Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.5 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
What's Hot!!
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
(125ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad)
Piano Buyer Guide
Piano Buyer Fall 2017
Who's Online Now
114 registered members (Almaviva, Bambers, accordeur, anotherscott, ajames, 32 invisible), 1,941 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 24 of 50 1 2 22 23 24 25 26 49 50
#1423487 - 04/24/10 04:50 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
EastWest Quantum Leap Goliath Pianos - Triple Review!

Thanks once again to pesk, we have DPBSD MP3s of (count 'em) three EastWest Quantum Leap Goliath Pianos for our analyzing and listening pleasure: the Fazioli F308 2 gig, the Steinway B, and the PMI Bosendorfer 290 - thanks pesk!

First, the things they have in common: None appear to be looped, which is good. But all fail the key down sympathetic resonance test, the brief pedal partial damping test, and the partial pedaling test. All of them have a strange response to the pedal down silent replay test - there is no audible damping during the test (which is good) but the velocity=1 note continues past the end - which should be impossible as no keys or pedals are being held at that point! There are no key up or pedal up/down sounds in any of the pianos, and the velocity layer switches are all quite visible and audible.

In terms of stretching, the Steinway doesn't appear to be stretched, the Fazioli with 82 groups is lightly stretched, and the Bosendorfer with 51 groups is the most stretched. In terms of velocity layer count, the Bosendorfer has 5, the Fazioli has 4, and the Steinway has 3. Seems like some kind of layer count / note stretch trade-off going on there.

The Bosendorfer and Fazioli both have very short note decay times, with the Fazioli bass notes coming to an abrupt stop fairly early. The Steinway has nice long note decays, and is also the only one that passes the pedal down sympathetic resonance test. The Bosendorfer has many of its samples marred by audible "clacks" and "thumps".

Reviews below, MP3s and more analysis pics at the share point.

[Linked Image]
Waveform view of the Fazioli. Note very short bass note decay & truncation.

[Linked Image]
Spectral pan view of the Bosendorfer. This one is the most stretched of the bunch.

[Linked Image]
Spectral frequency view of the Steinway, where both layer switches are visible.



----------------------------------------------------
- EastWest Quantum Leap Goliath Fazioli F308 2 gig -
----------------------------------------------------
FILE & SETUP:
- dpbsd_v1.6_ewql_goliath_fazioli_f308_2gig.mp3
- Recorded in Cubase 5, converted to MP3 in Wavelab 6 w/ LAME encoder.
- All settings default except reverb off.
- Recorded by "pesk".
PROS:
- No looping.
- Only a small amount of stretching.
- Stretch distances: 1(x5),2,1(x13),2,1(x10),2,1(x13),2,1(x5),2,1(x6),2,1(x24) = 82 groups.
- 4 velocity layers.
- Velocity switch @ vel=62,96,112.
CONS:
- Fails the pedal down sympathetic resonance test.
- Fails the key down sympathetic resonance test.
- Passes/fails the pedal down silent replay test, no damping during test, but vel=1 note continues past the end!
- Fails the brief pedal partial damping test.
- Fails the partial pedaling test.
- Lowest notes have quite short decay, ~1/2 Pianoteq, truncated.
- Samples have low frequency noise (air conditioner?).
- No key up or pedal up/down sounds.
- Velocity layer switches quite visible and very audible.
OTHER:
- Dynamic range 39dB (vel=1:127).
- MP3 levels: peak @ -1.6dB, noise floor @ -90dB.
- Date reviewed: 2010-04-23.


--------------------------------------------
- EastWest Quantum Leap Goliath Steinway B -
--------------------------------------------
FILE & SETUP:
- dpbsd_v1.6_ewql_goliath_steinway_b.mp3
- Recorded in Cubase 5, converted to MP3 in Wavelab 6 w/ LAME encoder.
- All settings default except reverb off.
- Recorded by "pesk".
PROS:
- Passes the pedal down sympathetic resonance test.
- No looping.
- Nice long decays on the order of Pianoteq (except for C1 which is a bit short).
- No obvious stretching.
- 3 velocity layers.
- Velocity switch @ vel=76,114.
CONS:
- Fails the key down sympathetic resonance test.
- Passes/fails the pedal down silent replay test, no damping during test, but vel=1 note continues past the end!
- Fails the brief pedal partial damping test.
- Fails the partial pedaling test.
- No key up or pedal up/down sounds.
- Velocity layer switches quite visible and very audible.
OTHER:
- Dynamic range 47dB (vel=1:127).
- MP3 levels: peak @ -0.33dB, noise floor @ -90dB.
- Date reviewed: 2010-04-23.


