Piano World Home Page Forums Our Most Popular Forums Piano Teachers Forum Streaming Piano Lessons Live Online?

Anyone tried streaming piano lessons live online?

Suggestions for needed equipment?

I've been exchanging emails with a couple of teachers who are interested in trying this. They teach masters classes and a few private students (around their performing schedules).

Having been approached by potential students from other parts of the country (and/or the world), their thought is to teach live via the Internet.

I wondered if anyone had experience with this, and what equipment you and your student(s) use?

I have not yet experienced this first-hand, but I'm going to try it with my voice teacher who is in CA (and I'm in WI). I downloaded Skype, and it is fairly easy to set up. Of course, a web cam and a decent mic will be needed to make it work the best (and a fast internet connection). I'll let you know how it goes! I had talked with a guitar teacher who taught this way with some success, so I think this will be an up-and-coming way to teaching when being in person is not possible.

Edited to add: Skype is free to download and use, by the way.

Thanks Morodiene,

Yes, Skype was mentioned by the teachers too.
I'll have to try it myself.

As you say, the cam and the mic will be important.

In my case I'd be playing on a Yamaha P-80 (DP) so I could probably run the piano midi through the computer, and I have a decent Shure mic (SM57)(although I have no idea how one would run the mic through the computer).

However, I'm presuming most people taking lessons from teachers who are also concert pianist will likely be playing acoustic pianos.

Please do keep us informed.
It will be interesting to find out what works, and what doesn't.

I know there are places on the Internet that offer online lessons, but most of them do not appear to be live/interactive in real time.

I have taught but not music. The bare bones of teaching are the same whether you are doing automotive instructioon or piloting skills or math. I have used flip charts, black board , slides and video.

One thing I found is that students expect at least (with video)the quality of the evening news as to holding their attention. Anything less and they drift away. Get a copy of Great Courses "Understanding Music". Find someone who can project with the enthusiasm of the instructor there.

It is possible to have a facilitator who doesn't even know the subject (or at least in this effort isn't a super piano player/ piano teacher) with experts introduced as the need arrives. Avoid hide bound dogma. "Cause I said so" won't cut it.

Segment your presentation so as to define the audience as to material you wish to present. Do a walk about demo-ing the scope of the course, all of it. The prospective learner will likely jump too far ahead but he/she will soon settle at the right level.

Certainly present the usual methods but leave room for inovation (my own preference anyway). Bring everyone along, and that isn't the same as no child left behind. What a dumbed down pile of residue. Challange along with illuminate.

The equipment I used (only a few years back) is now totally obsolete so I can't offer much there.

James McPherson

Frank,

My big desire is to be able to do this.

Any information about how to accomplish the technical parts and the budgetary concerns is welcome information.

I think it's wonderful that you are looking in this direction.

The posted page is very often difficult to convey exactly what is meant - and readers often assert their own experiences into the mix of what is being read - which changes the content of the information based on how well they are understanding what is being said.

When an instruction is said to someone, the authority of it takes precedence, and the listener is more likely to respond accurately, or ask questions to clarify. With the teacher in view of the student and vise versa, an immediate collaboration can take place with which to end on a teaching/learning point that satisfies both of the participants.

This is easiest to do in weekly lessons, however the disadvantage there is that it is a very specific time, place. With video tapes, or online live video, it can be done from both persons "home port" and when it is easy to just connect "electronically".

I wish you would tell us more about your plans!

Is part of your reason for this the extreme problems people are having in understanding theory as well as seeing that people get stuck in their musicianship and feel frantic and frustrated.

That does not have to happen!

People who are ______ (fill in the blank)dramatic, need drama. If none is present they will create some. Like wise: frustrated, lost, lost in space. Those who are competent in everything they do, accountable, questing, have another set of behavior and tolerance. Part of music making is understanding the self you are working with and how it came to be that way, and then, how to affect good changes toward better understanding and grasp (not grasping) of music making.

Thank you for a fine forum.

Betty Patnude

I have recently set up such a system, using Skype.
So far, I have only used it with existing students, here in Australia. When the connection (both ends) is good, it is fine, but be prepared for some glitches.

As to equipment needed, I can anly describe my own setup.
(I teach both piano and guitar (beginner and intermediate)
For the audio side, I have a Kawai MP-5 stage piano, small Yamaha keyboard, electro-acoustic guitar, and microphone, connected to a small audio mixer.(Tapco Mix 60)
The output from the mixer goes into a usb audio interface, connected to a Windows PC, running Skype.

My Video arrangement, is slightly different from your average webcam setup.
I use two camcorder type cameras. (Most useful for guitar, as I can show, either hand) One is fairly new, the other, an oldish, out of style model, but works perfectly. ( Both these cameras have better quality lenses, than your standard webcam)
The analog video-out connections on the cameras, connect to a cheap video switch box, so that I can switch cameras instantly, on the fly.
The output of the switch box, goes to the analog-in connection of a video capture card, installed in the PC.

