Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 2.7 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
What's Hot!!
Mr. PianoWorld - the full interview
-------------------
European Tour for Piano Lovers
JOIN US FOR THE TOUR!
--------------------
Posting Pictures on the Forums
-------------------
Forums RULES & HELP
-------------------
ADVERTISE on Piano World
Find a Professional
Our Classified Ads
Find Piano Professionals-

*Piano Dealers - Piano Stores
*Piano Tuners
*Piano Teachers
*Piano Movers
*Piano Restorations
*Piano Manufacturers

Advertise on Piano World

(ad)
Piano Buyer Guide
Piano Buyer Spring 2018
ad
Pierce Piano Atlas


Who's Online Now
45 registered members (cmoody31, akc42, CyberGene, Bishbosh0239, Charles Cohen, Bett, 13 invisible), 985 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Quick Links to Useful Piano & Music Resources
Quick Links:
*Advertise On Piano World
*Free Piano Newsletter
*Online Piano Recitals
*Piano Recitals Index
*Piano & Music Accessories
*Live Piano Venues
*Music School Listings
* Buying a Piano
*Buying A Acoustic Piano
*Buying a Digital Piano
*Pianos for Sale
*Sell Your Piano
*How Old is My Piano?
*Directory/Site Map
*Virtual Piano
*Music Word Search
*Piano Videos
*Virtual Piano Chords & Scales
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 48 of 50 1 2 46 47 48 49 50
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2390021
02/23/15 04:36 PM
02/23/15 04:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Well, yes, the more upscale ones have DSP blocks, but these are more like DSP ALU blocks, not DSP processors per se. One would need a local register set, a fetch and branch mechanism, etc. cobbled from the FPGA fabric in order to have a full blown DSP.

Interesting that the Arria has floating point. I don't keep tabs on the high end devices much as they are super expensive. Doing audio, often fixed point is a better fit as resolution for a given bit count is higher, and truncation noise and the like are constant rather than changing with the data exponents. Though floating point can make the algorithms much easier to describe and implement, with less chance of under / overflow.

(ad) ROLAND

Click Here

Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2390143
02/23/15 10:25 PM
02/23/15 10:25 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
T
Trevor H. Offline
Junior Member
Trevor H.  Offline
Junior Member
T
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
I would think something like the Xilinx zynq 7 series SoC (http://www.xilinx.com/publications/prod_mktg/zynq7000/Zynq-7000-combined-product-table.pdf) or better yet the upcoming zynq ultrascale SoC (http://www.xilinx.com/publications/prod_mktg/zynq-ultrascale-plus-product-selection-guide.pdf) would be ideal for an upper mid-range to high end digital piano. If you can do reasonable volumes you can get zynq 7010's and zynq ultrascales for just a bit over $10 a unit.

If you had a zynq ultrascale for ~$10-$15 you would have
* Some 240 DSP 48 slices for implementing custom algorithms and some 80K logic cells to tie it all together along with over 5 MB of block RAM for all of the srams, fifo's, buffers, etc. This is enough hardware that you could do some pretty complex custom algorithms
* 2 - R5 processors at 600 MHz for servicing all of the key press interrupts and stuff. You would probably want to run an RTOS on these cores and keep them for hard real time events.
* 4 - A-53 cores at at 1300 MHz complete with neon SIMD. This should be able to run your displays, maybe linux, and have lots of cycles left over for memory management and whatever algorithm's you have that are too much of a pain to put directly in hardware
* 1 - Mali 400 which could easily be a fantastic display driver or if you are willing to do some code optimization maybe you could run some additional algorithms out of it. I'm not sure that you could really get things parallel enough to properly use the Mali but it is there.
* Plus you could have a 64-bit memory interface to DRAM if you are willing to spend the money.

I feel like for about $30 (after including RAM and a good sized flash memory) you could have a digital piano that blows away most everything that is out there right now. And I'm sure $30 is a substantial increase to their current silicon BOM cost but man it doesn't feel unreasonable for them to put that kind of money into a product that retails for well over $1000.




Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2390233
02/24/15 05:37 AM
02/24/15 05:37 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 627
Valencia, Spain
M
mabraman Offline
500 Post Club Member
mabraman  Offline
500 Post Club Member
M
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 627
Valencia, Spain
I see it all clear now, thanks guys.
sick


Learning piano from scratch since September, 2012.
Kawai ES7.Kawai K-200
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: Trevor H.] #2390276
02/24/15 09:35 AM
02/24/15 09:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by Trevor H.
If you can do reasonable volumes you can get zynq 7010's and zynq ultrascales for just a bit over $10 a unit.

Wow, that's a lot of FPGA at incredible pricing! Electronics will completely run you over even if you're doing your level best to keep up with everything new coming out, the pace is insane.

Originally Posted by Trevor H.
I feel like for about $30 (after including RAM and a good sized flash memory) you could have a digital piano that blows away most everything that is out there right now. And I'm sure $30 is a substantial increase to their current silicon BOM cost but man it doesn't feel unreasonable for them to put that kind of money into a product that retails for well over $1000.

I haven't worked in the DP industry (though for unemployment I sent my resume to most DP and effects manufacturers) so I can only speculate, but I imagine they lack the in-house expertise to utilize FPGAs in that capacity. And even if they do the NRE is probably too onerous, especially given the general public's seeming willingness to continue to buy dumb loopers for way too much scratch.

The intersection of crackerjack HDL'er / DSP guru / UI & controller designer / musical instrument builder / pianist etc. is likely exceeding small to perhaps non-existent. And it's not like corporations go out of their way to attract free thinkers and other unmanagable sorts, they want sheep who can code a bit and need medical insurance.

(ad)
Piano & Music Accessories
piano accessories music gifts tuning and moving equipment
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2390371
02/24/15 01:47 PM
02/24/15 01:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
T
Trevor H. Offline
Junior Member
Trevor H.  Offline
Junior Member
T
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
I would love to see something like pianoteq optimized into something like a zynq and sold as a piano in a box. I'm sure it makes no business sense because it is targeting a small subset of a small market and pianoteq already runs on fairly modest hardware that people already own. I also can't imagine they have any interest in being a hardware vendor but man something like a pianoteq piano in a box mixed with something like the Kawai VPC1 could be a really cool combination.



Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2390414
02/24/15 03:23 PM
02/24/15 03:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 900
Germany
H
Hendrik42 Offline
500 Post Club Member
Hendrik42  Offline
500 Post Club Member
H
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 900
Germany
I would love to see Jony Ive to do a mass market DP. I don't need a car :-)


Kawai CN35. Daughter wanted a piano, so we got one. Now who'll learn faster? ;-)
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2391581
02/27/15 10:17 AM
02/27/15 10:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
BusyWait Offline
Full Member
BusyWait  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
I've made recordings of the DPBSD v2 with a Roland RP401R, played off a USB stick, and played via USB MIDI control. Also I used Addictive Keys Studio Grand and Upgright VSTi to render the MIDI file in a DAW.

Are any of those interesting? Can you remind me where the upload instructions are? Or, can I just share a dropbox link to the 44.1kHz 24bit .wav files?

Last edited by BusyWait; 02/27/15 11:21 AM.

Regards,
Steven
---
(Re)beginner
Roland RP401R
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2391600
02/27/15 11:10 AM
02/27/15 11:10 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Dropbox link would be fine Steven. Thanks!

Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2391632
02/27/15 12:10 PM
02/27/15 12:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
BusyWait Offline
Full Member
BusyWait  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
Files: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/u1zbemwnlk0ssq9/AAAdc-HyAwKxMVr-p5mOrFQha?dl=0

DPBSD v2 Recordings and Renders

Recording:

The Roland DP401R has 3 "SuperNatural" piano sounds amongst the hundreds of different tones it can produce. These recordings were made with Piano Tone 1 "Concert Piano", default settings, and ambience/reverb "OFF".

