2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
71 members (benkeys, apianostudent, Bellyman, AlkansBookcase, accordeur, akse0435, Barry_Braksick, 12 invisible), 1,851 guests, and 288 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 10 of 14 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,439
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,439
Originally Posted by theJourney
In other words: it is all about ME, ME, ME, MacMacMac. Everyone else be damned.
No, it's not. It's all about me choosing for me, and you choosing for you. What it's not about is: me choosing for you, and you choosing for me. Many people in this country (on both sides of the aisle) don't seem to understand that basic concept.
Quote
Did you choose to be born to your parents? Did you choose to be born in the USA or your home state versus another country?
Irrelevant. No one but no one has any such choice.
Quote
Did you choose to use public roads rather than only use your bare hands to wade through the wild Floridian Everglades every where you went?
Nope. I paid for that. Willingly.
Quote
Did you choose for the US to be a republic with representative democracy ...
Nope. Others did that two centuries ago.
Quote
... depending on well-educated citizens who are responsible and accountable for self-government ...
I wish there were more such people.

Quote
... rather than a failed state such as Somalia filled with Ayn Rand-styled "rugged individuals" choosing their self-interest as they axe each other to death? etc. etc.
This country was built on rugged individualism. I can't say that this is uniquely American, but it seems a foreign concept elsewhere in the world.
Quote
People who are indoctrinated to think of everything as a personal "choice" and of themselves merely as consumers in "free" markets rather than responsible citizens and members of civilized society equate the world to being nothing more complicated than being left alone to choose Crest over Colgate toothpaste. Simplistic lies.
Yes, marketing is filled with bullcrap. Shrug.
Quote
... this book even explains why MacMacMac might want to live in North Carolina.
I don't know that author, nor he me. So how can he possibly know why I choose to move to NC? The real reason: Raleigh is a fast-growing city with abundant tech jobs. (I've not read your cited source, but am I to expect in it something about job growth in NC? More likely your conclusion is just your personal rant.)

So ... if you don't agree with my thinking, that's fine. I'm okay with that. But why must you criticize me? I've not criticized the other side. I'm perfectly willing to let each side have his own. But apparently you're not.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Sorry for the off-topic (!), but...

EssBrace: New CP1 listed in your sig, but where's the Nord?!

James
x


Employed by Kawai Japan, however the opinions I express are my own.
Nord Electro 3 & occasional rare groove player.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,552
G
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
G
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,552
Originally Posted by Kawai James
Sorry for the off-topic (!), but...


Lol!

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
Originally Posted by Kawai James
Sorry for the off-topic (!), but...

EssBrace: New CP1 listed in your sig, but where's the Nord?!

James
x


Er, being swapped for CP1. I'm a lost cause I really am.

I don't think the CP1 has been successful, probably because it is overpriced. That said, the going rate in the UK is now £2600 against a list price of £4000+. With the CP5 at £1900+ I think the price differential now favours CP1. I think the CP1 is now actually (finally) worth its price. The EPs are just to die for James - and as far as AP sounds go I just have to accept I'm a Yamaha man at heart.

The Nord's action just gets on my nerves a bit to be honest so I've traded it against the CP. Great sounds and it's been a privilege to own the Nord but it had to go!

Anyway, enough of that piano rubbish - back to the topic at hand...

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,701
6000 Post Club Member
OP Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,701
This country was built on rugged individualism. I can't say that this is uniquely American, but it seems a foreign concept elsewhere in the world.

It's interesting that the imperialists romanticize the stealing of a land. smile

Our land was built using slave labor, let's not get carried away.


Yamaha AvantGrand N1X | Roland RD 2000 | Sennheiser HD 598 headphones
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 301
O
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
O
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 301
Originally Posted by EssBrace


It's so weird though Dewster - you are obviously referring to Mac - but I quite often find those with what I would call the most right wing, laissez-faire, look-after-number-one attitudes about society and community and all that big stuff are often, on a more individual, personal level, the kindest most generous people. There are some high profile examples. Our Mrs Thatcher, the most divisive and in many ways hated prime minister we have had in the modern era, with a vicious and uncaring public image was capable (and many examples have surfaced over the years) of astonishingly kind and generous personal gestures, quite at odds with her public personua.

So it might not be wise to judge so harshly - although I completely take your point.


You can say exactly the same about almost anyone on the planet including Hitler.

For every one of her kind gestures, I can show you a whole community she ruined and the gravestones of those she drove to suicide. I am a very forgiving person who tries to see good in everyone, but thatcher is the one person I can think of where I shall openly rejoice the day she dies, and anyone that knows me in real life would know how out of character saying such a thing is, but I despise what she did to this country and how many lives she wrecked.