-----------------------------------------------------
- EastWest Quantum Leap Goliath PMI Bosendorfer 290 -
-----------------------------------------------------
FILE & SETUP:
- dpbsd_v1.6_ewql_goliath_pmi_bosendorfer_290.mp3
- Recorded in Cubase 5, converted to MP3 in Wavelab 6 w/ LAME encoder.
- All settings default except reverb off.
- Recorded by "pesk".
PROS:
- No looping.
- 5 velocity layers.
- Velocity switch @ vel=34,66,98,114.
CONS:
- Fails the pedal down sympathetic resonance test.
- Fails the key down sympathetic resonance test.
- Passes/fails the pedal down silent replay test, no damping during test, but vel=1 note continues past the end!
- Fails the brief pedal partial damping test.
- Fails the partial pedaling test.
- Low and high notes have quite short decay, ~1/2 Pianoteq.
- No key up or pedal up/down sounds.
- C3 has loud "clack" sound @ ~2sec.
- C5 & C7 have a "thump" sound near the end.
- Obviously stretched.
- Stretch distances: 1,2,1,2,2,1,2(x3),1,2,2,1,2(x3),1,2,2,1,2(x3),1,2,2,1,2(x3),1,2,2,1,2(x3),1,2,2,1,2(x3),1,2,2,1,2,2,3 = 51 groups.
- Velocity layer switches quite visible and very audible, particulary @ vel=34,66,114.
OTHER:
- Dynamic range 23dB (vel=1:127).
- MP3 levels: peak @ -0.25dB, noise floor @ -90dB.
- Date reviewed: 2010-04-23.

(ad) ROLAND

Click Here

#1423513 - 04/24/10 05:18 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Native Instruments Kontakt 4 Factory Grand Piano Review

Thanks yet again to pesk, we have a DPBSD MP3 of the Native Instruments Kontakt 4 Factory Grand Piano - thanks pesk! I believe this is a free offering from NI.

This is a highly stretched, possibly looped, three velocity layer (with filtering) sample set. It's nice that they included key up and pedal up/down sounds, but I found them to be really obnoxious. It seems to have pedal down sympathetic resonance of some sort, and it surprisingly passes the pedal down silent replay test, but it fails the key down sympathetic resonance test, the brief pedal partial damping test, and the partial pedaling test. The velocity=15 G5 note used to signal the end of the DPBSD tests sounds strangely like a second higher note plays slightly later - very odd.

Review below, MP3 and more analysis pics at the share point.


[Linked Image]
Waveform view of the looping test. Note decays are nice and long.

[Linked Image]
Spectral phase view of the looping test. If there is looping it is very well done.

[Linked Image]
Spectral phase view of the stretch test. A mere 16 samples cover all 88 notes of this velocity layer.

[Linked Image]
Spectral frequency view of layer test, where both layer switches are clearly visible, as is some filtering to help blend them.



