|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
78 members (beeboss, brdwyguy, Burkhard, benkeys, Abdulrohmanoman, accordeur, Animisha, 15 invisible),
2,151
guests, and
477
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856 |
Incidently I started my youngest student ever yesterday - a girl who has just turned 5, and she has hands like a babies. It's terrifying. She kind of just poked at the keys. I'm going to have to take a way different tack to how I start off 6 year olds I think! Don't expect tiny fingers to play on anything other than a light keyboard. Teach 'drop and flop' (down) and flick (up) instead. You'll find them here: www.youtube.com/isstip
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Full Member
|
OP
Full Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 244 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,521
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,521 |
I recently had a little girl who had pain in her pinky on two chords that she played with no problem at home, on her unweighted tiny keyboard.
Her mother wanted her to "be brave and play through the pain in lessons".
It took me three weeks to fix that!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,444
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,444 |
Evidence: I learned with the coin on the hand thing and now, decades later, the tension has indeed limited my technique sacrificing speed, articulation and tone. I am now struggling to learn how to relax all that tension.
(BTW my teacher has me doing the ropey arms thing, slow scales while concentrating on releasing tension, heavy arms, exaggerating movement in my wrists, etc. The key seems to be in my shoulders. If I concentrate on relaxing them, it helps all the way to my fingerips.)
Best regards,
Deborah
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,521
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,521 |
I have been telling people for YEARS that the muscles in the shoulder/neck area are trigger points. The moment you get students to release unnecessary tension there, you will see the upper arms, elbows and forearms release tension, and it goes right down into the fingers.
Usually children only hold tension there when they are badly instructed, but adults will hold those muscles so tight, they will actually spasm.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,276
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,276 |
I don't buy this arm-weight/gravity-based/relaxation, modern way of playing. I see it as an inevitable result of the continual modern trend toward ease and convenience. Modern players want to do it the easy way and don't want to sweat and sacrifice, and so naturally, modern methods have evolved to accommodate this with techniques that imply lack of hard work and ease: let gravity do the work for you; let the weight of the arm do the work of playing for you while you loaf; just relax while playing and everything will be fine; etc. That's okay if you just want to play unchallenging pieces your whole life, but if you want to rise as a player you're going to have to work and suffer. My dad always told me "it's better to work smart than work hard." Why torture yourself and suffer if the same results can be achieved with less work?
I'll figure it out eventually. Until then you may want to keep a safe distance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856 |
I have been telling people for YEARS that the muscles in the shoulder/neck area are trigger points. The moment you get students to release unnecessary tension there, you will see the upper arms, elbows and forearms release tension, and it goes right down into the fingers.
Usually children only hold tension there when they are badly instructed, but adults will hold those muscles so tight, they will actually spasm. I always remember meeting a student of Matthay at a conference. The fluidity of the playing was overwhelming. She said afterwards it's in the shoulders where the last bit of tension is found and released, then all the fireworks start.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,181
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,181 |
The moment you get students to release unnecessary tension there, you will see the upper arms, elbows and forearms release tension, and it goes right down into the fingers.
Gary, HOW do you get this to happen? What do you say/do to get that tension to go away? I have a young lady that plays like this and all of my attempts to get her to relax have been temporary fixes. Her mom says she doesn't play that way at home (not sure though). When she comes to lessons she is strung tight!
It is better to be kind than to be right.
Professional private piano teacher since 1994.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,521
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,521 |
Gary, HOW do you get this to happen? What do you say/do to get that tension to go away?
This will sound extreme. Make relaxation more important than correct notes. Make relaxation more important than correct fingering. Make relaxation more important than correct or even rhythm. Make relaxation more important than anything else. This will be TEMPORARY. But you have to get a tense student to believe that being relaxed is more important than playing well. The reason is that you can NOT play well with unnecessary tension. Sooner or later tension will kill everything AND cause serious health problems. I have a young lady that plays like this and all of my attempts to get her to relax have been temporary fixes. Her mom says she doesn't play that way at home (not sure though). When she comes to lessons she is strung tight!
