Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.5 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
Find a Professional
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Advertise on Piano World

What's Hot!!
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
(125ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad)
Piano Buyer Guide
Piano Buyer Fall 2017
Who's Online Now
53 registered members (andy250, chopinoholic, bluejei, BachToTheFuture, Canonbury, 13 invisible), 1,271 guests, and 1 spider.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#2119754 - 07/18/13 04:51 PM Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score?  
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,016
ShiroKuro Offline
4000 Post Club Member
ShiroKuro  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,016
not in Japan anymore
A question (in PW's non-classical pianist corner forum) about whether a particular piece was "easy to play" or not got me thinking about how a score's difficulty is ranked. I sometimes think a piece sounds easier than it actually is, while another one will sound harder but be easier to play. I consider myself at an intermediate level, so I figure that if I can play something, then it's intermediate (or lower). But not only is that totally arbitrary, there is wide variation in difficulty across the various pieces I am currently working on and the pieces that are in my repertoire.

Sheetmusicplus.com lists guidelines for how it ranks scores

SMP Level Guidelines

so I decided to use that as a guideline and see how well I can systematically rank the difficulty of a particular piece.

But I wanted to ask here and see what the good folks in the teachers' forum think about how to rank a score's level. Is this SMP method a good one? How do you conclude whether a particular piece is an appropriate level for a particular student?

If you're interested, here's the thread from the non-classical pianist corner:
Where can I get music sheet for 'Summer?'


Started piano June 1999. My recordings at Box.Net:
https://app.box.com/s/j4rgyhn72uvluemg1m6u

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
(ad)
Piano & Music Accessories
piano accessories music gifts tuning and moving equipment
#2119777 - 07/18/13 05:36 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]  
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,090
bzpiano Offline
1000 Post Club Member
bzpiano  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,090
Irvine, CA
Yes SMP is a good one, I like it.


Piano lessons in Irvine, CA
Follow my 4YO student here: http://bit.ly/FollowMeiY
#2119800 - 07/18/13 06:23 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]  
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,275
AZNpiano Online happy
7000 Post Club Member
AZNpiano  Online Happy
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,275
Orange County, CA
The idea of ranking any piece by level is a problematic one. The most obvious problem is that, what's one person's "level 5" is another person's "level 6." It might serve a pedagogical purpose by giving students a general idea which books/pieces are of _similar_ level of difficulty. That's about it.

The most obvious error is to use the list of levels to show that, if I am level 5, I can play all pieces listed in level 5. That's just a common problem I see with students who take CM or any other leveled tests.

My advice is just to be cautious when approaching the idea of levels. It is one with many inherent problems and potential problems.


Private Piano Teacher and MTAC Member
#2119842 - 07/18/13 07:50 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]  
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,016
ShiroKuro Offline
4000 Post Club Member
ShiroKuro  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,016
not in Japan anymore
Quote
The idea of ranking any piece by level is a problematic one. The most obvious problem is that, what's one person's "level 5" is another person's "level 6."


AZNpiano, I agree, especially since my initial, totally arbitrary response to the question "is it easy to play" was "well if I can play it, it is." Obviously that's not helpful at all. It seems like at least the SMP guidelines give some objective ways to assess the score, so based on those measures, this is not "one person's 5,"  it's "does it have only three-note chords or also four-note chords" which seems much more useful.

Quote
My advice is just to be cautious when approaching the idea of levels. It is one with many inherent problems and potential problems.


So what would you suggest when someone asks if a piece is easy or not? At least the SMP levels make one way of evaluating a score very clear.


Started piano June 1999. My recordings at Box.Net:
https://app.box.com/s/j4rgyhn72uvluemg1m6u

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
#2119866 - 07/18/13 08:43 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]  
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
John v.d.Brook Offline
7000 Post Club Member
John v.d.Brook  Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
Olympia, Washington, USA
SMP's listing is good, but hardly the end all or be all. There are numerous problems with the literature they cite and respective levels of difficulty. For example, Schumann's Album for the Young spans a fairly wide range of difficulty, from SMP's level 3 to their level 8. Another discrepancy is the Brahms Op 79, in which n.1 is a level more difficult than n.2, and neither are at the most difficult level of music, as SMPs listing would suggest.

For classical literature, take a look at Henle's scaling. Many piano teaching organizations have listings, such as Piano Guild and RCM. Both have strengths and weaknesses.

Originally Posted by SK
How do you conclude whether a particular piece is an appropriate level for a particular student?

