Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.5 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
What's Hot!!
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
(125ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad)
Piano Buyer Guide
Piano Buyer Fall 2017
Who's Online Now
114 registered members (Automata, Bambers, Agent88, Alexander Borro, 36251, 30 invisible), 1,834 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#2091472 - 05/29/13 02:53 PM Another picture of Chopin?  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
JoelW Online content
5000 Post Club Member
JoelW  Online Content
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
USA
I was browsing the internet for "Chopin death mask" when I came across this photo that I have never seen before:

[Linked Image]

and with some minor adjustments to bring it out a bit more:

[Linked Image]


It is clearly not the official Bisson photo, as his face appears positioned slightly differently, and his eyes look to be closed. It seems to me like this photo was snapped, perhaps accidentally, by Bisson when they met for his picture in 1848.

There's no doubt this is Chopin. The hair and clothes are exactly the same as in the Bisson official photograph, and his facial features are no doubt his. Why have I, and a lot of you I suspect, never seen this picture before? Why is it unknown?



(ad)
Piano & Music Accessories
piano accessories music gifts tuning and moving equipment
#2091474 - 05/29/13 02:55 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,261
Polyphonist Offline
9000 Post Club Member
Polyphonist  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,261
New York City
Why'd you use the spoiler thing for the photos?

Nice find.


Regards,

Polyphonist
#2091477 - 05/29/13 02:57 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: Polyphonist]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
JoelW Online content
5000 Post Club Member
JoelW  Online Content
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
USA
Meh, I made it regular. Haha

#2091499 - 05/29/13 03:18 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,607
debrucey Offline
2000 Post Club Member
debrucey  Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,607
Manchester, UK
I don't think it was possible in those days to 'accidentally' take a photograph

(ad ) MusicNotes.com
sheet music search
#2091500 - 05/29/13 03:21 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: debrucey]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
JoelW Online content
5000 Post Club Member
JoelW  Online Content
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
USA
Originally Posted by debrucey
I don't think it was possible in those days to 'accidentally' take a photograph


You're right. I forgot about the insanely slow shutter speed. This photo is puzzling me. It doesn't look posed, yet pictures back then had to be posed.

...

#2091521 - 05/29/13 04:07 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,404
Carey Offline
8000 Post Club Member
Carey  Offline
8000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,404
Phoenix, Arizona
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by debrucey
I don't think it was possible in those days to 'accidentally' take a photograph


You're right. I forgot about the insanely slow shutter speed. This photo is puzzling me. It doesn't look posed, yet pictures back then had to be posed.

...


Actually, camera shutters weren't invented until the 1870s. smile


Mason and Hamlin BB - 91640
Kawai CA-65
YouTube channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/pianophilo
#2091527 - 05/29/13 04:21 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: Carey]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
JoelW Online content
5000 Post Club Member
JoelW  Online Content
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
USA
W
Originally Posted by carey
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by debrucey
I don't think it was possible in those days to 'accidentally' take a photograph


You're right. I forgot about the insanely slow shutter speed. This photo is puzzling me. It doesn't look posed, yet pictures back then had to be posed.

...


Actually, camera shutters weren't invented until the 1870s. smile


I mean... insanely long exposure time. Haha

#2091557 - 05/29/13 05:30 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,451
ChopinAddict Offline
6000 Post Club Member
ChopinAddict  Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,451
Land of the never-ending music
I see that the original photo (the unedited one) goes back to a blog by our Elene, so hopefully she will see this thread. smile



[Linked Image]

Music is my best friend.


#2091590 - 05/29/13 06:17 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,555
Bob Newbie Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Bob Newbie  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,555
it looks like a "daguerreotype"

#2091603 - 05/29/13 06:48 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: Bob Newbie]  
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,404
Carey Offline
8000 Post Club Member
Carey  Offline
8000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,404
Phoenix, Arizona
Originally Posted by Bob Newbie
it looks like a "daguerreotype"


Which was invented in 1839 - so that was the only technology available in the 1840s.