It is not normally possible to use analog video cameras with Skype, but there is a small, cheap software program available, that makes Skype think that I am using DV cameras.

I have also used this setup ( cameras, microphone, mixer) to record video lessons for a guitar student, who can not always make his lesson. I post it on a private web page so he can view and download it, at his convenience.
Hope some of this helps.

Rob

PS One the biggest problems, was positioning one of the cameras to show the keyboard effectively. The best I have come up with so far, was adapting a boom type microphone stand, to hold both the camera and microphone. Using the small remote control that came with the camera, I can also zoom in or out, easily.
If anyone is interested, I could take some pics of my setup.
It would also be interesting to see what others use.

Thanks Rob, any and all input is appreciated.

The teachers I'm talking with at the moment both have large acoustic grands.

However, your description of a mic and mixer using usb to connect to the PC would probably cover this. And the video capture card makes sense.

Of course the student would need a similar setup.

We're making progress here folks, please keep the feedback coming.

Hello Frank,

Using accoustic grands, would be even simpler. A mixer would not even be required. Just a microphone, suitably positioned to pick up both the instrument, and the teacher's voice.
This could be plugged in to the 'external mic' input, on a DV camcorder. The camera, could then be connected to the PC using the 'Firewire' connection.
Skype would then recognise this camera, without the need for additional software.

Edited to add: Don't forget to check out the features and add-ons, freely available for Skype, such as 'interactive white board sharing, desktop sharing, the ability to play an audio file, directly to the student in real time, transfer of files, pdf documents for manuscript, etc. etc.....the list goes on.

Also, if you have two internet computers available, you could set up a separate Skype account on each one, and trial the whole thing in the same room.

Rob, it sounds interesting but so complicated!

Heck, I don't even know what a firewire is yet. But I love this new technology coming along.

So, are you suggesting that a camcorder would be better than the webcam, and skype would recognize either?

I have watched recent Oprah shows where she uses skype. There are always glitches in the movements or voice to video.

I would imagine that they have some good equipment. (but maybe those who are recording don't???)

Rob,

~Are DV camcoders set up to accept something like the Shure SM57?
I realize the better the equipment, the better the recording.
But...
~Won't the streaming quality be limited by the speed of the users processor (computer) and Internet connection?
~ Does Skype set limitations on how much data can be streamed in a given time?
~ Does compression enter the picture?

Sorry to keep hitting you with questions, but you seem to have some experience with this and inquiring minds want to know :-)

Frank,
First let me apologise, for not realising earlier, that you are the Founder of this amazing forum.
For that, many thanks. It is an amazing resource. :-)

Secondly, I am far from an expert in matters Skype.
I just have a curious mind, and love to try out any new technology.
Not sure if I can answer your questions with any kind of authority, but here goes...

The DV camera I use, has an external mic input, so I assume most have, and your SM57, would connect to it. ( with a suitable adaptor)
The reason I use a mixer, is because I found that when using my camera ( a Canon MVX 330i )and connecting via firewire, I could not use any other audio source, than the camera's built in mic.
The mic I have, ( a condenser type) needs 48v 'phantom power', and the mixer provides this.
The mixer also allows me to connect a Digital Piano, guitar, etc., and control the volumes of each input. It was relatively inexpensive, just under $100 Australian.

Yes, the connection speed of both users, would play a part in the quality, as would general internet congestion, between the two connections.

I believe that Skype does introduce some kind of compression, or limitation on bandwidth, but that is unavoidable. Ther is no time limit, as far as I am aware, on the duration of calls, but lots of good info can be had on The Skype users forum (on the main Skype website)

Using the analog outputs ( the yellow RCA connectors) of the camcorders does not (in my case) result in any discernable loss in quality.

Some DV camcorders, are not capable of functioning as a webcam, so I would advise checking before purchasing.
Also, I found I had to remove the tape, to prevent the 'auto power off' function from kicking in, on my particular model.
Ironically, I get the best reults from an old Panasonic VX70 camcorder, which although outdated now, functions as well, or better than, the most expensive dedicated webcams available.
I am sure that many users will have something similar, lying in a box in the attic, somewhere.
Hope this answers at least some of your questions, and that someone with more experience that I, will happen along soon.

Regards,
Rob
PS I will try, over the next few days, to put together a short video, showing how I use my system. Hopefully it will be of help. I will let you know when it is done.

Hi Lilylady,
'Firewire' is simply a method of connecting digital equipment (cameras, audio devices, etc.,) to a PC. It is similar to USB.

To answer your second question, yes, a camcorder is generally of better quality than most webcams, However, webcams are designed specifically for the job, so easier to set up, but camcorders generally have higher quality lenses, and most people have one lying around doing nothing most of the time, so it makes sense to make use of it, if you don't already have a webcam.
And yes, Skype would recognise a DV camcorder, connected via Firewire or USB
You are right about the glitches. Not much we can do about that, I am afraid, except to close any unneccessary running programs whilst running Skype. The rest is down to your connection and the www :-)

Thank you for your help and explanations Rob.