Recordings via a Mackie Onyx Blackjack USB recording interface into Tracktion DAW, Windows 8.1, Sony Tap 11 PC.
(Probably using the Mackie ASIO driver, sorry I didn't make a note!)

dpbsd v2 recorded_rp401r from midi_Take_1.wav :

The dpbsd midi file played by the RP401R from USB stick, with no USB connection between the DP401R and the PC. Audio from the piano rear "Output" socket (3.5 mm TRS stereo jack) in to a Mackie Onyx Blackjack USB recording interface.

Note: connecting the RP401R USB (to host) MIDI cable at the same time as analogue out or in seems to create a path (ground loop?) for constant low-level digital chattering noise. The USB MIDI was disconnected for this recording.

Renders:

Addictive Keys Studio Grand VSTi virtual instrument allows you to play the different sampled pianos as if recorded with different microphones in different positions. It was loaded in to Tracktion DAW v5, and used to render the dpbsd v2 midi file with various configurations.

Hopefully the file names below are self explanatory:

dpbsd v2 recorded_AK Grand Render Front Tubes No EQ No Fx_Take_1.wav
dpbsd v2 recorded_AK Grand Side Rib Solo_Take_1.wav
dpbsd v2 recorded_AK Upright Front Ribbon_Take_2.wav
dpbsd v2 recorded_AK Upright Soundboard_Take_2.wav


Last edited by BusyWait; 02/27/15 12:26 PM.

Regards,
Steven
---
(Re)beginner
Roland RP401R
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2392976
03/02/15 05:08 PM
03/02/15 05:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Thanks to BusyWait we have a DPBSD MP3 of the Roland DP401R! BusyWait has this to say:

Quote
The Roland DP401R has 3 "SuperNatural" piano sounds amongst the hundreds of different tones it can produce. These recordings were made with Piano Tone 1 "Concert Piano", default settings, and ambience/reverb "OFF".

Recordings via a Mackie Onyx Blackjack USB recording interface into Tracktion DAW, Windows 8.1, Sony Tap 11 PC. (Probably using the Mackie ASIO driver, sorry I didn't make a note!)

The dpbsd midi file played by the RP401R from USB stick, with no USB connection between the DP401R and the PC. Audio from the piano rear "Output" socket (3.5 mm TRS stereo jack) in to a Mackie Onyx Blackjack USB recording interface.

Note: connecting the RP401R USB (to host) MIDI cable at the same time as analogue out or in seems to create a path (ground loop?) for constant low-level digital chattering noise. The USB MIDI was disconnected for this recording.

The spectral signatures are almost identical to the RD-700NX main "Concert" voice so I'm not going to do a formal review. Pedal and key sympathetic resonances are missing, which for some asinine reason is quite typical with Roland SN via MIDI playback without resorting to arcane, poorly documented SYSEX backflips.

mp3 : http://www.mediafire.com/listen/n129m2wj3oc9uwa/dpbsd_v2.0_roland_rp401r.mp3

(BusyWait: please PM me if you want to add/change anything)

Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2392987
03/02/15 05:23 PM
03/02/15 05:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
BusyWait, did you run the full or demo version of Addictive Keys through the DPBSD? It doesn't seem to be looped but it is clearly stretched, which is kind of weird. I'm guessing the full version, as XLN says the demo is limited to 4 octaves.

Typical gushing "review" from SOS chock full of needless popular references and phraseology (Dowager Lady Grantham, in-yer-face, delivers the goods, first port of call, etc.) though he does seem to loathe the Rhodes: http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan13/articles/xln-audio-addictive-keys.htm

Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2392995
03/02/15 05:51 PM
03/02/15 05:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
BusyWait Offline
Full Member
BusyWait  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
dewster, those are renders using the full version of the Addictive VSTi. I got the virtual instruments really as a reference to understand how good the Roland sound is - sometimes the Roland SuperNatural piano sounded a little uncanny to me, or metallic. It was interesting to hear the comparison to recordings of a real piano.