Mason and Hamlin BB - 91640
Kawai CA-65
YouTube channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/pianophilo
#2091621 - 05/29/13 07:23 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,261
Polyphonist Offline
9000 Post Club Member
Polyphonist  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,261
New York City
Originally Posted by JoelW
W
Originally Posted by carey
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by debrucey
I don't think it was possible in those days to 'accidentally' take a photograph


You're right. I forgot about the insanely slow shutter speed. This photo is puzzling me. It doesn't look posed, yet pictures back then had to be posed.

...


Actually, camera shutters weren't invented until the 1870s. smile


I mean... insanely long exposure time. Haha


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_photography grin


Regards,

Polyphonist
#2091788 - 05/29/13 10:15 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,039
tomasino Offline
2000 Post Club Member
tomasino  Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,039
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


"Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do so with all thy might." Ecclesiastes 9:10

#2091801 - 05/29/13 10:23 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: tomasino]  
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,261
Polyphonist Offline
9000 Post Club Member
Polyphonist  Offline
9000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,261
New York City
I think you're talking to JoelW (the OP), not me. He was the one who found the image. smile


Regards,

Polyphonist
#2091824 - 05/29/13 10:53 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: tomasino]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
JoelW Online content
5000 Post Club Member
JoelW  Online Content
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
USA
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

#2091847 - 05/29/13 11:34 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,168
outo Offline
3000 Post Club Member
outo  Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,168
Finland
Originally Posted by JoelW


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.




I'd say it's just a photoshopped version of the same shot. There are too many similarities and all the differences can be easily explained by editing the photo.

#2091859 - 05/29/13 11:51 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: outo]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
JoelW Online content
5000 Post Club Member
JoelW  Online Content
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
USA
Originally Posted by outo
Originally Posted by JoelW


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.




I'd say it's just a photoshopped version of the same shot. There are too many similarities and all the differences can be easily explained by editing the photo.


There are a few reasons why I feel this isn't the case:

1) To photoshop the actual angle of Chopin's face would be a very unusual and I assume difficult edit.

2) What is the motive for photoshopping such a photo in that way?

3) Look at the photo's top and bottom edges. See the wear? This isn't just an online picture, this is an actually physical photograph.

#2091860 - 05/29/13 11:57 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,451
ChopinAddict Offline
6000 Post Club Member
ChopinAddict  Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,451
Land of the never-ending music



[Linked Image]

Music is my best friend.


#2091861 - 05/30/13 12:00 AM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
JoelW Online content
5000 Post Club Member
JoelW  Online Content
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
USA
I see. Who is Mary-Ros Douglas? I can't find anything about her.

#2091868 - 05/30/13 12:16 AM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,204
Auntie Lynn Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Auntie Lynn  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,204
San Francisco, CA
Fred was already pretty sick by the time the subject photo was taken - you can clearly see the ravages of the disease - he was not long for this world, poor guy. Anyway, my favorite continues to be his portrait by his friend Delacroix...

#2091907 - 05/30/13 02:06 AM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,451
ChopinAddict Offline
6000 Post Club Member
ChopinAddict  Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,451
Land of the never-ending music
She is a PW member. (Elene is a PW member too.)



[Linked Image]

Music is my best friend.


#2091909 - 05/30/13 02:14 AM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,509
Nikolas Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Nikolas  Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,509
UK
Originally Posted by JoelW
There are a few reasons why I feel this isn't the case:

1) To photoshop the actual angle of Chopin's face would be a very unusual and I assume difficult edit.

2) What is the motive for photoshopping such a photo in that way?

3) Look at the photo's top and bottom edges. See the wear? This isn't just an online picture, this is an actually physical photograph.
You have a lot to learn about PS I think!

have fun:

http://www.ronenbekerman.com/category/render-vs-photo/

https://www.facebook.com/mediadesignschool/app_371569352914698

and

http://pinterest.com/ronenbekerman/best-photo-real-3d-renders/

#2091962 - 05/30/13 06:46 AM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
-Frycek Offline
5000 Post Club Member
-Frycek  Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
SC Mountains
Originally Posted by JoelW
I see. Who is Mary-Ros Douglas? I can't find anything about her.