[Linked Image]
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
Originally Posted by Ojustaboo
For every one of her kind gestures, I can show you a whole community she ruined and the gravestones of those she drove to suicide. I am a very forgiving person who tries to see good in everyone, but thatcher is the one person I can think of where I shall openly rejoice the day she dies, and anyone that knows me in real life would know how out of character saying such a thing is, but I despise what she did to this country and how many lives she wrecked.



Yes but what I was trying to say, and what gv said more explicitly (and more eloquently) is that the conservatives (those on the right politically) can tend to be, oh, I don't know, more generous, kinder if you like in the sense of giving to others. That's on a personal level I mean. I'm not affiliated to any political party - and I wouldn't vote Conservative while there's breath in my body by the way - but I have observed that characteristic.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
EssBrace, well now we're really starting to show our truly colours aren't we?

Originally Posted by EssBrace
I'm a Yamaha man at heart.

and

Originally Posted by EssBrace
The Nord's action just gets on my nerves...it had to go!


Now, I can just about tolerate your views on Thatcher, but trading in that beautiful red Nord...for a Yamaha?!

Honestly, words fail me.

And you can count yourself crossed-off the Christmas card list too, by the way!

Cheers,
James
x


Employed by Kawai Japan, however the opinions I express are my own.
Nord Electro 3 & occasional rare groove player.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,439
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14,439
gv: I have to agree with you on this:
Originally Posted by gvfarns
The more power you give the government improve the situation of the poorest, the greater the number of people pushed into poverty and dependence by that same government.
The 1960's era War on Poverty created this problem. Many of us can remember the shame associated with "living on the dole", as the British term it. But as each new generation of children grow up in such an environment, it becomes the norm, accepted as the standard (and only) way of life. The war on poverty has failed, and has only created a new dependent class. (And a ready source of votes for the pols who engendered it.)

And this:
Quote
I can look around and see many beneficial things provided by government but essentially every one I see is actually provided by state and local government, which is a very small part of our tax burden. The Feds take the lion share and do precious little good with it.
City and county governments are in touch with the needs of the local population and with the cultural norms of the region. States a bit less so. And the federal government is utterly out of touch.

My complaints are largely leveled at the federal government. In post-war America the feds have usurped state and local powers by means of taxation. And when people are forced to pay the feds for state/local programs, they are no longer able to endure state/local taxation for those purposes. The feds win by trumping state/local powers. In public works. In education. In health care. In most everything.

You ask if we can ...
Quote
... imagine how you would feel if in addition to your national taxes you had to pay an even larger portion of your wealth to an all-EU super-government, which promptly wasted it on projects that accomplish precious little.
In America, we don't have to imagine. We live with it constantly.

Your point here ...
Quote
American decline and American socialism go tightly hand in hand, which is why so many people oppose it despite the obvious theoretical benefits of having the government take care of anything you might worry about.
... is central to mine. I call it losership. That term might seem inflamatory. But it's fact. And sad. And the key to our possible downfall. I'll not likely live to see the fall of America. But my children and grandson likely will. Nothing hurts me more.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,946
T
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
T
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,946
Originally Posted by Dave Horne
This country was built on rugged individualism. I can't say that this is uniquely American, but it seems a foreign concept elsewhere in the world.

It's interesting that the imperialists romanticize the stealing of a land. smile

Our land was built using slave labor, let's not get carried away.


Slave labor, certainly (continuing up to this day but carried out now instead of by black slaves by the 11 to 25 million abused & exploited hungry Latin American men, women & children who were actively recruited into the US with village to village tax-subsidized U.S. corporate marketing campaigns -- despite all the rhetoric to the contrary). Some have argued that the black slaves had it better than the new Latin American slaves today that keep America's meat, vegetables, restaurant meals, construction, lawncare, home-cleaning, etc. etc. artificially cheap by using the labor of fearful refugees denied their human rights.