I'm convinced that the Roland sound changes a little day to day, because some days I'm quite offended by the sounds that some notes make, and other days I can't even hear the metallic overtone that bugged me before :-/

Is there any value in getting you a recording that includes the pedal or string resonance from the RP401R? It's pretty subtle in both cases IMO. If you'd like that I'm happy to try and hack the sysex.

When I bought AK, I saw that they had a bundle offer, so I got the upright piano (which I wanted because the RP401R doesn't seem to have an upright piano sound), and the Mark One. After reading the SOS Mark One review, maybe I should have got their "Electric Grand" instrument instead laugh

Last edited by BusyWait; 03/02/15 06:00 PM.

Regards,
Steven
---
(Re)beginner
Roland RP401R
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2393303
03/03/15 02:16 PM
03/03/15 02:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by BusyWait
Is there any value in getting you a recording that includes the pedal or string resonance from the RP401R? It's pretty subtle in both cases IMO. If you'd like that I'm happy to try and hack the sysex.

Thanks for the offer, but I don't want to put you through a major PITA in order to test something that probably hasn't changed from previous SN models.

BusyWait, I sent you a PM.

Last edited by dewster; 03/03/15 04:00 PM.
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2393968
03/04/15 11:12 PM
03/04/15 11:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
XLN Audio Addictive Keys Studio Grand

Thanks to PW member BusyWait we have DPBSD samples of the Addictive Keys Studio Grand and Upright Pianos!

BusyWait has this to say about them:

Quote
These sound to my untrained ears to be to be well recorded real piano sounds, notwithstanding the limitations revealed in the technical review. It was particularly interesting to me to get the upright piano instrument. The installed footprint is "only" 1.5GB per piano, and the ability to change the listening perspective (microphone position) from the front (players position), to various other close mic'ed or audience positions is very helpful to blend the instrument in to a mix with other instruments.

The stand alone player is easy to use. In Windows it worked well with the ASIO4ALL software for low latency, and felt like a nice instrument to play. (I'm beginner level, and have been for 30 years).

The stand alone player and the VSTi plug-in both allow sounds from the different microphones to be blended and processed in various natural to more creative and distorted ways, either by choosing from presets, or editing individual parameters. The velocity map (key velocity to played sound) can be adjusted, but I could not avoid "velocity=1 plays a sound" feature.

The tuning, key, and temperament (equal, just, pythagorian, ...) of the piano can be selected, and stretch tuning applied via the Help > About menu.

I was connected to the internet to install and register this, but just tested it with no internet connection, and it worked without limitation. A good demo of Addictive Keys is available to try, which is limited to 4 octaves and 3 microphone positions.


Since the Upright tests very similarly to the Grand I decided to only review the Grand. It's kind of strange that they aren't looped but are stretched, usually it's the other way around with DPs. Not sure why they felt they needed to pare down the size of sample sets that are running on a PC, but when in Rome I suppose it's easier to throw out samples outright via stretching rather than lop off the decays and then have to splice loops on. The lowest notes had fairly short decay times, so they seemed to be "saving" there as well.

mp3s:
- http://www.mediafire.com/listen/jf3k11ambcmbc4b/dpbsd_v2.0_xln_ak_grand_front_tubes_no_eq_no_fx.mp3
- http://www.mediafire.com/listen/5jm7lyeqba8v9u6/dpbsd_v2.0_xln_ak_grand_side_rib.mp3
- http://www.mediafire.com/listen/0md3mtqwi9xom1g/dpbsd_v2.0_xln_ak_upright_front_ribbon.mp3
- http://www.mediafire.com/listen/ejuzerql1be0hwt/dpbsd_v2.0_xln_ak_upright_soundboard.mp3

