2017 was our 20th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

Shop our online store for music lovers
SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Wessell Nickel & Gross
PianoForAll
(ad)
Best of Piano Buyer
 Best of Piano Buyer
(ad)
Faust Harrison Pianos
Faust Harrison 100+ Steinway pianos
Who's Online Now
61 members (Abdol, AlphaBravoCharlie, Calavera, 36251, Brendan, clothearednincompo, CyberGene, 16 invisible), 453 guests, and 433 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2091909 05/30/13 03:14 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
Originally Posted by JoelW
There are a few reasons why I feel this isn't the case:

1) To photoshop the actual angle of Chopin's face would be a very unusual and I assume difficult edit.

2) What is the motive for photoshopping such a photo in that way?

3) Look at the photo's top and bottom edges. See the wear? This isn't just an online picture, this is an actually physical photograph.
You have a lot to learn about PS I think!

have fun:

http://www.ronenbekerman.com/category/render-vs-photo/

https://www.facebook.com/mediadesignschool/app_371569352914698

and

http://pinterest.com/ronenbekerman/best-photo-real-3d-renders/

Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2091962 05/30/13 07:46 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
Originally Posted by JoelW
I see. Who is Mary-Ros Douglas? I can't find anything about her.




1. British civil servant

2. UK Breeder of champion Norwegian forest cats

3. Lifelong Chopin lover and player, occasionally found here on the Totally Devoted thread, posting as MaryRose

4. And more to the point, photoshopper extraordinare. She did
this one awhile back. Trying, I think to erase some of the
effects of his illness, portraying him as he might've been
on a better day. Good, isn't she?



Slow down and do it right.
[Linked Image]
Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2092342 05/30/13 05:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,047
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,047
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


You may be on to something with the mouth, as there is an unexplained shadow coming up from the left side of his mouth (his left). But there are still other explanations for that one detail--perhaps were looking at a photo made from a copy neg--which I believe to be the case--and a bit of dark fuzz or something, or anything dropped onto the photo being copied, or there was damage to the copy neg during development or subsequent handling. There are any number of other things that might give rise to this detail.

As to the angle of his head, I'm not quite sure what you're seeing, unless it's maybe that his head in the shot that is cropped at mid-chest, is canted just so slightly clockwise (clockwise to the viewer). I'd have to get a square out to see if that is really happening. But anyway, if it's from a copy neg--again, as I suspect it is--it would have been very easy to cause the change in angle by slightly turning the picture being copied. Such a turning could have even happened by accident.

As to what someone above referred to as "wear marks" along the edges, there are numerous causes for these, all supporting the idea that the image is from a copy neg. The lines along the right and left side are very typical of marks left by abrasion, or touching, or the masking of a 4X5 film holder, no matter what type of film is being used. But the marks along the bottom? I'll go even further. It looks like the kind of imperfect development one gets using Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film when the film is either old or cold. Also, the horizontal lines across the top look very much like the lines left by a Poloroid 4X5 holder when the Poloroid type 55 film isn't pulled out evenly and quickly. I've seen it a hundred times. The usual tell tale signature of Poloroid type 55 that fine art photographers love to include--the little mesh holes across the top edge--was probably cropped off, as intended by the Poloroid Corporation.

Style is another reason I believe this is from a copy neg. The style of cropping in the 1830s and 40s was often full body, or from the waist or mid-torso up. The very tight head shot came into its own quite a bit later. Also, think about what the photographer would have had to go through in Chopin's time to produce such a tight head shot. He would have had to laboriously frame the tight head shot, using a very cumbersome and heavy wooden tripod, and then attempt to force focus his camera when his bellows simply wouldn't allow for it, and then wasting an expensive piece of photographic material on a picture he knew would not be in the style of his times, nor would it be, could it be, sharp--I'll admit, this last objection would be a possible explanation for why it is so very soft in focus.

For all of these reasons, I believe this photo is from a rather inept copy neg made on Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film. It would have been sometime after, say, 1975, as this film was introduced about that time or later. All sans photoshop.

Tomasino




"Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do so with all thy might." Ecclesiastes 9:10

Re: Another picture of Chopin?
tomasino #2092371 05/30/13 06:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 208
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by tomasino
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


You may be on to something with the mouth, as there is an unexplained shadow coming up from the left side of his mouth (his left). But there are still other explanations for that one detail--perhaps were looking at a photo made from a copy neg--which I believe to be the case--and a bit of dark fuzz or something, or anything dropped onto the photo being copied, or there was damage to the copy neg during development or subsequent handling. There are any number of other things that might give rise to this detail.

As to the angle of his head, I'm not quite sure what you're seeing, unless it's maybe that his head in the shot that is cropped at mid-chest, is canted just so slightly clockwise (clockwise to the viewer). I'd have to get a square out to see if that is really happening. But anyway, if it's from a copy neg--again, as I suspect it is--it would have been very easy to cause the change in angle by slightly turning the picture being copied. Such a turning could have even happened by accident.

