Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.7 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Best of Piano Buyer
 Best of Piano Buyer
(ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
Find a Professional
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Advertise on Piano World

(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Who's Online Now
105 registered members (anotherscott, astrotoy, Animisha, Arty Movie, apianostudent, 28 invisible), 1,671 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Do great musicianship and great technique usually... #1993316
12/01/12 06:58 PM
12/01/12 06:58 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 25,152
New York City
pianoloverus Offline OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
pianoloverus  Offline OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 25,152
New York City
go together?

This was mentioned by a Jeffrey Jones in another thread. He said they do and I basically agree with him. I don't think there have been many pianists who are generally considered great who weren't great both as technicians and as musicians. Of course, I don't mean that every great pianist had a technique on the level of Horowitz or Hamelin, but I think very few pianists generally considered great had technical problems or a "weak" technique. In fact, I don't see how one can be considered great if one is weak in either area.

1. Do you think that great technique and great musicianship normally go together?

2. Even if you said yes to #1 can you name some exceptions, i.e. pianists with great technique but weak musicianship or vice versa?

3. For amateur pianists, do you think their level of technical skill and musical understanding are generally on about the same level?

Piano & Music Gifts & Accessories (570)
Piano accessories and music gift items
Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1993333
12/01/12 07:24 PM
12/01/12 07:24 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 27,409
Oakland
B
BDB Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
BDB  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
B

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 27,409
Oakland
1. If one does not have the technique to bring off the musicianship, you will never know about the musicianship.

2. Cortot and Schnabel were better known for their musicianship than their technique, at least for the bulk of their careers. There are many pianists with better technique than musicianship, but since pyrotechnics sells, they have careers. I do not wish to name any, because I do not wish to offend people for whom technique is so important.

3. No.


Semipro Tech
Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1993364
12/01/12 08:14 PM
12/01/12 08:14 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,767
Seattle area, WA
gooddog Offline
5000 Post Club Member
gooddog  Offline
5000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,767
Seattle area, WA
Originally Posted by pianoloverus
1. Do you think that great technique and great musicianship normally go together?
To become a really world class pianist, you need both. If one is a gifted musician but a lousy pianist, I assume it would make sense to choose another instrument or become a great conductor or composer.

Quote
2. Even if you said yes to #1 can you name some exceptions, i.e. pianists with great technique but weak musicianship or vice versa?
Sure. I've heard several professional performances that left me scratching my head. One was a harpsichordist who performed with the Seattle Symphony and was just terrible. He had technique but no musicality. One pianist who did not impress me at all with his musicality was Awadagin Pratt. The same for Marc-Andre Hamelin, although maybe he was having an off night. I once went to a recital given by a young man who was about to leave for the major Australian competition. He had blazing technique but his music was loud, louder, fast and faster. IMO he had astonishing technique but did not know how to make music. My ears were ringing and I couldn't wait to leave.
Quote

3. For amateur pianists, do you think their level of technical skill and musical understanding are generally on about the same level?
I think it varies too much to judge. It's safe to assume that most of us are working hard on both and are making the best progress we can when we find the time.


Best regards,

Deborah
Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1993504
12/02/12 04:32 AM
12/02/12 04:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 273
West Hartford, CT
fledgehog Offline
Full Member
fledgehog  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 273
West Hartford, CT
I believe that emotion and technique are mutually exclusive. Each has the means to support and complement the other, but it's definitely possible to have one without the other. There seems to be a trend towards robotic, note-perfection in the classical music world now -- lots of students just learning the notes, with absolutely no understanding of what they mean. At the same time, there are plenty of musicians who feel each composition as though they had written it themselves, and yet don't quite have the technical means to get the tricky passages and runs up to speed and clean. I believe you're more likely to find a stellar musician who also has good technique, than a virtuoso who can also emote.

