Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.5 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
What's Hot!!
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
(125ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad)
Piano Buyer Guide
Piano Buyer Fall 2017
Who's Online Now
58 registered members (cmb13, BachToTheFuture, Dave Horne, danielp11, 13 invisible), 1,695 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#2102709 - 06/14/13 11:02 PM It's about time - the world vs Warner  
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
John v.d.Brook Offline
7000 Post Club Member
John v.d.Brook  Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
Olympia, Washington, USA
If you haven't heard, someone is finally challenging the legality of the copyright on Happy Birthday, someone with deep enough pockets not to be intimidated by Warner's lawyers.

See here.


"Those who dare to teach must never cease to learn." -- Richard Henry Dann
Full-time Private Piano Teacher offering Piano Lessons in Olympia, WA. www.mypianoteacher.com
Certified by the American College of Musicians; member NGPT, MTNA, WSMTA, OMTA
(ad)
Piano & Music Accessories
piano accessories music gifts tuning and moving equipment
#2102748 - 06/15/13 01:55 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,688
Gary D. Offline
5000 Post Club Member
Gary D.  Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,688
South Florida
I hope they win...


Piano Teacher
#2102752 - 06/15/13 02:06 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,245
AZNpiano Offline
7000 Post Club Member
AZNpiano  Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,245
Orange County, CA
The entire copyright claim is bogus if the song is that old.


Private Piano Teacher and MTAC Member
#2102754 - 06/15/13 02:18 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264
btb Offline
4000 Post Club Member
btb  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264
Pretoria South Africa
I'm putting Warner/Chappell on my forever banned list.

And I'm going to sing Happy Birthday at my grand-daughter's upcoming outdoor birthday party ... hope the neighbours don't throw stones at my croke.

PS As a Piano Teacher, I have taught Happy Birthday to all my youthful new students ... but I don't provide the cake!

#2102823 - 06/15/13 08:06 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: Gary D.]  
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,155
Morodiene Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Morodiene  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,155
Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by Gary D.
I hope they win...
+1. The people who wrote this song and their near relatives are long dead now. Let the public have it!


private piano/voice teacher FT

[Linked Image][Linked Image][Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
#2103033 - 06/15/13 06:59 PM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
TimR Offline
3000 Post Club Member
TimR  Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
Virginia, USA
It's hard to imagine this hasn't been litigated before. People may be counting chickens before hatching season.


gotta go practice
#2103627 - 06/17/13 12:01 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,906
laguna_greg Offline
1000 Post Club Member
laguna_greg  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,906
guess where in CA and WA
A copyright does not protect or retain the performance rights, although it sounds like people have been unfairly bullied into paying them. I can't wait to see what a judge does with this!


Laguna Greg

1919 Mason & Hamlin AA
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/greg-dempster/34/325/6b9/ (my day job)
#2103786 - 06/17/13 10:08 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: laguna_greg]  
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,509
Nikolas Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Nikolas  Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,509
UK
Originally Posted by laguna_greg
A copyright does not protect or retain the performance rights, although it sounds like people have been unfairly bullied into paying them. I can't wait to see what a judge does with this!
Yes it does!

If one of my works (or my fathers works for that matter, who doesn't compose, but anyhow) are popular and get performed a lot I gain more from the royalties. If not, I gain nothing.

Royalties is the basic system on providing for those composers whose works are popular!

Unless you mean something else.

As far as the "happy birthday song" is concerned Warner can go *ahem* themselves... It's a ridiculous claim and the only reason nobody did anything is because of the size of Warner and the assets they hold in other songs/works. We'll see how this works out...

#2103810 - 06/17/13 11:12 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: Nikolas]  
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
TimR Offline
3000 Post Club Member
TimR  Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by Nikolas
As far as the "happy birthday song" is concerned Warner can go *ahem* themselves... It's a ridiculous claim and the only reason nobody did anything is because of the size of Warner and the assets they hold in other songs/works.


But why is it a ridiculous claim?

Because it is so widely known, and the copyright routinely ignored? Bad precedent, I'd say.

Because it's so old? Well, yeah, I'd agree, but apparently copyright law does not.

Most of the "probably not under copyright" comes from Robert Brauneis. His abstract is here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1111624
and if you're interested (I was) you can download the entire 69 page PDF full paper here.

His paper is full of statements like "almost certainly" and "most probably."

But what he says is the strongest argument is that the copyright renewal in 1963 was done for specific arrangements and not the entire song. Okay, if true, that should allow one to arrange and perform (and incidentally copyright) songs based on an earlier version. But it is not at all clear that is what people have done, and anybody who sings or arranges anything based on the copyrighted piano arrangement would be in violation.


gotta go practice
#2103903 - 06/17/13 02:29 PM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,785
Jeff Clef Offline
4000 Post Club Member
Jeff Clef  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,785
San Jose, CA
Well, if a sixty-nine page gloss is not enough for you...