----------------------------------------------------
- Native Instruments Kontakt 4 Factory Grand Piano -
----------------------------------------------------
FILE & SETUP:
- dpbsd_v1.6_ni_kontakt4_factory_grand.mp3
- Kontakt 4 non-realtime export, converted to MP3 in Wavelab 6 w/ LAME encoder.
- All settings default except reverb off.
- Recorded by "pesk".
PROS:
- Passes the pedal down sympathetic resonance test, though the effect is subtle.
- Pedal up/down sounds like loom-of-strings & key up makes "clunk" sound.
- Passes the pedal down silent replay test.
- Decay times are nice and long.
- 3 velocity layers with some filtering.
- Velocity switch @ vel=42,104
CONS:
- Fails the key down sympathetic resonance test.
- Fails the brief pedal partial damping test.
- Fails the partial pedaling test.
- I believe it is looped, but not audibly, with very long attack and loop samples.
- Visibly and audibly very stretched.
- Stretch distances: 1,6(x5),5,4,6(x8) = 16 groups.
- Velocity layer switches quite visible and very audible.
- Pedal & key up effects are obnoxiously loud.
- G5 sounds like a second higher note plays slightly later.
OTHER:
- Dynamic range 42dB (vel=1:127).
- MP3 levels: peak @ -3.81dB, noise floor @ -90dB.
- Date reviewed: 2010-04-23.

#1423621 - 04/24/10 09:18 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86
jmmec Offline
Full Member
jmmec  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86
New Mexico (yes, USA!)
Regarding the Roland HP-307:

Originally Posted by dewster

- Pedal and key noises are missing.


Yep! I hear that now (doh!). This confirms that the MIDI commands I added to DPBSD v1.7a for the "key down sympathetic resonance" test do not enable things like damper noise, etc, during MIDI playback. I plan to investigate this further, and am betting (hoping?) that additional MIDI commands are needed.

Originally Posted by dewster

The big thing that's missing is pedal down sympathetic resonance - I'm straining and looking but can't detect any.


I'm slowly figuring out what you've been talking about, and this post of yours about the CLP330 really helped:

http://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubb...e%20DP%20BSD%20Project!.html#Post1386410

I've done strictly analog recordings this afternoon, and I can't reproduce the decay that you are expecting to see. At the website below I added some pictures and an MP3 in case you want to open it up in Adobe Audition:

http://wmsar.info/dewster_dpbsd/

Since the expected / characteristic decay is not present on the HP-307, then what are we hearing for the "damper down sympathetic resonance" test? Is it "super fake" sympathetic resonance? I'm really confused.

Originally Posted by dewster
Also your levels could be better, the peak is -8.65dB, and the noise floor is around -72dB.


Thanks for letting me know. I'm new at this, so I'll try to figure out how to improve it. I'm trying not to download Adobe Audition, but I think I might have to. smile

Last edited by jmmec; 04/24/10 09:48 PM.

Roland HP-307
Roland Quad-Capture

https://vimeo.com/58278342
#1423668 - 04/24/10 10:40 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: jmmec]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
It makes absolutely no sense to me why many critical sound features are missing when the HP-307 plays a MIDI file - shouldn't all features enabled be the default? Roland is leaving everyone to their own devices, flailing around trying to turn them back on, without so much as even a MIDI spec. It's almost like a major manufacturer isn't standing behind their product or something. People want to buy these things and have them just work, that's why they shell out the big bucks.

(ad)
Piano & Music Accessories
piano accessories music gifts tuning and moving equipment
#1423864 - 04/25/10 09:33 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86
jmmec Offline
Full Member
jmmec  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86
New Mexico (yes, USA!)
Yep, I agree, especially being one that shelled out big bucks. It would be nice if Roland simply activated the current 'Piano Designer' settings during MIDI playback; or at least provided a menu option to enable or disable it. I plan to complain to Roland once I better understand the HP-307 MIDI behavior.

I'm still confused about the analog recordings that I took yesterday -- I hear what sounds like 'sympathetic resonance', but it doesn't seem to have the decay you're expecting. Any insight, or thoughts about what is happening?


Last edited by jmmec; 04/25/10 09:37 AM.

Roland HP-307
Roland Quad-Capture

https://vimeo.com/58278342
#1424074 - 04/25/10 05:45 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: jmmec]  
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,839
sullivang Offline
2000 Post Club Member
sullivang  Offline
2000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,839
Sydney, Australia
Here's another little test to add to the TODO list: if the instrument provides a different timbre for the soft pedal, test how far this extends into the forte velocities.

I've just noticed that in the EWQLP, which does provide true soft pedal samples, that they have only provided low velocity samples. No matter how hard it is played with the soft pedal, the timbre is VERY mellow - it's not authentic.

