2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
46 members (AlkansBookcase, Bruce Sato, APianistHasNoName, BillS728, bcalvanese, anotherscott, Carey, CharlesXX, 9 invisible), 1,461 guests, and 302 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
B
barryc Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
B
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
Background: I'm finally choosing to 'pull the trigger', going with the Kawaii CA 63. But, I still have a major hurdle choice and I need some expert help.

I am composing classical piano (only) and need something to record as I come up with new ideas. I'm choosing the 63 because of touch and an adequate sound. I'm not needing equipment for producing cds or anything, just want to have the capacity to put the body of work into an organized format and want to get good sound.

Question: Having read the thread on CA93/63 'custom settings', does the CA 63 have adequate customizing inherent to it or do I still need a Pianotech/computer/sound card/more speakers, set up in order to get great sound?

I'll appreciate any and all responses. Thanks, in advance

Last edited by barryc; 10/18/10 11:54 PM. Reason: poor response rate
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,842
C
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
C
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,842
Originally Posted by barryc
...
I am composing classical piano (only) and need something to record as I come up with new ideas. I'm choosing the 63 because of touch and an adequate sound. I'm not needing equipment for producing cds or anything, just want to have the capacity to put the body of work into an organized format and want to get good sound...


Use a computer. Software like Garage Band is all you really need. It can save music, put it in folders and if you also record MIDI (in addition to the audio) it can print music in standard notation.

I'd think if you are composing and you end product is sheet music you'd want some good notation software.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
Originally Posted by barryc
Question: Having read the thread on CA93/63 'custom settings', does the CA 63 have adequate customizing inherent to it or do I still need a Pianotech/computer/sound card/more speakers, set up in order to get great sound?

I'll appreciate any and all responses. Thanks, in advance

Hi barryc,
Let's split it up:

Do the CA93/CA63 have adequate customizing?
Yes absolutely, because of the extremely coherent UPHI sampling quality and unique dual voice mode combination, there is no other console type DP currently available that can touch it when it comes to customizing piano voices, not even close! cool

Reference: http://www.attacca.eu/images/settings_CA63_93.pdf



Do I still need Pianoteq?
I.m.h.o. the CA93/CA63 with for instance the new Steinway patch sounds amazing and is way superior to standalone Pianoteq (playability is excellent too). But please don’t just take my word for it: you’re personally invited to go and test a wide variety of dual voice custom settings for yourself and report back your findings at the CA93/CA63 custom settings thread! smile

Reference: (playing live, I perceived bigger differences between recording 2. and 4.)
http://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/1530455.html#Post1530455



Do I still need more speakers?
If you think so, you’d better buy the high-end CA93 with soundboard and 6-speaker system for authentic live playing at moderate to high volumes shocked wow (by the way, the CA63 and CA93 sound identical over headphones).

Reference: https://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubb...awai%20CA63%20vs%20CA93.html#Post1474117




K A W A I ..... R O L A N D ......... E - M U
C A - 9 3 ......... A X - 7 ...... X B O A R D - 4 9
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,115
S
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
S
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,115
OT: Nice paper TADutchman and Pinipon. I don't have a CA63 but do enjoy the result of the (static) overlay of piano tones using the CN33.

I know the emphasis is on how the results sound in your custom settings, but I just wonder if it would make sense or be interesting to also submit one of your piano sounds to Dewster and DPBSD to see what a waveform and spectrum analysis would make of it?

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 304
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 304
What is your end goal, the steps you already have taken to get there and the steps you will take next?

If you are composing solo piano works, and will print them as notation to have them played by a fantastic acoustic piano performer (whether yourself or another), then ease of recording and integration with decent notation software will rank high on your "wanted" list, and best possible sound and action will rank lower.

If you will be using a sequencer to record your keyboard playing, and then use the edited MIDI files to play back the same hardware instrument, the sound becomes much more important, and notation unnecessary, unless/until you want another to play your pieces.

Only if you think others will be listening to the actual instrument you play do you need really good and loud sound, otherwise they'll be listening to downloads or CDs.
Let us know, there are many quite helpful folks here who wish you well. smile


Terry@cincyrockers.com
www.theplayerpianoshop.com
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
Originally Posted by spanishbuddha
OT: Nice paper TADutchman and Pinipon.

