2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
60 members (Carey, AlkansBookcase, brdwyguy, 20/20 Vision, Charles Cohen, 36251, benkeys, bcalvanese, booms, 6 invisible), 1,871 guests, and 262 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#1515886 09/15/10 03:20 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
C
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
I am unsure. Say you are in common time. You have a half note tied to a quarter note with a dot aove it, followed by another quarter note with a dot above it. How is that measure articulated?
Or another example would be four four time and you have half noted thirds tied to a quarter noted third with a dot above and then a lone quarter note third. How is that played?

Thanks for your help.



Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
Sometimes it's easier to talk about these questions if you post an example, however, I'll give it a try. Let us know if this isn't really what you're asking, but I'm detecting two different issues here. The rhythm is straightforward: the half note tied to a quarter note is held for three beats and the remaining quarter note makes up the fourth beat of the measure.

The dots above the notes have nothing to do with this basic counting (if the dots appeared to the side of the notes you would have a different issue). Above the notes, the dots mean staccato or detached. With a dot over the two quarter notes, it suggests releasing the tied quarter note just a bit before the fourth beat starts to create a slight space or detachment between the third and fourth beat. Likewise, the last quarter note is released just a little early to create a space before the next measure.


Paul Buchanan
Estonia L168 #1718
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,534
G
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
G
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,534
If a note is tied to another note, without a staccato dot above it, then you just hold the second note for its time value, this is a regular tie. However, if a note is tied to another note that is staccato, then this is a slur, and the second note is played staccato.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
C
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
Confused.



Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,534
G
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
G
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,534
You can't have a staccato note as the second note in a tie.

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,913
D
2000 Post Club Member
Offline
2000 Post Club Member
D
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,913
Originally Posted by Gyro
You can't have a staccato note as the second note in a tie.
Sure you can. It happens fairly frequently.

Staccato means the note ends early. It doesn't have to affect the beginning of the note, though sometimes it does. You have to figure out what the composer meant.

(This is not a good marking because it's confusing to read - but it is certainly written often enough.)

Last edited by david_a; 09/15/10 05:08 PM.

(I'm a piano teacher.)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
Originally Posted by Gyro
You can't have a staccato note as the second note in a tie.

As david_a notes, this is flatly incorrect. I am not at home right now, but if it helps I can post a couple of examples from Gardner Read's Music Notation: A Manual of Modern Practice (2nd ed.) later.

There is (or at least there is supposed to be) a slight difference in the placement of the tie mark and a slur: "Though the tie-mark and the slur appear identical, the tie almost touches the note-head center, while the slur of necessity is set somewhat above or below the note-head" (Read, p. 110). This distinction is subtle and you cannot always depend on a particular publisher following all the rules, so caution is advised in this area. But tied notes with different articulation marks are very common and, in my opinion, not always particularly confusing.


Paul Buchanan
Estonia L168 #1718
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
C
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
Its like the palmetto pimento passages. That is not a staccato but like a dot glissando.

Okay I meant portamento passages maybe.

Last edited by LindaR; 09/15/10 11:36 PM. Reason: looked it up


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
Originally Posted by LindaR
Its like the palmetto pimento passages. That is not a staccato but like a dot glissando.

Okay I meant portamento passages maybe.

I assumed that you originally meant that the half and quarter notes in your first example were at the same pitch (because you used the word "tied"). Talking about glissandos makes me wonder if I jumped to a wrong assumption about this. Is it possible to post a scan of the measures in question?

Portamento notation using a little "o" (not a solid dot) over a note is usually seen in string notation, where it indicates a glissando or portamento to a harmonic. I don't know what it might mean in a piano context.

(I just hate being stumped on notation questions!)


Paul Buchanan
Estonia L168 #1718
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
C
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
An example in the right edition would be in Sonatina op 55 no 3, Kuhlau and about the 32nd and 33rd measure. Oh did I say the half note and the quarter note are the same note/pitch? I hope so. I have to call it a night and check in tomorrow. Thanks.

Last edited by LindaR; 09/16/10 12:42 AM. Reason: 31 to 33 changed.


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
Originally Posted by LindaR
Sonatina op 55 no 3, Kuhlau and about the 32nd and 33rd measure

I found an old Schirmer public domain edition of this on imslp.org, but I didn't see the example you describe in half and quarter notes. I did find this in the first movement:

[Linked Image]

If this is along the lines you are asking, then my original answer was correct. The half-note third in the RH is tied to an eighth-note third followed by three other eighth-note thirds (the first of which just repeats the tied third). The dots are staccato marks and indicate that a brief rest should be added AFTER each dotted third (without changing the rhythm of course).

The dot over the tied eighth-note third corresponds to the dotted eighth note in the LH, so the RH and LH should release their notes together here when creating the detached sound. Also, the half-note third has an accent mark indicating that it needs to be emphasized when it is first played.


