|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
79 members (AaronSF, apianostudent, beeboss, brdwyguy, benkeys, Abdulrohmanoman, accordeur, 19 invisible),
2,241
guests, and
447
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 6,177
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 6,177 |
You mean Chopin's or Beethoven's Sonatas? Beethoven.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,746
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,746 |
I've seen Chopin's large works ranked in groups of difficulty. Can someone do that with these Sonatas? Yes. The first one is the easiest and the rest get increasingly harder.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,956
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,956 |
The whole thing about interpreting music and the difficulty about it, is to try understanding the real idea of the composer and the piece. We can try to understand the "real idea" of the composer and the piece, but only the composer knows (or knew) for sure. I remember watching a video of Aaron Copland playing his Piano Variations. I was surprised - and just a little amused - at his interpretation of the piece. My own understanding of the work (and apparently that of other pianists I've heard play it) was a tad different than Mr. Copland's. So who's right??? When Copland premiered the work himself back in 1931 at a meeting of the League of Composers in NYC, it was met with some indifference. Copland's hardness of touch seemed to alienate the critics...but apparently that's how he himself "perceived" the work - even though the written score implied something else. Of course - this really doesn't have much to do with Beethoven....or does it?? Maybe sometimes the composer doesn't even know :O(joke) Exactly !!!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 430
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 430 |
You mean Chopin's or Beethoven's Sonatas? Beethoven. Check the beginning of this thread
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 892
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 892 |
This is a list I submitted for another thread. It is taken from the 2-volume edition by Liszt and published by Boswell. The ordering may be Liszt's, I don't really know.
Volume one
1 Op49 No2 2 Op49 No1 3 Op79 4 Op14 No2 5 Op14 No1 6 Op2 No1 7 Op10 No1 8 Op10 No2 9 Op2 No2 10 Op2 No3 11 Op10 No3 12 Op13 13 Op22 14 Op28 15 Op7 16 Op78 17 Op26 18 Op31 No3
Volume two
19 Op31 No1 20 Op90 21 Op27 No1 22 Op27 No2 23 Op54 24 Op31 No2 25 Op53 26 Op81a 27 Op57 28 Op101 29 Op110 30 Op109 31 Op111 32 Op106
John
I hadn't realised I'd posted this earlier in this thread. Oh well.
Last edited by drumour; 09/30/13 04:53 AM.
Vasa inania multum strepunt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352 |
This is a list I submitted for another thread. It is taken from the 2-volume edition by Liszt and published by Boswell. The ordering may be Liszt's, I don't really know.
Volume one
1 Op49 No2 2 Op49 No1 3 Op79 4 Op14 No2 5 Op14 No1 6 Op2 No1 7 Op10 No1 8 Op10 No2 9 Op2 No2 10 Op2 No3 11 Op10 No3 12 Op13 13 Op22 14 Op28 15 Op7 16 Op78 17 Op26 18 Op31 No3
Volume two
19 Op31 No1 20 Op90 21 Op27 No1 22 Op27 No2 23 Op54 24 Op31 No2 25 Op53 26 Op81a 27 Op57 28 Op101 29 Op110 30 Op109 31 Op111 32 Op106
John
I hadn't realised I'd posted this earlier in this thread. Oh well. The copy of the Liszt edition I examined presented the sonatas in the standard order. Is this alternate ordering something in a preface that has been added? M.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,169
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,169 |
This is a list I submitted for another thread. It is taken from the 2-volume edition by Liszt and published by Boswell. The ordering may be Liszt's, I don't really know. I've found it surprisingly hard, in this information age, to find a definitive listing of Liszt's difficulty ordering of the sonatas. I remember hearing that he ranked op.7 very near the hardest on the list, so I don't think this is it. -J
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662 |
This would be my list:
1 Op49 No2 2 Op49 No1 3 Op79 4 Op14 No2 5 Op14 No1 6 Op2 No1 7 Op10 No2 8 Op2 No2 9 Op10 No1 10 Op26 11 Op10 No3 12 Op13 13 Op31 No2 14 Op27 No1 15 Op27 No2 16 Op22 17 Op31 No3 18 Op28 19 Op31 No1 20 Op54 21 Op90 22 Op2 No3 23 Op7 24 Op78 25 Op81a 26 Op57 27 Op53 28 Op110 29 Op109 30 Op111 31 Op101 32 Op106
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 430
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 430 |
Have you played all 32 sonatas jeffreyjones? I haven't, but from those I have played, I see many things I really disagree with on that list: Op 10 no 3 is definitely harder than plenty of the pieces ahead of it. I also would say that Op 26 is harder than Op 13, Op 27 No 1 is MUCH harder than Op 27 No 2. Op 90 is easier than Op 10 No 3, actually, those two could pretty much switch places IMO. I am not gonna rank all 32 because I haven't played them all; also I consider it impossible to rank pieces, because you learn them in different stages of your life, and therefore you find them easier/harder depending on when you learn them. But the sonatas I have played are: Op 10 No 3, Op 13, Op 26, Op 27 No 1, Op 27 No 2, Op 49 No 1, Op 90 and Op 109. Out of these pieces, I had the hardest time learning Op 27 No 1, even harder than Op 109 for me. Though Op 109 is hard to make sound good, I still had a much easier time learning it than I would have expected. Op 90 was also alot easier than I thought it would be, except the alberti bass in tenths in the first movement. Op 10 No 3 was way harder than Pathetique and Moonlight for me. Op 26 was also harder than Moonlight and Pathetique; try playing the last movement of that sonata at the same tempo as Emil Gilels plays it(I think he plays this sonata the best), it's insanely difficult.
