|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
71 members (anotherscott, AaronSF, apianostudent, beeboss, brdwyguy, benkeys, Abdulrohmanoman, 17 invisible),
2,224
guests, and
427
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305 |
Last NAMM, one of the German makers exhibited a vertical >54" tall. If I have my nomenclature correct, that constitutes a cabinet grand.
Is there a market for a new cabinet grand, depending upon price?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,422
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,422 |
Are you referring to the Steingraeber 138? It's over 54.3" tall.
Or are you referring to the Bluthner Model S? The bloody thing is over 57.3" tall!
A dealer who has heard them told me they could certainly play loudly, but the bass overpowered the tenor and treble at times.
Another dealer who has played them said that they were capable of thunderous volume levels, and that their tonal balance needed some work. He also said their actions needed to be made a little more responsive. He couldn't be certain whether the tonal balance and action problems were inherent design problems, or could be solved by dealer preparation.
Have you heard or played one of these monsters? If so, what did you think of them?
Last edited by Almaviva; 08/24/13 03:23 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,331 |
I had a passing look at both in London last year, mainly because the Steingraeber 138 is similar my Schiedmayer which is about 1" taller and 5" wider.
The Steingraeber had over 85 years advantage over the Schiedmayer but I wouldn't have said the tonal balance or action of either were lacking. Neither would I describe them as monsters.
My Schiedmayer is mahogany. It's in quite a small room but it does not look out of proportion thanks perhaps to a large oak door and a 10 foot high ceiling.
I must say the shiny black Blüthner S was a looming presence and I much preferred the 1936 figured mahogany baby grand Blüthner upstairs.
What would I buy if I wanted a new upright and had the budget? A Steingraeber 138, probably, but I'd put the Grotrian Concertino on my shortlist and go back to Blüthner too.
Ian Russell Schiedmayer & Soehne, 1925 Model 14, 140cm Ibach, 1905 F-IV, 235cm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,422
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,422 |
LOL. When I called those two pianos "monsters", I was referring to their size, not to their musical qualities. I have not played either one personally.
The Mammoth Piano VCG (Vertical Concert Grand) is 7'2" tall, but that's a custom-made instrument. The Bluthner Model S, at 57.3" tall, is the largest vertical piano currently made in a factory.
Does anyone know how large vertical pianos got between 1890 and 1930, which I believe was the heyday of these huge instruments?
Last edited by Almaviva; 08/25/13 08:19 PM. Reason: concision
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 13,236
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 13,236 |
Just a side comment on our own internal business.
Fifteen years ago, the console model of piano (a vertical model under 45") was the largest selling type of vertical piano in our company. That has changed.
We now sell more studio model pianos (any vertical 45" or over) than consoles. I have some ideas as to why, but I wonder if others are having the same experience.
Dealers, how do your vertical sales fall these days?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305 |
Because the guys who used to buy consoles are now digital buyers?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305 |
In the vein of the thread....
Sure would wish CW would come out with the much rumored big vertical...something that would give a k52 a run for its money...at a M&H price...or less...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 13,236
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 13,236 |
Because the guys who used to buy consoles are now digital buyers? No, I don't think that is it Jolly. I think there are less folks wanting to "match" furniture styles today than there were 15 years ago or so. I think the instrument itself has become a bit more important. This is totally anecdotal and I would love to hear from other dealers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,760
3000 Post Club Member
|
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,760 |
In the vein of the thread....
Sure would wish CW would come out with the much rumored big vertical...something that would give a k52 a run for its money...at a M&H price...or less... With the Walters production being way up from the past few years and the export to China in the last year doing well, I think we will once again see the production of the W50 come together. We can only hope!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,969
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,969 |
Are you referring to the Steingraeber 138? It's over 54.3" tall.
Or are you referring to the Bluthner Model S? The bloody thing is over 57.3" tall!
A dealer who has heard them told me they could certainly play loudly, but the bass overpowered the tenor and treble at times.
Another dealer who has played them said that they were capable of thunderous volume levels, and that their tonal balance needed some work. He also said their actions needed to be made a little more responsive. He couldn't be certain whether the tonal balance and action problems were inherent design problems, or could be solved by dealer preparation.
Have you heard or played one of these monsters? If so, what did you think of them? That is remarkable since the only dealers who have them feel completely different about them then you have stated. Some dealers try to win a competitive advantage by criticizing their competition or by planting negative seeds, it's regrettable but it happens. I would encourage any piano lover seek out these larger uprights and audition them in person. I have had the opportunity to spend extended periods with a variety of larger uprights by a variety of premium makers, they have all been lovely.
Last edited by Alex Hernandez; 08/25/13 10:25 PM.
Blüthner USA, LLC
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305 |
My wife is a fan of the big verticals. I've been compiling a list of decent verticals that I feel have good value (there's that pesky value thing again) and there are some out there to choose from. The Knabe 131, the 51" W. Hoffman, the big Hailun, the Brodmann AS, the biggest Perzina, maybe a Bohemia if one is still out there, a Yamaha U3 (used U5 if I run across one) and a Kawai K8. Shucks, I'd even like to test drive this sucker: http://hzmpiano.com/piano_detail.aspx?model=140CKAm I leaving out any good, big verticals that are in the $9-$14K range?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305 |
Note that in my last post, with the exception of the Heintzman, none of those pianos topped 52".
Is there a market for a decent 54"-58" piano? Not a German made $30K vertical, but something from the Orient that would sell for less than $15K?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,559
7000 Post Club Member
|
7000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,559 |
Note that in my last post, with the exception of the Heintzman, none of those pianos topped 52".
Is there a market for a decent 54"-58" piano? Not a German made $30K vertical, but something from the Orient that would sell for less than $15K? I don't think so, but I'm speaking as a person more familiar with the US and Canada than elsewhere. To a typical American, having a "baby grand" has some sort of cachet that a tall upright just doesn't have (I don't necessarily agree with this). Entry-level small grands are readily available for less than $10k now, which has probably hurt the market for tall verticals here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 14,305 |
Note that in my last post, with the exception of the Heintzman, none of those pianos topped 52".
Is there a market for a decent 54"-58" piano? Not a German made $30K vertical, but something from the Orient that would sell for less than $15K? I don't think so, but I'm speaking as a person more familiar with the US and Canada than elsewhere. To a typical American, having a "baby grand" has some sort of cachet that a tall upright just doesn't have (I don't necessarily agree with this). Entry-level small grands are readily available for less than $10k now, which has probably hurt the market for tall verticals here. I think you're right, but I'm thinking the target market would be somebody who is downsizing...they don't want as much living space to keep up, but they'd still like to have a good acoustic piano for their own playing enjoyment...when we talk about a 55" piano, we're talking 6 foot+, grand-type bass...drop something like a Fandrich action in a big vertical, and you'd have a lot of performance in a very small footprint. Just thinking out loud...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,408
Posts3,349,457
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|