Greg.


Middle-aged Jeremy Clarkson acolyte.
#1424488 - 04/26/10 11:15 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
TruePianos Diamond Re-Review (for v1.5.0)

Thanks to our tireless pesk, we have five DPBSD MP3s of the latest TruePianos offerings - thanks pesk! I reviewed TP Diamond v1.4.1 almost three months ago so this is a good time to revisit them.

Since they are fairly similar, I decided to only analyze the Diamond piano in any depth. All of them appear to be looped, and benefit from fairly long attack samples, but they really could use longer loop samples. The low note decay is nice, but the upper notes decay rather quickly. There is a fair amount of stretching going on, both visibly and audibly. What's interesting is that the velocity layers are smoothly blended, much like the latest hardware-based DP fare, so there is no obvious velocity layer switching going on.

All pass the silent replay and brief pedal damping tests, all fail the key down sympathetic resonance test, and there is no support for partial pedaling. All are supposed to have pedal down sympathetic resonance, but for the life of me I just couldn't hear it (pesk confirms that it was indeed enabled in the options). For some reason only the Sapphire Pedal piano has pedal sounds (clunky loom-of-strings sounds) - all other lack this. And none of them have key up sounds.

Review below, MP3s and more analysis pics at the share point.


[Linked Image]
Waveform view of the looping test. Decay times for the low notes are nice and long, but the higher notes have rather short decay times.

[Linked Image]
Spectral phase view of the note C4. Looping is quite clearly seen here.

[Linked Image]
Spectral phase view of the stretch test, middle notes. 24 samples are pressed into service to cover 88 notes.

[Linked Image]
Spectral frequency view of layer test. Timber variation is smooth with no velocity switching evident.

[Linked Image]
Spectral pan view of the pedal down sympathetic resonance test. Pedal down on left, up on right. I couldn't hear any difference.




-----------------------------
- TruePianos Diamond v1.5.0 -
-----------------------------
FILE & SETUP:
- All settings default.
- Recorded in Cubase 5, converted to MP3 in Wavelab 6.
- Recorded by "pesk".
PROS:
- Passes the pedal down silent replay test.
- Passes the brief pedal partial damping test.
- Good lower note decay times, higher notes rather short.
- Nicely blended velocity layers, no switching visible or audible.
CONS:
- Fails the key down sympathetic resonance test.
- Fails the partial pedaling test.
- Visibly and audibly looped.
- Attack sample lengths are (C1:C8): 9.8,6.5,4.8,4.3,4.0,1.8,?,? seconds.
- Loop sample lengths are (C1:C8): 2.4,0.9,1.1,1.2,0.8,0.3,?,? seconds.
- Visibly and audibly very stretched.
- Stretch distances: 8,4(x4),2,5,3,4(x6),3(x3),1,3,5,2,2,1,7 = 24 groups.
- No pedal up/down or key up sounds (Sapphire Pedal has pedal sounds).
OTHER:
- Something like pedal down sympathetic resonance slightly visible, not audible.
- Sample set sizes: Amber (117 MB); Diamond (70 MB); Emerald (84 MB); Sapphire (107 MB).
- Dynamic range 59dB (vel=1:127).
- MP3 levels: peak @ -6.3dB, noise floor @ -90dB.
- Date reviewed: 2010-02-03; updated: 2010-04-26.

#1424685 - 04/26/10 04:48 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,319
Kawai James Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Kawai James  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,319
Hamamatsu, Japan
I thought 'True Pianos' was modelled, not sampled?
Which package am I thinking of, in addition to Pianoteq, of course?

Cheers,
James
x


Employed by Kawai Japan, however the opinions I express are my own.
Nord Electro 3 fan & occasional rare groove player.
#1424704 - 04/26/10 05:23 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: Kawai James]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by KAWAI James
I thought 'True Pianos' was modelled, not sampled?
Which package am I thinking of, in addition to Pianoteq, of course?

Good question! You're undoubtedly thinking of TruePianos, because I myself have heard this over and over in web forums. I did a Google search of "Truepianos modeled" (without quotes) and got 86,800 hits.