1. British civil servant

2. UK Breeder of champion Norwegian forest cats

3. Lifelong Chopin lover and player, occasionally found here on the Totally Devoted thread, posting as MaryRose

4. And more to the point, photoshopper extraordinare. She did
this one awhile back. Trying, I think to erase some of the
effects of his illness, portraying him as he might've been
on a better day. Good, isn't she?



Slow down and do it right.
[Linked Image]
#2092342 - 05/30/13 04:50 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,039
tomasino Offline
2000 Post Club Member
tomasino  Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,039
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


You may be on to something with the mouth, as there is an unexplained shadow coming up from the left side of his mouth (his left). But there are still other explanations for that one detail--perhaps were looking at a photo made from a copy neg--which I believe to be the case--and a bit of dark fuzz or something, or anything dropped onto the photo being copied, or there was damage to the copy neg during development or subsequent handling. There are any number of other things that might give rise to this detail.

As to the angle of his head, I'm not quite sure what you're seeing, unless it's maybe that his head in the shot that is cropped at mid-chest, is canted just so slightly clockwise (clockwise to the viewer). I'd have to get a square out to see if that is really happening. But anyway, if it's from a copy neg--again, as I suspect it is--it would have been very easy to cause the change in angle by slightly turning the picture being copied. Such a turning could have even happened by accident.

As to what someone above referred to as "wear marks" along the edges, there are numerous causes for these, all supporting the idea that the image is from a copy neg. The lines along the right and left side are very typical of marks left by abrasion, or touching, or the masking of a 4X5 film holder, no matter what type of film is being used. But the marks along the bottom? I'll go even further. It looks like the kind of imperfect development one gets using Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film when the film is either old or cold. Also, the horizontal lines across the top look very much like the lines left by a Poloroid 4X5 holder when the Poloroid type 55 film isn't pulled out evenly and quickly. I've seen it a hundred times. The usual tell tale signature of Poloroid type 55 that fine art photographers love to include--the little mesh holes across the top edge--was probably cropped off, as intended by the Poloroid Corporation.

Style is another reason I believe this is from a copy neg. The style of cropping in the 1830s and 40s was often full body, or from the waist or mid-torso up. The very tight head shot came into its own quite a bit later. Also, think about what the photographer would have had to go through in Chopin's time to produce such a tight head shot. He would have had to laboriously frame the tight head shot, using a very cumbersome and heavy wooden tripod, and then attempt to force focus his camera when his bellows simply wouldn't allow for it, and then wasting an expensive piece of photographic material on a picture he knew would not be in the style of his times, nor would it be, could it be, sharp--I'll admit, this last objection would be a possible explanation for why it is so very soft in focus.

For all of these reasons, I believe this photo is from a rather inept copy neg made on Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film. It would have been sometime after, say, 1975, as this film was introduced about that time or later. All sans photoshop.

Tomasino




"Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do so with all thy might." Ecclesiastes 9:10

#2092371 - 05/30/13 05:42 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: tomasino]  
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 208
Goomer Piles Offline
Full Member
Goomer Piles  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by tomasino
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


You may be on to something with the mouth, as there is an unexplained shadow coming up from the left side of his mouth (his left). But there are still other explanations for that one detail--perhaps were looking at a photo made from a copy neg--which I believe to be the case--and a bit of dark fuzz or something, or anything dropped onto the photo being copied, or there was damage to the copy neg during development or subsequent handling. There are any number of other things that might give rise to this detail.

As to the angle of his head, I'm not quite sure what you're seeing, unless it's maybe that his head in the shot that is cropped at mid-chest, is canted just so slightly clockwise (clockwise to the viewer). I'd have to get a square out to see if that is really happening. But anyway, if it's from a copy neg--again, as I suspect it is--it would have been very easy to cause the change in angle by slightly turning the picture being copied. Such a turning could have even happened by accident.

As to what someone above referred to as "wear marks" along the edges, there are numerous causes for these, all supporting the idea that the image is from a copy neg. The lines along the right and left side are very typical of marks left by abrasion, or touching, or the masking of a 4X5 film holder, no matter what type of film is being used. But the marks along the bottom? I'll go even further. It looks like the kind of imperfect development one gets using Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film when the film is either old or cold. Also, the horizontal lines across the top look very much like the lines left by a Poloroid 4X5 holder when the Poloroid type 55 film isn't pulled out evenly and quickly. I've seen it a hundred times. The usual tell tale signature of Poloroid type 55 that fine art photographers love to include--the little mesh holes across the top edge--was probably cropped off, as intended by the Poloroid Corporation.

