?)

Not sure it can count beats !

Thank you for the offer you will have slow intervals long enough ... whenever you have time for that ...

Here it is.

intervals begin at F3 as this is the first plain wire.

I can record the break too but I had to massage the basses before retuning.

Just get that with my phone so I apologize for the quality , but at last it is not as saturated as the last time.

Thanks

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6GjQDkF_AMQMWJfbV94THZhRXM/edit?usp=sharing

PS it is a sort of maximum stretch tuning , I would not use more. but the 12ths are still tempered

Last edited by Olek; 10/29/13 08:35 PM.

Professional of the profession.
Foo Foo specialist
I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
O
9000 Post Club Member
Offline
9000 Post Club Member
O
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
Here are a few chords with a lot of sustain pedal wink

I hope the tone not too horrible ..

It is a vertical W. HOffmann - dating 1987 , not yet refurthingized.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6GjQDkF_AMQTnRRN1ppZXpPZ3M/edit?usp=sharing



Professional of the profession.
Foo Foo specialist
I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 551
P
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 551
I keep meaning to do a recording when I get a piano that's worth recording my tuning on. My piano is definitely overdue one! I'll take you up on the offer when I do.

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,515
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,515

I don't see M3's in the temperament octave/range in that file, just M6's.

Kees

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
O
9000 Post Club Member
Offline
9000 Post Club Member
O
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,230
Yes they are on an other recorder, and on one string only. I forget.
There are 17 th 10th 15th 5 the 12 th.
Could you graph the 12 th s please.? Thank you.
May be I could record intervals again with a better recorder, the disk was full..

The piano is still moving, I will massage the wire and correct the tuning anyway.



Professional of the profession.
Foo Foo specialist
I wish to add some kind and sensitive phrase but nothing comes to mind.!
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
Originally Posted by DoelKees
.....

You are right, the only way to really test yourself is to do this experiment at home and listen live. I will be happy to measure beatrates for anyone wishing to do the experiment. Not sure if there is freeware that allows you do do spectral analysis yourself.

Kees


Yes, it doesn't matter if you can discern the beats, it matters if you can tune them.

When I want a clinical ET I will compare intervals by letting them beat 8 times (two beats of sixteenth notes) back and forth and see which one takes longer. Can't do that with a recording.

If I can find the time when I next tune my CW, I will try to figure out how to record the intervals. It is in the same room as the computer. Gosh, I have no idea when that might be. I am up to my ears in Cub Scout activities.


Jeff Deutschle
Part-Time Tuner
Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331
W
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
W
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331
Originally Posted by DoelKees
.....

You are right, the only way to really test yourself is to do this experiment at home and listen live. I will be happy to measure beatrates for anyone wishing to do the experiment. Not sure if there is freeware that allows you do do spectral analysis yourself.


Kees

People can download Audition 3.0 for Windows here for free (after creating an Adobe ID):
http://www.adobe.com/downloads/cs2_downloads/index.html

Would you be good enough to give us a brief heads up on how you use it to get beat rates?

Thanks.


Ian Russell
Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 140cm
Ibach, 1905 F-IV, 235cm
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 728
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 728
Jeff,

I checked one of the pianos I tuned today. It was an old German 1.6 metre grand, called a Hagspiel. I pitch adjusted and tuned it, unisons as you go, using a 4ths and 5ths temperament.

After tuning the middle, i checked A3 to A4 with tunelab, one string of every note of that ocatve. I could have nit picked that octave before I checked, but left it as is. It sounded pretty good.

A3 - (- 1.2)
A#3 - 0.2
B3 -0.3
C4 - 0.1
C#4 - 0.0
D4 - 1.0
D#4 - 0.1
E4 - 0.7
F4 - 0.5
F#4 - 1.2
G4 - 1.6
G#4 -2.5

M3 B/D# - slightly slower
M3 D/F3 - slightly slower
M3 F/A - slightly slower

M6ths wre all progressive


Mark
Piano tuner technician
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,404
A
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
A
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,404
Originally Posted by Olek
Originally Posted by DoelKees
Originally Posted by Phil D

I was pretty damn close!

You are right, I stand corrected.
Originally Posted by Phil D

The fact that a break was at C is unusual - is that a plate strut on a grand? What kind of piano is this?

It a 1903 Heintzmann upright. There is no reason that mini-break should be there. String diameter remains the same. Perhaps the makers anticipated tunelab placing C too high which results in a better CE M3 and thus something like a mild well temperament. (Joke.)
Originally Posted by Phil D

I move my head around and play at different volumes to pick out the partials that I want to listen to. This was difficult to do here.

You are right, the only way to really test yourself is to do this experiment at home and listen live. I will be happy to measure beatrates for anyone wishing to do the experiment. Not sure if there is freeware that allows you do do spectral analysis yourself.

