 |
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
77 members (All in Stride, AWilley, brennbaer, 36251, accordeur, anotherscott, 18 invisible),
760
guests, and
539
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,094
9000 Post Club Member
|
9000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,094 |
I have a concert pianist friend who had been complaining to me about the octaves in the Chopin op.53 Polonaise. She had played this piece for decades, but for some reason she was now starting to get fatigued part-way through the section. She was using a combination of 1-5 and 1-4 (and maybe a 1-3), connecting all the top notes. I recommended she switch to all 1-5, and she now swears by that fingering; she said that after an awkward couple days, the section is easy again. A rare case of problem solved. I'm going to try that. I've never used anything except 4, because I learned the piece years ago when I was in the habit of (almost) always using 4 -- and I've always had at least a little trouble with it (more of course when I haven't been practicing it) but never thought of changing the fingering, because -- y'know, sometimes you just never think of changing something if you've always done it a certain way.... I learned the Polonaise years ago using 5 (when I was in the habit of almost always using 5) and now that I've revisited the piece I've switched to 4 on the black keys - which works SO MUCH better for me !!!! 4 on the black keys is also the fingering given in Henle, FWIW.
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,453 |
I usually use 1-4, but not always. 
Music is my best friend.
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 447
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 447 |
I always play octaves with 2 and 3.
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,586
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,586 |
I always play octaves with 2 and 3. Good luck with those LH octaves in the Opus 53 !!!
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 447
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 447 |
I always play octaves with 2 and 3. Good luck with those LH octaves in the Opus 53 !!! 
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 51
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 51 |
Totally depends what comes before and what comes after. Whether staccato or legato.
Heels down!
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 838
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 838 |
Li Lundi uses all 1/5 as does the Taubman & Goldansky methods, also Earl Wild.
I think 1/4 is fine for slower tempos but probably 1/5 works better for fast octaves.
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 838
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 838 |
1/5 is better for me because it's less stretch. It the stretch that partly gives me pain after a while. There is a youtube video of Goldansky coaching octaves and what she says about rotating into the thumb helps for me. It takes a lot of the the pressure/stress out of playing octaves. I don't like that little tug on the wrist tendons I get when I stretch a little to accommodate the 4th on black.
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,082
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,082 |
Has anyone tried measuring their hand span from thumb tip to 5th fingertip and thumb to 4th fingertip? You may well find that the latter is slightly longer, if your ring fingers are longer than your index fingers, like mine are. (I believe that women have ring fingers shorter than their index fingers, while men tend towards the opposite). My LH measurements are 8.15in 1-4 and 8.05in 1-5. On RH, it's 8.05in 1-4 and 8in 1-5. Which explains why I find it slightly easier to stretch 10ths on LH than RH, and probably why I almost always play 1/4 on black octaves, unless it's a chord where the 4th finger is already employed elsewhere.
But it might also be because my teacher taught me to play octaves this way, from the very first piece I learnt that has fast octave scales (Schubert's D664). I remember being rather miffed that I had to roll the very first RH chord when Sviatoslav Richter (my hero at the time) could play it perfectly as written, and thought that I wasn't a 'real' pianist when I couldn't even physically play what Schubert actually wrote......
"I don't play accurately - anyone can play accurately - but I play with wonderful expression. As far as the piano is concerned, sentiment is my forte. I keep science for Life."
|
|
|
 Re: Quick question. 1 4 or 1 5 for black key octaves
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,446
5000 Post Club Member
|
5000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,446 |
Has anyone tried measuring their hand span from thumb tip to 5th fingertip and thumb to 4th fingertip? You may well find that the latter is slightly longer, if your ring fingers are longer than your index fingers, like mine are. (I believe that women have ring fingers shorter than their index fingers, while men tend towards the opposite). My LH measurements are 8.15in 1-4 and 8.05in 1-5. On RH, it's 8.05in 1-4 and 8in 1-5. Which explains why I find it slightly easier to stretch 10ths on LH than RH, and probably why I almost always play 1/4 on black octaves, unless it's a chord where the 4th finger is already employed elsewhere.
But it might also be because my teacher taught me to play octaves this way, from the very first piece I learnt that has fast octave scales (Schubert's D664). I remember being rather miffed that I had to roll the very first RH chord when Sviatoslav Richter (my hero at the time) could play it perfectly as written, and thought that I wasn't a 'real' pianist when I couldn't even physically play what Schubert actually wrote...... For most people, I imagine the span is pretty close one way or the other. The difference, especially for people with smaller hands, is the angle from 1-4 vs the angle from 1-5. The thumb and pinky are the two fingers with greatest lateral motion, and also are at opposite ends of the hand. When you "stretch" your hand out and look at it, you can see there is a much greater angle between 1-4 vs 1-5. The 1-5 span is nearly perpendicular to the wrist, which makes it much easier to play octaves without twisting. For small hands, especially, a 1-4 span requires one of two things: a large enough hand that you can span the distance, or a reposition of the hand/arm (without twisting if played correctly) in order to span the distance. Any time you have to reposition, it slows you down. Extra movements require more time and effort to execute. So, the idea should be to minimize this effort. This, ironically, was the initial reasoning behind the switch from 1-5 to 1-4 on black-key octaves. (The hand has to move in to play a 1-5 black key octave.) However, with octaves, left-right movements to reposition (for smaller hands) takes longer and creates a "destructive interference" effect with the muscles. An in/out movement creates far less interference with speed than a left/right movement. So, for smaller hands, it is usually advised to forgo the left/right reposition, and to move in/out to play a 1-5 octave on all keys. Also, if you start in on white keys and out on black keys (rather than playing in the middle of the white key or the middle of the black key), you can minimize the in/out distance your hand has to travel.
Every day we are afforded a new chance. The problem with life is not that you run out of chances. In the end, what you run out of are days.
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics204,289
Posts3,047,262
Members100,077
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|