There are a number of reasons why technique seems to be so much more heavily emphasized in modern times. Recording studios, multiple takes, studio magic, etc, have raised everybody's standards of what a good performance sounds like. In concert, even technical titans flub occasionally, but because we've become used to edited studio recordings, suddenly the occasional missed note sticks out like a sore thumb. Another part of it is that classical music is sadly suffering, and flashy/bombastic is just going to sell more. To the casual listener, La Campanella is going to have just the right "wow" factor, but a late Schubert sonata is going to be long and tedious. Thus, the technical showcasers get all the attention. I also believe technique is easier to learn than musicality. You can train and do exercises to strengthen and coordinate your fingers, but it's much, much more difficult (if not impossible) to teach somebody genuine musical emotion.

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: gooddog] #1993615
12/02/12 12:11 PM
12/02/12 12:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,654
San Jose, CA
J
jeffreyjones Offline
2000 Post Club Member
jeffreyjones  Offline
2000 Post Club Member
J

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,654
San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by gooddog

Quote
2. Even if you said yes to #1 can you name some exceptions, i.e. pianists with great technique but weak musicianship or vice versa?
Sure. I've heard several professional performances that left me scratching my head. One was a harpsichordist who performed with the Seattle Symphony and was just terrible. He had technique but no musicality. One pianist who did not impress me at all with his musicality was Awadagin Pratt. The same for Marc-Andre Hamelin, although maybe he was having an off night. I once went to a recital given by a young man who was about to leave for the major Australian competition. He had blazing technique but his music was loud, louder, fast and faster. IMO he had astonishing technique but did not know how to make music. My ears were ringing and I couldn't wait to leave.


I think there's more than a bit of abuse and misunderstanding of "piano technique," and "musicians" like this are the result. Technique is not about the ability to play the fastest and loudest all the time. It's about the ability to control and portray the full range of musical material, no matter how difficult or awkward. Hamelin has the full range of technique. Many successful pianists do not.

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1993625
12/02/12 12:59 PM
12/02/12 12:59 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,483
Ohio, USA
signa Offline
8000 Post Club Member
signa  Offline
8000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,483
Ohio, USA
musicianship depends on techniques, which is essential base of a great pianist. but musicality of a pianist goes above techniques or virtuosity. we have tons of pianists in the world who can play anything, but how many among them make it to a great pianist with something unique and special to say in music making? someone like Bozhanov or young Pogorelich doesn't come along often, who would arouse controversy, debate or sensation, and yet would leave the world some unforgettable music experience and moments...

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: signa] #1993635
12/02/12 01:30 PM
12/02/12 01:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 615
New York
W
Works1 Offline
500 Post Club Member
Works1  Offline
500 Post Club Member
W

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 615
New York
Originally Posted by signa
musicianship depends on techniques, which is essential base of a great pianist. but musicality of a pianist goes above techniques or virtuosity. we have tons of pianists in the world who can play anything, but how many among them make it to a great pianist with something unique and special to say in music making? someone like Bozhanov or young Pogorelich doesn't come along often, who would arouse controversy, debate or sensation, and yet would leave the world some unforgettable music experience and moments...


Sad thing is I think most of the general listening public do not appreciate sensitive playing and would rather hear a flashy lightening fast version of La Campanella over Schubert's D959, for example.

It's also sad when something like the ridiculous midi reproduction below gets more hits on Youtube than almost any classical piece performed by even the best artists (albeit most out of curiousity I imagine):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHBuKmyhbtQ&feature=player_detailpage

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: Works1] #1993892
12/02/12 10:51 PM
12/02/12 10:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,063
W
wr Offline
9000 Post Club Member
wr  Offline
9000 Post Club Member
W

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,063
Originally Posted by Works1


It's also sad when something like the ridiculous midi reproduction below gets more hits on Youtube than almost any classical piece performed by even the best artists (albeit most out of curiousity I imagine):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHBuKmyhbtQ&feature=player_detailpage


I didn't click on the link to find out what you are talking about, but you know, posting the link will probably generate more of those deplorable hits. smile

