64 registered members (36251, Calavera, bajtucha, camperbc, barbaram, almo82, Boboulus, aphexdisklavier, Animisha, 16 invisible),
879
guests, and 475
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Looking at Pianos
#2046569
03/11/13 04:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
RosieP
OP
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18 |
Hi,
I am starting my search for a grand, knowing that it could be a long process. I have identified 3 interesting used pianos and I wondered about everyone's opinion:
1. Baldwin SF-10 1985 - well maintained from new, but not rebuilt $11,750
2.C Bechstein Model A 1902 - rebuilt in 1998. $7,000
3. Heintzman & Co 5' 4" baby grand 1940 - some work done(hammers and keytops replaced) and refinished 25 years ago. $8,000
All 3 pianos look to be in good condition and are from private owners. I would get my tech to check them all out, but I would value your comments on price etc.
I have also been thinking about new and have considered Kawai, Ritmuller, Brodmann, and Hailun.
I know that most people on this forum suggest buying new, but something keeps drawing me back to these older pianos.
Many thanks for your help
Rosie
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2046602
03/11/13 05:03 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 372
Jonathan Alford
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 372 |
Rosie,
Have you played them? Do play as many as you can - one will be the perfect piano for you - maybe new - maybe used.
Have fun! Jonathan
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: Jonathan Alford]
#2046604
03/11/13 05:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
RosieP
OP
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18 |
Hi Jonathan,
I haven't played them yet. Because of the distance involved I was going to get a tech to check out a couple of favourites and then make the final decision. It will probably be a weekend full of piano playing!
Thanks, Wendy
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2046621
03/11/13 05:32 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 372
Jonathan Alford
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 372 |
Wendy,
Not sure how much your tech charges, but it could get expensive having him/her check them out first.
When I was shopping, I played maybe 15-20 pianos and then had my tech check out the one used piano I was considering. Cost about $100 for that one. (I ended up going with a new Ritmuller instead.)
Jonathan
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2046643
03/11/13 06:18 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,527
Mark...
4000 Post Club Member
|
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,527 |
1. Baldwin SF-10 1985 - well maintained from new, but not rebuilt $11,750
I like!
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: Mark...]
#2046659
03/11/13 07:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
RosieP
OP
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18 |
Hi Mark,
That's the one I favour too! Now I just have to persuade my better half that 7 feet is "not that big"!
Cheers, Rosie
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: Jonathan Alford]
#2046660
03/11/13 07:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
RosieP
OP
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18 |
Thanks for the advice Jonathan - I will bear that in mind.
Rosie
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2046680
03/11/13 08:37 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 325
dsch
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 325 |
Not knowing anything else, I'd choose #1. It has way more potential for giving you pleasure. I'd probably go with that over a new Brodmann or Ritmuller. But you may have to put more money into it to get it in tip top shape.
Bechsteins from that era are usually just for looks.
With #3 you are paying $KK for the looks rather than the touch and tone.
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2046691
03/11/13 08:48 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,439
Minnesota Marty
7000 Post Club Member
|
7000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,439 |
If it passes a thorough inspection, without a doubt, I would go for No. 1.
Marty in Minnesota
It's much easier to bash a Steinway than it is to play one.
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2046708
03/11/13 09:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 558
Guapo Gabacho
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 558 |
I, obviously, would favor the Baldwin SF-10.
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2046711
03/11/13 09:19 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 5,377
Ed McMorrow, RPT
5000 Post Club Member
|
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 5,377 |
Prestonscan, On the SF-10, be sure to the tech evaluates the soundboard to rim glue joints. I have seen several where this is failing, seemingly from the factory. Also the bridge can split where the capo bar section ends and the agraffe section begins.
The other two listed I would not consider until I have eliminated the SF-10. But with old used pianos each one is an individual case and general statements have many caveats and exceptions.
