Piano World Home Page Forums Our Most Popular Forums Pianist Corner Order of pieces in an amateur piano competition

Hi All,

Is there a rule that we need to follow regarding the order of the pieces that we are going to use at each stage? Should I play from the earlier era to the later era, or I can just play in whatever order I like?

I really appreciate any feedback on this.

RS

Whatever you'd like.

Sometimes (rarely) there will be stated requirements for particular rounds. Like, the Paris event states that you have to play some Bach in the semi-finals. But if you read closely, you see that they don't mean it.

The Warsaw-Chopin competition required certain types of Chopin pieces in each round. That's the only amateur competition I'm aware of that has had any such real requirement.

Recommendation: Especially if it's your first competition, start with your best or most secure piece, provided it fits the time allowance.

I don't know what you're playing, but I always like to have the first piece of any performance be something that was written as such (i.e. a first movement or standalone piece). This is especially important if you're playing excerpts. I wouldn't recommend opening with a second movement of a Sonata or a fugue without a prelude. Similarly, make sure whatever you play last has a strong sense of finality.

Thanks Marc and BWV831 for the info and advice!!!

Yes -- absolutely.
Although with possible exceptions but one should beware of them.

If can be effective to go against that rule and end sort of 'ironically.' I've sometimes ended with Scriabin's 9th Sonata, which ends fading-away, and that does work. But we have to be careful about things like that, and what you said is good general advice.

so many play programs chronologically, without regards to the effect of the order/program of the whole, I think chronological order should be banned, just keep an eye and an ear to what suits best!