Paul Buchanan
Estonia L168 #1718
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
C
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
Thanks everyone. Packa that was what I was thinking of, variations of the example you scanned for me. I guess but you are saying the right hand isn't articulated just lifted quickly to in stacatto or portamento way at same time as left hand and are you saying that? I guess that is why I thought the tie was there. I see variations of this everywhere and my knowledge isn't about knowing how to fix this. smile



Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
Originally Posted by LindaR
Thanks everyone. Packa that was what I was thinking of, variations of the example you scanned for me. I guess but you are saying the right hand isn't articulated just lifted quickly to in stacatto or portamento way at same time as left hand and are you saying that? I guess that is why I thought the tie was there. I see variations of this everywhere and my knowledge isn't about knowing how to fix this. smile

I would say that staccato means a SHORTENED sound rather than always a SHORT QUICK sound. A staccato mark over an eighth or sixteenth note certainly suggests a quick "grace-note-like" sound production, especially at fast tempos. But dots over longer notes like quarter notes or at slower tempos may just be somewhat shortened and detached but without the quick "jabbing" sound you may be imagining. That is the case with the tied notes in the example. You still hold the tied notes for ALMOST their full duration.


Paul Buchanan
Estonia L168 #1718
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
C
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
I understand staccato differently. I give up. Thanks for help.



Joined: May 2007
Posts: 9
M
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
M
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 9
Hello Linda
I have the Kuhlau Sonatina Book 1. Although I am not to Op.55, #3 yet. In looking at measures 32 & 33 I expect my teacher to have me hold the b&d in the right hand through the half note and come up and off early on the tied eighth note to have a staccato feel.... and then play the remaining 3 eighth notes stacatto. hope this helps

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
C
Full Member
OP Offline
Full Member
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 223
Okay thanks, I think that is what Packa said too... But with the remaining 3 eighth notes just short of full time-portamentoish. Now to try it out in real time. smile



Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
Originally Posted by michele3gsp
... come up and off early on the tied eighth note to have a staccato feel.... and then play the remaining 3 eighth notes stacatto

Yes. And the reason for lifting early in the RH is to allow that staccato eighth note in the LH to really stand out as a short detached sound that establishes the feel for the three following staccato eighth notes in the RH.


Paul Buchanan
Estonia L168 #1718
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
M
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Originally Posted by LindaR
Okay thanks, I think that is what Packa said too... But with the remaining 3 eighth notes just short of full time-portamentoish. Now to try it out in real time. smile


Just to clear up some possible confusion: portamento is different from portato. In the case where you are playing something staccato but not really short, just detached, that is portato. Portamento is when you slide from one pitch to the next (not literally possible on the piano as this is different than a glissando). smile


private piano/voice teacher FT

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
Originally Posted by Morodiene
Originally Posted by LindaR
Okay thanks, I think that is what Packa said too... But with the remaining 3 eighth notes just short of full time-portamentoish. Now to try it out in real time. smile


Just to clear up some possible confusion: portamento is different from portato. In the case where you are playing something staccato but not really short, just detached, that is portato. Portamento is when you slide from one pitch to the next (not literally possible on the piano as this is different than a glissando). smile

The distinction with portato is certainly true, but portamento is sometimes, although much more rarely, used as a synonym for appogiatura, which is obviously possible on a piano (e.g. see the entry for "portamento" in The Oxford Companion To Music).


Paul Buchanan
Estonia L168 #1718
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
M
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,391
Originally Posted by packa
Originally Posted by Morodiene
Originally Posted by LindaR
Okay thanks, I think that is what Packa said too... But with the remaining 3 eighth notes just short of full time-portamentoish. Now to try it out in real time. smile


Just to clear up some possible confusion: portamento is different from portato. In the case where you are playing something staccato but not really short, just detached, that is portato. Portamento is when you slide from one pitch to the next (not literally possible on the piano as this is different than a glissando). smile

The distinction with portato is certainly true, but portamento is sometimes, although much more rarely, used as a synonym for appogiatura, which is obviously possible on a piano (e.g. see the entry for "portamento" in The Oxford Companion To Music).


Which I do not see in the musical example provided, unless I missed something coming in late to the discussion. smile


private piano/voice teacher FT

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Bart K, platuser 

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Recommended Songs for Beginners
by FreddyM - 04/16/24 03:20 PM
New DP for a 10 year old
by peelaaa - 04/16/24 02:47 PM
Estonia 1990
by Iberia - 04/16/24 11:01 AM
Very Cheap Piano?
by Tweedpipe - 04/16/24 10:13 AM
Practical Meaning of SMP
by rneedle - 04/16/24 09:57 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,392
Posts3,349,293
Members111,634
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.