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: Works1] #1993904
12/02/12 11:23 PM
12/02/12 11:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,238
polyphasicpianist Offline
1000 Post Club Member
polyphasicpianist  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,238
Originally Posted by Works1
Originally Posted by signa
musicianship depends on techniques, which is essential base of a great pianist. but musicality of a pianist goes above techniques or virtuosity. we have tons of pianists in the world who can play anything, but how many among them make it to a great pianist with something unique and special to say in music making? someone like Bozhanov or young Pogorelich doesn't come along often, who would arouse controversy, debate or sensation, and yet would leave the world some unforgettable music experience and moments...


Sad thing is I think most of the general listening public do not appreciate sensitive playing and would rather hear a flashy lightening fast version of La Campanella over Schubert's D959, for example.



Yes, remember the good ol' days when music was perfect and you would never hear arguments of this sort. You know, the glory days of Beethoven, Liszt, Rachmaninoff, when the concept of "spectacle" didn't exist, and muscians represented a higher calling and grasped, indeed held, something spiritual, something ethereal; when art was perfect. Those were the days.

Not like the [censored] we get now. Bunch of mechanistic twats who clearly are only in it for the fame and glory. Pianist's these days! Honestly! Ain't got no respect, Ain't got no appreciation! Just a bunch of thoughtless artless ingrates. If only people knew how perfect the world used to be!

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: polyphasicpianist] #1993993
12/03/12 07:26 AM
12/03/12 07:26 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 558
Europe (Northern Spain)
W
Wuffski Offline
500 Post Club Member
Wuffski  Offline
500 Post Club Member
W

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 558
Europe (Northern Spain)
Originally Posted by polyphasicpianist
Yes, remember the good ol' days when music was perfect and you would never hear arguments of this sort. You know, the glory days of Beethoven, Liszt, Rachmaninoff, when the concept of "spectacle" didn't exist, and muscians represented a higher calling and grasped, indeed held, something spiritual, something ethereal; when art was perfect. Those were the days.

Really? They all have been great showman as well! It is known that Beethoven sometimes played so intense that the pianoforte he was performing on broke under his fingers. And not once. He pretty well knew about the quality of his instruments - and knew how to make a spectacle out of it.

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1993997
12/03/12 07:37 AM
12/03/12 07:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 860
Poland
K
kapelli Offline
500 Post Club Member
kapelli  Offline
500 Post Club Member
K

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 860
Poland
You can be great technic completely without any musical feelings.
And opposite - you can have "Weak" (weak im comparison to lets say Volodos, Horowitz, Godowsky etc) like Sofronicki (I don't know what's the proper spelling for his name in English) or Petri - but play beautifully.

Read Henry Neuhaus book - you won't find anything better about the correct approach to piano playing, from each side.
Also there you will find answer for your questions smile

Jest compare Bang Bang and Yuja Wang.
Both have tremendous skills - Lang perhaps even much better, his control of action is out of this world.
But his playing is like being in circus, but not like being in the temple of art (Just look on youtube his two Rach preludes from PROMS - bing bang technic with completely lost musicality, he even killed the Stars and Stripes - watch the video that was made in front is White House in Washington).
He is sometimes good in low volume, lirycal places - but most of the time his performaces are like 10-year child which want to say to everybody "hey, i am doing stupid things, so maybe now you will see me eventually".

Listening to Yuja is like a long journey, full of color and emotions... It's much more deep fastinating playing... I love listening to her.. great technic and musicality...

Regards

Last edited by kapelli; 12/03/12 07:51 AM.
Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1994045
12/03/12 10:37 AM
12/03/12 10:37 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,090
Pennsylvania
C
Cheeto717 Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Cheeto717  Offline
1000 Post Club Member
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,090
Pennsylvania
I doubt there was ever a musician who DIDN'T use his skills to flex his ego.

And, call me shallow, but I think I'd rather listen to La Campanella than most Schubert works.