I never listen to parents or students about what is happening at home. According to them, the play correct rhythms, correct notes, relaxed, and everything that goes wrong in lessons ONLY happens HERE.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464 |
I don't buy this arm-weight/gravity-based/relaxation, modern way of playing. I see it as an inevitable result of the continual modern trend toward ease and convenience. Modern players want to do it the easy way and don't want to sweat and sacrifice, and so naturally, modern methods have evolved to accommodate this with techniques that imply lack of hard work and ease: let gravity do the work for you; let the weight of the arm do the work of playing for you while you loaf; just relax while playing and everything will be fine; etc. That's okay if you just want to play unchallenging pieces your whole life, but if you want to rise as a player you're going to have to work and suffer. If you honestly think that placing a coin on sombody's hand would provide an antidote to an excessively tense manner of playing, I seriously hope you're not a professional teacher. The best thing I've found is the advice of Alan Fraser about activating proper grip in the hand. Unless the hand can support, relaxation in the shoulders is futile. If you don't achieve balance, the tension will have to occur somewhere, no matter how hard you try to relax. I was badly affected by the ludicrous idea of a slack hand. It held me back for years. Once I finally got my fingers to support, it became possible to relax. Free shoulders are important, but concentrating on the shoulder itself is futile unless you can find balance at the key. I find the most important thing is to get the kid to learn to rest on the fingers in between the notes. Once they get used to a solid platform to balance on (without need for much effort), things can start to ease up. I'm convinced that tensions in the shoulder usually come out of necessity when then the hand is not supportive enough. Concentrating on tension in the arms and shoulders etc. before using the hand properly is like trying to fix a leaking bucket by adding more water. First you have to plug the hole, before you worry about adding more water. I think this is a rather uncoventional appraoch, but it certainly worked for me. Relaxing in the wrong places was the underlying cause of the most destructive tensions. Andrew
Last edited by Nyiregyhazi; 07/24/09 09:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856 |
I was badly affected by the ludicrous idea of a slack hand. It held me back for years. Once I finally got my fingers to support, it became possible to relax.... I find the most important thing is to get the kid to learn to rest on the fingers in between the notes. Ludicrous!? If anything's ludicrous it's resting 'on the fingers'. Why not just rest on the keys, they don't seem to mind the tension. Welcome to PW, I do hope you've done more than just watch a DVD though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464 |
[quote/]Ludicrous!? If anything's ludicrous it's resting 'on the fingers'. Why not just rest on the keys, they don't seem to mind the tension. [/quote]
What else did you think I was suggesting the fingers ought to be rested upon, if not the keys? This is usually the problem when kids suffer negative tensions. If they don't support by resting on the finger, they find it hard to play the following note. Playing the next note is like trying to start a sprint while standing on one leg. Once you get them to find a comfortable neutral position in between the striking of keys, the benefit quickly carry across into the following fingers.
Also, if a slack hand were not a ludicrous idea, presumably it would not be ludicrous to put a layer of foam over the keys? If there is a lot slack at that end, energy is wasted and a larger workload is hence placed on the shoulders. It's simple physics. It was the idea of keeping the hands as 'loose' as possible that screwed up my playing for years. A hand that has a lot of give in it is the eqivalent to trying to play through a foam pad.
Last edited by Nyiregyhazi; 07/24/09 10:39 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856 |
If they don't support by resting on the finger, they find it hard to playing the following note. You rest nothing on the fingers till the moment of key depression. Even then, that's just for one particular articulation
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464 |
If they don't support by resting on the finger, they find it hard to playing the following note. You rest nothing on the fingers till the moment of key depression. Even then, that's just for one particular articulation You misunderstand my point. Whichever finger is depressed needs to support the gravity, not fingers that are not in use. I used to think in terms of tension and release but that led to a slack, useless hand after the strike and a workload on the shoulders, rather than a balanced support at the point of contact. I actually got very tired from playing technically straightforward pieces, because I was 'holding' my arms, rather than supporting on the keys. Tensions would arise all over the place, regardless of how much I tried to relax. It wasn't that I didn't know how to feel the weight of my arm, but that fingers were not up to supporting it. The laws of moments have to add up somewhere, regardless of how much you might intend to relax. The way I'm finding at the moment involves a very small but consistent level of tension to grip at the keys themself- rather than a sense of full release. If you line the fingers up just right, the sense of effort is so miniscule that there's not any need to 'relax' from it. I'd strongly recommend Alan Fraser's work to anyone, although personally I see it as the missing link for arm-weight ideas, rather than as an alternative.
