2022 our 25th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Who's Online Now
39 members (Doug M., Davidnewmind, Dfrankjazz, brdwyguy, busa, benkeys, Burkhard, Erinmarriott, David Boyce, 6 invisible), 1,123 guests, and 267 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 11
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
Originally Posted by moscheles001
Originally Posted by mikelovespiano
Well come on then king of piano, post us your version of Prelude in g minor.


1. I can't play it yet; I'm working on basic technique, including note-reading, before I try the really difficult repertoire. I want to be able to do justice to great music, not just play the notes.

2. Grow up.


Well then you clearly don't know what technique is. Who are you to be telling people what technique is and how it should be learned when you're not playing advanced-intermediate repetoire? In fact, besides Angelina, none of the people posting about this person's technique (who, by the way, have not even heard him play) are playing particularly advanced repetoire. You all need to stop acting all high and mighty and let people learn how they want; and, if you REALLY want to rag on people about how they learn, at least be an advanced musician yourself. And, if you think you need to read notes to have good technique, you obviously have never heard of Art Tatum. That man alone makes your entire argument completely wrong.

Last edited by xtraheat; 05/06/10 12:57 PM.

Currently working on
Prokofiev Piano Concerto 3
Beethoven Sonata Op.109
Chopin Op.10 No.1
Bach WTC II no. 15

--Sam--
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 359
F
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
F
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 359
Originally Posted by mikelovespiano
Exactly, so don't dictate to me when you're still working on the basics. As for llama, I did not come on here asking how to play it. I said I'm also learning this via synethesia, just like the other guy. Infact I didn't even start this thread you tool. Go back to the start and read from there. Don't just dive in the deep end.
*shrug* I guess I'm confusing my idiots. My apologies.
By the way - 'don't just dive in the deep end', coming from you, is deliciously ironic.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by moscheles001
Originally Posted by mikelovespiano
Well come on then king of piano, post us your version of Prelude in g minor.


1. I can't play it yet; I'm working on basic technique, including note-reading, before I try the really difficult repertoire. I want to be able to do justice to great music, not just play the notes.

2. Grow up.


Well then you clearly don't know what technique is. Who are you to be telling people what technique is and how it should be learned when you're not playing advanced-intermediate repetoire? In fact, besides Angelina, none of the people posting about this person's technique (who, by the way, have not even heard him play) are playing particularly advanced repetoire. You all need to stop acting all high and mighty and let people learn how they want; and, if you REALLY want to rag on people about how they learn, at least be an advanced musician yourself. And, if you think you need to read notes to have good technique, you obviously have never heard of Art Tatum. That man alone makes your entire argument completely wrong.


Dont be ridiculous



Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 359
F
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
F
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 359
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by moscheles001
Originally Posted by mikelovespiano
Well come on then king of piano, post us your version of Prelude in g minor.


1. I can't play it yet; I'm working on basic technique, including note-reading, before I try the really difficult repertoire. I want to be able to do justice to great music, not just play the notes.

2. Grow up.


Well then you clearly don't know what technique is. Who are you to be telling people what technique is and how it should be learned when you're not playing advanced-intermediate repetoire? In fact, besides Angelina, none of the people posting about this person's technique (who, by the way, have not even heard him play) are playing particularly advanced repetoire. You all need to stop acting all high and mighty and let people learn how they want; and, if you REALLY want to rag on people about how they learn, at least be an advanced musician yourself. And, if you think you need to read notes to have good technique, you obviously have never heard of Art Tatum. That man alone makes your entire argument completely wrong.
Um. He was 1. blind and 2. a jazz pianist. What a shite comparison.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
Originally Posted by FunkyLlama
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by moscheles001
Originally Posted by mikelovespiano
Well come on then king of piano, post us your version of Prelude in g minor.


1. I can't play it yet; I'm working on basic technique, including note-reading, before I try the really difficult repertoire. I want to be able to do justice to great music, not just play the notes.

2. Grow up.


Well then you clearly don't know what technique is. Who are you to be telling people what technique is and how it should be learned when you're not playing advanced-intermediate repetoire? In fact, besides Angelina, none of the people posting about this person's technique (who, by the way, have not even heard him play) are playing particularly advanced repetoire. You all need to stop acting all high and mighty and let people learn how they want; and, if you REALLY want to rag on people about how they learn, at least be an advanced musician yourself. And, if you think you need to read notes to have good technique, you obviously have never heard of Art Tatum. That man alone makes your entire argument completely wrong.
Um. He was 1. blind and 2. a jazz pianist. What a shite comparison.


It wouldn't be a bad comparison if you weren't so stubborn that you deny everyone that disagrees with you and had a clue about what you were talking about.
Since he was blind, he obviously didn't rely on notated music to learn his technique. Regardless of whether he played jazz or not, his technique was easily as good as any other pianist of his day, and even Horowitz had that famous quote that if Tatum played classical, he would be out of a job.