Style is another reason I believe this is from a copy neg. The style of cropping in the 1830s and 40s was often full body, or from the waist or mid-torso up. The very tight head shot came into its own quite a bit later. Also, think about what the photographer would have had to go through in Chopin's time to produce such a tight head shot. He would have had to laboriously frame the tight head shot, using a very cumbersome and heavy wooden tripod, and then attempt to force focus his camera when his bellows simply wouldn't allow for it, and then wasting an expensive piece of photographic material on a picture he knew would not be in the style of his times, nor would it be, could it be, sharp--I'll admit, this last objection would be a possible explanation for why it is so very soft in focus.

For all of these reasons, I believe this photo is from a rather inept copy neg made on Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film. It would have been sometime after, say, 1975, as this film was introduced about that time or later. All sans photoshop.

Tomasino

Five paragraphs that deny Photoshopping, even after the explanation was already given? Wow!

#2092387 - 05/30/13 06:45 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: Goomer Piles]  
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,629
Damon Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Damon  Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,629
Originally Posted by Goomer Piles

Five paragraphs that deny Photoshopping, even after the explanation was already given? Wow!


I think it was Photo Impacted.

#2092506 - 05/30/13 10:00 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: tomasino]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
JoelW Online content
5000 Post Club Member
JoelW  Online Content
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,982
USA
Originally Posted by tomasino
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


You may be on to something with the mouth, as there is an unexplained shadow coming up from the left side of his mouth (his left). But there are still other explanations for that one detail--perhaps were looking at a photo made from a copy neg--which I believe to be the case--and a bit of dark fuzz or something, or anything dropped onto the photo being copied, or there was damage to the copy neg during development or subsequent handling. There are any number of other things that might give rise to this detail.

As to the angle of his head, I'm not quite sure what you're seeing, unless it's maybe that his head in the shot that is cropped at mid-chest, is canted just so slightly clockwise (clockwise to the viewer). I'd have to get a square out to see if that is really happening. But anyway, if it's from a copy neg--again, as I suspect it is--it would have been very easy to cause the change in angle by slightly turning the picture being copied. Such a turning could have even happened by accident.

As to what someone above referred to as "wear marks" along the edges, there are numerous causes for these, all supporting the idea that the image is from a copy neg. The lines along the right and left side are very typical of marks left by abrasion, or touching, or the masking of a 4X5 film holder, no matter what type of film is being used. But the marks along the bottom? I'll go even further. It looks like the kind of imperfect development one gets using Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film when the film is either old or cold. Also, the horizontal lines across the top look very much like the lines left by a Poloroid 4X5 holder when the Poloroid type 55 film isn't pulled out evenly and quickly. I've seen it a hundred times. The usual tell tale signature of Poloroid type 55 that fine art photographers love to include--the little mesh holes across the top edge--was probably cropped off, as intended by the Poloroid Corporation.

Style is another reason I believe this is from a copy neg. The style of cropping in the 1830s and 40s was often full body, or from the waist or mid-torso up. The very tight head shot came into its own quite a bit later. Also, think about what the photographer would have had to go through in Chopin's time to produce such a tight head shot. He would have had to laboriously frame the tight head shot, using a very cumbersome and heavy wooden tripod, and then attempt to force focus his camera when his bellows simply wouldn't allow for it, and then wasting an expensive piece of photographic material on a picture he knew would not be in the style of his times, nor would it be, could it be, sharp--I'll admit, this last objection would be a possible explanation for why it is so very soft in focus.

For all of these reasons, I believe this photo is from a rather inept copy neg made on Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film. It would have been sometime after, say, 1975, as this film was introduced about that time or later. All sans photoshop.

Tomasino




How would you explain the left side of his mouth angled more upwards? And look at the left side of his hair, it's shaped differently. I guess photoshop can do this but I don't see any motive. Oh well.