However, don't forget the other grand pillar at the foundation of the American Nation: deliberate genocide (in the form of biological warfare, massacres and mass murder a.k.a. heinous crimes against humanity).

one small example:
Quote

On June 29, 1763, a week after the siege began, Bouquet was preparing to lead an expedition to relieve Fort Pitt when he received a letter from Amherst making the following proposal: "Could it not be contrived to send the smallpox among the disaffected tribes of Indians? We must on this occasion use every stratagem in our power to reduce them." [1]
Bouquet agreed, writing back to Amherst on July 13, 1763: "I will try to inoculate the bastards with some blankets that may fall into their hands, and take care not to get the disease myself." Amherst responded favorably on July 16, 1763: "You will do well to inoculate the Indians by means of blankets, as well as every other method that can serve to extirpate this execrable race."[2]
As it turned out, however, officers at the besieged Fort Pitt had already exposed the Indians in just the manner Amherst and Bouquet were discussing. During a parley at Fort Pitt on June 24, 1763, Captain Simeon Ecuyer gave representatives of the besieging Delawares two blankets and a handkerchief from the smallpox ward "out of regard to them" after the Delawares pledged to renew their friendship.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Fort_Pitt

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
Originally Posted by Kawai James
...but trading in that beautiful red Nord...for a Yamaha?!

Honestly, words fail me.

And you can count yourself crossed-off the Christmas card list too, by the way!


I know, I know. Sorry is an inadequate word in such circumstances. Perhaps a lifetime of regret would be appropriate punishment? Maybe that is my destiny? But at least I'll have an illuminated Yamaha logo to compensate! Good times!!

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,998
A
5000 Post Club Member
Offline
5000 Post Club Member
A
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,998
Originally Posted by EssBrace
But at least I'll have an illuminated Yamaha logo to compensate! Good times!!


They illuminate the logo? They can do that?!

ando #2061143 04/08/13 03:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
Originally Posted by ando
Originally Posted by EssBrace
But at least I'll have an illuminated Yamaha logo to compensate! Good times!!


They illuminate the logo? They can do that?!


I know. Amazing. The piano sounds and action are so-so - but that logo - Wow! I dim the lights and dance in front of it. The neighbours join in. It's the biggest single advance in DP design in years.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 19,097
Originally Posted by EssBrace
I dim the lights and dance in front of it. The neighbours join in.


Reminds me of this scene in 'Portlandia':



Cheers,
James
x

ps. Sorry for the off-topic, by the way...


Employed by Kawai Japan, however the opinions I express are my own.
Nord Electro 3 & occasional rare groove player.
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,565
Originally Posted by Kawai James
Originally Posted by EssBrace
I dim the lights and dance in front of it. The neighbours join in.


Reminds me of this scene in 'Portlandia':



Cheers,
James
x

ps. Sorry for the off-topic, by the way...


Very funny! And yes, that could have been shot in front of a CP1 - at the end of the day there's very little difference between raging naked flames and Yamaha's phosphorescent display (three level adjustability and off). There's a primeval quality to both!

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,701
6000 Post Club Member
OP Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,701
A family member posted a question on FaceBook as a result of my response to another post of his. His views are probably more aligned with MacMacMac.

He asked the following question ... Everybody: I like to try something if you can help me out. I like to ask a question of all out there in Facebook land:

Q: Do you know/feel/believe you are living in a better country than Europeans? Please consider the health issues, the food, the banking system, the schools, the people, our form of government and importantly - the freedoms.


To date I am the only person to reply to his post. Here's what I wrote ...

As an America who has lived 44 years in the US and 18 years in the Netherlands, my vote goes to Europe, and more specifically, the Netherlands.

Health care ... Everyone in Western Europe (Scandinavia, Australia, Japan, and Canada) is covered by universal health care. As a result of that universal health care we enjoy a lower infant mortality rate and a greater longevity rate (when compared to the US). I use those rates to judge the overall health of a country. (These statistics can be found at our own CIA World Factbook ... or NationMaster.com ... I have them posted at my web site as well.) The cost of health care through my private health care provider here is about half of that in the US.

I think the entire world is aware that two thirds of the US population are overweight; one third of the US population is obese. (Obese is a having a BMI of greater than 30.)

Transportation - we have better roads in Holland than the US. The train system here in the Netherlands is excellent. When entering and exiting a bus, tram, or train one only has to flash a plastic card over a card reader and the amount of the trip is automatically deducted from your balance. I have my card set up so it is automatically 'filled up' when it gets below a certain limit.

If you like to get around by bike, there are bike paths everywhere. I own two bikes and prefer to use my bike instead of my car.

Banking - no one here uses checks. We pay with a debit card and most if not all bills are paid online. (Speaking of online, my village of 20,000+ inhabitants was recently completely wired up with optical fiber.)

Education - everyone can afford to go to university, everyone.

Freedoms - I can't imagine a more free country than the Netherlands. The Netherlands was either the first or second country in the world to legalize same sex marriage. We don't have just two political parties here, we have a collection of 12 or so. Compromise is not a foreign concept like in the US.