Kees


There are freewares, I am looking for one that I had and the name escapes me(providing the same type of real time "flag "graph (flag ?)

Not sure it can count beats !

Thank you for the offer you will have slow intervals long enough ... whenever you have time for that ...

Here it is.

intervals begin at F3 as this is the first plain wire.

I can record the break too but I had to massage the basses before retuning.

Just get that with my phone so I apologize for the quality , but at last it is not as saturated as the last time.

Thanks

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6GjQDkF_AMQMWJfbV94THZhRXM/edit?usp=sharing

PS it is a sort of maximum stretch tuning , I would not use more. but the 12ths are still tempered


Hi Isaac,

I have listened to the three samples you posted and I think you have done a great job, really. Tuning that piano-brand is a real challenge... and I also enjoyed your impro.

You know what? Perhaps this time we (meaning we/PW's) will be able to elaborate on a standard...

Regards,

Alfredo
.


alfredo
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,515
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,515
Originally Posted by Olek
Originally Posted by DoelKees
Originally Posted by Phil D

I was pretty damn close!

You are right, I stand corrected.
Originally Posted by Phil D

The fact that a break was at C is unusual - is that a plate strut on a grand? What kind of piano is this?

It a 1903 Heintzmann upright. There is no reason that mini-break should be there. String diameter remains the same. Perhaps the makers anticipated tunelab placing C too high which results in a better CE M3 and thus something like a mild well temperament. (Joke.)
Originally Posted by Phil D

I move my head around and play at different volumes to pick out the partials that I want to listen to. This was difficult to do here.

You are right, the only way to really test yourself is to do this experiment at home and listen live. I will be happy to measure beatrates for anyone wishing to do the experiment. Not sure if there is freeware that allows you do do spectral analysis yourself.

Kees


There are freewares, I am looking for one that I had and the name escapes me(providing the same type of real time "flag "graph (flag ?)

Not sure it can count beats !

Thank you for the offer you will have slow intervals long enough ... whenever you have time for that ...

Here it is.

intervals begin at F3 as this is the first plain wire.

I can record the break too but I had to massage the basses before retuning.

Just get that with my phone so I apologize for the quality , but at last it is not as saturated as the last time.

Thanks

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6GjQDkF_AMQMWJfbV94THZhRXM/edit?usp=sharing

PS it is a sort of maximum stretch tuning , I would not use more. but the 12ths are still tempered


Some 12ths don't go through a whole cycle so I can't measure those. Here's what I got for the ones I could see and the M6's:

M6

F3D 8.1
F#D# 8.5
GE 8.8
G#F 10.0
AF# 9.1
A#G 11.5
BG# 11.9
C4A 10.5
C#A# 10.5
DB 13.3
D#C 14.2
EC# 14.9
F4D 12.9
F#D# 16.7
GE 17.5
G#F 16.8

P12

G3 0.30
A# 0.97
B 1.26
C4 1.04
C# 0.58
D 1.5
D# 1.8

Kees

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 728
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 728
I pitch adjusted and tuned a 1.7 metre August Forster grand this morning, using a 4ths and 5ths temperament,unisons as I go. I did tweak this temperament.

The negatives are in brackets.

A3- (-0.1)
A#3- (-2)
B3- (0.2)
C4- (-0.1)
C#4- (-0.2)
D4- (-0.6)
D#4- 0.4
E4- (-0.3)
F4- (-0.2)
F#4- 0.1
G4- 0.3
G#4- 0.6
A4- 0.2

3rds and 6ths progressive

FWIW



Last edited by Mark Davis; 10/31/13 06:52 AM. Reason: minor correction

Mark
Piano tuner technician
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,425
Thanks, Mark:

After my poor evaluation of Kees audio file, I think I will keep my opinions to myself until I post my own audio file and get feedback. I will just have to find the time to squeeze it in.


Jeff Deutschle
Part-Time Tuner
Who taught the first chicken how to peck?
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 728
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 728
I just wanted to get back to you with some numbers, as I said I would.

I have recently begun to tune unisons as I go, temperament included, even for pitch adjusting. It has been an interesting experience, particularly, shimming the temperament after the initial setting of it.

All the best with the scouts!


Last edited by Mark Davis; 10/31/13 09:03 AM. Reason: minor correction

Mark
Piano tuner technician
Page 20 of 38 1 2 18 19 20 21 22 37 38

Moderated by  Piano World, platuser 

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
How Much to Sell For?
by TexasMom1 - 04/15/24 10:23 PM
Song lyrics have become simpler and more repetitive
by FrankCox - 04/15/24 07:42 PM
New bass strings sound tubby
by Emery Wang - 04/15/24 06:54 PM
Pianodisc PDS-128+ calibration
by Dalem01 - 04/15/24 04:50 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,384
Posts3,349,152
Members111,629
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.