2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
60 members (AlkansBookcase, brdwyguy, 20/20 Vision, Charles Cohen, 36251, benkeys, clothearednincompo, bcalvanese, booms, 7 invisible), 1,903 guests, and 253 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
R
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
R
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
Hi,
Although I'm working slowly through the basics, I'm aware that I need to start somewhere and 'learn a proper song' for my repertoire.

I'm looking for a song that requires timing, left and right hands, good range of dynamics and isn't so obscure that I would struggle to find sheet music and perhaps a recording or two, to compare against.

If you have any suggestions, I'm all ears ;-)

Regards,


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,065
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,065
I guess you would have to qualify what you have been learning as far as songs go and what sort of music you would like to learn:

This site is excellent as it has sheet music and mp3 files (and some videos)

http://gmajormusictheory.org/Freebies/freebiesFP.html


Surprisingly easy, barely an inconvenience.

Kawai K8 & Kawai Novus NV10


13x[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,496
A
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
A
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,496
Bach's (well, actually it turns out, Petzold's) minuet in G has been used for exactly this purpose for centuries.

Although, personally, I subscribe to the view that it's a little harder than some would give credit for.

This is a nice cheap selection of early repertoire - the pieces get progressively harder. As your piano skills improve you can use it for sight reading:

Joy of Classics



  • Debussy - Le Petit Nègre, L. 114
  • Haydn - Sonata in Gm, Hob. XVI/44

Kawai K3
[Linked Image][Linked Image][Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
M
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
It really depends on what you can currently do. The above mentioned Minuet in G is great, but it's also very tricky for a beginner (I consider it early intermediate). Are you working through a method book on your own, or are there any pieces that you can currently play?


private piano/voice teacher FT

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
R
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
R
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
Hi, Thanks for the replies.
I'm currently just starting with Alfreds all in one book. I don't have a teacher, but I'm going to give it a good try to learn some of the basics myself, such as from this book.

My thinking was that if I have a song I can keep revisiting it, each time a new concept is introduced in the book, Block chords, arpeggios, rhythm, etc. and apply what I have learnt?


Regards,

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
M
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
The most important thing to do when you are first learning piano is to encounter as much different music as you can, all within a certain skillset that you already have. You need experience more than one warhorse you keep having a go at to realize that you still don't know how to play it.

That's not to say it's wrong to have that piece as a carrot to entice you to work harder, but I think it's more importnat and more productive to work on the pieces that will give you the skills to get there.

For supplemental music for Alfred, try looking into the Keith Snell series at the preparatory level. He offers selections in Baroque and Classical, and Romantic-20th century that you might enjoy and would be very good to learn. Also, Jeanine Yeager has Fresh Impressions which is a bit new agey sounding if you enjoy that. Both of these are published by Neil A. Kjos Music Company:

http://www.kjos.com/detail.php?division=5&table=product&prod_id=GP600
http://www.kjos.com/detail.php?division=5&table=product&prod_id=GP620
http://www.kjos.com/detail.php?division=5&table=product&prod_id=WP518


private piano/voice teacher FT

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,189
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,189
I am playing from the Snell series as a beginner to supplement the Alfred's All-in-One. I highly recommend it. There is alot of variety. I did not start with the Prep Level; I am working out of Level One.


Kawai MP11 : JBL LSR305 : Focusrite 2i4 : Pianoteq / Garritan CFX

We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams. -Willy Wonka


[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
R
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
R
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
You guys are awesome, you've probably just saved me months of 'beating a dead horse' by working on a single piece, and never really having a frame of reference.

I going to check out the Snell books now. Thanks for the links too.

Regards.

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,189
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,189
The nice thing about the Snell books (at least the one I have), are that they include a CD.

But I have to caution you. I have over extended myself with the number of pieces I am working on. You can easily start working on too many at one time. I have way too many books open. I try, really try, to keep it to five pieces at a time. But well, that does not always work.

Last edited by scorpio; 04/25/13 11:08 AM.

Kawai MP11 : JBL LSR305 : Focusrite 2i4 : Pianoteq / Garritan CFX

We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams. -Willy Wonka


[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
R
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
R
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
Thanks for the tip Scorpio. I Intend to work out some kind of routine where I get to work through the Alfred book, practice some scales, learn some theory and finally work on a piece or two at a time.

Not quite sure yet how to do it, I'm still reading though some of the great advice found in the older pages of this site. Unless you already know of some topics on training schedules?

Regards.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,607
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,607
I'm not into the idea of taking a piece far beyond one's ability and over time keep re-visiting it in the hopes of improving it as one's skill builds. I think there are some problem with that. First, over time, you become so familiar with the piece that you really do not see it with fresh eyes and you really don't improve on it. Better to wait until you actually have half a chance of doing a decent job before attempting it. But that's me. I know that's at least one person here at ABF that takes the complete opposite view.

The Keith Snell series is really good. Anything in the Preparatory level is good, and they are nice sounding too, though be aware it may be a little challenging for someone who's just starting out.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,065
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,065
Originally Posted by 4evrBeginR
I'm not into the idea of taking a piece far beyond one's ability and over time keep re-visiting it in the hopes of improving it as one's skill builds. I think there are some problem with that. First, over time, you become so familiar with the piece that you really do not see it with fresh eyes and you really don't improve on it. Better to wait until you actually have half a chance of doing a decent job before attempting it. But that's me. I know that's at least one person here at ABF that takes the complete opposite view.

The Keith Snell series is really good. Anything in the Preparatory level is good, and they are nice sounding too, though be aware it may be a little challenging for someone who's just starting out.


