|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
47 members (danno858, achoo42, ChickenBrother, Cheeeeee, ColoRodney, BritishJim, akse0435, Americas, 12 invisible),
2,146
guests, and
299
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 788
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 788 |
Love this thread and kudos galore to jeffreyjones. He gets my vote for the all-time Piano World "put up or shut up" award. We should establish such an award and call it the "jeffreyjones cup" or something. Well done.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662
2000 Post Club Member
|
OP
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662 |
I have to get to work, so I'm not going to look at Nikolas' score yet. You have my word I'll record it later!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562 |
Holy moly! Well, we have up to 6 outer ledger lines, which he says he knows by heart. Heh... I know! There is one good thing about the score, though... It's all 16ths and nothing else. Very little pedal and nothing else. (I'm mainly interested about the 2 and 1/2 pages, rather than the second half of the third page, btw... That part should be 'easier' (but under no accounts "easy" per se"). Thanks Jeffrey: Really looking forward to your take. I'm very interested exactly because I want to see how you fair with something like this, see if you understand "what's wrong" with it and tell me if it's as difficult as I think it is...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,837
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,837 |
It's incredibly difficult to read because it requires so much redistribution between the hands. All of that has to be planned in advance. (Although I'm sure some 20th century specialists would be able to dispatch it rather easily - someone like Oppens, Crossley or Aimard.)
Fortunately, the tempo isn't too terribly fast, so it seems completely playable to me.
(Though I don't know why anyone would want to - it seems to suffer from a common problem among contemporary composers, it sounds cool in Finale, but nobody actually wants to learn it because it's awkward and just not worth the effort. I've seen a dozen versions of this same kind of writing in the last 5 years; it seems to be very much in vogue right now.)
There are ways to get that same effect without abandoning idiomatic writing - for example, in some of Carl Vine's sonatas or the Babadjanian poem.
"If we continually try to force a child to do what he is afraid to do, he will become more timid, and will use his brains and energy, not to explore the unknown, but to find ways to avoid the pressures we put on him." (John Holt) www.pianoped.comwww.youtube.com/user/UIPianoPed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562 |
(Though I don't know why anyone would want to - it seems to suffer from a common problem among contemporary composers, it sounds cool in Finale, but nobody actually wants to learn it because it's awkward and just not worth the effort. I've seen a dozen versions of this same kind of writing in the last 5 years; it seems to be very much in vogue right now.) The reason the notes were distributed as such was because of the lack of any real pattern in the single melodic line. It would be unfair of my big hands distributing the right-left hands, where someone would feel very differently. Contemporary scores quite often leave this issue (as well as fingering) out exactly because it becomes very personal. And I should note that I don't compose with the aid of Finale. In fact some times I don't compose with the aid of a piano either! This chunk that you see remains a part of a much bigger score. And of course it has been performed (that specific part in one go) so it's perfectly playable thank you! Oh! BTW this work was composed 6 years ago in 2005! When I was putting the notes in Finale, I pondered exactly for the reason you mention (the distribution of the hands), and I decided for the above reasons to go with the version you see here. Of course later on, I decided to proof read the score and I asked a composer friend and a couple of pianists here to 'have a look'. I'm quite open to suggestions, so I'd appreciate any info, or sample page you have on that style of 'semi-random' streams of notes and the distribution of the hands... In public or private, I don't mind either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 74
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 74 |
Could you perchance play some of Dvorak's 6 Mazurkas? I am interested in what they sound like. Here is the link. http://imslp.org/wiki/6_Mazurkas,_Op.56_%28Dvo%C5%99%C3%A1k,_Anton%C3%ADn%29 Edit: Scratch that, I found recordings on Pianosociety.com.
Last edited by robotherolove; 08/22/11 05:42 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 833
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 833 |
Some questions I need to ask you JeffreyJones, since I'm trying to become like you:
1) How many years have you been practising sightreading? You don't practice it, you do it, at whatever tempo you feel comfortable at. It doesn't matter if it's as fast as I do it, as long as it's at a tempo where you can be reasonably accurate. 2) Do you count in your head as you sightread, and if not, how do you deal with a measure that has a very tricky rhythm? I practiced all of the tricky rhythms already in other pieces, so when I see them, it's already familiar. 3) How far ahead do you look generally? Not at all. 4) How many outer and inner ledger lines do you have memorized by heart, and accordingly what range of notes can you play blindly? Up to 6 ledger lines each direction for the outer ranges. Going above the bass or below the treble, probably 3-4, that's not as important. 5) What kind of piece is the most challenging for you to sightread? (e.g. heavy and frequent two-handed chords, scattered notes everywhere, polyrhythmic, etc...) Counterpoint! There's no way to predict the patterns. I was just gonna say, make him sight read Bach's fugues I have tremendous trouble with fugues in general. 2 parts are relatively okay, but my LH technique gets in the way. Some of the 3 or 4 parts in 48 P+F are almost sight-readable, but the fingerings are next to impossible to figure out. My sightreading abilities are surely nowhere close to Jeffrey's, but it's pretty good considering how little time I actually play the piano. One of my teachers routinely ask me to accompany her students in concertos without prior warning. Of course, in concertos accompaniments, you are free to simplify some things and most are well-known concertos. The Ravel concerto, however, I have a devil of a time accompanying. Not so much notes, although that isn't exactly easy, but counting is way more difficult. Maybe I'm just unfamiliar with the rhythm. Inspired by this thread, I started sightreading Beethoven's sonatas starting volume I. Not too bad, but Beethoven's stuff again are never easy, and whenever he goes polyphonic with non-trivial LHs, I mess up. Do you have the same problem with LHs Jeffrey? I'm curious, when it comes to polyrhythms, can you sight read something like this: http://216.129.110.22/files/imglnks..._-_Op.18_-_Violin_Sonata_in_Eb_Major.pdf2nd movement, 2nd line, starting 3rd measure. there's a bunch of similar syncopated polyrhythms the rest of the piece, some even trickier than this one. i was reading some music with a violinist friend and when i got here, i'm like, what on earth? after much practicing, i think the next time i see something like this i would be better prepared. EDIT: indeed, this time as i'm trying it it's very easy. the ones on 4th page, 2nd line (still 2nd movement) are tricky too, but not quite as bad--but 1st measure, 3rd line i think is impossible to sightread accurately unless you've played something exactly the same before. maybe it's my ignorance, but i'm curious, can you sigttread that? EDIT: tried it, still impossible!