--------------------
- XLN Studio Grand -
--------------------
FILE & SETUP:
- dpbsd_v2.0_xln_ak_grand_front_tubes_no_eq_no_fx.mp3
- Setup: Tracktion DAW v5.
- Recorded by "BusyWait".
PROS:
- Passes the pedal sympathetic resonance test.
- Passes the silent replay test.
- Passes the looping test (unlooped).
- This is a blended multi-velocity layered sample set.
CONS:
- Fails the key sympathetic resonance test.
- Fails the quick partial damping test.
- Fails the late pedal partial damping test.
- Fails the half pedaling test.
- Fails the stretching test.
- Obviously stretched, group transitions fairly audible.
- Stretch distances: 2,3,1,3,3,2,3,1,2,3,3,1,2(x4),3,3,1,3,2,3,3,2(x3),3,2,3,2,3,4,2,3,2,2,3 = 37 groups.
- High and low note decay times are fairly short (~1/2 Pianoteq).
OTHER:
- Velocity layer switch visible @ vel=50,62.
- Velocity layer switch audible @ vel=62,104.
- Dynamic range 30dB (vel=1:127).
- Notes played @ vel=1 produce sound.
- Dampered | undampered transition: E6 | F6
- MP3 levels: peak @ -5dB, noise floor @ -105dB.
- Date reviewed: 2015-03-02

Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2394207
03/05/15 12:54 PM
03/05/15 12:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
I'm not trying to make anyone feel bad about purchasing the XLN Audio pianos, but I just re-skimmed the SOS review pointed to above and nowhere in it does he mention stretching. The stretch groups have sufficient timbre differences to pretty much jump out at you when doing chromatic runs and the like, even a casual reviewer who is aware of modern sample mangling practices would likely notice it. Listen for yourself to this walk up the upright piano, particularly the first 1/2 (bass and mid stretching are generally the most audible):

http://www.mediafire.com/listen/9emaanidwioceto/xln_ak_upright_soundboard_stretch.mp3

What is it with professional reviewers? I'm pretty cynical but this kind of thing pegs my meter.

Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2395002
03/07/15 08:48 AM
03/07/15 08:48 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
BusyWait Offline
Full Member
BusyWait  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
I heard the differences at certain places while recording the test file. I put the timbre changes down to the sounds being a recording from a real piano - the string construction (core thickness, materials and windings) and arrangement (1 string, 2 string unisons, 3 string unisons) changes moving up the keyboard.

That's just based on a casual look inside a piano, which I last did 30 years ago. But it looked a little like this: http://sgusedpiano.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/used-yamaha-piano-U3-excellent-condition.jpg

Not the case?



Regards,
Steven
---
(Re)beginner
Roland RP401R
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: BusyWait] #2395048
03/07/15 12:04 PM
03/07/15 12:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
dewster Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
dewster  Offline OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,675
Northern NJ
Originally Posted by BusyWait
Not the case?

As you say, timbre change from note to note is entirely natural and expected with an acoustic piano due to vagaries of the physical implementation, and could easily be discontinuous to some degree due to 1/2/3 string transitions, hammer jogs, undampered transition etc.

A stretched sample set (not in the tuning sense but in the sample discard sense) has static timbre among the notes of a stretch group (since they all share the same base sample) with timbre change occurring at group to group transitions. The groups are generally 2 or 3 notes wide, much narrower than otherwise physically caused timbre grouping on an acoustic piano. These islands of uncharacteristic uniformity are fairly unnatural sounding IMO.

And I'm against the trashing of otherwise functional samples merely to keep the storage space required to hold them below some absurdly low limit. Sampled pianos aren't generally in need of less variability.

Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2438714
07/05/15 11:04 AM
07/05/15 11:04 AM
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7
Z
zeugma Offline
Junior Member
zeugma  Offline
Junior Member
Z
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by dewster
And I'm against the trashing of otherwise functional samples merely to keep the storage space required to hold them below some absurdly low limit. Sampled pianos aren't generally in need of less variability.


I don't know, I suspect some of the uniformization could be due to not wanting the "same" variability becoming noticed on the same notes, if you know what I mean. By tuning down the variability it takes more time to notice that notes sound the same every time you hit them on a digital piano. In fact I think that's the bigger issue here, that sampled pianos don't add some randomness when they could very well do so.

Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2438767
07/05/15 02:04 PM
07/05/15 02:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 283
El Paso
E
Edtek Offline
Full Member
Edtek  Offline
Full Member
E
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 283
El Paso
The timbre change I've observed in acoustic pianos is a gradual change across the key range (if it's not gradual then voicing is needed).

For me the problem with using the same sample for several notes in DPs is the abrupt timbre change between adjacent notes that use different sample sets.


Ed (Out in the West Texas town of El Paso)
Yamaha P255
Re: The DPBSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2443856
07/23/15 03:59 AM
07/23/15 03:59 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 900
Germany
H
Hendrik42 Offline
500 Post Club Member
Hendrik42  Offline
500 Post Club Member
H
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 900
Germany
I am still a bit surprised that there is no, like, keyboard magazine tracking the hard facts about PD actions. You know, facts, like:

- length of keys / proportion (black, white)
- pivot point / proportion (was discussed a while ago here)
- folded / non-folded action (has an impact on size)
- how fast a key comes back up from fully/half pressed
- pressure/weight needed to press a key (full/half) (maybe just all the C's)
- up-pressure of a pressed key
- noise of a key pressed (f vs p and so on maybe)
- ...

Other things could probably be "objectified" as well, like how keys "bottom out" and things like that.

The above is probably cheap to measure, some of which even possible in a showroom (maybe after hours). Other things would be more expensive to measure, like putting the plastic through an aging simulation like pressing it 10000 times, subjecting it to UV, temperature changes etc.

I fully agree with the notion that at the end, features do not count as much as the experience. And the experience is significantly subjective. But I am really surprised by the lack of numbers in this industry.


Kawai CN35. Daughter wanted a piano, so we got one. Now who'll learn faster? ;-)
Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2476999
11/03/15 10:00 PM
11/03/15 10:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 3
M
monai117 Offline
Junior Member
monai117  Offline
Junior Member
M
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 3
Interesting dewster.Thanks for the new files setchman!

Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2478668
11/09/15 06:12 AM
11/09/15 06:12 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1
P
PelPix Offline
Junior Member
PelPix  Offline
Junior Member
P
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1
Thanks for making this test! It's super useful for hunting for bugs in my software! Not gonna stop until it passes everything. So far it does, but with tons of bugs.

Last edited by PelPix; 11/09/15 06:15 AM.
Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2480298
11/13/15 05:58 PM
11/13/15 05:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
P
pbasista Offline
Junior Member
pbasista  Offline
Junior Member
P
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
Hi All,

If anyone is interested, here is a recording from playing the DPBSD v2.0 midi file from Kawai MP11 with firmware v1.12:

http://www.mediafire.com/download/s6p7pb646pgwhow/dpbsd_v2.0_kawai_mp11.flac

It was recorded by the piano itself using the "MIDI to wav" feature at maximum piano volume and 0dB playback gain. Still, the volume seems to be kind of low and I am not sure what else to do in order to increase it (without increasing gain to positive levels). If someone knows, please let me know and I will repeat the test.

I have used the default concert grand #1, turned off the reverb and used the factory settings on all the other parameters.

Hopefully someone will find it useful.

Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: pbasista] #2482989
11/21/15 11:09 AM
11/21/15 11:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
P
pbasista Offline
Junior Member
pbasista  Offline
Junior Member
P
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 9
I was, obviously, using incorrect settings. During the recording, I had the Panel Mode set to "Normal", which means that any changes to the panel, including reverb and volumes will *not* affect the recording session. So, what happened is that I have changed the volume and turned off the reverb, but just *after* entering the recording mode. And that did not have any effect... Sorry for that.

