|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
75 members (bluebilly, accordeur, BillS728, aphexdisklavier, bobrunyan, anotherscott, AaronSF, apianostudent, 16 invisible),
2,119
guests, and
357
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,808
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,808 |
I've only heard a few of his performances, but when I heard this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qAYv5c6-Lc&list=PLF14E3CDFCF742651I was severely disappointed. The really strange rhythmic distortions, outrageous mistakes in not such a difficult piece, and totally bizarre(to my thinking) ideas. Even if all the horrendous mistakes weren't there I'd find it very bizarre. For example, the first page introduction is played so fast it makes no sense musically either by itself or in relation to the rest of the piece. The few other recordings I had heard from him didn't leave such a negative impression, so I'm curious if others find this as disappointing as I did. So many seem to revere him as one of the greatest pianists, but this recording has left a truly negative impression for me. What do you think? These Cortot recordings seem at least much more reasonable if IMO nothing to write home about: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2fRWWW_6MMhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yae0Pq_HqsEhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOJIOIpnLQE
Last edited by pianoloverus; 03/03/13 10:19 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
Interesting find. I agree to a great extent.
The flaws are outrageous, especially I think in the first portion, like the first minute or so. But I love a lot of the things throughout the piece that you probably find bad and even bizarre. And do you not like the section starting at 1:02? (And continuing for a fair while?) I think it's truly great, and BTW the section is fairly free of goofs.
But even for someone like me who loves those things he does, the bad aspects are striking -- not just that there are wrong notes, but that quite a few of them seem not even close, that even when he gets the right notes, the attack and tone seem often to be drastically crude (can't tell for sure because of the primitive recording quality), and his seeming not to give much of a darn about how it is sounding because of how imperturbable he seems about it all. In fact, I recall having heard (or read) that Cortot didn't always care about details of his recordings, most famously wrong notes, but this seems of a different order than what we'd ever expect. If I didn't know who the player was, I would think it was a top-level performer, but that he was under some impairment like substances or senility. I don't mean that I suspect either in this instance -- I don't -- but that's the impression it would give me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 273
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 273 |
I think the first recording is from late in his life -- in the 1940s and most certainly in the 1950s his playing was sloppy at best. But his younger recordings are brilliant and some of the most musical I've ever heard. Of course most of them still have plenty of flubbed notes, but nowhere near as many as the later recordings.
EDIT: for a remarkably Cortot-esque sense of rubato, romanticism, sensitivity and music, but a much cleaner sound and more precise technique, listen to some of Samson Francois' recordings.
Last edited by fledgehog; 03/03/13 01:27 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 854
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 854 |
In fact, I recall have heard (or read) that Cortot didn't always care about details of his recordings, most famously wrong notes, but this seems of a different order than what we'd ever expect. Indeed; bear in mind that the technical aspect behind performance has come to mean greatly more than it used to; of course wrong notes are wrong but, um, if the flow was correct (and fresh) then it's entirely a success, regardless of the anatomy...I mean, there's still room for romanticism in piano but for how much longer I couldn't dare say.
Sometimes, we all just need to be shown a little kindness <3
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 6,177
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 6,177 |
I've heard many Cortot recordings, especially Chopin third scherzo. It was horrendous. I don't get it, can someone explain to me why he is praised?
EDIT:
Also.. he obviously had technique, so how the heck was he so inaccurate a lot of the time?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
....he obviously had technique, so how the heck was he so inaccurate a lot of the time? Harold Schonberg talks a lot about this in "The Great Pianists," which BTW you really should read! (You'll love it.) Cortot did a lot besides play -- conducting, writing, editing scores....and very extensive teaching, which he was much more interested in than most top-level pianists. Schonberg has a great line about it, something like, "So how did he have time to keep his fingers in shape? The answer is simple: he didn't." I'd guess it was more than just not having the time; he just wasn't as interested to put in the time for practicing as he was for that other stuff -- and if you look at something like how many prodigies just gave up piano completely at a certain point because they couldn't get interested any more in finger wiggling, it's not completely surprising that someone would have felt that way. You might say, then he shouldn't have performed at all. I can only guess that he liked playing and performing, as long as he could do it on his own terms and as long as audiences were interested -- and indeed they were. He didn't need everybody to like what he did, he just needed some -- and there were lots.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,572
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,572 |
I've only heard a few of his performances, but when I heard this one
So you are older than I would have thought!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,277
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,277 |
Cortot was famously erratic - but his virtuosity was up there with the best when he'd practised properly. Many great pianists cite Cortot as their favourite pianist, with good reason, even though they don't - and wouldn't - play with his rhythmic freedom and flexibility. How many of today's pianists can play this piece at this speed with this degree of power and brilliance and flair - and accuracy? http://youtu.be/sKQ5tWWC_-cBTW, this transfer is very muddy, but my CD of this performance is much clearer and does show that he isn't fudging anything.
If music be the food of love, play on!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,572
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,572 |
I've heard many Cortot recordings, especially Chopin third scherzo. It was horrendous. I don't get it, can someone explain to me why he is praised?
EDIT:
Also.. he obviously had technique, so how the heck was he so inaccurate a lot of the time? I've heard many Cortot recordings, especially Chopin third scherzo. It was horrendous. I don't get it, can someone explain to me why he is praised?