We can buy guns here in the Netherlands but not over the counter like in the US. You must first join a local gun club for one year and the club evaluates you while the government also does a background check. If you receive a 'clean bill of health' you may purchase a gun.

Everyone here enjoys the same freedoms as in the US. The overall standard of living is higher here than in the US ... and I've given more than several specific examples to back that claim up.

I like the fact that all telephone lines and computer cables, etc. are run underground and not strung on poles in plain sight.

If you really want to compare issues between countries, go to NationMaster.com and you can easily compare the percentage of a population in prison (the US is number one as a percentage\per capita), the literacy rate, education levels, agricultural exports, teenage pregnancy rates ... whatever.

I compare using statistics.


Yamaha AvantGrand N1X | Roland RD 2000 | Sennheiser HD 598 headphones
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 307
C
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
C
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 307
Very well put, Dave, I'm with you 100%. Still, some people will tell you they value their freedoms more than any of those benefits you have listed.

I'd say we can only agree to disagree at this point.

Last edited by Clayman; 04/08/13 05:51 AM.

-- Zbynek N.

Learning to play the piano since 06/2013 on a Kawai CA-95.

Music is what feelings sound like. ~ Author Unknown
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 301
O
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
O
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 301
Originally Posted by MacMacMac
The 1960's era War on Poverty created this problem. Many of us can remember the shame associated with "living on the dole", as the British term it. But as each new generation of children grow up in such an environment, it becomes the norm, accepted as the standard (and only) way of life. The war on poverty has failed, and has only created a new dependent class. (And a ready source of votes for the pols who engendered it.)


Personally I'm glad things have moved on enough so that people no longer feel shame if they are out of work through no fault of their own and have to claim back from a system they've been contributing to all the time they've been working.

Speak to my grandmother (no longer with us) she can remember a time when if a girl got pregnant out of wedlock in the UK she'd have a good chance of being placed (and forgotten about) in a mental institution, I am glad things move forwards.

I'm not saying there isn't a problem with SOME people but we get to hear about those plastered across the front pages of the UK tabloid press, implying everyone on welfare fall into this category when it simply isn't true.

A good friend of mine while at university became good friends with another guy. This guys parents, brothers and grandparents all lived their lives deliberately sponging off the state. My friend went back to this guys house and all his family were laughing at them both for being at Uni and for trying to work for a living.

However for every family like the above, there are 1000s of people in dire need that are not conning the system.

I know people born with severe disabilities both mental and physical stopping them ever from doing work in a normal working environment

A few charity/government schemes have been set up to give them a sense of self worth where they are working at the mercy of people donating or tax payers expense in that they aren't making a profit, but it is giving them self worth, but those seem to be being cut more and more lately.

Due to the minority of people conning the system and those being heavily publicised, people are scared to admit they are on welfare, not because of shame but because so many others now think they are pulling a fast one, they are deemed guilty without trial.

But, take any race of people from any country, any religious belief, any sexual preference, white, black, asian etc. You could spend the next year printing weekly headlines of someone from that race/gender/religion being a sponger, being violent, being a bully or whatever. But just because some are like that we don't presume all are.

If there's 1000 people claiming they are starving and 50 of them aren't, I would rather 1000 people get handouts and those 50 people live off other peoples generosity than no one gets it and 950 people go without food. And I view the whole of welfare with that mindset.

Sure in an ideal world the 50 would be found out but in an ideal world, those at the top would treat their workers fairly, wouldn't use loopholes not to pay tax etc.

over the years they try to weed out the cheats and scroungers but end up harming those in greatest need. I can give yo a few real life examples. I spent some time in care (children's home) as a teenager. I witnessed people reach 18/19. thrown out of the home with zero family to fall back on, zero help, if they didn't have a roof over their head, they couldn't go to their parents, relatives etc as many didn't have them.

About 80% of the people I was in care with were dead by the time I was 35.

My wife left home a couple of weeks before her 16 birthday with her brother who was a year older, due to their new step dad sexually abusing my wife. The authorities were informed but nothing could be proven. At 16 she started a hairdressing apprenticeship (and today, 31 years later, is happily self employed as a mobile hairdresser).

They were given housing benefit that allowed them to rent a one room tiny bedsit. They needed this, it allowed them to work, exist and get away from her stepdad.

Today her brother is a policeman, she is self employed, both hard working tax payers, but if another young girl found themselves in my wife's horrible position, due to the government clamping down on cheats and spongers, they would no longer get housing benefit as it's been stopped for people that age.

