 |
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
85 members (Beansparrow, ambrozy, Baltguy, BachToTheFuture, Bentsch, Animisha, Beowulf, Blague, 20 invisible),
918
guests, and
580
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
 Looking for critique of my RECORDING technique
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16 |
Hi All I have started recording my piano, and would like to get your opinions on my recording technique. This is a friend's playing of Claire de Lune by Debussy. Piano: Steinway D Recording 8 Channels into 2 at 24bits and 96kHz sampling rate. You can comment on the piano technique if you want. THANKS! http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=4cecc3a38da090f4312dbd5f2bdc50625445c52891d92514ce018c8114394287(link is all one word) Doug
DK
|
|
|
 Re: Looking for critique of my RECORDING technique
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 654
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 654 |
Nice piano, nice playing.
The recording is good too. Overall, the tone sounded great. There were at least two minor issues that I heard, however.
I haven't done this kind of stuff in years, so please take these observations with a bag of salt.
First, there were what I can only describe as discontinuities in the recording. The only way I can describe it is it's as if a jack was being turned (or partially removed) during the recording, causing slight static and discontinuity. I have no idea what caused it in your recording.
Second, there are at times what I can only describe as flutter. Back some decades when I was interested in stero high fidelity and using vinyl records or magnetic tapes, the velocity of the platter or the tape would vary from perfectly constant. If varied at a slow rate, it was called wow. If it varied at a faster rate, we called it flutter. I can't imagine how it is in a digital recording.
I'd be curious as to the microphones you used, how you mixed, and how you collected the bits (on tape? into a computer?). I'd also be curious as to the encoding algorithm (MP3? commercial CD?).
Hop
Hop
HG178, Roland FP-5, Casio PX 130
|
|
|
 Re: Looking for critique of my RECORDING technique
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16 |
Thanks for your thoughts. I too heard clicks and pops, and I think it has to do with the speed of the computer keeping up with the tons of data dumped onto the disk. I will try to redo this.
DK
|
|
|
 Re: Looking for critique of my RECORDING technique
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 385
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 385 |
Aside from the severe technical defects that Hop noted, acoustically it's a very good recording.
I was listening closely, trying to find something "wrong" with the stereo image. It's neither the "10-foot-wide" piano often created by too-close-micing, nor a "natural" image from stereo pair at a distance. But considering that the stereo image suggests relatively close mics, it's quite ambient. It's very nice, but I can't decide if the ambience is a wee too much. Might be something to explore.
But I am nitpicking. It's a very very good sound.
|
|
|
 Re: Looking for critique of my RECORDING technique
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 432 |
Yeah ...a couple clicks and pops....but
You played it beautifully. Really nice intonation.
I think Claude would've liked it.
It still breaks me up every time.
Baldwin M Casio PX-330 Casio AP-45
|
|
|
 Re: Looking for critique of my RECORDING technique
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,789
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,789 |
Hmmm, your avg pc today should fairly easily be able to keep up with a stereo signal unless there is a lot of something else going on. The recording, other than the obvious issues noted, sounds "processed" a bit, even though it's not compressed. Perhaps your mic levels are a tad bit too high (i.e. the "processed" sound is simply soft clipping)? Also there were a couple of times in the beginning I could hear what sounds like the hammers falling back fairly loudly (:53, 1:17), though this could have been something else in the background or a glitch. I mention this because it was an issue I had when trying to record some softer pieces.
Another thing I've been observing more with recent recordings (professional as well so certainly nothing against this recording) is that I can pretty clearly hear the dampers going up and down (i.e. when the right pedal is used). It's a bit distracting but given the quality of today's mics I guess it's inevitable.
Please do let us know what you used and where it was placed.
|
|
|
 Re: Looking for critique of my RECORDING technique
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16 |
Thanks Again. I may have placed the mics too close together. This is my first real recording, I used six individual mics, 3 pairs of matched. I experienced technical difficulties such as the piano bench squeaking (!), and perhaps the damper needs lubrication. But this is why I posted the music, as your comments are EXTREMELY helpful. I will experiment with different mic placements. I want to use the six channels to create surround 5.1 with some delay effects, etc. I am also looking for TALENT in the waltham, MA area that wants to be recorded (for free, of course) so I can improve my recording techniques. I used a laptop, but will soon have a core i7 dedicated computer. This is fun!! Doug
DK
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics204,265
Posts3,046,950
Members100,063
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|