|
Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!
|
|
66 members (bobrunyan, anotherscott, AaronSF, apianostudent, beeboss, brdwyguy, benkeys, 15 invisible),
2,196
guests, and
389
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264
4000 Post Club Member
|
OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264 |
It was in noting that one of our members used the Gershwin Preludes to convey a level of performance skill ... that got me questioning in particular Prelude III ..." a mere bagatelle!!" of 58 measures (in 6 flats) at a dizzy Allegro ben ritmato e deciso ... dashed of in 1m40s by George ... here’s the 1st page of 4 ... is there anyone out there who can match the 1m40s ... or does a description of "performance" level not have to include the requisite racy tempo?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420 |
Angela Brownridge (The Complete Music for Solo Piano by George Gershwin, HELIOS CDH55006) clocks in at about 1m3s. The listed track time is 1:11, but there are several seconds of silence at the end of the track.
Paul Buchanan Estonia L168 #1718
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,163
6000 Post Club Member
|
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,163 |
Hi btb, I just noticed something odd (or coincidental or interesting, at least). 58 measures of music in 2/4 time at 116 bpm equals exactly one minute. If the M.M. marking on the score is Gershwin's, it looks like he intended it to be a "Minute Prelude"! Steven
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 26,909
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 26,909 |
George must have had an off day when he recorded the third Prelude. If you do the math and follow Gershwin's tempo - MM=116=quarter note [1] - then one should play the 58 measures of this piece in about one minute. It would seem, then, that Ms. Brownridge is closer to the composer's recommended tempo than "ol' George" himself.
Why would there be a question whether or not anyone "out there" could play this at the requisite tempo?
[1] that may be a "crotchet" to you, btb
Regards,
BruceD - - - - - Estonia 190
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420
1000 Post Club Member
|
1000 Post Club Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,420 |
I was curious enough about this to dig out the score I have (which I have never played). It is in a volume called "The Complete Gershwin Preludes" edited by Alicia Zizzo and published by Warner Bros in 1996.
The introduction claims that it is a completely new edition prepared from original manuscripts where possible and Prelude III (which is subtitled "Spanish Prelude") has no metronome marking and only the tempo marking of "Agitato" (which a footnote says is the only indication given in the original manuscript).
Paul Buchanan Estonia L168 #1718
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 203
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 203 |
Before I read everyone's responses, I played through it (the 3rd prelude and I are long-time friends!). It was about a minute, just over, but I was trying to play it "fast", I usually play it a little slower.
MTNA Nationally Certified Teacher of Music, Piano Member: College of Examiners, Royal Conservatory of Music (Toronto, ON) Member: MTNA, OhioMTA, SW District OhioMTA Board Member: American Eurhythmics Society Owner, Piano Sensei www.pianosensei.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264
4000 Post Club Member
|
OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264 |
Interesting that you chaps should get out your log books to reduce the Prelude III to a duration of about a minute ... which represents a sight-reading and finger speed of a blurring 15 notes per second (there are 880 notes).
Thank goodness neither sv nor BruceD pretend to be able to play the Prelude III in anywhere near a minute if at all ... but there’s always someone who bucks the premise ... and joins the ranks of terminal inexactitude artists.
However, the main reason for the thread was to settle the hash of a Forum student "looking for bigger things" (after a 5 year slog at the piano) with a background which included bringing to performance level, amongst others ... about half of Schumann’s Kinderscenen Opus 15 and the Gershwin Preludes ... but it was the Prelude III that had me questioning what constitutes performance level.
BTW My pianist (under the pseudonym of George) is Mario Rapko Delorko who pleasantly completes the Prelude in an apparently slow 1m40s (by all accounts) ... anything less has my second name of Thomas raising doubt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 105
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 105 |
Velocity is no substitute for musicality, for heaven's sake.
Steinway D, Pramberger 185, pianist-teacher
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 26,909
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
|
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 26,909 |
Velocity is no substitute for musicality, for heaven's sake. While I agree with the above, I don't see what it has to do with this particular thread. Gershwin's suggested tempo for this Prelude is MM=116=quarter note. Anyone who plays it considerably slower than that is not following the composer's direction, however "musical" the interpretation may be. Regards,
BruceD - - - - - Estonia 190
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264
4000 Post Club Member
|
OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264 |
Quite agree BruceD,
But Canadian CD131 has thrown into the melting pot the interesting sidestep to stringent adherence to the tempo marking ... with the (for heavens sake!!) comment
"Velocity is no substitute for musicality".