But then I go over to http://www.truepianos.com and do a text search for "model" on all of the pages I'm allowed access to and come up with nothing.

I don't know where the whole "TruePianos is modeled" meme came from, but it seems TruePianos themselves aren't pushing it, at least not explicitly any more. From their FAQ:

Quote
What technology does TruePianos use to produce it's piano sound ?
We combine different technologies at different places, following the 'common sense' rule. Things, that generally work better with sampling - we use samples for, and for the features, where samples make the product less versatile - we use other techniques. We are going to proceed with the same philosophy in the future as well. What-is-what may change inbetween the versions to maintain the best quality and experience of the product.

Unless one has a woefully inadequate PC that won't play anything but lobotomized romplers, I'm not sure why anyone would buy their stuff. The layer blending is nice, and the attack sample lengths are adequate, but with those babies comes a fair amount of dirty bathwater.

#1424714 - 04/26/10 05:38 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 172
NikkiPiano Offline
Full Member
NikkiPiano  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 172
Hertfordshire, UK
Originally Posted by dewster

Unless one has a woefully inadequate PC that won't play anything but lobotomized romplers, I'm not sure why anyone would buy their stuff. The layer blending is nice, and the attack sample lengths are adequate, but with those babies comes a fair amount of dirty bathwater.


Someone is....

From the VSL Vienna Imperial manual:
This software contains copyrighted elements of the following third parties:
(C) 2005–2009 4Front Technologies
(C) 2005–2008 SIA Syncrosoft
(C) 2003–2008 Alberto Demichelis,
(C) 1995–2005 Jean-Loup Gailly and Mark Adler,
(C) 1998–2008 Glenn Randers-Pehrson,
(C) 2000-2007 Josh Coalson
(C) 1996–2008 The FreeType Project,
(C) 1998–2000 Thai Open Source Software Center Ltd and Clark Cooper,
(C) 1998–2000 Clark Cooper,
(C) 2001–2008 Keith Packard,
(C) 2001–2008 Carl Worth,
(C) 2001–2006 Expat maintainers,
(C) 2002 University of Southern California.

#1424722 - 04/26/10 06:00 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: NikkiPiano]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by NikkiPiano
Someone is....

From the VSL Vienna Imperial manual:
This software contains copyrighted elements of the following third parties:
(C) 2005–2009 4Front Technologies

I'm just not seeing in their products what they bring to the table that is exceptional or different.

If they could come up with a very compact efficient solution, with no looping and with all of the other standard features fully functional - kind of a SuperNATURAL piano on the PC - then it could have some real value. As it is, it's a very mediocre offering compared to the other PC sample/player sets.

#1424728 - 04/26/10 06:21 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
bkmz Offline
Full Member
bkmz  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
Belarus
Originally Posted by dewster
TruePianos Diamond Re-Review (for v1.5.0)
What's interesting is that the velocity layers are smoothly blended, much like the latest hardware-based DP fare, so there is no obvious velocity layer switching going on.


Are you sure that there are "velocity layers" in truepianos?
To me this looks like only one single sample with some kind of filter.

[Linked Image]


ex-Yamaha CLP 330
#1424729 - 04/26/10 06:21 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,319
Kawai James Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Kawai James  Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,319
Hamamatsu, Japan
I recall downloading the TruePianos trial for Mac OS X a few months ago - the installer was relatively small (around 50-60mb or so), giving me the impression that the package did not use/contain samples.

Cheers,
James
x


Employed by Kawai Japan, however the opinions I express are my own.
Nord Electro 3 fan & occasional rare groove player.
#1424741 - 04/26/10 06:37 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
bkmz Offline
Full Member
bkmz  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
Belarus
Originally Posted by dewster


I don't know where the whole "TruePianos is modeled" meme came from, but it seems TruePianos themselves aren't pushing it, at least not explicitly any more.