Last edited by Franz Beebert; 09/30/13 03:14 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 26,909
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 26,909 |
I really don't understand the obsession that some appear to have with precisely ranking each and every Beethoven Sonata in order of difficulty relative to all the other Beethoven Sonatas. Since we each have different strengths and weaknesses - both musical and technical - the whole question seems an exercise in futility.
It becomes absurd when one person will argue with another person's ranking of the order of difficulty, but, then again, the whole idea seems somewhat absurd to me.
What's the point?
BruceD - - - - - Estonia 190
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,169
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,169 |
It's fun. That's all. If it's not fun for you, that's fine... but it is for some of us. Just did op.2/2, and it's not clear to me that its first movement is significantly easier than op.57's first movement, because it goes so fast.... I'm surprised to find it so low on various lists. -J
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 892
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 892 |
The copy of the Liszt edition I examined presented the sonatas in the standard order. Is this alternate ordering something in a preface that has been added?
M.
It's the order in which the sonatas are presented in that edition. I, unfortunately, only have the first volume. I sent away, at great expense, for what I thought was volume two, but it was volume 2 of the standard ordering - and a facimile of a poor quality 19th century edition with poor quality cover to boot. John
Vasa inania multum strepunt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,352 |
The copy of the Liszt edition I examined presented the sonatas in the standard order. Is this alternate ordering something in a preface that has been added?
M.
It's the order in which the sonatas are presented in that edition. I, unfortunately, only have the first volume. I sent away, at great expense, for what I thought was volume two, but it was volume 2 of the standard ordering - and a facimile of a poor quality 19th century edition with poor quality cover to boot. John At the time I obtained a copy it seems to have been out of print except for an edition out of the orient which I obtained through interlibrary loan. Even with the standard ordering of the sonatas it was definitely Liszt's edition and it detailed his various small changes to the sonatas - it was all 32 sonatas in one volume. I like the ordering based on difficulty. If someone with a limited amount of time for it wants to learn a Beethoven sonata this makes it quite easy to identify one neither too challenging or too easy. M.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662 |
It's fun. That's all. If it's not fun for you, that's fine... but it is for some of us. Just did op.2/2, and it's not clear to me that its first movement is significantly easier than op.57's first movement, because it goes so fast.... I'm surprised to find it so low on various lists. -J I find that 2/2 is not as difficult as it looks, because the fingerwork is kind to the fingers. It's fast and sometimes tricky, but it can be overcome with the right approach. There's hardly a single bar in Op. 57, or 101, or 106 that is comfortable to play even after you've practiced them extensively. I also put Op. 78 in that category but it's not as hard.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1 |
Chopin: Etudes Op.10, No.4,12. Ballade Op.23 Franck: Prelude, Fugue and Variation Op.18 Rachmaninov: Prelude Op.3 No.2 Beethoven: Sonata Op.57
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328 |
This thread is twelve years old, and was last posted in more than two years ago. You don't revive it just to say "Interesting topics."
Regards,
Polyphonist
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,651
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,651 |
I don't think the ranking has changed since 2013. Unless Beethoven has written something new that I haven't heard about?
Do or do not. There is no try.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
This thread is twelve years old, and was last posted in more than two years ago. You don't revive it just to say "Interesting topics." I think we should regard it very differently when it's a new member. First of all I think the main thing we should do is welcome him/her, and hope that he/she will become an active member. But besides -- and I speak from my own experience, from when I first began looking at discussion forums -- it isn't necessarily readily obvious to a new member whether a discussion is current or not, plus they don't necessarily see any reason to make a distinction between new and old. By the time I came here I did know all that, because I had been active on a couple of other sites (not about music), but when I was new to this whole thing, I didn't know at all. Besides, the way that many if not most new members come here is via internet search. They look up something, it links to a Piano World thread -- and if they find it interesting, they might want to post on it, even maybe just to say that they found it interesting, or, as in this case, that they think various of our topics are interesting, presumably including this one. I think that most people arriving at a thread in such a way wouldn't have any idea that it matters whether the thread is recent or not -- and y'know, I don't really think it does. In fact, I like how old threads sometimes get brought back, and it's almost always by new members, and I think usually it's because they found it by a search of a topic they were interested in.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,328 |
I think we should regard it very differently when it's a new member. First of all I think the main thing we should do is welcome him/her, and hope that he/she will become an active member. But besides -- and I speak from my own experience, from when I first began looking at discussion forums -- it isn't necessarily readily obvious to a new member whether a discussion is current or not, plus they don't necessarily see any reason to make a distinction between new and old. By the time I came here I did know all that, because I had been active on a couple of other sites (not about music), but when I was new to this whole thing, I didn't know at all.
Besides, the way that many if not most new members come here is via internet search. They look up something, it links to a Piano World thread -- and if they find it interesting, they might want to post on it, even maybe just to say that they found it interesting. I think that most people arriving at a thread in such a way wouldn't have any idea that it matters whether the thread is recent or not. But why is posting on any thread, new or old, with the words "Interesting topics" and then a squiggly mark considered a legitimate post?
Regards,
Polyphonist
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
But why is posting on any thread, new or old, with the words "Interesting topics" and then a squiggly mark considered a legitimate post? Content isn't everything. It's a legitimate post because it's a first post by a new member, and because it signals to us that this thread was (probably) found via a search and that it was interesting enough to bring someone here, and because it brings the thread back to us, for anyone else who might be interested, which I believe will be quite a few people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,405
Posts3,349,434
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|