Last edited by Nyiregyhazi; 07/24/09 10:58 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856 |
You misunderstand my point. Whichever finger is depressed needs to support the gravity, ... because I was 'holding' my arms, rather than supporting on the keys. Tensions would arise all over the place, regardless of how much I tried to relax. It wasn't that I didn't know how to feel the weight of my arm, but that fingers were not up to supporting it. Fingers have no role in supporting the arm other than during key depression. You have shoulders to do that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464 |
You misunderstand my point. Whichever finger is depressed needs to support the gravity, ... because I was 'holding' my arms, rather than supporting on the keys. Tensions would arise all over the place, regardless of how much I tried to relax. It wasn't that I didn't know how to feel the weight of my arm, but that fingers were not up to supporting it. Fingers have no role in supporting the arm other than during key depression. You have shoulders to do that. Sorry, but that goes against all rational sense. The shoulders aren't going to stop your hand from going limp. That only occurs within the hand. When you use gravity in the most productive way, it helps to solidify the hand in a manner that reduces the need for muscular effort. Regardless of how you approach it, a hand with zero grip has no fuction whatsoever. Even if you choose not to exploit the return force that the keys exert against gravity, you are gripping with your hand to some extent. Otherwise you would waste most of the effort through slack fingers. You could not play a note. I think the problem is often that those who get it right feel a release but still use sufficient grip while doing so. However, for a lot of people, they end up relaxing into a point of no grip. For such people, it doesn't matter how much you try to relax- the forces cannot balance until the hand finds more stability at the key. This was certainly my problem. In your case, you may not be aware of how you continue to grip slightly with your finger, but if you did not do so, they would collapse after the strike. Regardless of which end you approach it from, stable fingers seem to be the common link in any efficient technique I've seen. How many famous pianists have fingers that notceably give way when they strike a chord? Why would you want to physically hold your arms in the air at all times, when you can rest upon your fingers? Obviously there are times when you have to hold from the shoulder (such as in rapid staccato- but isn't there a good reason why rapid staccato is so tiring? Because the hands are never a rest surely?)? For what purpose? Why be thinking in terms of realeasing effort at the fingers, yet constantly be having to hold your arms in the air, without biving yourself a platform to balance on?
Last edited by Nyiregyhazi; 07/24/09 12:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856 |
Regardless of how you approach it, a hand with zero grip has no fuction whatsoever. Before key depression there is no function for the hand. Function comes through use.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464 |
Regardless of how you approach it, a hand with zero grip has no fuction whatsoever. Before key depression there is no function for the hand. Function comes through use. You are contradicting yourself. You said that the effort stops after the strike. By that logic, the function that comes through use should stop, when the strike is finished. If the shape of the fingers remains the same, there still needs to be activity. By your logic the function would be lost, if there were a full release of the effort. This demonstrates one of two possibilities to be occuring. Either the armweight must be resting, for the keys to maintain the balance of the structure. Alternatively the hand may be gripping. Personally, I believe both are required, to find the balance. Also, if function came solely through use, every finger would lie slack until it played the note. That simply is not true. If you look at any good pianists hand, you can see preparation in the fingers. This can only come through muscular activity.
Last edited by Nyiregyhazi; 07/24/09 12:10 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 10,856 |
You are contradicting yourself. You said that the effort stops after the strike. By that logic, the function that comes through use should stop, when the strike is finished. If the shape of the fingers remains the same, there still needs to be activity. By your logic the function would be lost, if there were a full release of the effort.
Don't get your problem - you 'strike' (hate that word), and the hand goes back to its natural shape.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,464 |
Would you care to name any great pianists who play every note in a movement that is instantly followed by a notable slackening of the hand?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,405
Posts3,349,434
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|