Frankly, experience is probably the best guide!


"Those who dare to teach must never cease to learn." -- Richard Henry Dann
Full-time Private Piano Teacher offering Piano Lessons in Olympia, WA. www.mypianoteacher.com
Certified by the American College of Musicians; member NGPT, MTNA, WSMTA, OMTA
#2119904 - 07/18/13 09:56 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: ShiroKuro]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,393
Bobpickle Offline

Gold Supporter until July 10  2014
Bobpickle  Offline

Gold Supporter until July 10  2014


Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,393
Cameron Park, California
I personally like John's rule of thumb:
Originally Posted by John v.d.Brook
As a general rule of thumb, if my students cannot sight-read through a piece at 1/2 to 2/3rds tempo, then I don't assign it, because they are not prepared technically to tackle the piece.



Though for horrible sightreaders like myself, it would change my approach significantly, so your mileage may vary. However, with this in mind (that I need to improve on this area of my musicianship), I may actually consider changing my approach to put a greater emphasis on sightreading and its correlation to music with which to work.


"[The trick to life isn't] just about living forever. The trick is still living with yourself forever."
#2119930 - 07/18/13 10:40 PM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,275
AZNpiano Online happy
7000 Post Club Member
AZNpiano  Online Happy
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,275
Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by John v.d.Brook
Another discrepancy is the Brahms Op 79, in which n.1 is a level more difficult than n.2, and neither are at the most difficult level of music, as SMPs listing would suggest.

That's why lists like the SMP criteria are totally inadequate for labeling difficult advanced music. There are pieces that are 11 (Chopin Op. 25 etudes) and some are close to 15 (Alkan or Ligeti etudes). They might as well say "beyond 10" for stuff that really has no need to be categorized.

And where do you draw the line?? Chopin Scherzo No. 2? Liszt Grande Etudes? Brahms Op. 79 No. 1 is indeed more difficult than No. 2, and I would say No. 2 is a "10" and No. 1 is "beyond 10."


Private Piano Teacher and MTAC Member
#2120038 - 07/19/13 06:13 AM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: AZNpiano]  
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,673
jdw Offline
1000 Post Club Member
jdw  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,673
Philadelphia, PA
I notice that SMP ranks the Bach 2-part Inventions as more difficult than the 3-part, which seems odd.


1989 Baldwin R
Currently working on:
Chopin, Waltz in E minor (op. posth.)
Schubert, Op. 90 no. 2
Mendelssohn, Op. 19 no. 2
#2120095 - 07/19/13 09:17 AM Re: Is this a good way to rank the difficulty of a score? [Re: jdw]  
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
John v.d.Brook Offline
7000 Post Club Member
John v.d.Brook  Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
Olympia, Washington, USA
Pedagogically, Bach ordered them as follows: 2 Pt, French Suites, 3 Pt.

Bach introduces 3 voices in the French Suites, with some being relatively easy for the student to perform, and others, quite difficult. Dividing a voice between two hands, keeping them balanced and in proportion to the other two voices, is quite demanding for pianists.


"Those who dare to teach must never cease to learn." -- Richard Henry Dann
Full-time Private Piano Teacher offering Piano Lessons in Olympia, WA. www.mypianoteacher.com
Certified by the American College of Musicians; member NGPT, MTNA, WSMTA, OMTA

Moderated by  Ken Knapp 

Piano Acc. & Gift Items in
Piano World's Online Store
In PianoSupplies.com ,(a division of Piano World)
our online store for piano and music gifts and accessories, Digital Piano Dolly, party goods, tuning equipment, piano moving equipment, benches, lamps Caster Cups and more.


Free Shipping* on Jansen Artist Piano Benches, Cocoweb Piano Lamps, Hidrau Hydraulic Piano Benches
(*free shipping within contiguous U.S. only)
(ad)
Pearl River & Ritmuller
Ritmuller Pianos
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq 6 Out now
ad
Pierce Piano Atlas


New Topics - Multiple Forums
Kawai MP11/MP7 v1.15 software update - now available
by Kawai James. 12/14/17 01:29 AM
Recommendations on recording gear?
by Muhwu. 12/14/17 01:07 AM
slow play
by hendo. 12/14/17 01:00 AM
Interview with Martha Argerich from 1978
by Stubbie. 12/13/17 10:33 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums44
Topics183,265
Posts2,679,087
Members89,267
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Check It Out!
There's a lot more to Piano World than just the forums.
Click Here to
Explore The Rest of Piano World!!
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2017 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0