"I was obliged to be industrious. Whoever is equally industrious will succeed equally well."

J.S. Bach
Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1994058
12/03/12 11:24 AM
12/03/12 11:24 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,728
B
bennevis Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
bennevis  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
B

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,728
'Musicianship' is subjective, technique is objective. Therein lies the difficulty of trying to differentiate between the two. Horowitz told Perahia (when the latter studied with him) that 'to be more than a virtuoso, first you must become a virtuoso.' After which Perahia played music that didn't suit him - Rachmaninoff and Liszt. Did he become a better pianist after that experience? I found his Chopin less poetic and more relentless after it (listen to his Chopin Concertos), but does that mean it's less 'musical' than before?

And what did Mozart say about Clementi's playing when the two fought in a duel? That's often what some people say about those with great techniques....


"I don't play accurately - anyone can play accurately - but I play with wonderful expression. As far as the piano is concerned, sentiment is my forte. I keep science for Life."
Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: kapelli] #1994234
12/03/12 06:01 PM
12/03/12 06:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 820
Netherlands
B
babama Offline
500 Post Club Member
babama  Offline
500 Post Club Member
B

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 820
Netherlands
Originally Posted by kapelli
You can be great technic completely without any musical feelings.
And opposite - you can have "Weak" (weak im comparison to lets say Volodos, Horowitz, Godowsky etc) like Sofronicki (I don't know what's the proper spelling for his name in English) or Petri - but play beautifully.


Sofronitsky had a weak technique?!

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: babama] #1994238
12/03/12 06:10 PM
12/03/12 06:10 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 25,152
New York City
pianoloverus Offline OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
pianoloverus  Offline OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 25,152
New York City
Originally Posted by babama
Originally Posted by kapelli
You can be great technic completely without any musical feelings.
And opposite - you can have "Weak" (weak im comparison to lets say Volodos, Horowitz, Godowsky etc) like Sofronicki (I don't know what's the proper spelling for his name in English) or Petri - but play beautifully.


Sofronitsky had a weak technique?!
Petri had weak technique??

Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1994499
12/04/12 08:15 AM
12/04/12 08:15 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 860
Poland
K
kapelli Offline
500 Post Club Member
kapelli  Offline
500 Post Club Member
K

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 860
Poland
Originally Posted by pianoloverus
Originally Posted by babama
Originally Posted by kapelli
You can be great technic completely without any musical feelings.
And opposite - you can have "Weak" (weak im comparison to lets say Volodos, Horowitz, Godowsky etc) like Sofronicki (I don't know what's the proper spelling for his name in English) or Petri - but play beautifully.


Sofronitsky had a weak technique?!
Petri had weak technique??


Henry Neuhaus claims that technique of Petri was especially weak in octaves (or not so good as the rest). Sofronitzky also had some weak points. But you know, the question about technique on this level of pianists is rather something like:
Can the pianist play each figure at the same immense speed as his competitors (or with one very high tempo)?
Even good pianists have their week points.
I know, that all of them compared to us have great skills, but if you would stand on their level, for sure you would change the point of view ;-)

Of course, you can doubt about Henry Neuhaus thesis and argue with him grin

Last edited by kapelli; 12/04/12 08:21 AM.
Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: kapelli] #1994518
12/04/12 09:23 AM
12/04/12 09:23 AM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 25,152
New York City
pianoloverus Offline OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
pianoloverus  Offline OP
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 25,152
New York City
Originally Posted by kapelli
Neuhaus claims that technique of Petri was especially weak in octaves (or not so good as the rest). Sofronitzky also had some weak points. But you know, the question about technique on this level of pianists is rather something like:
Can the pianist play each figure at the same immense speed as his competitors (or with one very high tempo)?
Even good pianists have their week points.
I know, that all of them compared to us have great skills, but if you would stand on their level, for sure you would change the point of view ;-)

Of course, you can doubt about Henry Neuhaus thesis and argue with him grin
Petri and Sofronitsky were both world class pianists so I think any claims of weak technique are rather silly. Using just one person's opinion about a single aspect of another pianist's technique is particularly dangerous. If a pianist does not have the technique of a Horowitz, Richter, or Gilels that does not mean he has a weak technique.