I'll look forward to your video.

For 2 years, I have been hoping to do something via the internet with teaching or with MC, lessons. I knew that the technology was arriving and have anticipated it.

Soon, I'll be too old to continuing gardening for a vocation and want to get back into teaching, but maybe exploring something different from the past.

Frank, I look forward to you getting some master classes set up for us!

I use Skype all the time to "video chat" with other piano players (I'm not a teacher, just chatting with other online "piano friends).

All I have is a simple web cam with a mic builtin to the web cam and it works great. No mixer, no camcorder, just a very simple 1 usb wire connection to the computer and you're off and running.

Given how cheap a webcam is I'd suggest trying that first and see if the quality is satisfactory before investing in any higher quality more costly audio/video equipment.

The only tricky part is how you mount a web cam to get a good view of the keyboard.

I must admit, I brought my idea to teach online to Frank. I taught a young man in Singapore for a 10 minute lesson on specific stretching exercises--on Skype. Worked well--from an airport I did this. I simply used my MSI netbook and it worked rather nicely. I would most probably use my own larger laptop at home next to my Steinway 'B' though. Frank--we'll talk more about this when we are enjoying CO Springs and Keith Emerson next week!

I totally agree with you, DeepElem, that there is absolutely no need to invest in fancy equipment, especially as many computers these days, come already equipped with a web cam and built in mic.
I would certainly advise anyone, to try these first, to see if Skype is suitable for them.
Frank mentioned teachers who run master classes, and I would imagine that if they wish to demonstrate advanced techniques, dynamics, etc., over Skype, then video and audio quality would be of a high priority.

For mounting the camera over a keyboard, I use a microphone boom stand, adapted to take both the camera, and an external microphone. I would post a photo, but not sure if that is possible, or allowed here.

I've tried recording using just a webcam.
The video was acceptable, the audio was a disaster.

The little mic built into the webcam can't handle the range of my P-80 DP, I'm guessing it would have the same (if not worse) problem with a concert grand.

Although we aren't talking about trying to record cd quality audio, it would be important to capture as much of the nuances and overtones as possible, considering the teacher would be trying to critique a student who is paying a fair amount of money for an advanced lesson.

Rob,

Pictures are fine, note the "enter an image" choice next between the create a link to an email and enter a media tag in the Post choices.

The National Resource Center for Blind Musicians has successfully used Skype to teach Braille Music and access to music technology for the blind via distance education. Being blind myself, I am not sure of the visual aspects of this application. I have heard many good things about the audio quality.

Sorry to hear the audio was a disaster, Frank.
To get any kind of quality, I really think you need to connect the line out, or audio out, of your piano, directly to your computer's soundcard. That is assuming that you have a good quality card, with ASIO drivers, to eliminate the latency between striking a key, and hearing the sound. The best solution, would be a dedicated 2 channel audio interface that you can connect both the piano, and microphone into.
The main reason that I use a mixer, is so that I can have a microphone, guitar, D piano, and keyboard, all connected at the same time, and for ease of controlling levels, eq, etc.

Anyway, as promised, here is a pic of my cobbled together camera solution. The boom can be raised or lowered, depending on how much of the keyboard I need to show.

And here is the Tapco mixer. The piano outputs, microphone and guitar lead, are plugged in here, and the mixer output goes into the Edirol UR-80, audio/MIDI interface, connect to the PC via usb. (This interface would be overkill for most applications, but I use it to control Cubase, for recording.)

I have a little thread going in the Adult Beginners section. I just invested in a camcorder to get the lessons across better. I am amazed at the quality of picture and sound $500 bucks gets me.I am getting audio from the built in mic. The monitors are right near the camera, mounted on a mic stand above my head. This all takes place in the closet under the stairs.

To up load the material to a free storage site means converting to mp4 format.
It all takes time. A 3 min video takes an hour to download from the camera to the computer, edit, and convert to mp4 and upload to the online site.


When I hear students play back the material on line, there is a whole lot of things I could do in person, like watch posture and tension in the hand, that I could fix in 2 seconds. On line and from a midi file, things are more difficult. I think recording makes the students tense.

I find the on line students have entirely different expectations than the students that walk in the door of my studio. Maybe the students online have visited too many sites that guarantee to have them playing like a pro in 2 days.
I guess I need a clearer definition of the word pro before I buy into that idea.


I am wondering about copyright issues. How risky is it to use copyright material for educational purposes?

I have been avoiding the copyright issue by writing my own material. The down side is that teaching a student their favorite song gets a whole lot more practicing out of them and they learn familiar melodies much quicker. The upside is that I am writing a lot of new material.

If any one can fill me in on protecting a digital book from being easily spread across the internet, I sure would enjoy that conversation.