Which is what I mean by rules put in place to stop the spongers harming the people that really need help.

Trouble is, its very hard for the poor to be poor compared to 50+ years ago.

So many rules and regulations in place, illegal to beg in certain places, cost of housing (in England) off the scale compared to what it was like before Thatcher introduced the greed culture.

Look at some of the worlds greatest from history, they simply couldn't do what they did today. So many of them didn't fit into the school system, but weren't written off as thug's and louts, many of therm started work at 13-14 etc.

My son wanted to work when he was 15 in his school holidays, but no one would employ him, not because he isn't capable (studying systems engineering at uni) but because company policy wouldn't allow it due to health and safety/insurance etc.

When I was 19, I lived in Guildford in Surrey which is considered a very affluent part of the UK. I rented a one bedroomed flat (bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom) with my wife (then girlfriend) for £20 a week each. The rates were next to nothing as were the electricity bills.

My wife earned very little doing her apprenticeship and I worked in a small hardware shop which I loved but the pay wasn't very good. We could still easily afford to rent our flat, eat, and go out a few times a week to the pub etc.

The cost to buy an average 3 bed semi house in Guildford was around £20k when Thatcher came to power in 1979
Two years later in 1981 it had risen to £30k
Another two years and it was £34K
Another two years and it was £48K
Another two years in 1987 it was 72K
Another two years in 1989 and it has risen from £20k ten years ago to £95k

What it meant in reality is no one could do the sensible thing and save up for a deposit because the prices rose far faster than anyone could possibly save.

So the banks etc offered 100% mortgages (even higher in some cases).

Then greedy people realised they could take out a 100% mortgage, rent out their home for a year or two and sell it and make a fortune. This meant that loads of people started to buy to let. Which meant that they needed the rent to be enough to pay their mortgages, which meant the cost of renting went through the roof.

And it very soon became what is still the case today, many people didn't earn enough to qualify for a decent rate mortgage but the amount of rent they pay would easily cover the mortgage repayments.

The more people made, the more they bought, the greedier they got and the higher the house prices rose.

In the middle of all that is the poor person. They cant take a low wage job and afford to live now, it's simply impossible. They find employment, find their benefits stopped and find themselves worse off than when they weren't working. A catch 22 situation but still not their fault.

Then there's the fact that if between 1979 and 1989 house prices rose from 20K to 95K, the cost of welfare payments to pay for rent for those that need help, also went through the roof. The same house would cost around £270k now which would mean if wages rose by a similar amount, average salary for someone 18 - 25 would be something around £80k a year now rather than £15k to £20k

At the same time utilities have been privatised and the prices gone through the roof.

The local taxes that were rates and are now called council tax is off the scale compared to what it used to be in relations to someone earnings.

And all of that is why we are in the recession we are in now. Its the house price boom that has caused the mess, people had to turn to the sub prime market to get a roof over their heads, prices continued rising and rising and a 3 year old could tell it couldn't continue.

All that's happened is property developers and estate agents have got rich and everyone else is worse off with mortgage payments off the scale due to the cost of their houses.

Yet I guarantee you when house prices start rising our government will be happy.

And all most people want to do is an honest days work and be able to live.

At the same time companies have ignored their workers who help build their companies up, outsourced to cheap labour abroad meaning there isn't the jobs for those that do want to work, and those jobs that do exist are mainly minimum wage.

The greed of society is what's caused such a great need for welfare over the years and I cant see it getting any better.





[Linked Image]
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,946
T
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
T
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,946
Originally Posted by Ojustaboo
thatcher is the one person I can think of where I shall openly rejoice the day she dies, and anyone that knows me in real life would know how out of character saying such a thing is, but I despise what she did to this country and how many lives she wrecked.



I don't know what kind of voodoo you use, but I for one plan to stay on your good side. shocked

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...ret-Thatcher-dies-of-stroke-aged-87.html

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 301
O
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
O
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 301
Yep, which means I now have to endure the next week or so of every news and chat program going on about great this evil woman was frown


[Linked Image]
Page 10 of 14 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
New DP for a 10 year old
by peelaaa - 04/16/24 02:47 PM
Estonia 1990
by Iberia - 04/16/24 11:01 AM
Very Cheap Piano?
by Tweedpipe - 04/16/24 10:13 AM
Practical Meaning of SMP
by rneedle - 04/16/24 09:57 AM
Country style lessons
by Stephen_James - 04/16/24 06:04 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,390
Posts3,349,260
Members111,633
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.