On Petri, Dubal says:
"Even in old age his technique remained superlative."
"He was capable of the most fabulous deeds of technical daring in the Transcendental Etudes which he programmed in cycle."
"When Liszt transcriptions were being frowned upon, Petri played them and was dazzling."

Last edited by pianoloverus; 12/04/12 09:25 AM.
Re: Do great musicianship and great technique usually... [Re: pianoloverus] #1994627
12/04/12 01:47 PM
12/04/12 01:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 860
Poland
K
kapelli Offline
500 Post Club Member
kapelli  Offline
500 Post Club Member
K

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 860
Poland
Originally Posted by pianoloverus
Originally Posted by kapelli
Neuhaus claims that technique of Petri was especially weak in octaves (or not so good as the rest). Sofronitzky also had some weak points. But you know, the question about technique on this level of pianists is rather something like:
Can the pianist play each figure at the same immense speed as his competitors (or with one very high tempo)?
Even good pianists have their week points.
I know, that all of them compared to us have great skills, but if you would stand on their level, for sure you would change the point of view ;-)

Of course, you can doubt about Henry Neuhaus thesis and argue with him grin
Petri and Sofronitsky were both world class pianists so I think any claims of weak technique are rather silly. Using just one person's opinion about a single aspect of another pianist's technique is particularly dangerous. If a pianist does not have the technique of a Horowitz, Richter, or Gilels that does not mean he has a weak technique.

On Petri, Dubal says:
"Even in old age his technique remained superlative."
"He was capable of the most fabulous deeds of technical daring in the Transcendental Etudes which he programmed in cycle."
"When Liszt transcriptions were being frowned upon, Petri played them and was dazzling."


That "one person's opinion" is opinion of teacher of Richter, Gilels, Yakov Zak and many many other great pianist. A genious pegagoue, whose book is till today a bible for professors and teachers about correct approach to piano playing on each level.
He was also phenomenal pianist untill he got some kind of injury in his hands.

And, this is not silly. Petri even himself was telling, that his octave technique is weaker in comparison to his other piano skills (he often also played octaves slower then rest of the piece).

Horowitz about Neuhaus:
After Blumenfeld - Neuhaus was the artist, whom I owe most of all.

Of course, as I said, you can discuss with HN, but this is silly for me.


Moderated by  Brendan, Kreisler 

Shop Our Online Store!
Shop Our Store Online
Shop PianoSupplies.com

Did you know Piano World has an online store, and that it's loaded with goodies pianists and music lovers want?
Check it out and place your order.

Special Purchase!
Keyboard and Roses Piano Bench Cushion Keyboard & Roses 14"x30" piano bench cushions Regularly sold for $79 to $100, now only $39. (while supplies last)

(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq Bechstein
(ad)
Faust Harrison Pianos
Faust Harrison 100+ Steinways
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Any info about piano dealers in NC, SC?
by ShiroKuro. 06/16/19 10:54 AM
Piano & Room Size, Voicing and other Questions
by ShiroKuro. 06/16/19 10:30 AM
Features/sounds: Do you use them? Why why not?
by Bruce In Philly. 06/16/19 09:58 AM
More articles about the decline of the piano
by MSnow. 06/16/19 08:59 AM
Inefficient learning, advice needed
by Tom97. 06/16/19 06:56 AM
What's Hot!!
PIANO TEACHERS Please read this!
-------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
Forum Statistics
Forums41
Topics192,546
Posts2,838,366
Members93,623
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
Please Support Our Advertisers
Faust Harrison 100+ Steinways

Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver

 Best of Piano Buyer

PianoTeq Bechstein
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2019 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1