Currently working on
Prokofiev Piano Concerto 3
Beethoven Sonata Op.109
Chopin Op.10 No.1
Bach WTC II no. 15

--Sam--
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by FunkyLlama
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by moscheles001
Originally Posted by mikelovespiano
Well come on then king of piano, post us your version of Prelude in g minor.


1. I can't play it yet; I'm working on basic technique, including note-reading, before I try the really difficult repertoire. I want to be able to do justice to great music, not just play the notes.

2. Grow up.


Well then you clearly don't know what technique is. Who are you to be telling people what technique is and how it should be learned when you're not playing advanced-intermediate repetoire? In fact, besides Angelina, none of the people posting about this person's technique (who, by the way, have not even heard him play) are playing particularly advanced repetoire. You all need to stop acting all high and mighty and let people learn how they want; and, if you REALLY want to rag on people about how they learn, at least be an advanced musician yourself. And, if you think you need to read notes to have good technique, you obviously have never heard of Art Tatum. That man alone makes your entire argument completely wrong.
Um. He was 1. blind and 2. a jazz pianist. What a shite comparison.


It wouldn't be a bad comparison if you weren't so stubborn that you deny everyone that disagrees with you and had a clue about what you were talking about.
Since he was blind, he obviously didn't rely on notated music to learn his technique. Regardless of whether he played jazz or not, his technique was easily as good as any other pianist of his day, and even Horowitz had that famous quote that if Tatum played classical, he would be out of a job.


What is technique for you ?



Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625


Currently working on
Prokofiev Piano Concerto 3
Beethoven Sonata Op.109
Chopin Op.10 No.1
Bach WTC II no. 15

--Sam--
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 359
F
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
F
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 359
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by FunkyLlama
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by moscheles001
Originally Posted by mikelovespiano
Well come on then king of piano, post us your version of Prelude in g minor.


1. I can't play it yet; I'm working on basic technique, including note-reading, before I try the really difficult repertoire. I want to be able to do justice to great music, not just play the notes.

2. Grow up.


Well then you clearly don't know what technique is. Who are you to be telling people what technique is and how it should be learned when you're not playing advanced-intermediate repetoire? In fact, besides Angelina, none of the people posting about this person's technique (who, by the way, have not even heard him play) are playing particularly advanced repetoire. You all need to stop acting all high and mighty and let people learn how they want; and, if you REALLY want to rag on people about how they learn, at least be an advanced musician yourself. And, if you think you need to read notes to have good technique, you obviously have never heard of Art Tatum. That man alone makes your entire argument completely wrong.
Um. He was 1. blind and 2. a jazz pianist. What a shite comparison.


It wouldn't be a bad comparison if you weren't so stubborn that you deny everyone that disagrees with you and had a clue about what you were talking about.
Since he was blind, he obviously didn't rely on notated music to learn his technique. Regardless of whether he played jazz or not, his technique was easily as good as any other pianist of his day, and even Horowitz had that famous quote that if Tatum played classical, he would be out of a job.
So? I'm fully aware that he was very good; the fact still remains that as a jazz pianist whose playing was mostly improvisatory, not reading sheet music would simply not have been an obstacle to him as it would be to classical pianists. But, yeah, I'm the stubborn one. Sure.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
Originally Posted by xtraheat


Do you think playing advanced repertoire or any repertoire improving technique ?



Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
Originally Posted by Batuhan
Originally Posted by xtraheat


Do you think playing advanced repertoire or any repertoire improving technique ?


While your question didn't make any sense, I feel like you are trying to refute that that video shows good technique, which is rediculous


Currently working on
Prokofiev Piano Concerto 3
Beethoven Sonata Op.109
Chopin Op.10 No.1
Bach WTC II no. 15

--Sam--
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
Originally Posted by FunkyLlama
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by FunkyLlama
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by moscheles001
Originally Posted by mikelovespiano
Well come on then king of piano, post us your version of Prelude in g minor.


1. I can't play it yet; I'm working on basic technique, including note-reading, before I try the really difficult repertoire. I want to be able to do justice to great music, not just play the notes.

2. Grow up.


Well then you clearly don't know what technique is. Who are you to be telling people what technique is and how it should be learned when you're not playing advanced-intermediate repetoire? In fact, besides Angelina, none of the people posting about this person's technique (who, by the way, have not even heard him play) are playing particularly advanced repetoire. You all need to stop acting all high and mighty and let people learn how they want; and, if you REALLY want to rag on people about how they learn, at least be an advanced musician yourself. And, if you think you need to read notes to have good technique, you obviously have never heard of Art Tatum. That man alone makes your entire argument completely wrong.
Um. He was 1. blind and 2. a jazz pianist. What a shite comparison.