#2092507 - 05/30/13 10:04 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,451
ChopinAddict Offline
6000 Post Club Member
ChopinAddict  Offline
6000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,451
Land of the never-ending music
Mary-Rose wanted Chopin to be pain-free and happier, that's why the left side of his mouth is angled more upwards...



[Linked Image]

Music is my best friend.


#2092521 - 05/30/13 10:32 PM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 581
boo1234 Offline
500 Post Club Member
boo1234  Offline
500 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 581
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]



It's the same image... if you superimpose the sepia color image on top of the black and white in photoshop, you can scale it down and it fits exactly... look, I changed the opacity of the sepia color image and scaled it down to fit the well known photo:

[Linked Image]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us


notice how it looks like I just simply scaled the image down and put it onto the original... In fact I actually changed the opacity of the top layer to about 45% so you can see the bottom original picture through it. Except since they are a complete match, it looks like the top picture is complete with 100% opacity. There was no need for image rotation either to get a perfect match, which suggests that it is indeed the same picture but cropped since it would be almost impossible for that to happen in 2 separate photo sittings.

Last edited by boo1234; 05/30/13 10:33 PM.
#2092584 - 05/31/13 12:40 AM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
-Frycek Offline
5000 Post Club Member
-Frycek  Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
SC Mountains
Thank you boo! It's amazing. Several of us recognized it, knew exactly who did it, when, why and how and stated this plainly. MaryRose modified it from the 1849 dag and shared it with Elene and me several years ago. ChopinAddict even posted a link to Elene's blog (where it's clearly identified as MaryRose's) from which it apparently spread to the net. And ya'll are still going on about it. Is this how internet myths /urban legends are started?

MaryRose is having computer access challenges currently but I've let her know. Hopefully, she'll claim it sometime this weekend.


Slow down and do it right.
[Linked Image]
#2092608 - 05/31/13 01:14 AM Re: Another picture of Chopin? [Re: JoelW]  
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,432
Elene Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Elene  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,432
Land of Enchantment
Hi, all--

Frycek alerted me to this just now. I don't know whether to laugh or... well, something. The image in question is indeed Mary-Rose's altered version of the 1849 photo, in which she attempted to put our Fryderyk back into a rather better state of health and happiness. I think ChopinAddict's comment was exactly right.

I find this piece of art quite beautiful, especially since he appears to be looking at us through a mist or veil, which seems to me to express the many uncertainties we have about him. It also seems very alive and in motion, as if he is just about to speak.

I don't know what to make of the fact that there was apparently a link to my blog, which distinctly states that the picture was made by Mary-Rose (who is a long-time denizen of the "Devoted to Chopin" thread, less active lately), and yet you didn't look there for information. Right under Mary-Rose's portrait is a shot of Clésinger’s bust based on the death mask, which is why googling "Chopin death mask" yielded this image.

So some of you have been arguing passionately about nothing. (And spelling "Polaroid" wrong in the process.)

I've noticed that googling images can lead one in some very strange directions.

The original blog post: Fryc in Print

Elene

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Brendan, Kreisler 

Piano Acc. & Gift Items in
Piano World's Online Store
In PianoSupplies.com ,(a division of Piano World)
our online store for piano and music gifts and accessories, Digital Piano Dolly, party goods, tuning equipment, piano moving equipment, benches, lamps Caster Cups and more.


Free Shipping* on Jansen Artist Piano Benches, Cocoweb Piano Lamps, Hidrau Hydraulic Piano Benches
(*free shipping within contiguous U.S. only)
(ad)
Pearl River & Ritmuller
Ritmuller Pianos
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq 6 Out now
ad
Pierce Piano Atlas


New Topics - Multiple Forums
After the bass string breaks
by Keith Roberts. 11/17/17 12:43 PM
New Upright Piano from Hurstwood Farm Pianos
by Mark Polishook. 11/17/17 11:17 AM
In need of advice / Kawai ES8 & CN37
by wolflone249. 11/17/17 10:53 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums44
Topics182,808
Posts2,672,547
Members89,150
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Check It Out!
There's a lot more to Piano World than just the forums.
Click Here to
Explore The Rest of Piano World!!
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2017 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0