Last edited by Lingyis; 08/22/11 09:23 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 613
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 613 |
Jeffreyjones, you are phenomenal! By the way, I think the 2nd link is the same as the 1st... Look forward to hearing the Moszkowski.
"You are the music while the music lasts" - T.S. Eliot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,600
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,600 |
Love this thread and kudos galore to jeffreyjones. He gets my vote for the all-time Piano World "put up or shut up" award. We should establish such an award and call it the "jeffreyjones cup" or something.... Looks like a pretty good idea to me....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 74
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 74 |
Great job! Thanks a lot. Really liked the final Mazurka, I like all of Dvorak's piano pieces.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662
2000 Post Club Member
|
OP
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662 |
Jeffreyjones, you are phenomenal! By the way, I think the 2nd link is the same as the 1st... Look forward to hearing the Moszkowski. Fixed it, thanks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,562 |
Thanks Jeffrey! It's quite interesting that you're able to latch on pitches, without any other aid really.
I'll explain it to the other thread as well, but that specific part (the 2 and 1/2 pages) was composed with one thing in mind: to have no repeated patterns, to have nothing to latch on. Thus the notes are all over the place, the octaves go up and down like nuts and there's no fixed place for the hands. And that's why I never distributed the hands. It's not random in the sense of "whatever comes next", but it's random in the sense of "Yikes! No idea what's going on here", which was my main point on that part of the score.
I won't derail the thread any longer. Again thanks Jeffrey!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662
2000 Post Club Member
|
OP
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,662 |
Thanks Jeffrey! It's quite interesting that you're able to latch on pitches, without any other aid really.
I'll explain it to the other thread as well, but that specific part (the 2 and 1/2 pages) was composed with one thing in mind: to have no repeated patterns, to have nothing to latch on. Thus the notes are all over the place, the octaves go up and down like nuts and there's no fixed place for the hands. And that's why I never distributed the hands. It's not random in the sense of "whatever comes next", but it's random in the sense of "Yikes! No idea what's going on here", which was my main point on that part of the score.
I won't derail the thread any longer. Again thanks Jeffrey! On the one hand, I was looking at the music and thinking 'this makes no sense,' but then I was instinctively doing pushing and pulling, broadening and contracting without even realizing it. I dunno. It was a strange reading for sure.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 833
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 833 |
No can do Lingyis, one of my conditions is it had to be solo piano. If you don't follow the rules you don't get a recording from me. That's okay, I'm sure you'll do well anyway I was gonna suggest some certain Beethoven sonata movement with tricky yet innocent looking LH passages. If your LH is good, I can imagine you do pretty well on those. Only thing is that it's way too in the standard repertoire. I'm currently learning Beethoven's Emperor concerto, I'm curious, how hard do you find the LH in places like: Those 4 measures (middle 4 measures) are taking me quite some time to learn. If LH and RH were reversed, it becomes sightreadable at full tempo, so I'm just wondering for better pianists than I if they can sightread it at close to full tempo. No need to post a recording, I'm just curious to know. It's weird, if the passage is in the RH, my brain can process it pretty much instantaneously, but since it's LH, it barely even responds to it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 89
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 89 |
Bravo on the sight reading!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 715
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 715 |
Fantastic! I'd be happy at 25% of that.
Just a quick question - how much time do you normaloly spend previewing a piece to determone key signature and changes, overall structure, flow, etc. before actually starting to play?
Steinway 1905 model A, rebuild started 2008, completed 2012 Yahama CVP-401 Will somone get my wife off the Steinway so I can play it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 71
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 71 |
here is a Saint-Saens etude if you dear to try! it's no. 6 the Toccata! imslp
storing.no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 437
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 437 |
http://imslp.org/wiki/Mazeppa,_S.100_(Liszt,_Franz)
|
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,394
Posts3,349,343
Members111,634
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|