In a seemingly infinite universe-infinite human creativity is-seemingly possible. According to NASA, 93% of the earth like planets possible in the known universe have yet to be formed. Contact: Ed@LightHammerpiano.com
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2047091
03/12/13 03:52 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 100
Scout
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 100 |
7 feet really is "not that big"! I find that a grand piano always looks smaller once it's in the home than it does in one's imagination beforehand. My non-pianist husband agrees on this experience. (We're not at 7 feet, but bigger than ever before.)
1989 Baldwin L
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: Ed McMorrow, RPT]
#2047290
03/12/13 08:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
RosieP
OP
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18 |
Thanks for the advice Ed. I will certainly pass that info on to the tech.
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: Guapo Gabacho]
#2047292
03/12/13 08:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
RosieP
OP
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 18 |
Guapo,
I notice that your Baldwin is a similar vintage to the one I am considering. Have you had any work done on yours since you bought it? Anything I should know?
Thanks!
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2047321
03/12/13 09:41 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
ahhsmurf
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 48 |
It has way more potential for giving you pleasure.
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: Scout]
#2047521
03/13/13 07:33 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,907
Plowboy
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,907 |
7 feet really is "not that big"! I find that a grand piano always looks smaller once it's in the home than it does in one's imagination beforehand. My non-pianist husband agrees on this experience. (We're not at 7 feet, but bigger than ever before.) Maybe because my condo is quite small, but my 5'2" grand looks much bigger here than at the dealer's. If I was a rational person, I'd trade it in on a higher quality upright.
Gary Essex EUP-111 at the mountains W. Hoffmann T-122 at the beach
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: Plowboy]
#2047859
03/13/13 07:16 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 100
Scout
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 100 |
Oh yes, of course, always bigger at home than at the dealer's--but not always bigger than what the imagination does with it before it gets home.
1989 Baldwin L
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: dsch]
#2047864
03/13/13 07:31 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 968
Miguel Rey
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 968 |
Not knowing anything else, I'd choose #1. It has way more potential for giving you pleasure. I'd probably go with that over a new Brodmann or Ritmuller. But you may have to put more money into it to get it in tip top shape.
Bechsteins from that era are usually just for looks.
With #3 you are paying $KK for the looks rather than the touch and tone. Far from the truth, if the Bechstein has been rebuilt in 98 then is definitely worth a second look from a qualified tech. Also double check the year on the Bech, most often people confuse the case# from the serial#. The case# is etched underneath the piano in the wood and the serial would be on metal plate looking down from the top. Most old Bechs no longer have that plate. I just bought what was first believed a 1889 Bech that turned out to be a 1905, definite plus for me. I think first you should narrow down the sound and feel you are looking for then go from there. You will find no shortage of pianos to choose from.
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2048218
03/14/13 12:59 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 388
mikeheel
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 388 |
I like your list and the combination of new and used you're looking at. Like folks above, I'd encourage you to try as many as you can, narrow your list, and then pick a favorite. If one of the used ones, make sure to have it checked out with a fine tooth comb. If one of the new, be sure you're working with a good dealer.
Looking forward to hearing how this adventure turns out.
Mike
|
|
|
Re: Looking at Pianos
[Re: RosieP]
#2049109
03/16/13 10:51 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4
love my baldwin
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4 |
I was in the same boat you are in just 6 short weeks ago. I started out perusing the craiglist ads hoping to save some money but actually never went to a private home. The first dealer I went to was a Steinway dealer. Obviously Steinways are out of my price range but they also sold Kawai and Kohler Campbell. Kohler Campbells were not for me so I was leaning towards a new baby grand Kawai. The next dealer was a Yamaha dealer and I discovered I didn't care for Yamaha's but I played a Baldwin L (6'3") built in 1950. The Baldwin had been redone. The sound was exquisite, unlike anything I had heard before or since. After thinking it over for a few days I had it delivered and couldn't be happier. It all comes down to what sounds good to you.
Jerry
|
|
|
|
Forums41
Topics195,587
Posts2,900,214
Members95,196
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|