Quote from manual:

http://www.truepianos.com/download/manual.pdf
Quote
TruePianos does not meticulously try to replicate existing pianos. Instead it uses a combination of the latest sampler, physical modeling and synthesis techniques to produce our interpretation of great playable pianos.


ex-Yamaha CLP 330
#1424745 - 04/26/10 06:43 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: Kawai James]  
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
bkmz Offline
Full Member
bkmz  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
Belarus
Originally Posted by KAWAI James
I recall downloading the TruePianos trial for Mac OS X a few months ago - the installer was relatively small (around 50-60mb or so),


That's because of lots of stretching and only one velocity layer.


ex-Yamaha CLP 330
#1424892 - 04/26/10 11:23 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: Kawai James]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by KAWAI James
I recall downloading the TruePianos trial for Mac OS X a few months ago - the installer was relatively small (around 50-60mb or so), giving me the impression that the package did not use/contain samples.

Where there is stretching and looping, there is by very definition sampling going on. TruePianos says they use sampling in their FAQ. They also suggest that they use other techniques, whatever they are. I think they are like Yamaha, and are abusing the word "modeling" to make their products seem more exotic than they actually are.

#1424897 - 04/26/10 11:28 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: bkmz]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by bkmz
Are you sure that there are "velocity layers" in truepianos?
To me this looks like only one single sample with some kind of filter.

I can only speculate, but a multi-velocity sample of a real piano is almost certainly the input to their process. After some analysis and processing it may just boil down to a filter - who knows? To me it would be more impressive if there was no stretching, and if all the other features (e.g. pedal down sympathetic resonance) worked as they should.

#1424903 - 04/26/10 11:38 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: bkmz]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by bkmz
Originally Posted by KAWAI James
I recall downloading the TruePianos trial for Mac OS X a few months ago - the installer was relatively small (around 50-60mb or so),


That's because of lots of stretching and only one velocity layer.

Exactly. DPs do this too to reduce the sample memory size. But why sample memory remains so sacred is a mystery for the ages.

#1424904 - 04/26/10 11:44 PM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: bkmz]  
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,842
ChrisA Offline
3000 Post Club Member
ChrisA  Offline
3000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,842
Redondo Beach, California
Quote
Are you sure that there are "velocity layers" in truepianos?
To me this looks like only one single sample with some kind of filter.


If you were to play an acoustic piano, I bet you'd not see any "layers". I think what they've done is interpolation. Call it "layer morphing".


About Kawai Jame's comment that the installer was so small it may not be sample based. I'd add "maybe not time domain samples" What if they use frequency domain samples at a low 10 per second rate and from that they could generate the high rate stereo sound. In short what they store is exactly the kind of data Dewster is plotting. It is very compact and captures the tone well.

Last edited by ChrisA; 04/26/10 11:45 PM.
#1424973 - 04/27/10 06:03 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
bkmz Offline
Full Member
bkmz  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
Belarus
Originally Posted by dewster
Originally Posted by bkmz
Are you sure that there are "velocity layers" in truepianos?
To me this looks like only one single sample with some kind of filter.

I can only speculate, but a multi-velocity sample of a real piano is almost certainly the input to their process.


Almost certainly? Why?
And what do you mean "only speculate"? Can't you see that there are no differences between samples on all velocities in Truepianos?

Originally Posted by ChrisA
If you were to play an acoustic piano, I bet you'd not see any "layers". I think what they've done is interpolation. Call it "layer morphing".


What are you talking about? Of course I can see (and hear too) the differences between layers - if they are. Look again at CP1 layers:
[Linked Image]

You see? This is "interpolation".

Now compare with Truepianos:

[Linked Image]

Interpolation, morphing? Between what? They all are the same!

upd
And, by the way, here is how it should look on "acoustic piano" - VSL Vienna Imperial with ~100 layers.

[Linked Image]


ex-Yamaha CLP 330
#1425001 - 04/27/10 07:26 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: bkmz]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by bkmz
Are you sure that there are "velocity layers" in truepianos?
To me this looks like only one single sample with some kind of filter.

As ChrisA suggests, it could also be morphing between two samples, one high velocity and the other low velocity. If it is just a filter, then some analysis most likely went into designing that filter. But either of these processes would most likely start with a multi-velocity sample set at it's origin.