EDIT:
Also.. he obviously had technique, so how the heck was he so inaccurate a lot of the time? Think of Las Vegas. At Las Vegas, you have the Eiffel Tower, the Great Pyramide, the Taj Mahal, and so much more. All in one city, all built in the space of a couple of decades. Really! What a waste, prior history! Centuries and centuries of pharoahs and maharajas and Eiffel's pavaning before the ignorant people who bowed their heads, never seeing the emperor's new clothes ... when in America we can do it better, faster, stronger. Why didn't humanity just wait ? Really, I think that Joel's post shows so much insight that it has to be re-read, and re-re-read ... I've heard many Cortot recordings, especially Chopin third scherzo. It was horrendous. I don't get it, can someone explain to me why he is praised?
EDIT:
Also.. he obviously had technique, so how the heck was he so inaccurate a lot of the time?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,395
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,395 |
...I mean, there's still room for romanticism in piano but for how much longer I couldn't dare say. That reminds me - I was reading a critic/blogger on Cliburn (someone who reviews for a major newspaper in the US (accepting, for the moment, the questionable premise that such a thing still exists)). This person made it sound as if Cliburn was way, way out there on the extreme edge of interpretive freedom. And there seemed to be a certain "eeiuwww" reaction to that sort of thing in the tone of the writing. Just imagine, playing Romantic music in a genuinely Romantic interpretation - how utterly disgusting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,239
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,239 |
Yes, one man's "expression" is another man's "stop MESSING with the music, ffs!" :-)
Dial up some recorded performances of technically undemanding pieces. Beethovens's "Moonlight" sonata movement is a good example. You'll hear an amazing variety of approaches. Some just can't seem to cope with its simplicity and overload it with portentious pauses and hesitations, completely killing the melodic flow. In my opinion. Perhaps you like that sort of thing? That's fine.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 789
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 789 |
For years, I had based my opinion of Cortot on the lp of Chopin waltzes that was in my local library. As a high school student in a moderate-sized town during the mid-70's, I had no access to his earlier (better) reordings. My initial impression - or uninformed opinion - was that perhaps he had a little too much wine to drink before the recording sessions. Nowadays, I feel more benign towards his Chopin waltzes: Despite some feeble passagework, there's a sense of spontaniety and recklessness that I now do enjoy - an approach that I couldn't fully comprehend as a "serious" piano student. Or maybe now, I'm the one who has too much wine to drink while listening I forget who said this, about his earlier recordings: "..he was looking for the 'opium' in the music" - a wonderful description.
Last edited by Gerard12; 03/03/13 12:05 PM.
Piano instruction and performance
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
....Perhaps you like that sort of thing? That's fine. For me, depends on where. There?? Probably not. This waltz? Absolutely -- if done well. And here, it's done both well and poorly at the same time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,808
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 36,808 |
I forget who said this, about his earlier recordings: "..he was looking for the 'opium' in the music" - a wonderful description. Daniel Barenboim(Bareness according to spell check) said it although I don't really understand what he meant. In this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2fRWWW_6MM
Last edited by pianoloverus; 03/03/13 02:25 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,607
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,607 |
Apparently he used his right hand to help him play the Ravel left hand concerto. It still remains the most inaccurate recordings haha
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
5000 Post Club Member
|
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921 |
Cortot was past it and broke when he did his recordings. Not to mention being terminally afficted with an extreme case of red light fever. (I had this from a student of one of his students.) Apparently his recordings in no way represent what he could do live in his prime.
(Having been told, "you sound so much better in person" myself, I'm willing to believe this.)
Slow down and do it right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
Cortot was past it and broke.... Really?? Not denying it, because I don't know, but I would have thought that couldn't be, because of all his various activities including especially teaching, which would be expected to bring a lot of income to someone of his stature. ....Not to mention being terminally afficted with an extreme case of red light fever.... I think you need to explain the phrase....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,392
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,392 |
With due apologies, I have never understood Cortot's claim to fame. I have read all this stuff about his mistakes being those of a 'god', what the heck? They are just sloppy mistakes.
Of course he was a renown teacher and editor, but if he was a great pianist, then it must have been before his recordings. I could not get through his recording of the Chopin Etudes, and without Cortot's name attached to them, it seems highly unlikely they would be at all known today.
But he certainly had a gift for self-promotion.
Jason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921
5000 Post Club Member
|
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,921 |
Come on Mark, you know what red light fever means - or maybe in the rarified heights you inhabit you don't. It's the absolute paralysis that affects beginners (such as inhabit ABF, marginal players (like me) and apparently some professionals new to recording (like Corot) when they have to record. It's in reference to that little red light that means the Zoom machine is on and recording your every breath, your every hesitation, your every mistake, and your hungry kid or cat crying, for posterity. It turns some of us to stone. It turns my hands into crab claws skittering across the keys which is why I've given up trying to record anything.
Re broke - after WWII Cortot got in a lot of trouble with "his public" and lost market share because he supposedly collaborated with the Nazis - in other words he played for them like a sensible person who wanted to survive in one piece - instead of heroically defying them and being killed or imprisoned. We're all heroes in hindsight if we aren't there.
Slow down and do it right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,601 |
Come on Mark, you know what red light fever means - or maybe in the rarified heights you inhabit you don't. I wouldn't have asked if I did! My heights aren't that rarefied but I never heard of it. It's the absolute paralysis that affects beginners (such as inhabit ABF, marginal players (like me) and apparently some professionals new to recording (like Corot) when they have to record. It's in reference to that little red light that means the Zoom machine is on.... I'd be surprised if Cortot had anything like that, but I don't know.... Re broke - after WWII Cortot got in a lot of trouble with "his public" because.... Yes, I know about that. (And well said.) But I would have thought he could still have taught as much as he wanted, and been paid very considerably for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,408
Posts3,349,457
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|