As to what someone above referred to as "wear marks" along the edges, there are numerous causes for these, all supporting the idea that the image is from a copy neg. The lines along the right and left side are very typical of marks left by abrasion, or touching, or the masking of a 4X5 film holder, no matter what type of film is being used. But the marks along the bottom? I'll go even further. It looks like the kind of imperfect development one gets using Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film when the film is either old or cold. Also, the horizontal lines across the top look very much like the lines left by a Poloroid 4X5 holder when the Poloroid type 55 film isn't pulled out evenly and quickly. I've seen it a hundred times. The usual tell tale signature of Poloroid type 55 that fine art photographers love to include--the little mesh holes across the top edge--was probably cropped off, as intended by the Poloroid Corporation.

Style is another reason I believe this is from a copy neg. The style of cropping in the 1830s and 40s was often full body, or from the waist or mid-torso up. The very tight head shot came into its own quite a bit later. Also, think about what the photographer would have had to go through in Chopin's time to produce such a tight head shot. He would have had to laboriously frame the tight head shot, using a very cumbersome and heavy wooden tripod, and then attempt to force focus his camera when his bellows simply wouldn't allow for it, and then wasting an expensive piece of photographic material on a picture he knew would not be in the style of his times, nor would it be, could it be, sharp--I'll admit, this last objection would be a possible explanation for why it is so very soft in focus.

For all of these reasons, I believe this photo is from a rather inept copy neg made on Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film. It would have been sometime after, say, 1975, as this film was introduced about that time or later. All sans photoshop.

Tomasino

Five paragraphs that deny Photoshopping, even after the explanation was already given? Wow!

Re: Another picture of Chopin?
Goomer Piles #2092387 05/30/13 07:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,686
D
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,686
Originally Posted by Goomer Piles

Five paragraphs that deny Photoshopping, even after the explanation was already given? Wow!


I think it was Photo Impacted.

Re: Another picture of Chopin?
tomasino #2092506 05/30/13 11:00 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 6,177
JoelW Offline OP
6000 Post Club Member
OP Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 6,177
Originally Posted by tomasino
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


You may be on to something with the mouth, as there is an unexplained shadow coming up from the left side of his mouth (his left). But there are still other explanations for that one detail--perhaps were looking at a photo made from a copy neg--which I believe to be the case--and a bit of dark fuzz or something, or anything dropped onto the photo being copied, or there was damage to the copy neg during development or subsequent handling. There are any number of other things that might give rise to this detail.

As to the angle of his head, I'm not quite sure what you're seeing, unless it's maybe that his head in the shot that is cropped at mid-chest, is canted just so slightly clockwise (clockwise to the viewer). I'd have to get a square out to see if that is really happening. But anyway, if it's from a copy neg--again, as I suspect it is--it would have been very easy to cause the change in angle by slightly turning the picture being copied. Such a turning could have even happened by accident.

As to what someone above referred to as "wear marks" along the edges, there are numerous causes for these, all supporting the idea that the image is from a copy neg. The lines along the right and left side are very typical of marks left by abrasion, or touching, or the masking of a 4X5 film holder, no matter what type of film is being used. But the marks along the bottom? I'll go even further. It looks like the kind of imperfect development one gets using Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film when the film is either old or cold. Also, the horizontal lines across the top look very much like the lines left by a Poloroid 4X5 holder when the Poloroid type 55 film isn't pulled out evenly and quickly. I've seen it a hundred times. The usual tell tale signature of Poloroid type 55 that fine art photographers love to include--the little mesh holes across the top edge--was probably cropped off, as intended by the Poloroid Corporation.

Style is another reason I believe this is from a copy neg. The style of cropping in the 1830s and 40s was often full body, or from the waist or mid-torso up. The very tight head shot came into its own quite a bit later. Also, think about what the photographer would have had to go through in Chopin's time to produce such a tight head shot. He would have had to laboriously frame the tight head shot, using a very cumbersome and heavy wooden tripod, and then attempt to force focus his camera when his bellows simply wouldn't allow for it, and then wasting an expensive piece of photographic material on a picture he knew would not be in the style of his times, nor would it be, could it be, sharp--I'll admit, this last objection would be a possible explanation for why it is so very soft in focus.

For all of these reasons, I believe this photo is from a rather inept copy neg made on Poloroid type 55 positive/negative film. It would have been sometime after, say, 1975, as this film was introduced about that time or later. All sans photoshop.

Tomasino




How would you explain the left side of his mouth angled more upwards? And look at the left side of his hair, it's shaped differently. I guess photoshop can do this but I don't see any motive. Oh well.

Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2092507 05/30/13 11:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453
Mary-Rose wanted Chopin to be pain-free and happier, that's why the left side of his mouth is angled more upwards...



[Linked Image]

Music is my best friend.


Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2092521 05/30/13 11:32 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 649
B
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
B
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 649
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by tomasino
Polyphonist,

I did a quick search of Chopin images and came up with quite a few different croppings of what appears to be the same image, and the photo you're showing can be explained as the most extreme crop of all, of the same image. The more you crop into the image, the softer and less sharp the image will be. There are other possible explanations too--someone attempted to make a copy of the original image and didn't properly focus the copy camera? Could be. At any rate, I don't believe it is a different image from the same shoot, or a new, heretofore unknown image.