Thanks, spanishbuddha!


Originally Posted by spanishbuddha
I know the emphasis is on how the results sound in your custom settings, but I just wonder if it would make sense or be interesting to also submit one of your piano sounds to Dewster and DPBSD to see what a waveform and spectrum analysis would make of it?

That's exactly right, no paralysis by analysis: my main goals are maximizing sheer live sound quality and offering variety to CA93/CA63 owners! Although an excellent idea that also has crossed my mind before, submitting some of my dual voice presets to Dewster is currently not an option, because I work almost exclusively by way of developing completely new sound signatures with complex sympathetic resonances in my piano voices. These resonances are not yet supported with Midi-files, like what's needed for running the DPBSD test (firmware v1.08 perhaps?).


K A W A I ..... R O L A N D ......... E - M U
C A - 9 3 ......... A X - 7 ...... X B O A R D - 4 9
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
B
barryc Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
B
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
These responses have been so helpful---thank you for taking the time to respond. It's very much appreciated. I'm only going to use the instrument in a small bedroom for practice, and recording and developing ideas.

I suppose if this were for playing in a larger room, I'd go for the 93, but it sounds as if you guys are collectively confirming that the 63 would be a good choice for my purposes. I think I'll be doing most of this via headphones. Thoughts on good ones?

I will want to eventually put my stuff to notation. Any further suggestions would be valuable to me in that regard also.

Thanks, again, all.

Last edited by barryc; 10/19/10 12:41 PM.
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 483
R
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
R
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 483
Originally Posted by barryc
I think I'll be doing most of this via headphones. Thoughts on good ones?


I have a few sets of headphones but the main ones I reach for are Sony MDR-V6's. They can be quite loud though so you have to be careful.

Headphones these days are much cheaper, for a decent set, than ten years ago. The MDR's are quite honest although for purely piano, you might want to check out something maybe a little bit duller if you're going to be using them for long periods of time. Some of the Sennheisers are good value for money and often a lot duller than the Sony's. Try and get some phones that cup your ears and are nice and soft. They best way to choose is to try some out and go from there. Everyones ears and heads are different sizes so what works for one person might not work so well for another..

Regards. Rimmer

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
I'm using Sennheiser HD595 headphones and I've heard that AKG K701 works well too.


K A W A I ..... R O L A N D ......... E - M U
C A - 9 3 ......... A X - 7 ...... X B O A R D - 4 9
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,842
C
3000 Post Club Member
Offline
3000 Post Club Member
C
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,842
Originally Posted by barryc
.... I think I'll be doing most of this via headphones. Thoughts on good ones?

I will want to eventually put my stuff to notation. Any further suggestions would be valuable to me in that regard also.

Thanks, again, all.


When buying headphones the first think to decide is if you need the "open" or "closed" type.

Closed ones will offer better sound isolation. They muffle outside noise from (say) a TV playing downstairs and they keep the sound you hear from leaking out into the room. "Open headphones don't isolate sound so well.

But for any given price piont the open headphones will have better quality sound. Or, for a given sound quality you'd pay double or more for closed headphones.

I use AGK K240 headphones. These have been the most popular studio headphones used in the recording industry for decades. You can get them for $100 from Sweetwater. If you like closed headphones of the same quality prices are closer to $200 an example would be the K271. Closed ones are needed if you plan to sing into a mic, so the headphones sound doe not bleed into it.



For recording I always say to simply use Garage Band until you can point to some specific feature you need that it lacks then upgrade to Logic Express. GB comes free and pre-installed on every Mac. The "free and pre-installed" part pretty much makes it a no-brainier.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
Originally Posted by barryc
I will want to eventually put my stuff to notation.

In case you mean this literally: http://www.notation.com/ grin wink


K A W A I ..... R O L A N D ......... E - M U
C A - 9 3 ......... A X - 7 ...... X B O A R D - 4 9

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
How Much to Sell For?
by TexasMom1 - 04/15/24 10:23 PM
Song lyrics have become simpler and more repetitive
by FrankCox - 04/15/24 07:42 PM
New bass strings sound tubby
by Emery Wang - 04/15/24 06:54 PM
Pianodisc PDS-128+ calibration
by Dalem01 - 04/15/24 04:50 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,384
Posts3,349,159
Members111,630
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.