It wouldn't be a bad comparison if you weren't so stubborn that you deny everyone that disagrees with you and had a clue about what you were talking about.
Since he was blind, he obviously didn't rely on notated music to learn his technique. Regardless of whether he played jazz or not, his technique was easily as good as any other pianist of his day, and even Horowitz had that famous quote that if Tatum played classical, he would be out of a job.
So? I'm fully aware that he was very good; the fact still remains that as a jazz pianist whose playing was mostly improvisatory, not reading sheet music would simply not have been an obstacle to him as it would be to classical pianists. But, yeah, I'm the stubborn one. Sure.


His argument was that you need to be able to read sheet music to improve your technique. This proves that you do not. I'm not sure what you are talking about


Currently working on
Prokofiev Piano Concerto 3
Beethoven Sonata Op.109
Chopin Op.10 No.1
Bach WTC II no. 15

--Sam--
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
Originally Posted by xtraheat
Originally Posted by Batuhan
Originally Posted by xtraheat


Do you think playing advanced repertoire or any repertoire improving technique ?


While your question didn't make any sense, I feel like you are trying to refute that that video shows good technique, which is rediculous


I think you dont hear anything about scales, arpeggios etc. in your life.



Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
What are you talking about?


Currently working on
Prokofiev Piano Concerto 3
Beethoven Sonata Op.109
Chopin Op.10 No.1
Bach WTC II no. 15

--Sam--
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 359
F
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
F
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 359
Originally Posted by xtraheat
His argument was that you need to be able to read sheet music to improve your technique. This proves that you do not. I'm not sure what you are talking about
He was quite clearly referring to classical pianism, to which learning to read music is indeed probably beneficial to technique.

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 758
M
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 758
My argument was that being able to read music is a big part of technique. Blind pianists are, of course, excused from that requirement.

Yes, Sam, my technique is not as good as yours, and probably never will be, but I know enough about technique to know that there's more to it than just notes played in the right order at the right speed.

I'm also adult enough not to consider myself superior to those whose technique is less than my own.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
1000 Post Club Member
Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,081
Originally Posted by xtraheat
What are you talking about?


you need to be able to read sheet music to improve your technique.

You use sythesia for reading hanon exercises czerny etc ?



Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
My technique isn't all that good either, and I wasn't claiming that it was any better than yours. All I am trying to say is that one shouldn't pass judgement onto another person's technique (I personally don't believe they ever should) unless they are a master of technique themselves. I'm not trying to give anyone the misconception that I have great technique; rather, I think everyone should just leave this guy alone.


Currently working on
Prokofiev Piano Concerto 3
Beethoven Sonata Op.109
Chopin Op.10 No.1
Bach WTC II no. 15

--Sam--
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 625
Originally Posted by Batuhan
Originally Posted by xtraheat
What are you talking about?


you need to be able to read sheet music to improve your technique.

You use sythesia for reading hanon exercises czerny etc ?


I never used sheet music to learn scales, arpeggios, chordal scales, etc. Most people don't.


Currently working on
Prokofiev Piano Concerto 3
Beethoven Sonata Op.109
Chopin Op.10 No.1
Bach WTC II no. 15

--Sam--
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,600
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,600
Originally Posted by BruceD
.....If you are seriously attempting to learn and play this Prelude, you should know what key it is in. The key is not "something major or minor;" it's G-sharp minor.

Originally Posted by pianoloverus
When I taught high school and asked students what piece they played, sometimes I got "Chopin....or Sonatina...or the one in the green book." The most common amswer I got when I asked them what kind of piano they had was "black"....

Just a couple of highlights from the hilarious beginning. ha

And yet.......

Originally Posted by Victor25
Your learning Rachmaninov's G-sharp minor prelude from midi :|

That's impressive.
Although there are the limitations that were mentioned, it's impressive -- and, IMO, great to see.

It's great to see that even people who don't read music are into these things enough (and able enough) to try to play the pieces.

I love it.

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
M
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
M
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Finally, it's nice to see some support from you nice people. You wouldn't beleive the amount of people on here being asses to me simply because I can play rachmaninoff using synethesia. Half the people even commenting probably can't play prelude in g minor.

Page 4 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 11

Moderated by  Brendan, platuser 

Link Copied to Clipboard
What's Hot!!
Piano World Has Been Sold!
--------------------
Forums RULES, Terms of Service & HELP
(updated 06/06/2022)
---------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
(ad)
(ad)
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Country style lessons
by Stephen_James - 04/16/24 06:04 AM
How Much to Sell For?
by TexasMom1 - 04/15/24 10:23 PM
Song lyrics have become simpler and more repetitive
by FrankCox - 04/15/24 07:42 PM
New bass strings sound tubby
by Emery Wang - 04/15/24 06:54 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums43
Topics223,385
Posts3,349,183
Members111,631
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010

Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations |

Advertise on Piano World
| Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map


Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community.