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Deliver...29492.pdf?abstractid=1111624&mirid=1

...additional documents are gathered here:

http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/rbrauneis/happybirthday.htm

Bon appetit.

PS- Too much birthday cake is not good for your teeth or figure. It may seem laughable, but let enough candles accumulate and these things are definitely a fire hazard--- more than plenty, in the case in point, to burn Time Warner's house down (or at least, a wing).

This is not to say that a respect for proper and reasonable protection of intellectual property is a bad thing. Anyone who reads biographies of musicians will see what great troubles have resulted from their lack (Beethoven comes to mind).

PPS.- Still not enough? There's more:

http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/rbrauneis/happybirthdayaddenda.htm

Some--- including some sitting members of the Supreme Court--- will see this brief as storm clouds, gathering in a towering nimbus, whose lightnings will presently smite a parasite and a pest. We shall see--- we've already seen more than I could have believed.

Last edited by Jeff Clef; 06/17/13 02:47 PM.

Clef

#2103939 - 06/17/13 03:23 PM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: Jeff Clef]  
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
John v.d.Brook Offline
7000 Post Club Member
John v.d.Brook  Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
Olympia, Washington, USA
Well, let's see. Jessica Hill neither wrote the melody nor composed the words, yet through some legal connivance, was able to obtain a copy right. I guess that before Jessica came along, no one wished anyone Happy Birthday. Oh, and the tune which the Hill sisters wrote is similar to, but not identical to Happy Birthday tune. But who cares. I once heard a piece from the 18th century which had the tune of Beautiful Brown Eyes unmistakably clear. I wonder if we scanned Baroque and pre-Baroque music sufficiently, we wouldn't find the melodic sequence of Happy Birthday.


"Those who dare to teach must never cease to learn." -- Richard Henry Dann
Full-time Private Piano Teacher offering Piano Lessons in Olympia, WA. www.mypianoteacher.com
Certified by the American College of Musicians; member NGPT, MTNA, WSMTA, OMTA
#2104249 - 06/18/13 07:23 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
TimR Offline
3000 Post Club Member
TimR  Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by John v.d.Brook
I wonder if we scanned Baroque and pre-Baroque music sufficiently, we wouldn't find the melodic sequence of Happy Birthday.


Include Renaissance, and I'd guess we've covered ALL modern tunes!


gotta go practice
#2104251 - 06/18/13 07:37 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: TimR]  
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
John v.d.Brook Offline
7000 Post Club Member
John v.d.Brook  Offline
7000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,639
Olympia, Washington, USA
Proving once again the old wisdom that there's Nothing new under the sun.


"Those who dare to teach must never cease to learn." -- Richard Henry Dann
Full-time Private Piano Teacher offering Piano Lessons in Olympia, WA. www.mypianoteacher.com
Certified by the American College of Musicians; member NGPT, MTNA, WSMTA, OMTA
#2104267 - 06/18/13 08:11 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
TimR Offline
3000 Post Club Member
TimR  Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by John v.d.Brook
Proving once again the old wisdom that there's Nothing new under the sun.


It depends on how much difference is required.

For example, since bagpipes are not tuned equal temperament, is Amazing Grace a copyright violation? (unauthorized rearrangement?)

http://cityofoaks.home.netcom.com/Bagpipe_Tuning.html


gotta go practice
#2104269 - 06/18/13 08:13 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,502
R0B Offline
1000 Post Club Member
R0B  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,502
Australia
Even ASCAP tried to jump on the gravy train, wanting royalties for ringtones which may be overheard by the general public!
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2009/10/15/judge_throws_out_ascap_s_ringtone_money_grab


Rob
#2104276 - 06/18/13 08:27 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: R0B]  
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,496
Andy Platt Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Andy Platt  Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,496
Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by R0B
Even ASCAP tried to jump on the gravy train, wanting royalties for ringtones which may be overheard by the general public!
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2009/10/15/judge_throws_out_ascap_s_ringtone_money_grab


That's too sensible a judgement for it to survive the appeal wink


  • Debussy - Le Petit Nègre, L. 114
  • Haydn - Sonata in Gm, Hob. XVI/44

Kawai K3
[Linked Image][Linked Image][Linked Image]
#2104283 - 06/18/13 08:44 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: Andy Platt]  
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,155
Morodiene Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Morodiene  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,155
Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by Andy Platt
Originally Posted by R0B
Even ASCAP tried to jump on the gravy train, wanting royalties for ringtones which may be overheard by the general public!
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2009/10/15/judge_throws_out_ascap_s_ringtone_money_grab


That's too sensible a judgement for it to survive the appeal wink
I'm not sure how I feel about this. On one hand, I agree, it's rubbish. On the other hand, where does one draw the line? If someone plays a copyrighted song on the piano and their windows are open and they live in a highly populated area, isn't it likely the music would be heard in "public"? If so, so what? Are they grasping at straws to justify their jobs? Are publishers and composers hurting because of the internet?