Tomasino


Sorry but I don't think this explains it at all. There is a CLEAR difference between these two photos.

The head seems to be slightly angled differently and look at the mouth. It's a dead giveaway.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]



It's the same image... if you superimpose the sepia color image on top of the black and white in photoshop, you can scale it down and it fits exactly... look, I changed the opacity of the sepia color image and scaled it down to fit the well known photo:

[Linked Image]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us


notice how it looks like I just simply scaled the image down and put it onto the original... In fact I actually changed the opacity of the top layer to about 45% so you can see the bottom original picture through it. Except since they are a complete match, it looks like the top picture is complete with 100% opacity. There was no need for image rotation either to get a perfect match, which suggests that it is indeed the same picture but cropped since it would be almost impossible for that to happen in 2 separate photo sittings.

Last edited by boo1234; 05/30/13 11:33 PM.
Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2092584 05/31/13 01:40 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
Thank you boo! It's amazing. Several of us recognized it, knew exactly who did it, when, why and how and stated this plainly. MaryRose modified it from the 1849 dag and shared it with Elene and me several years ago. ChopinAddict even posted a link to Elene's blog (where it's clearly identified as MaryRose's) from which it apparently spread to the net. And ya'll are still going on about it. Is this how internet myths /urban legends are started?

MaryRose is having computer access challenges currently but I've let her know. Hopefully, she'll claim it sometime this weekend.


Slow down and do it right.
[Linked Image]
Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2092608 05/31/13 02:14 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,461
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,461
Hi, all--

Frycek alerted me to this just now. I don't know whether to laugh or... well, something. The image in question is indeed Mary-Rose's altered version of the 1849 photo, in which she attempted to put our Fryderyk back into a rather better state of health and happiness. I think ChopinAddict's comment was exactly right.

I find this piece of art quite beautiful, especially since he appears to be looking at us through a mist or veil, which seems to me to express the many uncertainties we have about him. It also seems very alive and in motion, as if he is just about to speak.

I don't know what to make of the fact that there was apparently a link to my blog, which distinctly states that the picture was made by Mary-Rose (who is a long-time denizen of the "Devoted to Chopin" thread, less active lately), and yet you didn't look there for information. Right under Mary-Rose's portrait is a shot of Clésinger’s bust based on the death mask, which is why googling "Chopin death mask" yielded this image.

So some of you have been arguing passionately about nothing. (And spelling "Polaroid" wrong in the process.)

I've noticed that googling images can lead one in some very strange directions.

The original blog post: Fryc in Print

Elene

Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2093423 06/01/13 03:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 208
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 208
And this thread comes to a screeching halt as the know-it-alls retreat in silent embarrassment!

Re: Another picture of Chopin?
Elene #2093435 06/01/13 04:05 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,190
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,190
Originally Posted by Elene
So some of you have been arguing passionately about nothing.


Seems to happen a lot around here !!! grin


Mason and Hamlin BB - 91640
Kawai K-500 Upright
Kawai CA-65 Digital
YouTube channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/pianophilo
Re: Another picture of Chopin?
Carey #2093549 06/01/13 06:47 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,919
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,919
Originally Posted by carey
Originally Posted by JoelW
Originally Posted by debrucey
I don't think it was possible in those days to 'accidentally' take a photograph


You're right. I forgot about the insanely slow shutter speed. This photo is puzzling me. It doesn't look posed, yet pictures back then had to be posed.

...


Actually, camera shutters weren't invented until the 1870s. smile


Hmmmm..... 22 years for the shutter to make its appearance. That IS a long time.


There is no end of learning. -Robert Schumann Rules for Young Musicians
Re: Another picture of Chopin?
JoelW #2095451 06/04/13 04:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 808
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 808
Interesting re the photo, but I'm more fascinated by your Frederic experiences you describe on your blog. wow

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Brendan, Kreisler 

Link Copied to Clipboard
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq Karsten Collection
(ad)
PianoDisc

PianoDisc
(ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad)
Mason & Hamlin Pianos
Download Sheet Music
Virtual Sheet Music - Classical Sheet Music Downloads
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Complaining clients that wear hearing aids
by TimM_980 - 09/30/20 01:06 PM
Samick JS-115 VS. Yamaha M405
by AngP - 09/30/20 11:30 AM
Searching for a new piano
by lisztlover - 09/30/20 10:57 AM
Pianist receives bionic gloves
by dogperson - 09/30/20 09:11 AM
What's Hot!!
News from the Piano World
3,000,000+!
------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
Forum Statistics
Forums41
Topics201,908
Posts3,008,374
Members98,725
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
Please Support Our Advertisers


Faust Harrison 100+ Steinways

Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver

 Best of Piano Buyer

PianoTeq Bechstein
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

Virtual Sheet Music - Classical Sheet Music Downloads



 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2020 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4