Originally Posted by bkmz
And what do you mean "only speculate"? Can't you see that there are no differences between samples on all velocities in Truepianos?
...
Interpolation, morphing? Between what? They all the same!

There is a timber difference with increasing velocity. Here is a highly compressed sample of the TruePianos velocity layer test, where the volume increase between the notes has been removed:

http://www.mediafire.com/?hje4gfn3zzt

And here is a spectral frequency view of that MP3 file:
[Linked Image]

Clearly there is a timber difference. They obviously don't use a separate sample for each velocity as the VSL Vienna Imperial does. And they are doing it more smoothly than the CP1 does. Beyond that we can only guess at what the actual process is.

#1425007 - 04/27/10 07:35 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
bkmz Offline
Full Member
bkmz  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
Belarus
dewster

The only reason why we hear and see timbral differences is filter (EQ), I already said that!

I can't understand why are you ignoring the fact that all the samples are the same, except filtering.

You think all the piano samplers are using multi-sampling? No, Yamaha CLP230 uses only one layer, and P85 too, as far as I know.

Quote
it could also be morphing between two samples


But that's what I'm talking about - there is no even two different samples.


ex-Yamaha CLP 330
#1425011 - 04/27/10 07:54 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: bkmz]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by bkmz
The only reason why we hear and see timbral differences is filter (EQ), I already said that!

I can't understand why are you ignoring the fact that all the samples are the same, except filtering.

EQ is a very good guess, but it is still a guess.

Originally Posted by bkmz
But that's what I'm talking about - there is no even two different samples.

The lowest velocity and the highest velocity could be two different phase aligned samples that they crossfade between. That method would have two different samples.

#1425021 - 04/27/10 08:14 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
TADutchman Offline
500 Post Club Member
TADutchman  Offline
500 Post Club Member

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 761
Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
Originally Posted by dewster
The lowest velocity and the highest velocity could be two different phase aligned samples that they crossfade between. That method would have two different samples.


Wouldn't that kind of 'harmonic alignment' lead to a direct patent infringement? (except when they have a license of course)
http://www.samplemodeling.com/en/index.php


K A W A I ..... R O L A N D ......... E - M U
C A - 9 3 ......... A X - 7 ...... X B O A R D - 4 9
#1425022 - 04/27/10 08:15 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: ChrisA]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by ChrisA
About Kawai Jame's comment that the installer was so small it may not be sample based. I'd add "maybe not time domain samples" What if they use frequency domain samples at a low 10 per second rate and from that they could generate the high rate stereo sound. In short what they store is exactly the kind of data Dewster is plotting. It is very compact and captures the tone well.

Adding all the attack and loop lengths together and dividing by 8 gives an average total sample time of:

9.8 + 6.5 + 4.8 + 4.3 + 4.0 + 1.8 + (1.8) + (1.8) = 34.8
2.4 + 0.9 + 1.1 + 1.2 + 0.8 + 0.3 + (0.3) + (0.3) = 7.3
(34.8 + 7.3) / 8 = 5.26 seconds

5.26 sec * 24 stretch groups * 2 ch (stereo) * 2 bytes/sample * 44100 samples/sec = 22 MB

I just downloaded the demo and the Diamond.data file is 70 MB. Plenty of room in there for even three layers of samples.

#1425027 - 04/27/10 08:28 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: TADutchman]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by TADutchman
Wouldn't that kind of 'harmonic alignment' lead to a direct patent infringement? (except when they have a license of course)
http://www.samplemodeling.com/en/index.php

From the link:

1) "Time alignment of the phase of a set of musical sounds to be used with samplers" . Patent-pending. Filed by Giorgio Tommasini, as of September 23th 2004.

2) "Determination of modal resonances and body impulse response of a musical instrument by analysis of sounds performed with pitch changes. Application to the synthesis of vibrato & portamento with samplers". Patent-pending. Filed by Giorgio Tommasini and Stefano Lucato, as of December 20th 2004.


Attempts to patent the most obvious and straightforward approach to solving a problem are such a crock.

Both pending since 2004 - I wonder what stage of the patent process would they be at now?