After switching the Panel Mode to "Play", I was able to change the panel settings during the recording session as well. I have set the volume to maximum and turned off the reverb. Here are the recordings from Kawai MP11's built-in concert grands #1 and #2:

http://www.mediafire.com/download/5luk5n1dhpkccfc/dpbsd_v2.0_kawai_mp11_concert_grand_1.flac
http://www.mediafire.com/download/i25arddttgcoaj6/dpbsd_v2.0_kawai_mp11_concert_grand_2.flac

Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2519886
03/11/16 01:00 PM
03/11/16 01:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1
W
Walter Cruz Offline
Junior Member
Walter Cruz  Offline
Junior Member
W
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Hi! Is this project still going on? I could provide mp3 of the new pianos from Komplete 10 (Mavericks, The Gentleman and The Grandeur)

Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2519895
03/11/16 01:24 PM
03/11/16 01:24 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,110
UK
lolatu Offline
1000 Post Club Member
lolatu  Offline
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,110
UK
Well, dewster hasn't been sighted since last July or posted to this thread for over a year, so I guess not.


Kawai CA95 / Steinberg UR22 / Sony MDR-7506 / Pianoteq Stage + Grotrian / Galaxy Vintage D / CFX Lite
In the loft: Roland FP3 / Tannoy Reveal Active / K&M 18810
Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2520149
03/12/16 08:51 AM
03/12/16 08:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,530
Suffolk, United Kingdom
E
EssBrace Offline
3000 Post Club Member
EssBrace  Offline
3000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,530
Suffolk, United Kingdom
We miss Dewster...if you're reading this Dewster, come back! The creator of what must be the most viewed thread in PW history.


Roland RD-1000 | Nord Piano 3 | Dexibell Vivo P7
Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: EssBrace] #2520342
03/12/16 07:12 PM
03/12/16 07:12 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,494
P
pv88 Offline
3000 Post Club Member
pv88  Offline
3000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,494
Originally Posted by EssBrace
We miss Dewster...if you're reading this Dewster, come back! The creator of what must be the most viewed thread in PW history.


Agreed!

What has happened (if anyone knows) and why did he take leave?


Roland V-Piano | Yamaha CLP-585 | Yamaha CLP-990M | Kawai EP3
Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2525699
03/29/16 01:15 PM
03/29/16 01:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 627
Denmark
pinkfloydhomer Offline
500 Post Club Member
pinkfloydhomer  Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 627
Denmark
Sorry if this has been answered before, couldn't find anything with search or in the first post:

Is there a way to see a sorted list if pianos from best to worst, in terms of passing this test?

I know that the test doesn't assign a single number saying how "good" a piano is, but I still would like to get a general idea of which models and brands are typically "good" in this regard and if others are typically "bad".

At the moment the only thing I can do is click on each piano and read the report.


Nordiska 120CA (Dongbei) upright from about 2004. Yamaha CP33 digital. Sennheiser HD 600.
Re: The DP BSD Project! [Re: dewster] #2525710
03/29/16 01:41 PM
03/29/16 01:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 692
Austria, EU
L
lophiomys Offline
500 Post Club Member
lophiomys  Offline
500 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 692
Austria, EU
I don't think there isn't any "good" and "bad" classification with respect brands.

If I understand correctly, the aim of this project is to counter-check on the marketing promises of the technical capabilities of their (still mainly sample based) sound engines and the advertised advances technology.

IMHO in this context "good" would be a physically modeled digital piano sound (Physis and "new" Rolands in spring 2016, Pianoteq SW) or a very well crafted sample-based digital piano with huge samples featuring many layers.

Page 48 of 50 1 2 46 47 48 49 50

Moderated by  Piano World 

Check Out Our Newsletter!
Our August 2018 Free Newsletter for Piano Enthusiasts is here now, check it out!
Piano World Newsletter
(ad)
Pianoforall
PianoForAll
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Korg SP-250 sounds only coming from headphones
by Chadley99. 08/16/18 10:33 PM
ABRSM piano guides
by alexcawley. 08/16/18 07:40 PM
Is my teacher pacing lessons to quickly?
by Avid. 08/16/18 05:55 PM
Baldwin SF-10 search & other info
by mypianos4evr. 08/16/18 05:52 PM
(ad)
Pianoteq
PianoTeq Steingraeber
(125ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
Forum Statistics
Forums40
Topics186,926
Posts2,739,288
Members90,786
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
(ad)
Accu-Tuner
Sanderson Accu-Tuner
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers


 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter |


copyright 1997 - 2018 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1