Perhaps, the subject of thread ... the student with 5 years at the piano ... is being advised just so in the playing of the Gershwin Prelude III ... musicality before velocity.
I'm not sure that Gershwin would agree.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 441
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 441 |
In this case, I think it would be very unmusical to pick a much slower tempo to achieve perfection of tone and avoid potential wrong notes. The piece is supposed to be fast, crazy and reckless. To sacrifice recklessness to achieve control is totally against the spirit of the music. Of course, in the ideal case the performer has total control while creating a impression of crazy recklessness. But if the choice is between fast and reckless with potential mistakes or a slower "safe" version, I'd choose the fast one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,618
2000 Post Club Member
|
2000 Post Club Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,618 |
One could just as easily state that "Musicality is no substitute for velocity" Playing something appreciably more slowly than indicated by the composer due to a lack of technical capacity, then attempting to justify this on "musicality" grounds, is IMNSHO in itself just as much humbug as ripping through something faster than the composer indicates just to show off[1] that one is capable of doing so. Michael B. [1] For those interested in thread convergence, I believe that the current LL discussion is over there -------------------------->
There are two rules to success in life: Rule #1. Don't tell people everything you know.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 105
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 105 |
With regard to me comment,"velocity is no substitute for musicality," I no way implied that this prelude should be played at a tempo slower than one which fulfills the emotional requirements of the music.
What I intended by my comment was to impress upon btb that making velocity the primary objective would likely result in other elements being overlooked to the detriment of the music, the listener, and ultimately, the pianist making the music.
Speed is an intoxicating thing. Many think, "because I can, I should." We hear and feel all the small things, even the spaces between the notes. As such, what we may perceive as not too fast actually sounds faster to the audience.
In the 1970s, Mr. Horowitz gave an interview the day before he performed in recital in Toronto. He remarked that, as an older man, he slowed his tempos down of many works, not because he couldn't play as quickly, but because he felt that he was doing an injustice to the music. To his surprise, people kept coming up to him and saying, "How is it that you are able to play even faster than you did as a young man?" He said that he was astonished, but then realized that people could hear all of the notes clearly, not just as a glittering wave that washed over them. I think he may have been on to something.
Last edited by CD131; 03/10/09 06:55 PM.
Steinway D, Pramberger 185, pianist-teacher
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264
4000 Post Club Member
|
OP
4000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,264 |
If only RogerW would divulge his home-base ... lack of profile info makes us wonder whether he’s a New Yorker or a Cockney ... but his IMHO valid focus on the "risk" factor of the Prelude III stirs my vivid image of the Manhattan wild traffic and racy lifestyle which characterized those stirring Gershwin song-writing days.
Thanks Michael B for the "humbug" slant on allowing musicality to over-reach tempo ... you clearly denounce watering down the tempo of a brisk piece ... by some perhaps a ploy to hide indifferent technique.
Thanks for the explanation CD131 ... apologies for drawing you out ... we all like Horowitz and expect that most would approve of his later penchant for a gentle slowing of tempo ... but then who can compare with the great Vladimir Horowitz.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 203
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 203 |
CORRECTION: Actually the recording I have of Gershwin playing it is 55 seconds.
MTNA Nationally Certified Teacher of Music, Piano Member: College of Examiners, Royal Conservatory of Music (Toronto, ON) Member: MTNA, OhioMTA, SW District OhioMTA Board Member: American Eurhythmics Society Owner, Piano Sensei www.pianosensei.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 754
500 Post Club Member
|
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 754 |
When I hear this prelude played at the indicated speed, it *always* sounds rushed. So Gershwin clearly got it wrong
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 203
Full Member
|
Full Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 203 |
Ha ha, yeah clearly the composer doesn't interpret his own piece the correct way.
MTNA Nationally Certified Teacher of Music, Piano Member: College of Examiners, Royal Conservatory of Music (Toronto, ON) Member: MTNA, OhioMTA, SW District OhioMTA Board Member: American Eurhythmics Society Owner, Piano Sensei www.pianosensei.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:34 PM
|
Piano
by Gino2 - 04/17/24 02:23 PM
|
|
Forums43
Topics223,408
Posts3,349,457
Members111,637
|
Most Online15,252 Mar 21st, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|