I could not agree more. It is nice to have a piece in your sights as a goal for when you improve, but to try to force yourself to play is disappointing and will only result in beginner mistakes only being incorporated into the piece and then hard to correct (eg finger positions.

I have started working on several pieces beyond my standard, I have let them go until I can do them properly and do them justice.


Surprisingly easy, barely an inconvenience.

Kawai K8 & Kawai Novus NV10


13x[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
R
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
R
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
Your right, know I've come back to the question, I can see where your coming from. I have order a couple of books as recommended and will benefit more from the mileage in covering a number of songs, rather than sticking to a single piece.
I think lots of easy pieces will give me more finger-time and a more rounded view also. Many thanks guys, I'll hopefully get a couple of videos up on YouTube over the summer so you can all see how bad I am ;-)

Regards.

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,496
A
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
A
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by 4evrBeginR
I'm not into the idea of taking a piece far beyond one's ability and over time keep re-visiting it in the hopes of improving it as one's skill builds. I think there are some problem with that. First, over time, you become so familiar with the piece that you really do not see it with fresh eyes and you really don't improve on it. Better to wait until you actually have half a chance of doing a decent job before attempting it. But that's me. I know that's at least one person here at ABF that takes the complete opposite view.


I don't think I would have this as a goal but I disagree with your "problems." I've "re-tackled" a piece a couple of times and each time was able to improve it relatively quickly because my technique had improved so much. And professional pianists will often talk about how they approach certain pieces in a very different manner.

But, I wouldn't set out to do this deliberately. The world of piano repertoire is so broad there's almost no point. And certainly not "too early" - that's a complete waste of time.


  • Debussy - Le Petit Nègre, L. 114
  • Haydn - Sonata in Gm, Hob. XVI/44

Kawai K3
[Linked Image][Linked Image][Linked Image]
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,607
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,607
I don't think my comment applies to you because from your signature, you're working on a Chopin Nocturn and Bach Invention both are advance pieces. I assume if you could manage those with a good job from your teacher, then you're way pass that stage anyway. I'm more talking about someone at my level who can't manage a Bach Invention but deciding to do it anyway, failing, then playing it again, failing again, etc. So my comments wasn't about those who play something now and later come back and play it better because that assumes you actually could play it now already. Hope that makes sense.

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 806
A

Silver Supporter until Jan 04 2013
500 Post Club Member
Offline

Silver Supporter until Jan 04 2013
500 Post Club Member
A
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 806
Originally Posted by Andy Platt
Originally Posted by 4evrBeginR
I'm not into the idea of taking a piece far beyond one's ability and over time keep re-visiting it in the hopes of improving it as one's skill builds. I think there are some problem with that. First, over time, you become so familiar with the piece that you really do not see it with fresh eyes and you really don't improve on it. Better to wait until you actually have half a chance of doing a decent job before attempting it. But that's me. I know that's at least one person here at ABF that takes the complete opposite view.


I don't think I would have this as a goal but I disagree with your "problems." I've "re-tackled" a piece a couple of times and each time was able to improve it relatively quickly because my technique had improved so much. And professional pianists will often talk about how they approach certain pieces in a very different manner.

But, I wouldn't set out to do this deliberately. The world of piano repertoire is so broad there's almost no point. And certainly not "too early" - that's a complete waste of time.


Originally Posted by 4evrBeginR
I don't think my comment applies to you because from your signature, you're working on a Chopin Nocturn and Bach Invention both are advance pieces. I assume if you could manage those with a good job from your teacher, then you're way pass that stage anyway. I'm more talking about someone at my level who can't manage a Bach Invention but deciding to do it anyway, failing, then playing it again, failing again, etc. So my comments wasn't about those who play something now and later come back and play it better because that assumes you actually could play it now already. Hope that makes sense.


It might depend on how long you wait between those pieces. I'm looking over a couple of pieces (Bach) that I just couldn't "finish" for whatever reasons (I'm thinking impatience and trying to rush through certain key measures I needed to take slowly). There were at least 5 botched measures that I couldn't master. I tried to look over them a month or 3 later, I still couldn't overcome it. It's been a year at least, but now I'm seeing them through more experienced and patient eyes and those obstacles are doable. I've acquired better learning skills so now I can handle those problem areas better.

Here's a slightly relevant story. When I was 14 or so, we got a piano. No lessons, however. My mom taught me a few things about reading, gave me a basic book and some easy pop songs and let me go with it. I still remembered basic reading from my elementary music classes, which was helpful. For herself, she bought Moonlight Sonata (the full one). She taught me how to read the first part, and from there, off and on for years(I'm talking super sporadically), I learned to read both clefs quite well. I could read and find the notes very quickly - I just couldn't play them that well. I went all the way through the first movement. The downside is that I developed horrible technique and have spent probably most of my 3 years in lessons overcoming that. Combined with my impatient nature, it has been challenging.

Moral of the story: "project" pieces slightly over your level are fine, but don't go in way over your head.






Last edited by AimeeO; 04/26/13 02:33 PM.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,607
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,607
Originally Posted by AimeeO

Moral of the story: "project" pieces slightly over your level are fine, but don't go in way over your head.


Exactly.



Moderated by  Bart K, platuser 

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Recommended Songs for Beginners
by FreddyM - 04/16/24 03:20 PM
New DP for a 10 year old
by peelaaa - 04/16/24 02:47 PM
Estonia 1990
by Iberia - 04/16/24 11:01 AM
Very Cheap Piano?
by Tweedpipe - 04/16/24 10:13 AM
Practical Meaning of SMP
by rneedle - 04/16/24 09:57 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,392
Posts3,349,293
Members111,634
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.