I do often wonder how some of the great composers of previous eras would have felt about this. In those days, if a composer copied another composer's idea, it was considered the highest complement. How did that turn into an insult or an offense? Back then there was no thought at all of how the original composer could profit. My guess is because his idea was being heard by more people. Not only that, but what composer wouldn't be curious to see what someone else came up with using his idea?

Of course, there is plagiarizing, where someone takes an entire work (and not an idea or a melody) and sells it under their name. That I feel is wrong, flat-out stealing, and organizations like ASCAP are necessary to protect its members.

So what constitutes stealing, versus just being inspired by someone else's idea and putting their own spin on it? Is it really just a money thing? If someone profits, then it's stealing, whereas if they don't then it's fine?


private piano/voice teacher FT

[Linked Image][Linked Image][Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
#2104648 - 06/18/13 09:19 PM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: John v.d.Brook]  
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,509
Nikolas Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Nikolas  Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,509
UK
Morodiene you're confusing two entirely different realms: Copyrights and royalties.

ASCAP does NOT deal with copyrights.
copyright.gov deals with that in the US.

ASCAP is trying to grab royalties when music is played in public. Depending on the circumstance this can be great, bad, or ridiculous and all over the world there's ludicrous claims: PRS claimed royalties in a mechanics shop, because they had the radio on. While at first this seems a bit far fetched, apparently the people working there had turned their mechanics shop into a 'hot spot for chicks' more or less with the use of music! Greek AEPI has been claiming royalties from people using their radio, in their 1x1m (literally) tiny shop (periptero), which is as ridiculous as it goes. etc...

Copying someone's work is a violation of copyrights and has little to do with the above, in a legal sense (of course if I claim that "whoops I did it again" is mine, I am to claim all royalties coming from that song!). But in the classical world, quoting other composers is as valid as it's ever been and there's not much problem (because probably there's very few bucks to talk about when talking about classical music anyways). I do recall a friend of mine to who used a theme of Steve Reich and had to pay a license of about 100 US$! That's all!

_______________________________

Now, the ridiculous part of the claim, Tim. It's because apparently the song it self is too old. And too popular. And it's just a money grabbing device, for movies, shows and radio, not much else (since Warner is not going after you and me throwing a party at our sons, daughters and wives)....

________________________________

EDIT: PS. Morodiene

It's not all about money.

If you work on a piano work, in the memory of your mother (for example) and I decide to take it, to use it for fun (no money involved) in a home made... erotika movie (for whatever amazingly awful reasons) that would certainly cross the line!

In general copyright is the right to copy . - Plain and simple. MY song, MY lyrics, MINE to do whatever I want with them. You can't force me to use MY music in a racist campaign, no matter the money!

Of course there are many limits that one needs to cross in order to come to legal action, but... lets not go in there...

Last edited by Nikolas; 06/18/13 09:22 PM.
#2104770 - 06/19/13 06:55 AM Re: It's about time - the world vs Warner [Re: Nikolas]  
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
TimR Offline
3000 Post Club Member
TimR  Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,945
Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by Nikolas
In general copyright is the right to copy . - Plain and simple. MY song, MY lyrics, MINE to do whatever I want with them. You can't force me to use MY music in a racist campaign, no matter the money!


And that includes rearranging someone's work. I've talked with people who were very emotionally attached to something they'd written, and were vehemently opposed to it being altered in any manner. It wasn't a money thing at all, it was a creative process element.


gotta go practice

Moderated by  Ken Knapp 

Piano Acc. & Gift Items in
Piano World's Online Store
In PianoSupplies.com ,(a division of Piano World)
our online store for piano and music gifts and accessories, Digital Piano Dolly, party goods, tuning equipment, piano moving equipment, benches, lamps Caster Cups and more.


Free Shipping* on Jansen Artist Piano Benches, Cocoweb Piano Lamps, Hidrau Hydraulic Piano Benches
(*free shipping within contiguous U.S. only)
(ad)
Pearl River & Ritmuller
Ritmuller Pianos
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq 6 Out now
ad
Pierce Piano Atlas


New Topics - Multiple Forums
Scarlatti Sonata B minor k 27 pedal
by Potlea. 11/18/17 05:46 AM
Mostly Medtner concert in Berlin, 28/11/2017
by Ken Iisaka. 11/18/17 01:45 AM
Looking for "rock"piano songs with a specific rhythm
by Wormwith.co. 11/17/17 10:04 PM
I finally inventoried my music!
by gooddog. 11/17/17 09:38 PM
Steinway Teflon Years?
by Duke of Dunning. 11/17/17 09:23 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums44
Topics182,816
Posts2,672,667
Members89,154
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Check It Out!
There's a lot more to Piano World than just the forums.
Click Here to
Explore The Rest of Piano World!!
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2017 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0