#1425048 - 04/27/10 09:07 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
bkmz Offline
Full Member
bkmz  Offline
Full Member

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 142
Belarus
Originally Posted by dewster
EQ is a very good guess, but it is still a guess.


No, it's not a guess - it's a logical conclusion from the obvious fact of absence of differences between samples. The only difference is in frequency view - so its just a frequency filter there.

Quote
The lowest velocity and the highest velocity could be two different phase aligned samples that they crossfade between. That method would have two different samples.


The lowest and the highest velocity samples must have different spectral pictures.


ex-Yamaha CLP 330
#1425051 - 04/27/10 09:10 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,070
mucci Offline
1000 Post Club Member
mucci  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,070
Munich, Germany
I own Truepianos and have used it for more than 2 years for joyful play. I really love the sound signature and the expressivenss of the sound. And no, it's not just 50-60MB, that's only the application itself. After that you have to download the individual pianos, each of them is about 200-300MB. I know, it's still not near any big multi velocity software piano. I don't know how they do it, and I don't like the fact that they treat this as a big secret.

Overall I was really pleased by the sound for more than two years. The only big drawback was that pedal resonance or any other resonance is not detectable at all, even if you enable it within the software - I have the feeling as if they just claimed to have this implemented whereas there is nothing implemented in this respect.


<~ don't test forever - play and enjoy! ~>
#1425059 - 04/27/10 09:26 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: mucci]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
dewster Offline
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline
4000 Post Club Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by mucci
And no, it's not just 50-60MB, that's only the application itself. After that you have to download the individual pianos, each of them is about 200-300MB.

I'm pretty sure pesk has the full version. Here are the sizes of the *.gs2 files he reports:

Amber (117 MB)
Diamond (70 MB)
Emerald (84 MB)
Sapphire (107 MB)
SapphirePed (107 MB)

Originally Posted by mucci
The only big drawback was that pedal resonance or any other resonance is not detectable at all, even if you enable it within the software - I have the feeling as if they just claimed to have this implemented whereas there is nothing implemented in this respect.

I can sort of barely see some difference between the pedal up and pedal down spectral views, but I sure can't hear any difference. It's like the option checkbox isn't connected to anything.

#1425062 - 04/27/10 09:32 AM Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster]  
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,070
mucci Offline
1000 Post Club Member
mucci  Offline
1000 Post Club Member

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,070
Munich, Germany
Originally Posted by dewster
Originally Posted by mucci
And no, it's not just 50-60MB, that's only the application itself. After that you have to download the individual pianos, each of them is about 200-300MB.

I'm pretty sure pesk has the full version. Here are the sizes of the *.gs2 files he reports:


Sorry, my mistake, you're right.


<~ don't test forever - play and enjoy! ~>
Page 24 of 50 1 2 22 23 24 25 26 49 50

Moderated by  Piano World 

Piano Acc. & Gift Items in
Piano World's Online Store
In PianoSupplies.com ,(a division of Piano World)
our online store for piano and music gifts and accessories, Digital Piano Dolly, party goods, tuning equipment, piano moving equipment, benches, lamps Caster Cups and more.


Free Shipping* on Jansen Artist Piano Benches, Cocoweb Piano Lamps, Hidrau Hydraulic Piano Benches
(*free shipping within contiguous U.S. only)
(ad)
Pearl River & Ritmuller
Ritmuller Pianos
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq 6 Out now
ad
Pierce Piano Atlas


New Topics - Multiple Forums
Hammer bore distance
by Bill McKaig,RPT. 11/20/17 02:42 PM
PIANOS OF THE SECOND RANK
by Karl Watson. 11/20/17 11:43 AM
DIY Digital piano - how i did it
by Mikanator. 11/20/17 11:21 AM
P255 and CP300
by Jitin. 11/20/17 10:04 AM
Need Advice--Used Schulze Pollman or New
by AC1. 11/20/17 08:26 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums44
Topics182,852
Posts2,673,135
Members89,164
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Check It Out!
There's a lot more to Piano World than just the forums.
Click Here to
Explore The Rest of Piano World!!
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2017 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0